ADB to provide $410 million package for Barrick-run Pakistan mine, sources say
Islamabad hopes the project will serve as a springboard to draw more foreign interest to its mineral sector, particularly to exploit rare earth deposits. Pakistan has already attracted interest from the Trump administration and offered future concessions to U.S. companies.
The loans and a financing guarantee will support development of Reko Diq, which is expected to produce copper and gold from 2028 and generate about $70 billion in free cash flow over its lifespan.
The financing is composed of two loans totalling $300 million to Barrick and a $110 million financing guarantee for the government of Pakistan, both sources said ahead of the official announcement.
The $6.6 billion project in Balochistan is 50% owned by Barrick with the other half held by the federal and provincial governments.
ADB, the petroleum ministry and Barrick did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The project aims to raise upwards of $2 billion and has a previous agreement for $700 million in financing from the International Finance Corporation, the World Bank's private investment arm.
The project's developers are in talks with other prospective financiers, including the U.S. Export-Import Bank, Export Development Canada and Japan's JBIC and expect to sign term sheets this quarter, project director Tim Cribb told Reuters in April.
Reko Diq, delayed for years by a legal dispute that was settled in 2022, will produce 200,000 metric tons of copper annually in its first phase, rising to 400,000 tons after an expansion.
Barrick says the mine could operate beyond its 37-year life through upgrades and further exploration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Trump weighs using $2 billion in CHIPS Act funding for critical minerals, sources say
Aug 21 (Reuters) - The Trump administration is considering a plan to reallocate at least $2 billion from the CHIPS Act to fund critical minerals projects and boost Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's influence over the strategic sector, two sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. The proposed move would take from funds already allocated by Congress for semiconductor research and chip factory construction, avoiding a fresh spending request as it seeks to reduce U.S. dependence on China for critical minerals used widely in the electronics and defense industries. Boosting Lutnick's role over critical minerals financing would also help centralize the administration's approach to the sector, a push sought by White House officials after the rollout of the Pentagon investment in rare earths company MP Materials (MP.N), opens new tab last month sparked questions about the U.S. government's minerals strategy, one source said. The White House did not respond to requests for comment. Pentagon officials were not immediately available to comment. MP Materials declined to comment. The Commerce Department oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, formally known as the CHIPS and Science Act. The act, signed into law by then-President Joe Biden in 2022, has provided funding so far for research while also seeking to lure chip production away from Asia and boost American domestic semiconductor production. But since taking office in January, Trump has moved to change the CHIPS Act - legislation he has called "a horrible, horrible thing" that amounts to a giveaway to companies - largely by renegotiating grants to chipmakers. Repurposing some funds for mining-related projects would align in part with the spirit of the CHIPS Act as the semiconductor industry requires abundant supplies of germanium, gallium and other critical minerals over which China has tightened its market control, said the sources, who are not permitted to speak publicly about the deliberations. "The administration is creatively trying to find ways to fund the critical minerals sector," said the first source. The plans are under discussion and could change, the sources added. Mining companies themselves could benefit, but also processing and recycling firms. Most of the minerals considered critical by the U.S. government are not processed inside the country. Kent Masters, CEO of North Carolina-based Albemarle (ALB.N), opens new tab, the world's largest producer of lithium for rechargeable batteries, told Reuters last month that the company's stalled plans to build a U.S. lithium refinery are "difficult now without some type of government support or partnership." It was not immediately clear if the Trump administration aimed to use the funds for grants or equity stakes in mining companies, but Lutnick aims to "get the $2 billion out the door" as soon as possible, the first source said, adding that the administration aims to find other funds to reallocate in the near future. A former U.S. official said the Biden administration considered using CHIPS Act grants for rare earths but decided it was uneconomical, required many environmental exemptions and was best left for the Department of Energy to handle. The administration is also looking to use CHIPS Act-related funding to take equity stakes in Intel INTC.O and other chip makers in exchange for cash grants, Reuters reported on Tuesday. Trump moved quickly to expand U.S. critical minerals production since taking office in January by signing executive orders to boost deep-sea mining and domestic projects. On Tuesday he met with the CEOs of Rio Tinto RIO.L and BHP at the White House despite the ongoing negotiations with European leaders over Russia's invasion of Ukraine, a move aimed at underscoring his support for U.S. mining. The CHIPS Act deliberations come after the Energy Department last week proposed $1 billion in spending for some critical minerals projects, with funds tied to the 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The White House aims to give Lutnick a greater role over funding decisions for critical minerals by giving him oversight of the decision making process within the administration, the sources said. The Pentagon's multibillion-dollar investment in MP Materials and its move to extend a price support mechanism - a deal negotiated by Deputy Defense Secretary Steve Feinberg - was seen by White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles as uncoordinated as it sparked confusion over whether Washington would guarantee a price floor for all miners and forced the administration to clarify that it does not intend for MP to have a rare earths monopoly, the two sources said. Much of the funding for MP's deal - including Washington's equity stake, loans and purchase agreements - still needs to be allocated by Congress. Two weeks after the Pentagon announced its MP investment, administration officials rushed to meet at the White House with rare earths firms and their customers to underscore broad support for the entire sector, Reuters reported. Lutnick will now help coordinate the administration's funding decisions, taking the lead from the Pentagon and other agencies, the sources said. Lutnick ran brokerage firm Cantor Fitzgerald ( before he joined Trump's cabinet. Cantor is a large shareholder in Critical Metals Corp (CRML.O), opens new tab, which Reuters reported in June is under consideration for a loan from the U.S. Export-Import Bank.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Ant smuggling into the US is out of control since Trump's cuts – and it could have dire impacts on the country
The smuggling of ants and other insects in the U.S. could be on the rise due to recent cuts to the USDA under the Trump administration, a new report says. The Department of Government Efficiency, the agency once led by billionaire Elon Musk, issued widespread layoffs and buyouts to federal employees this spring. This impacted several members of the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, which helps restrict the smuggling of invertebrates like ants, Wired reports. While some of those staff were later rehired, other positions have remained vacant, according to the outlet. These cuts have alarmed experts, and sources familiar with the industry say ant smugglers have been emboldened by the recent cuts under the Trump administration, according to Wired. 'It's getting out of hand,' one ant seller said. 'They realize the U.S. market is a gold mine.' Some members of the ant-selling community also told Wired that the process to sell ants legally has become harder, which in turn is contributing to an uptick in illegal sales. 'Smuggling ants hasn't gotten easier from the cuts to federal services, trading ants across state borders legally has gotten harder,' one former black market ant seller told Wired. This could pose a problem because invasive ants can have devastating impacts on the environment. In Florida, millions of tawny crazy ants — an invasive species from South America — are forming super colonies and driving out local wildlife, the Herald-Tribune reports. The ants are also invading residents' homes and damaging electrical equipment. Areas of the southeast U.S. also saw an increase in invasive Asian needle ants this summer. The venomous species has been found in the U.S. for 90 years, but its population exploded recently. A single sting can send someone to the hospital with life-threatening symptoms. Some experts say they're concerned about cuts to infrastructure that detects and prevents invasive species. 'There's been a lot of cutting of the inspectors as part of the quote-unquote 'efficiency' moves from the government recently,' Chris Stelzig, executive director of the Entomological Society of America, told Wired. 'A reduced infrastructure to detect invasive species can be problematic.' However, this isn't an entirely new problem. Retired USDA entomologist Carlos Blanco told Wired there were enforcement problems even before the DOGE cuts, too. Armando Rosario-Lebrón, the former co-chair of the Federal Interagency Committee on Invasive Terrestrial Animals and Pathogens, told Wired that the 'illegal market rapidly has become much more aggressive because of the lack of enforcement.' 'The invasiveness potential is off the charts,' he added. 'It's just ridiculous.' USDA spokesperson Heather Curlett told Wired that the agency has the 'same number of entomology staff within the pest permitting unit as we did before' and that the agency's enforcement of federal plant pest regulations 'has not changed or diminished.' 'We work to address all instances of noncompliance both from permit holders who fail to follow the terms and conditions of their permits and those who move plant pests without obtaining the proper permits,' Curlett added.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
It is beyond madness to suggest 100 per cent Inheritance Tax would improve productivity
A video clip has been doing the rounds on social media today of a prominent radio presenter making a passionate case for hiking inheritance tax to 10 0 percent in order to incentivise work and productivity. Is it my South Asian sensibilities, I sometimes wonder, which makes me baulk at statements like '[y]ou don't have a right to inherit money from mummy and daddy that you did nothing to earn'? My child, being my family, is an extension of myself. Just as my child needs to do nothing to earn my love, he needs to do nothing to earn anything I am able to leave behind for him, as I follow my natural instinct as a parent to provide him with a life better than my own. And it is this instinct that incentivises me to work, to be productive. Can this be a race thing, is that why so many in politics and the media fail to grasp this very basic concept in this country? The truth of course is that it isn't anything to do with race at all. It is to do with a largely left-leaning Establishment which, in its blind pursuit of 'progressive policies', persistently loses sight of basic human nature. Inheritance tax remains one of the most unpopular taxes in this country, which already imposes one of the highest rates of it globally. There are many reasons for Brits' aversion to the Government claiming a chunk of a grieving family member's inheritance — double taxation topping the list — but almost all relate to the fundamental unfairness of the policy. As for Britain's productivity woes, blaming them on individual savers and inherited wealth exposes the remarkable disconnect which has repeatedly condemned the Left to political wilderness in the history of our country. The tragedy is that the mindless pursuit of progressive policies is no longer the prerogative of the Left in post-Blair Britain. If it were, then the anti-family Inheritance Tax would not have survived a 14-year Conservative rule.
