Harvard Will Relinquish Photos of Enslaved People to Museum After Legal Battle with Distant Relative
The settlement comes between Harvard and Tamara Lanier after a six-year legal battle
Two of the photos depict Lanier's alleged ancestors, Renty and Delia, in South CarolinaHarvard University will relinquish photographs of enslaved people to the International African American Museum (IAAM) in Charleston, S.C. in a settlement reached on Wednesday, May 28.
The Ivy League institution previously housed the images, believed to be the earliest taken of enslaved African people in the United States, in the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. The photos' subjects, identified as Renty and his daughter Delia, were taken in approximately 1850, when they were enslaved.
The daguerreotype portraits, which are 175 years old, were identified by Tamara Lanier as her great-great-great-grandfather and his child. The settlement between Harvard and Lanier comes after a six-year legal battle, per the New York Times. Lanier filed the suit on the basis that her ancestors did not consent to being photographed.
The outlet reports that the images were obtained by the university for Harvard biologist Louis Agassiz to use as evidence for a discredited pseudoscientific theory of Black racial inferiority in defense of slavery. Outside of the photographs of Renty and Delia, there are five other portraits of enslaved people that will be relinquished to the IAAM.
'I have been at odds with Harvard over the custody and care of my enslaved ancestors, and now I can rest assured that my enslaved ancestors will be traveling to a new home,' Lanier told the New York Times.
She continued, 'They will be returning to their home state where this all began, and they will be placed in an institution that can celebrate their humanity.'
James Chisholm, a spokesman for Harvard, told the outlet, 'Harvard has been committed to stewarding the daguerreotypes in a responsible manner and finding an institutional home for them where their historical significance is appreciated."
Joshua Koskoff, Lanier's attorney, told the Associated Press that this outcome of the case was "unprecedented."
Koskoff elaborated, 'I think it's one of one in American history, because of the combination of unlikely features: to have a case that dates back 175 years, to win control over images dating back that long of enslaved people — that's never happened before."
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
The AP reports that Susanna Moore, a descendant of Agassiz, was also in support of the settlement. Moore told the outlet that her ancestor's study was a 'deeply racist project.'
She continued to say, 'This victory reminds us that the meaning of such objects in museums can and should change. This woman standing next to me, she knew all along she was not small and she was not alone.'
Moore and Lanier have become close personal friends. Lanier told the Times of Moore's family, 'I have vacationed with them. I have spent time with them. We stay connected."
IAAM CEO Tonya Matthews said in a statement to the AP, 'The bravery, tenacity, and grace shown by Ms. Lanier throughout the long and arduous process of returning these critical pieces of Renty and Delia's story to South Carolina is a model for us all."
PEOPLE reached out to the IAAM, but did not immediately hear back.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
a few seconds ago
- Fast Company
Trump calls on Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook to resign over alleged mortgage fraud
President Donald Trump on Wednesday called on Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook to resign after a member of his administration accused Cook of committing mortgage fraud, the latest example of the Trump administration's efforts to gain control over the central bank. Bill Pulte, director of the agency that oversees mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, urged the Justice Department to investigate Cook, who was appointed to the Fed's governing board by former president Joe Biden in 2022. She was reappointed the following year to a term that lasts until 2038. Pulte, in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, alleged that Cook has claimed two homes as her principal residences — one in Michigan, the other in Georgia — to fraudulently obtain better mortgage lending terms. Pulte also charged in his letter that Cook has listed her condo in Atlanta, Georgia, for rent. Mortgages for homes used as principal residences typically carry lower interest rates than properties that are purchased to rent, Pulte's letter said. The allegation represents another front in the Trump administration's attack on the Fed, which has yet to cut its key interest rate as Trump has demanded. If Cook were to step down, then the White House could nominate a replacement. And Trump has said he would only appoint people who would support lower rates. The more members of the Fed's governing board that Trump can appoint, the more control he will be able to assert over the Fed, which has long been considered independent from day-to-day politics. Trump will be able to replace Chair Jerome Powell in May 2026, when Powell's term expires. Yet 12 members of the Fed's interest-rate setting committee have a vote on whether to raise or lower interest rates, so even replacing the Chair doesn't guarantee that Fed policy will shift the way Trump wants. All seven members of the Fed's governing board, however, are able to vote on rate decisions. The other five voters include the president of the Fed's New York branch and a rotating group of four of the presidents of the Fed's other 11 regional branches. Trump appointed two members of the Fed's board in his first term, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman. Both dissented July 30 from the central bank's decision to keep its rate unchanged in favor of a rate cut. Another Fed governor, Adriana Kugler, stepped down unexpectedly Aug. 1, and Trump has appointed one of his economic advisers, Stephen Miran, to fill out the remainder of her term until January. If Trump is able to replace Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's board, as well as Kugler and Powell, that would give him a clear majority on the board of governors. Powell, however, could stay on the board after finishing his term as chair next May. The Federal Reserve declined to comment on the accusation. Trump has for months demanded that the Federal Reserve reduce the short-term interest rate it controls, which currently stands at about 4.3%. He has also repeatedly insulted Powell, who has said that the Fed would like to see more evidence of how the economy evolves in response to Trump's sweeping tariffs before making any moves. Powell has also said the duties threaten to raise inflation and slow growth. Trump says that a lower rate would reduce the government's borrowing costs on $37 trillion in debt and boost the housing market by reducing mortgage rates. Yet mortgage borrowing costs do not always follow the Fed's rate decisions. The Trump administration has made similar claims of mortgage fraud against Democrats that Trump has attacked, including California Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
The misery of auto tariffs is hitting families and factories
It's not as though we couldn't have seen it coming. Section 4.26 of the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 made the case for tariffs on imported goods. The document argued that tariffs will force U.S. companies to onshore manufacturing. Trump's style of threatening and coercing U.S. trading partners with high tariffs has increased the toxicity of trade policy. This has all made for a rough start, with initial tariff announcements roiling the stock and bond markets and stoking consumer fear and uncertainty. But now, two things have become clear. First, the Trump approach to tariffs has confused companies and the financial markets. Since March, employment has plummeted in industries with increased exposure to higher tariff-related costs. Second, and more important, the price of the chaos has come due, and it's being paid largely by working Americans. The trade wars reveal just how much Trump has sold a bill of goods to his political base. Tariffs drive up prices to U.S. consumers, both directly and indirectly. Tariffs on imported finished goods, and components that are used in domestic manufacturing, are passed on to consumers directly through higher prices, as we've seen with coffee. Tariffs also stifle competition from abroad by making imports more expensive. This loss of competition can spur domestic price increases, as we've seen with tariffs on imported solar panels. Let's take the high-profile case of automobiles. Automakers produce some models in the U.S. for sale here, make others for export and import other models. With tariffs on auto parts jumping from 2.5 percent to 25 percent, on steel from an original 0 percent to 50 percent and finished cars from 2.5 percent to 25 percent, costs are rising in all three areas. Jeep maker, Stellantis, reported an expected $2.7 billion loss in the first half of 2025, partially due to tariffs. General Motors reported a $1.1 billion hit from tariffs on imported cars and parts in the second quarter of 2025. And Ford Motors estimates that tariffs will cost the company $1.5 billion in 2025. We will see working Americans absorb the full force of these tariff-related cost increases, tariffs on imported vehicles from Asia and Europe and, to some (still uncertain) extent from Canada and Mexico, in higher automobile prices. Because automobiles represent a sizable chunk of the average U.S. consumer's budget, higher prices will be an enormous hit to paychecks and pocketbooks. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that consumer spending on transportation between 2020-2023 accounts for about 17 percent of the average American's budget and new vehicles account for over 60 percent of that outlay. Transportation ranks second among the five largest necessities that account for 75 percent of total consumer spending, preceded by housing (first) and followed by food (third). Moreover, multiple cohorts depend heavily on cars for transportation. Over 90 percent of adults rely on personal vehicles for their commute to work. And in rural areas, for swing- and night-shift workers, and for families, car ownership is essential. Simply put, working Americans spend a lot on automobiles because they have to. And for many Americans, a car is an absolute necessity. Tariff-induced higher prices for automobiles carry a significant opportunity cost for consumers. Tariffs are expected to increase the price of a new automobile by between 6 percent and 22 percent. That's an additional $3,000 to $10,500 per new car purchase, piled onto the average automobile price of $48,000. By way of comparison, this incremental cost is the equivalent of about five weeks of the average U.S. family food budget or 14 weeks of rental housing or mortgage payments. Budget-constrained consumers make careful choices about how to spend their paychecks. For necessities like automobiles, higher tariff-induced prices will force them to cut back on spending in other important areas. The sheer size of this forced rebalancing stands, on balance, to further tighten budgets and lower working Americans' quality of life. The Trump administration's willful ignorance of how tariffs hit working Americans and is coming home to roost. In March, Trump stated that the administration did not care about whether automobile tariffs drive up consumer prices. And faced by complaints from Wal-Mart, Amazon and Mattel in May, Trump told U.S. companies to 'eat the tariffs' instead of passing them on to consumers through higher prices. The ultimate tariff hit to paychecks and pocketbooks will be painful. Moreover, even if Trump's draconian policy was remotely successful in spurring the onshoring of U.S. manufacturing, it would take far longer than the three and a half years left in Trump's final and devastating presidential term. So far, there's no sign that will happen. To the contrary, manufacturing has been shedding jobs and pulling back on investment this year. Democrats should be looking now to find ways to advertise that Trump's tariff policy puts working Americans in the cross-hairs, and to campaign on reversing the policy and mitigating the harm.
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
DNC chair: Trump administration trying to ‘march' US ‘toward full-on fascism'
Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chair Ken Martin said Tuesday that the Trump administration is trying to 'march' the U.S. 'toward full-on fascism.' 'What we're seeing right now is just a full-on attempt by this authoritarian regime to march us toward full-on fascism, and we have to stand up right now in this moment as Democrats,' Martin said on MSNBC's 'The Weeknight.' 'My job is to call it like it is, and what we're seeing right now out of this administration is a cover-up at every step of the way. Donald Trump's trying to avoid any accountability as it relates to [Jeffrey] Epstein, of course,' Martin continued. In recent months, Trump has faced backlash from Democrats over multiple controversies, including his administration's handling of files related to Epstein, a convicted sex offender, as well as the president's use of federal force in Washington, D.C. and Los Angeles, and his firing of the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. 'He's done everything he could over the years to create this conspiracy theory that there's a deep state that's hiding things from the American public, well, guess what? Donald Trump is the deep state,' Martin said Tuesday evening. Democrats have struggled to come back from their losses in last November's election, with different factions of the party arguing over how to rebuild. The party has also received negative feedback from Americans. According to new polling from The Wall Street Journal, the Democratic Party was viewed negatively by 63 percent of American voters. In a polling average from Decision Desk HQ, the party currently has a 51.5 percent unfavorability rating. 'There is a fascist in the White House—and we have to throw out our old playbook,' Martin said in a Tuesday post on the social platform X. 'Democrats cannot be the only party that's playing by the rules anymore.'
