logo
Investigators to wrap up public hearings into fatal midair crash between Army chopper and airplane

Investigators to wrap up public hearings into fatal midair crash between Army chopper and airplane

The National Transportation Safety Board on Friday enters its third and final day of public testimony over the fatal midair crash between an Army helicopter and commercial jet in January.
Two previous days of testimony underscored a number of factors that likely contributed to the collision that left all 67 people aboard both aircrafts dead, sparking Board Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy to urge the Federal Aviation Administration to 'do better' as she pointed to warnings the agency ignored years earlier.
Some of the major issues that have emerged so far include the Black Hawk helicopter flying above prescribed levels near Ronald Reagan National Airport as well as the warnings to FAA officials for years about the hazards related to the heavy chopper traffic there.
It's too early for the board to identify what exactly caused the crash. A final report from the board won't come until next year.
But it became clear this week how small a margin of error there was for helicopters flying the route the Black Hawk took the night of the nation's deadliest plane crash since November 2001.
The January incident was the first in a string of crashes and near misses this year that have alarmed officials and the traveling public, despite statistics that still show flying remains the safest form of transportation.
Worry over military helicopters
The board focused on air traffic control and heard Thursday that it was common for pilots to ask to use visual separation or relying on their eyesight just as the Army Black Hawk's pilots, who were wearing night vision goggles, agreed to do the night of the crash.
FAA officials also said controllers relied heavily on pilots using visual separation as a way to manage the complex airspace with so many helicopters flying around Washington D.C.
But Rick Dressler, an official with medevac operator Metro Aviation, told the board it is difficult to identify other aircraft in the night sky around Ronald Reagan National Airport, especially if a key onboard locator system was switched off, as Army choppers routinely did.
Dressler said that he and other civilian helicopter pilots in the area have long been concerned about the Army and Air Force helicopters flying around Reagan airport.
'I don't like saying this. I'll say it again on the record,' Dressler, a former Army aviator and retired Air Force officer, said. 'I'm speaking for my group there. We we are all very uncomfortable when those two units are operating.'
The Department of Defense referred questions about Thursday's testimony to the Army, which did not immediately respond. Army officials at the hearing did ask Dressler to elaborate on his concerns and consider visiting the Pentagon to share them.
Dressel said part of what worries him is the relative lack of experience of the military pilots who may have only been in the area a short time and don't understand the complex airspace around Washington D.C.
'They don't get the seasoning here to really, truly understand how the airspace works,' said Dressel, who also complained that the Army helicopter unit no longer participates in regular meetings with all the other aviators in the area to discuss issues.
The Air Force also did not immediately respond to questions about Dressler's remarks.
The American Airlines jet arrived from Wichita, Kansas, carrying, among others, a group of elite young figure skaters, their parents and coaches, and four union steamfitters from the Washington area.
Final moments
Testimony covered much ground, including the final audio communications from pilots aboard the Army chopper.
The Black Hawk's crew had been communicating with the airport's control tower, although the helicopter pilots did not fully hear the controller's instructions.
The Black Hawk pilots told the tower twice in the minutes before the crash that they had the American Airlines passenger plane in sight and would maintain proper separation. But when the controller instructed the pilots to 'pass behind' the jet, the crew didn't hear that instruction because the Black Hawk's microphone key was pressed at that moment.
Just before the collision an instructor pilot aboard the helicopter asked the pilot at the controls to come left. But it wasn't clear if the pilot had time to maneuver the helicopter before the crash.
'Kinda come left for me ma'am,' the instructor said.
The pilot responded: 'Sure.'
Concern about distances between planes and helicopters
John Cox, an aviation safety expert and retired airline pilot, said the hearings are headed in the right direction to determine what happened and to prevent similar accidents.
His main concerns focus on the Black Hawk helicopter, including why it was above the 200-feet (61 meters) elevation limit for that particular helicopter route. Another question is why the Black Hawk wasn't closer to the east bank of the Potomac River, where it would have been further away from landing airplanes.
'I've passed helicopters underneath me over the east bank of the Potomac a lot of times,' said Cox, who flew commercial airliners for 25 years. 'And there's always been plenty of separation. It's not a lot because the space is so constrained. But you're dealing with professional pilots and it's not been a problem.'
Investigators said Wednesday the flight data recorder showed the helicopter was actually 80 feet to 100 feet (24 to 30 meters) higher than the barometric altimeter the pilots relied upon showed they were flying.
___
Associated Press writers David Klepper, Mike Catalini, Leah Askarinam, Ben Finley and Rio Yamat contributed to this story.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman Says She's Helping an Ex Who's Going Through a ‘Crisis' — at the ‘Expense' of Her Current Relationship
Woman Says She's Helping an Ex Who's Going Through a ‘Crisis' — at the ‘Expense' of Her Current Relationship

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Woman Says She's Helping an Ex Who's Going Through a ‘Crisis' — at the ‘Expense' of Her Current Relationship

The woman, who shared her story on Reddit, said she feels as though her boyfriend is "leveraging" the situation "to make me choose between them"NEED TO KNOW A woman claims her boyfriend is 'livid' because she is helping an ex who recently 'suffered a severe mental health crisis' The woman says she and the friend 'briefly' dated almost a decade ago She shared her story on Reddit, where the majority of commenters said they thought the woman's boyfriend was being unreasonableA woman says her partner is 'livid' because she's been helping out an ex in 'crisis' — and she's wondering who's in the wrong. The 34-year-old detailed her story on the popular Reddit forum 'Am I the A------,' a place where users can go to seek advice about interpersonal dilemmas. In her post, the woman said she has been dating her current partner, 'Tom,' for 'about eight years,' and they recently bought a home together. The woman went on to explain that she has a friend, 'Alex,' whom she 'briefly' dated 'for about six months almost a decade ago' — though she said that it was 'more like a platonic, asexual companionship than a romantic relationship.' The issue? The OP (original poster) said Alex recently 'suffered a severe mental health crisis.' 'He was involuntarily hospitalized, lost his job. He's disoriented, struggles with memory, and clearly needs support,' she added. 'I've been trying to help where I can, like helping him fill out job paperwork or apply for assistance because he has no one else here [in this country],' she continued. The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! The OP went on to share that her partner is now 'absolutely livid' over the situation — despite the fact that she only sees Alex 'about once a month.' 'He's never liked Alex, and now he openly hates him,' she wrote. 'He's said hurtful things like, 'Are we supposed to wipe his a-- forever?' and has called him cruel names." 'I can't help but feel that he's leveraging this situation as an opportunity to make me choose between them … which feels pretty bad, to be honest,' the OP added. The OP also said that while Tom 'demands transparency' about the current situation with Alex, he also 'blows up' when she shares details about what's happening. She additionally said that Tom refuses to go to couples counseling with her because he 'doesn't really seem to believe in therapy.' "He accuses me of choosing [my friend] over him and says he feels like I'm not hearing his concerns,' she added. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. 'So, AITA [am I the a------] for continuing to help my friend even though it's damaging my relationship?' the OP asked as she concluded her post. The vast majority of commenters said they thought the OP was perfectly within her right to want to help her friend — and also suggested that she perhaps reconsider her relationship with her partner. 'NTA [not the a------],' one person said. 'Your partner's comments are uncalled for, and his refusal to go to therapy is a big red flag. He sounds very emotionally immature and more than a little insecure.' 'NTA,' agreed someone else. 'Lose the load and get rid of Tom. You sound like a good friend to Alex. Tom sounds like a terrible boyfriend.' 'Have you fully considered what this behavior says about your partner?' yet another commenter asked. 'Leaving aside the fact that he's coming across as jealous and controlling, he's coming across [as] incredibly callous and selfish.' They added, 'Your friend is struggling alone, and your partner wants you to what? Forget that? Stop caring? He has zero concern for a fellow human who is important to you. Is that really someone you want to be with?' If you or someone you know needs mental health help, text "STRENGTH" to the Crisis Text Line at 741-741 to be connected to a certified crisis counselor. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

Northern Colorado school district to ban cell phones in classrooms
Northern Colorado school district to ban cell phones in classrooms

CBS News

time11 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Northern Colorado school district to ban cell phones in classrooms

Starting next year, all school districts in Colorado are required to have a policy in place limiting the use of cell phones in classrooms. But some schools will have those new policies in place this year. The Weld RE-4 School District in Weld County will not allow students to use their cell phones during class when school starts this month. The district, which serves Windsor, Severance and western Greeley, announced it will enforce a cell phone ban in nearly all situations while students are on school grounds. "We are implementing a new cell phone policy that we think will be great for everybody," said Kami Fockler, a local parent and member of the district accountability team. Fockler said a team of local parents and staff worked together to try and find a way to eliminate the distractions of cellphones in classrooms that was appropriate for all ages. She said she recently read the book "The Anxious Generation," which uses data to show how younger generations have been impacted by the emergence of cellphones and social media. The impacts can range from decreased learning to lower confidence and even depression. She said she has noticed many children are more likely to take comfort in their phones than with their peers. "They will text each other instead of talking," Fockler said. "They're more concerned with what is going on (in their hand) than they are with what is going on in their surroundings. I think that is a concern." The Weld RE-4 district will start the 2025-2026 school year with a new policy that nearly bans all cell phone use in schools. The policy prohibits the use of cell phones inside elementary and middle schools. For high school students, they can only use their cellphones during passing periods and lunch. Smartwatches are only allowed to be used for timekeeping purposes at all levels. "We just want the best learning environment for the kids," Fockler said. Many know that cellphones have been a distraction in classrooms for more than 20 years, especially as smartphones became more prevalent. While some students use the devices in class to scroll social media, others have used them to cheat on school work or even communicate with their family for non-school related reasons. "Kids will sometimes be ordering their lunch on them, they are playing a game. It takes away from the learning time," Fockler said. The district announced students at all grade levels could face having their phones confiscated and turned over to school administrators for the remainder of the school day if they are caught using them. First offenses could result in students having to pick up the phone from the school office. Repeat offenses may include parents having to go to the school to retrieve the phone for their students. Repeat offenders may also be required to complete additional assignments from the school to help them understand why the policies exist. "Learning for the kids is the important thing, and that is why we need to concentrate on this,' Fockler said. Governor Jared Polis signed a bipartisan bill into law that requires all Colorado school districts to create their own cell phone policies by the start of the 2026-2027 school year. Fockler said Weld RE-4 was already exploring the idea of creating its policy before the law was created, adding she thinks the 2025-2026 school year will give the district the chance to see if its policy was effective before making any possible changes for the 2026-2027 school year. "In the end, I hope we create great learning environments for the students, where their time isn't interrupted, and they can focus on their studies," Fockler said. "And (hopefully) the parents can see that in the kids' grades, they can see it in the way they feel about school."

Goose, the wandering water monitor lizard, has been captured
Goose, the wandering water monitor lizard, has been captured

CBS News

time11 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Goose, the wandering water monitor lizard, has been captured

After two weeks of wandering around Massachusetts and Connecticut, Goose, the escaped water monitor lizard has been captured, the Webster Police Department announced. Following his capture, Goose will be relocated to a nonprofit animal sanctuary. The 5-foot-long lizard was being kept as a pet in Webster, Massachusetts, when he crawled out of a second-floor window on July 18. He was spotted a week later on July 25 in Thompson, Connecticut, about five miles south of Webster. At that time, Webster Police warned that the animal was owned illegally and that if it was spotted, it should not be approached. The department also said it was working with reptile specialists, Rainforest Reptile Shows, to find Goose. Goose's latest appearance was on Wednesday, July 30, in Douglas, Massachusetts, according to Massachusetts Environmental Police. Douglas is about 13 miles north of Thompson. It's eight miles east of Webster. Rainforest Reptile Shows announced on its Facebook page that Goose will now live at RRS Oasis, a nonprofit animal sanctuary. The organization said Goose would have expert care and live in a specially designed habitat. "We would like to thank the Massachusetts Environmental Police, Webster Police Department ... and Douglas Police Department. Their incredible teamwork and dedication ensured Goose's safe capture - and we couldn't be more grateful. We are thrilled to have been a part of a such a great group to give Goose a chance on thriving," Rainforest Reptile Shows said in a statement. The organization said it will have updates about Goose on its Facebook page.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store