
Grooming gangs inquiry ‘must not delay action' against child abuse, says NSPCC
The Prime Minister said on Saturday that he had read 'every single word' of an independent report into child sexual exploitation by Baroness Louise Casey and would accept her recommendation for the investigation.
The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) said it is 'pleased' with the decision – but added that a full national probe 'must not delay' urgent Government action.
'We are pleased to see the Prime Minister engaging with the recommendations set out in the Casey Review and will also read it line by line when it is published,' NSPCC chief executive Chris Sherwood said.
'But a national inquiry into abuse by organised networks must not delay urgent action on child sexual abuse that is long overdue.
'Survivors have already waited more than two years for the important recommendations from the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) to be implemented,' Mr Sherwood added.
The IICSA, chaired by Professor Alexis Jay, found institutional failings and tens of thousands of victims across England and Wales.
The seven-year probe made 20 recommendations in the final report published in 2022, as it described child sexual abuse as an 'epidemic' across the two nations.
Earlier this year, the Government dismissed calls for a public inquiry into the grooming gangs scandal, saying its focus was on putting in place the outstanding recommendations already made in the IICSA.
Mr Sherwood said the Government now has the opportunity to make tackling child sexual abuse 'a non-negotiable priority'.
'Child sexual abuse and exploitation by groups of offenders is deeply insidious and devastates lives,' he said.
'Now is the moment for this Government to take concerted action by making child safeguarding a non-negotiable priority.
'This means joined up work to prevent child sexual abuse across all public, private, and voluntary sector agencies and mandatory training so all those working with children can identify the signs of abuse, step in and stop offenders in their tracks.
'Most of all it means supporting victims and survivors by investing in life-changing therapeutic and recovery services and ensuring the justice system can cope with the current backlog of child sexual abuse cases in court.'
Following the Prime Minister's announcement on Saturday, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage described the move as a 'welcome U-turn', while Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch called on him to apologise for 'six wasted months'.
'Just like he dismissed concerns about the winter fuel payment and then had to U-turn, just like he needed the Supreme Court to tell him what a woman is, he had to be led by the nose to make the correct decision here,' she said.
'I've been repeatedly calling for a full national inquiry since January. It's about time he recognised he made a mistake and apologised for six wasted months.'
Speaking to reporters on Saturday while on his visit to Canada, Sir Keir said: 'I have never said we should not look again at any issue. I have wanted to be assured that on the question of any inquiry. That's why I asked Louise Casey who I hugely respect to do an audit.
'Her position when she started the audit was that there was not a real need for a national inquiry over and above what was going on.
'She has looked at the material she has looked at and she has come to the view that there should be a national inquiry on the basis of what she has seen.
'I have read every single word of her report and I am going to accept her recommendation.
'That is the right thing to do on the basis of what she has put in her audit.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Treasury minister Reynolds struggles over Lower Thames Crossing answers
The Lower Thames Crossing will link Essex and Kent but economic secretary Emma Reynolds was unable to give details of the precise location of the crossing or the total cost of the project. She also mistakenly referred to the existing crossing being the 'Dartmouth tunnel', apparently confusing the Devon town with Dartford, the location of the crossings for traffic across the Thames. 'I meant Dartford, excuse me, I had a very early morning,' the minister told LBC Radio. Asked about the proposed new crossing's location, she said: 'You'll forgive me, I can't recall the landing zone.' The crossing will involve two tunnels under the Thames to the east of Tilbury in Essex and Gravesend in Kent. Pressed on the cost, she said 'it's going to cost quite a lot of money', suggesting it would be 'several billion pounds'. LBC Radio presenter Nick Ferrari told Ms Reynolds: 'Is there much point continuing this conversation because you don't know where a bridge starts, where it ends and you don't know how much it costs?' National Highways has estimated the cost will be between £9.2 billion and £10.2 billion depending on the funding model chosen. It would connect the A2 and M2 in Kent to the A13 and M25 in Essex via a 2.6-mile tunnel under the Thames, which would be the UK's longest road tunnel. The funding for the Lower Thames Crossing will be part of the Government's 10-year plan for infrastructure. A new structures fund will also invest in repairing bridges, flyovers, tunnels and other transport infrastructure such as roads. The Lower Thames Crossing is aimed at reducing congestion at Dartford. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has said that the project is 'essential for improving the resilience of a key freight route and is critical to our long-term trade with Europe'. 'It will speed up the movement of goods from south-east England to the Midlands and the north, crucial to thousands of jobs and businesses,' she added. Rachel Reeves has said ministers are 'going all in by going up against the painful disruption of closed bridges, crossings and flyovers'. The Chancellor added: 'This is a turning point for our national infrastructure, and we're backing it with funding to support thousands of jobs and connect communities, delivering on our plan for change.' It comes ahead of the Government's infrastructure strategy, expected this week, while public procurement rules are set to be overhauled so that public bodies will have to give more weight to firms which can prove they will boost British jobs when they are bidding for contracts. The Chancellor outlined a range of infrastructure investments as part of last week's spending review.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Labour ‘owe an apology' for delay in grooming gangs inquiry, ex-human rights boss says
Labour ministers "owe an apology" to everyone they dismissed over grooming gangs after Sir Keir Starmer's U-turn on a national inquiry, the former chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission has said. The prime minister bowed to months of mounting pressure over the issue ahead of the publication of a new report by Louise Casey, who led the original review into the scandal, on Monday. The Labour leader initially pointed to previous work on the issue by Professor Alexis Jay, saying the public wanted action not another inquiry. But after Ms Casey's report backed the idea, the PM accepted the recommendation. The issue hit the headlines again in January with a series of tweets by Donald Trump ally Elon Musk. Sir Trevor Phillips said: "I think that ministers owe an apology to all of the people who they essentially said were talking rubbish, to all the people who to whom they said 'you haven't actually bothered to read the Jay Report and you don't know actually what's going on'. And to all of the people of whom it was suggested their interest and concern about this was motivated in some way by racial distaste or prejudice." Speaking on Times Radio he called specifically for an apology to the late Times reporter Andrew Norfolk 'who did more than anyone else to expose this scandal and to keep it in the headlines… and who went to his grave feeling that people who should know better regarded him as a racist and a bigot.' He added: 'One minister said to me yesterday, it shouldn't be about the hurt feelings of journalists and so on. Well let's be clear about this. People like Andrew Norfolk were speaking on behalf of those who could not speak. This isn't a matter of vanity. It isn't a matter of journalists saying look at me. It is a matter of people like Norfolk, and there were others, who spoke out because the people who were the victims were not being heard and could not speak for themselves and I think they are owed an apology." In April, Sir Trevor condemned the government's approach to grooming gangs as "utterly shameful". The shadow home secretary Chris Philp defended the Conservatives' record on the issue, saying Theresa May had set up original Rotherham inquiry. He told GB News: 'It was Rishi Sunak, a Conservative prime minister, who set up the grooming gangs task force, which in its first year led to 550 arrests. So that's what the last government did.' He also called for a 'quick' inquiry. 'Some public inquiries drag on for five or ten years. We can't have that happening here. This needs to be a one- or two-year process, a very focused process,' he said. At the start of the year Mr Musk even called on the King to step in and dissolve parliament after Labour rejected a call for a national inquiry. The tech billionaire's erratic request followed days of an explosive row over the PM's handling of historic child abuse in Oldham after he suggested the Labour leader had failed to bring 'rape gangs' to justice when he was director of public prosecutions. While the monarch does have the power to dissolve parliament, this power is a formality and is done so upon request of the prime minister. Sir Keir condemned Mr Musk at the time suggesting his 'lies and misinformation' on grooming gangs were amplifying the 'poison' of the far right. Mr Musk has engaged in a long-running war of words with Sir Keir's administration which came to a head during last summer's far-right riots when the social media boss claimed 'civil war is inevitable' in the UK.


Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Winter fuel payment to be restored in full for most Scots pensioners by SNP Government
The First Minister announced the change to the scheme in the wake of a rethink by the UK Government. Scots pensioners will receive the same winter fuel payment as people south of the border after a u-turn by First Minister John Swinney. Most pensioners will now pocket a payment after a UK Government decision that will see extra funding come to Holyrood. Speaking to public sector leaders on Monday morning, Swinney said "no pensioner will receive less than they would under the new UK scheme." The changed policy originates from Chancellor Rachel Reeves' controversial decision last year to strip millions of pensioners of a payment worth up to £300. SNP Ministers initially responded by offering a more generous scheme of a full payment for pensioners on benefits and £100 for everyone else. After a fierce backlash, Reeves binned her own scheme and restored the full payment to all pensioners earning up to £35,000. Her u-turn will lead to extra funding for Swinney and he confirmed today his Government will mirror the Reeves system south of the border. Pensioners will qualify for either £200 or £300 depending on age. This is a breaking news story - we'll bring you updates, pictures and video as it happens. Here you can get your must-see news, features, videos and pictures throughout the day from the Daily Record, Sunday Mail and Record Online. Get all the big headlines, pictures, analysis, opinion and video on the stories that matter to you. You can also check out our social media channels for live us on Twitter @Record_Politics for the latest news. Or you can catch all the action by following our team: @paulhutcheon, @andrewjquinn97 and @dennynews.