logo
Ilhan Omar on George Floyd, 5 years later

Ilhan Omar on George Floyd, 5 years later

Politico20-05-2025

Programming note: We'll be off next Tuesday, May 27, following the federal holiday in the U.S., and we'll return to your inboxes the following day, May 28.
What up, Recast fam. On today's agenda:
This weekend marks five years since George Floyd's murder by a Minneapolis police officer, a moment captured on video that sparked international protests calling for an end to systemic racism and a national conversation on how law enforcement interacts with Black and brown communities.
The murder took place in the district represented by Rep. Ilhan Omar, a member of the Squad who has become a lightning rod for conservative provocateurs. In the wake of Floyd's murder, with protests rising around the country, corporations implementing DEI policies — and pledging collectively to spend some $50 billion to work toward eradicating systemic racism — and politicians openly talking about reforming policing, Omar hoped his death would spur radical change in the nation.
But today, the protests have evaporated, DEI departments are shutting down and conservatives are even calling for President Donald Trump to issue a pardon to Derek Chauvin, the white officer convicted of killing Floyd. While it is unclear if Trump will move forward with a pardon, Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz told reporters 'it behooves us to be prepared for it,' according to The Minnesota Star Tribune.
Meanwhile, bipartisan talks around federal laws to reform policing have been scuttled. And by one measure, 2024 saw more people killed by police than in any year in the last decade.
As the anniversary approaches, I spoke with Omar about the push for a Chauvin pardon, the legacy of the protest movement his death prompted and whether Democrats bear any blame for ceding support of law enforcement to conservatives, who have since labeled the Democrats the party of 'defund the police.'
◆◆◆
This interview has been edited for length and clarity.
THE RECAST: How do you think the country should be thinking about the fifth anniversary of George Floyd's murder?
OMAR: I believe after George Floyd was murdered in broad daylight for all of us in the United States and the world to witness, it seemed like it created a moment of hope. It ignited a lot of urgent conversations about the state of our nation, the state of policing and the state of our justice system, and who's entitled to justice. And unfortunately, as we have seen every time there is a movement for the liberation of Black people, for equality, for justice, we see a backslide — a backlash — where things not only stop progressing, but we are seeing more people emboldened with their racism.
We are seeing unjust calls for [Chauvin] to be pardoned, which is telling since they're not calling for the pardon for his fellow officers that were also charged and convicted by a jury of their peers.
Was The Recast forwarded to you by a friend? Don't forget to subscribe to the newsletter here.
You'll get a weekly breakdown of how race and identity are the DNA of American politics and policy.
THE RECAST: To your point, Chauvin was tried, convicted and sentenced during his 2021 trial. The following year a federal court convicted the former police officer of two constitutional rights violations — in a case where Chauvin himself pleaded guilty — and in 2023 the Minnesota Court of Appeals upheld his second-degree murder conviction.
So what do you think is driving this sentiment, particularly from conservative circles, about this push to pardon Chauvin, given the courts have ruled pretty decisively on his actions?
OMAR: Well, I believe it is rooted in white supremacy.
And just to be clear, the president only has the ability to pardon people who are charged and convicted under federal law. George Floyd's murderer still faces the state murder conviction and will, regardless of the federal pardon, be in jail, and he will always be known to the world and people of this country as a murderer.
THE RECAST: You alluded to Floyd's murder creating 'a moment' in this country. There was also a moment on Capitol Hill to push forward on some sort of agreement on how policing on the federal level could be changed. Yet that promise went unfilled too. Can you talk a little bit about the frustrations that talks fell apart and if there are plans of this bill being reintroduced in this Congress?
OMAR: I was grateful at that moment that then-Congresswoman Karen Bass and the Black Caucus rallied around the idea of reforming our policing and justice system after George Floyd's murder. We weren't successful in getting it across the finish line, and that was a missed opportunity by Congress.
We know that with the passing of the bipartisan gun violence prevention legislation we were able to direct a lot of resources to help with some of those intended reforms across police departments. The Minneapolis Police Department has not become perfect, by any sense, but it's been reformed to some capacity. We've seen the consent decree from the DOJ come through, though we know that Trump's DOJ has paused it.
So I am optimistic in the fact that there will be lasting positive impacts in regards to policing in this country that came out of that movement in the summer of 2020. But I'm not optimistic about having a president that fans the flames of hate, racism and bigotry.
THE RECAST: Republicans have successfully labeled Democrats the party that was soft on crime and anti-police during the racial reckoning protests of five years ago. Is there anything Democrats can do to take back some of the mantle about how they are viewed as far as being welcoming to law enforcement?
OMAR: There's always a narrative battle when you're in politics.
I do believe that Democrats themselves have conceded that debate of whether we are for law and order and whether we care about the safety of our communities. None of us want hurt and harm for those who sign up to serve, but we do want people who actually care about that oath to serve.
I hope that my Democratic colleagues find a way to reclaim that narrative, that we are not the ones that are pardoning Jan. 6 insurrectionists who beat up and were ultimately the cause of the deaths of so many Capitol police officers. We are not the ones that are calling for a murderer to be released and pardoned. We are not the ones that are creating an environment for the law to be disregarded and for order to be dismantled in this nation.
I think oftentimes Democrats can end up being focused on pointing the finger at each other, instead of thinking about what the broader narrative is on what we are fighting for.
THE RECAST: There's plenty of finger-pointing going on now with how much of a role Joe Biden played in Democrats' defeats this past cycle. I take it you fall into the camp that Democrats should focus on crafting a message of taking on Trump.
OMAR: Oftentimes, I think we can be that kid who thinks they're smart, and they don't fully hear the teacher's instructions. And they raise their hand, try to answer, give the wrong answer and embarrass themselves. I do think that we often forget to read the room, to look at where our narrative should be and really hone in on what it means to care and and protect the future of this country.
BOTTOMS LAUNCHES GEORGIA GUBERNATORIAL BID
Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms surprised no one with her official campaign launch for Georgia governor on Tuesday.
If elected, she would score a number of historic firsts: She'd be the nation's first Black woman to become a governor, the first Black person and first woman to lead the state of Georgia — and the first Democrat to win the Governor's Mansion in a generation.
'Donald Trump is a disaster for our economy and our country,' Bottoms proclaimed in the nearly 2 1/2-minute announcement video. She poked fun at a minor kerfuffle earlier this year when the president claimed to have fired her from the White House Export Council, a post she was appointed to by Biden. She vehemently denies that she was fired, arguing that she resigned prior to Trump taking office.
'While I laugh when Donald Trump spent part of his first day in office firing me from a job I didn't even have, for thousands of hard working Georgians who've lost their livelihoods, Donald Trump is no laughing matter,' she said in the ad.
Bottoms enters the 2026 Democratic primary with broad name ID in the Peach State, but there are still looming questions about whether she can extend her reach outside the Atlanta area. It's also unclear if Georgia voters will be reluctant to elect her to the state's highest office after she stunned many Democrats by deciding against seeking a second term as mayor.
She faces a potentially crowded primary, with state Sen. Jason Esteves and Atlanta-area pastor Olu Brown having declared their candidacies. In March, Rep. Lucy McBath suspended her exploratory bid to help her husband recover from cancer surgery, but she left the door open to launching a run for governor in the future. On the Republican side, state Attorney General Chris Carr launched his bid last year, while MAGA darling Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is thought to be eyeing a run after bowing out of a chance to run for Senate next year.
Bottoms is running to replace the popular GOP Gov. Brian Kemp, who is term-limited.
WHAT WE'RE WATCHING THIS WEEK
DOJ hits New Jersey Democrat with criminal charge — The Justice Department announced an assault charge Monday against Rep. LaMonica McIver, a New Jersey Democrat. She remains the only elected official currently charged with a crime following a tussle this month between federal agents and Democratic lawmakers who attempted to gain access to an Immigrations and Customs Enforcement facility in Newark. The city's mayor, Ras Baraka, was initially charged for trespassing, but those charges were later dropped.
Our POLITICO colleagues note the McIver charge 'is an extraordinary stress-test for the separation of powers at a time in which President Donald Trump is seeking to maximize executive branch dominance.'
TODAY'S CULTURE RECS
You make me wanna … sue! — We informed you a few issues back that hip-hop legends Salt-N-Pepa will finally be inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame this year. Ahead of their official induction ceremony, the pioneering female emcees are suing Universal Music Group over control of their music catalog.
A Spike Lee joint — The upcoming film'Highest 2 Lowest,' a remake of the 1963 Japanese film 'High and Low,' is reimagined and set in New York. It stars Denzel Washington as a music mogul and A$AP Rocky, who ransom's his son. Acclaimed director Spike Lee is garnering high praise from Variety, which calls the work 'a soul-searching genre movie that entertains while also sounding the alarm about where the culture could be headed.'
Shakira's Stirring Performance on Fallon — International superstar Shakira, who recently celebrated the 20th anniversary of her megahit 'Hips Don't Lie' on the 'Tonight Show,' returned Monday night to perform 'Antología,' proving that she can move a crowd even when seated on a stool.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scott Bessent Accuses Gavin Newsom of Threatening 'Tax Evasion'
Scott Bessent Accuses Gavin Newsom of Threatening 'Tax Evasion'

Newsweek

time36 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Scott Bessent Accuses Gavin Newsom of Threatening 'Tax Evasion'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent accused California Governor Gavin Newsom of "threatening to commit criminal tax evasion" after the Democratic leader suggested in a social media post that the state should consider withholding federal tax payments in response to possible funding cuts from the Trump administration. Newsweek has reached out to Newsom's press office for comment via email on Sunday. Why It Matters The Trump administration has threatened to withhold federal funding from various state programs and institutions, including research and education programs. Last week, CNN reported that the administration is considering cutting grant funding to the University of California and California State University systems. In late-May, President Donald Trump threatened to pull "large scale federal funding" from the Golden State unless it bars transgender athletes from competing in girls' sports. Bessent's remarks come amid ongoing tensions between federal, state, and local authorities as protests continue in Los Angeles, which were sparked following immigration raids during which police followed the Trump administration's directives to arrest people. Some protesters have thrown rocks at officers, with one allegedly throwing a Molotov cocktail, and burning items in the streets. Agents have used tear gas on the crowds. The clashes highlight deepening conflicts between sanctuary jurisdictions and federal immigration policy, as Trump has implemented sweeping changes through executive orders and deployed the National Guard against local leaders wishes. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on May 7. Inset: California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in West Hollywood, California, on March 26. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on May 7. Inset: California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks in West Hollywood, California, on March 26. Photo by Corine Solberg/Sipa USA/Aaron Schwartz/AP Images What To Know On Friday, Newsom shared a screenshot of a CNN article on X, formerly Twitter, about the Trump administration's potential move to cut federal funding to the state, writing, "Californians pay the bills for the federal government. We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back. Maybe it's time to cut that off." Californians pay the bills for the federal government. We pay over $80 BILLION more in taxes than we get back. Maybe it's time to cut that off, @realDonaldTrump. — Gavin Newsom (@GavinNewsom) June 6, 2025 His post followed a CNN report that the Trump administration is targeting California's public university system over alleged antisemitism on campus. The administration has already taken similar action against Harvard University. California is the most populous state in the country with over 39 million people. It leads all the states in federal tax collection, with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) reporting that California contributed around $806 billion to total IRS collections in the 2024 fiscal year, which is about 15 percent of the national total. A recent analysis by the Rockefeller Institute of Government found the state contributed $83.1 billion more in federal taxes in 2022 than it received back. In response to the governor, Bessent, who oversees the IRS, wrote in an X post on Sunday: "Governor @GavinNewsom is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion. His plan: defraud the American taxpayer and leave California residents on the hook for unpaid federal taxes." Governor @GavinNewsom is threatening to commit criminal tax evasion. His plan: defraud the American taxpayer and leave California residents on the hook for unpaid federal taxes. (1/3) — Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent (@SecScottBessent) June 8, 2025 In a follow up post, he wrote: "I am certain most California businesses know that failing to pay taxes owed to the Treasury constitutes tax evasion and have no intention of following the dangerous path Governor @GavinNewsom is threatening." In a third post, the treasury secretary called the governor's comments "extremely reckless." Federal law defines a willful attempt to evade or defeat federal taxes as a felony under United States law. The public clash comes as Newsom is sparring with Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over deployment of the National Guard, and potentially active-military Marines, following protests in California sparked over federal immigration enforcement operations. Hegseth wrote in a Saturday evening post on X that in addition to mobilizing guards, nearby Marines may also be called upon, writing, "And, if violence continues, active-duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." What People Are Saying White House spokesperson Kush Desai told CNN in a Friday statement: "No taxpayer should be forced to fund the demise of our country," in regard to certain California policies related to energy and immigration. "No final decisions, however, on any potential future action by the Administration have been made, and any discussion suggesting otherwise should be considered pure speculation." Robert Rivas, speaker of the California State Assembly, wrote in a BlueSky post about the CNN article on Friday: "This is unconstitutional and vindictive. We're the nation's economic engine and the largest donor state, and deserve our fair share. I'll use every legal and constitutional tool available to defend CA -- we must look at every option, including withholding federal taxes." What Happens Next? The tension between the Trump administration and Newsom don't show signs of easing.

Suffolk jails forced to hold 125 prisoners set for transfer because of state chaos
Suffolk jails forced to hold 125 prisoners set for transfer because of state chaos

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Suffolk jails forced to hold 125 prisoners set for transfer because of state chaos

Suffolk County's jails are being forced to hold onto 125 felons who were supposed to be transferred upstate — with officials blaming state government chaos for the delay, The Post has learned. County Executive Ed Romaine blamed Gov. Kathy Hochul and said housing a growing number of state prisoners is putting staff in a dangerous situation as taxpayers are on the hook for hundreds of thousands in estimated extra costs. 'They've been convicted and are supposed to be in state prisons and they're not because the state is just not taking them,' Romaine told The Post. Advertisement 'Now, why is the state not taking them?' the Republican added. 'Well, [Hochul] fired 2,000 corrections officers striking for better working conditions and she's closing prisons around the state.' 4 Suffolk County's jails are being forced to hold onto 125 felons who were supposed to be transferred upstate. New York Post Under state law, inmates sentenced to hard time in state prison are supposed to be transferred upstate within 10 business days. But Romaine said that has changed in the aftermath of labor unrest with the corrections officer union and Democratic governor. Advertisement He said the delays are now causing headaches across the system, from administration to the inmates themselves. Most of the detainees in the two county jails — in Riverhead and Yaphank — are people accused of low-level crimes that are being held for trial and have not been convicted. They are now bunking alongside convicted criminals who were intended to only pass through the system. 4 Under state law, inmates sentenced to hard time in state prison are supposed to be transferred upstate within 10 business days. Suffolk County Executive Ed Romaine pictured. James Messerschmidt Romaine added that the influx of roughly 125 felons is raising serious safety and management concerns for staff. Advertisement 'Our jail staff are already spread thin,' Romaine wrote in a letter to Gov. Hochul in May obtained by The Post. 'I understand that the state faces similar staffing challenges, but it is unfair to shift this burden to the County with minimal financial compensation and little to no collaboration.' The state Department of Corrections and Community Supervision blamed the backlog on system-halting staffing shortages that were sparked after the state fired 2,000 corrections officers who participated in an unauthorized, nearly month-long strike in March. 4 Romaine added that the influx of roughly 125 felons is raising serious safety and management concerns for staff. Newsday via Getty Images Romaine shot back that the staffing shortages should be Suffolk's problem. Advertisement 'The law says they're state ready, then they need to be in state prisons, not local jails,' he said. New York State is reimbursing Suffolk $100 per day for every inmate stuck in the county jails, but Romaine said the county pays $250 per day for each, meaning taxpayers are on the hook for the extra $150. 'The warden and his staff calculate that we have expended approximately $280,000 in excess of what we have received from the state to house these state ready but unclaimed prisoners since February,' Romaine wrote in the May letter. 4 New York State is reimbursing Suffolk $100 per day for every inmate stuck in the county jails. New York Post More inmates in lockup means more guards are needed to work — with more overtime costs, he added. Romaine warned that if the backlog continues, it could lead to dangerous overcrowding and unravel the work the county has been doing to improve jail conditions. 'This is unsustainable long term,' he said.

What to know about President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to LA protests
What to know about President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to LA protests

Chicago Tribune

timean hour ago

  • Chicago Tribune

What to know about President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops to LA protests

President Donald Trump says he's deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles to respond to immigration protests, over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. It's not the first time Trump has activated the National Guard to quell protests. In 2020, he asked governors of several states to send troops to Washington, D.C., to respond to demonstrations that arose after George Floyd was killed by Minneapolis police officers. Many of the governors he asked agreed, sending troops to the federal district. The governors that refused the request were allowed to do so, keeping their troops on home soil. This time, however, Trump is acting in opposition to Newsom, who under normal circumstances would retain control and command of California's National Guard. While Trump said that federalizing the troops was necessary to 'address the lawlessness' in California, the Democratic governor said the move was 'purposely inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' Here are some things to know about when and how the president can deploy troops on U.S. soil. Generally, federal military forces are not allowed to carry out civilian law enforcement duties against U.S. citizens except in times of emergency. An 18th-century wartime law called the Insurrection Act is the main legal mechanism that a president can use to activate the military or National Guard during times of rebellion or unrest. But Trump didn't invoke the Insurrection Act on Saturday. Instead, he relied on a similar federal law that allows the president to federalize National Guard troops under certain circumstances. He federalized part of California's National Guard under what is known as Title 10 authority, which places him, not the governor, atop the chain of command, according to Newsom's office. The National Guard is a hybrid entity that serves both state and federal interests. Often it operates under state command and control, using state funding. Sometimes National Guard troops will be assigned by their state to serve federal missions, remaining under state command but using federal funding. The law cited by Trump's proclamation places National Guard troops under federal command. The law says that can be done under three circumstances: When the U.S. is invaded or in danger of invasion; when there is a rebellion or danger of rebellion against the authority of the U.S. government, or when the President is unable to 'execute the laws of the United States,' with regular forces. But the law also says that orders for those purposes 'shall be issued through the governors of the States.' It's not immediately clear if the president can activate National Guard troops without the order of that state's governor. Notably, Trump's proclamation says the National Guard troops will play a supporting role by protecting ICE officers as they enforce the law, rather than having the troops perform law enforcement work. Steve Vladeck, a professor at the Georgetown University Law Center who specializes in military justice and national security law, says that's because the National Guard troops can't legally engage in ordinary law enforcement activities unless Trump first invokes the Insurrection Act. Vladeck said the move raises the risk that the troops could end up using force while filling that 'protection' role. The move could also be a precursor to other, more aggressive troop deployments down the road, he wrote on his website. 'There's nothing these troops will be allowed to do that, for example, the ICE officers against whom these protests have been directed could not do themselves,' Vladeck wrote. The Insurrection Act and related laws were used during the Civil Rights era to protect activists and students desegregating schools. President Dwight Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock, Arkansas, to protect Black students integrating Central High School after that state's governor activated the National Guard to keep the students out. George H.W. Bush used the Insurrection Act to respond to riots in Los Angeles in 1992 after the acquittal of white police officers who were videotaped beating Black motorist Rodney King. National Guard troops have been deployed for a variety of emergencies, including the COVID pandemic, hurricanes and other natural disasters. But generally, those deployments are carried out with the agreements of the governors of the responding states. On Sunday, Trump was asked if he plans to send U.S. troops to Los Angeles and he said, 'We're gonna have troops everywhere. We're not going to let this happen to our country. We're not going to let our country be torn apart like it was under Biden.' Trump didn't elaborate. In 2020, Trump asked governors of several states to deploy their National Guard troops to Washington, D.C. to quell protests that arose after George Floyd was killed by Minneapolis police officers. Many of the governors agreed, sending troops to the federal district. At the time, Trump also threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act for protests following Floyd's death in Minneapolis – an intervention rarely seen in modern American history. But then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper pushed back, saying the law should be invoked 'only in the most urgent and dire of situations.' Trump never did invoke the Insurrection Act during his first term. But while campaigning for his second term, he suggested that would change. Trump told an audience in Iowa in 2023 that he was prevented from using the military to suppress violence in cities and states during his first term, and said if the issue came up again in his next term, 'I'm not waiting.' Trump also promised to deploy the National Guard to help carry out his immigration enforcement goals, and his top adviser Stephen Miller explained how that would be carried out: Troops under sympathetic Republican governors would send troops to nearby states that refuse to participate, Miller said on 'The Charlie Kirk Show,' in 2023. After Trump announced he was federalizing the National Guard troops on Saturday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said other measures could follow. Hegseth wrote on the social media platform X that active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton were on high alert and would also be mobilized 'if violence continues.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store