Decades-old Sehri tradition fading away
People dine out in the cool evening breeze in Karachi on Thursday. Many eateries stay open till Sehri to serve people enjoying dining out - the only nightlife permissible in the country. Photo: express
A 150-year-old tradition in the subcontinent of waking people up for Sehri during the holy month of Ramazan by banging empty tin cans and drums is now gradually fading away in the country. In its place, social media and telephone alerts have taken over.
A century ago, the practice of waking people up before Sehri by banging tin cans and drums at the doors of houses and streets seemed effective, but now, after scientific advancements, if drums are beaten near houses or streets even an hour before Sehri, people, who fast, now get upset and irritated.
Every Muslim country has its own method of waking people up for Sehri. When fasting was made obligatory in the 2nd Hijrah year, Hazrat Bilal bin Rabah (RA) would roam the streets of Madinah, calling out in his beautiful voice to wake people for Sehri. A few years later, more companions of the Prophet (SAW), young people and children, joined him. Within a few years, this practice spread to Makkah and then to all Islamic states.
In the early days of Islam, since there were no loudspeakers, mosque imams would light red lanterns or lamps on the minarets, chimney tops, or high places two hours before Sehri. The Muslims would wake up upon seeing the light. Around one and a half centuries ago in the subcontinent, Muslims began using large empty tin cans to wake people up for Sehri.
Soon after, drums were added to the practice, and the rhythmic beating of the tin cans and drums would announce, "Rozedaro utho Sehri ka waqt ho gia ha" (Rise, O fasting ones, it is time for Sehri). People would wake up upon hearing it.
After the creation of Pakistan, this tradition continued, and groups also started roaming the streets reciting naat to wake people up.
However, this practice has now completely vanished. The beginning of the new century in 2001 marked the gradual end of this custom. Occasionally, a drum can be heard in some streets during Sehri time, but now, it is met with harsh words from the fasting people.
In today's Ramazan, the tradition of going to bed at night is almost extinct. In most homes, people stay awake until Sehri, and children can be seen playing cricket on the streets until Sehri time. The practice of sleeping after Sehri is now on the rise. Mosques used to announce "It's time for Sehri " and also sound sirens to wake people up, and these sirens are still used for Sehri and iftar times.
In Pakistan, the practice of waking people up with drums during Sehri turned into a business. After waking people for a month, people would collect "Eidi" (gifts) on the day of Eidul Fitr from all over the city, which would include cash, flour, sugar, wheat, and rice as offerings from the people.
Abdul Shakoor, a 41-year-old man in Rawalpindi who still wakes people up with drums, says his grandfather, father, uncle, and other relatives had been doing this since before his birth. "We've been doing this since the creation of Pakistan," he said. However, this practice is now near its end because people get upset if drums are played in some streets. Moreover, they no longer give gifts on Eid. Despite this, Abdul Shakoor has been continuing the family business out of necessity and as a means of earning spiritual reward.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
Humanity on the line: true cost of a third world war
Listen to article Consequentialism is defined as "the ethical study of morals, duties and rights with an approach that focuses consequences of a particular action or cause". A consequentialist holds the belief that "consequences form the basis for any valid moral judgement about an action". Thus, from a consequentialist standpoint, a morally right action is one that produces a good outcome or consequence. The Muslims observe the Greater Bairam, known as the Eid-ul-Adha, in remembrance of the great sacrifice by Hazrat Ibrahim (AS) of his son Hazrat Ismael (AS) obeying his Creator. The sacrifice of what is dearest to heart in the world was demanded as a proof of unconditional obedience. The father was ready to offer the sacrifice of his son who was the dearest thing to him as the son was born in the father's old age. The demands of sacrifice become more poignant when the father is required to slaughter his son with his own hands. It is quite difficult to imagine feeling the agonising pain at the writhing body of one's own son being slaughtered. When the father was close to slaughter, the Creator transformed the son into a ram. The father came out victorious in the litmus test for devotion and love. The Muslims, particularly in our part of the world, have transformed this devotional sacrifice into a worldly affair of ostentation and self-aggrandisement. The wealthier the person is, the costlier the sacrificial animal is. The purchase in hundreds of thousands is a way to showcase one's opulence, as the sharing of wealth with the poor unshowingly doesn't satisfy one's urge for self-exhibitionism. Accepted that one ought to buy the cattle at par with one's financial muscle, but the real sacrifice would be to distribute its meat among the destitute. The children and youngsters play with their sacrificial animals in front of those who can't afford to buy one. It nurtures hopes in the poor neighbours that they would get a meal with the meat which has been unaffordable to them throughout the year, but this day, too, they wouldn't. We must advise our children to include such children in the festivities. A religion that enjoins upon its adherents to cover the eatables being taken home lest it might tantalise the poor children in the neighbours cannot allow them to exclude the less privileged from the festivities of a religious festival. Some families have devised a ploy to defang the pricking of conscience: They reserve mutton for the family and distribute beef among the poor. Paradoxically, the rich who relish mutton throughout the year behave as if they have never eaten mutton. As is the norm, they stuff their deep freezers with the meat for "the rainy days". The divine sacrifice demands parting with one's desires and avarice. The desire to store and avarice for more makes man the poorest of the lot. The irresponsibility people display in disposing of the remains of the sacrificed animals goes against the spirit of the sacrifice and Islamic teachings. The offal fly-tipped along the streets and roads creates an unpleasant scene marring the beauty and sanctity of the holy tradition of the great sacrifice as these litter louts don't bother that their actions might become the cause of public nuisance. Even if the remains are thrown away from the vicinity, they land near the slums and ghettos, compounding miseries of the dwellers twofold. First, they were not included in the joys and blessings of the festival. Second, they were reminded with the heaps of stinking offal that they are the segregated part of society. What to speak of including the minorities in the joys and blessings of the festival? The bliss of divine sacrifice is in inclusivity, not in exclusivity. It's a communal festival. If our offering of sacrifice doesn't make us shake off all the impurities of ego – arrogance, avarice, ostentation, selfishness and the ilk – we will have to take stock of our intentions and actions. If we don't find ourselves a changed, rather a metamorphosed, person after sacrificing what is dearest to us, it means we haven't sacrificed what is dearest to us – the raison detre of the divine sacrifice.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
The Greater Bairam: a festival of inclusivity
Listen to article Consequentialism is defined as "the ethical study of morals, duties and rights with an approach that focuses consequences of a particular action or cause". A consequentialist holds the belief that "consequences form the basis for any valid moral judgement about an action". Thus, from a consequentialist standpoint, a morally right action is one that produces a good outcome or consequence. The Muslims observe the Greater Bairam, known as the Eid-ul-Adha, in remembrance of the great sacrifice by Hazrat Ibrahim (AS) of his son Hazrat Ismael (AS) obeying his Creator. The sacrifice of what is dearest to heart in the world was demanded as a proof of unconditional obedience. The father was ready to offer the sacrifice of his son who was the dearest thing to him as the son was born in the father's old age. The demands of sacrifice become more poignant when the father is required to slaughter his son with his own hands. It is quite difficult to imagine feeling the agonising pain at the writhing body of one's own son being slaughtered. When the father was close to slaughter, the Creator transformed the son into a ram. The father came out victorious in the litmus test for devotion and love. The Muslims, particularly in our part of the world, have transformed this devotional sacrifice into a worldly affair of ostentation and self-aggrandisement. The wealthier the person is, the costlier the sacrificial animal is. The purchase in hundreds of thousands is a way to showcase one's opulence, as the sharing of wealth with the poor unshowingly doesn't satisfy one's urge for self-exhibitionism. Accepted that one ought to buy the cattle at par with one's financial muscle, but the real sacrifice would be to distribute its meat among the destitute. The children and youngsters play with their sacrificial animals in front of those who can't afford to buy one. It nurtures hopes in the poor neighbours that they would get a meal with the meat which has been unaffordable to them throughout the year, but this day, too, they wouldn't. We must advise our children to include such children in the festivities. A religion that enjoins upon its adherents to cover the eatables being taken home lest it might tantalise the poor children in the neighbours cannot allow them to exclude the less privileged from the festivities of a religious festival. Some families have devised a ploy to defang the pricking of conscience: They reserve mutton for the family and distribute beef among the poor. Paradoxically, the rich who relish mutton throughout the year behave as if they have never eaten mutton. As is the norm, they stuff their deep freezers with the meat for "the rainy days". The divine sacrifice demands parting with one's desires and avarice. The desire to store and avarice for more makes man the poorest of the lot. The irresponsibility people display in disposing of the remains of the sacrificed animals goes against the spirit of the sacrifice and Islamic teachings. The offal fly-tipped along the streets and roads creates an unpleasant scene marring the beauty and sanctity of the holy tradition of the great sacrifice as these litter louts don't bother that their actions might become the cause of public nuisance. Even if the remains are thrown away from the vicinity, they land near the slums and ghettos, compounding miseries of the dwellers twofold. First, they were not included in the joys and blessings of the festival. Second, they were reminded with the heaps of stinking offal that they are the segregated part of society. What to speak of including the minorities in the joys and blessings of the festival? The bliss of divine sacrifice is in inclusivity, not in exclusivity. It's a communal festival. If our offering of sacrifice doesn't make us shake off all the impurities of ego – arrogance, avarice, ostentation, selfishness and the ilk – we will have to take stock of our intentions and actions. If we don't find ourselves a changed, rather a metamorphosed, person after sacrificing what is dearest to us, it means we haven't sacrificed what is dearest to us – the raison detre of the divine sacrifice.
Express Tribune
24-05-2025
- Express Tribune
UN says 427 Rohingya feared dead in May shipwrecks
Locals evacuate Rohingya refugees from a boat that came ashore on the north coast of Indonesia's Sumatra island in June 2020. PHOTO: REUTERS Listen to article The United Nations said Friday it feared that 427 Rohingya, Myanmar's persecuted Muslim minority, had perished at sea in two shipwrecks on May 9 and 10 off the Myanmar coast. If confirmed, this would be the "deadliest tragedy at sea" involving Rohingya refugees so far this year, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees(UNHCR) said in a statement. The Rohingya have been persecuted in Myanmar for decades. Thousands of them risk their lives every year by fleeing repression and civil war in their country by sea, often aboard makeshift boats. "The UN Refugee Agency is gravely concerned about reports of two boat tragedies off the coast of Myanmar earlier this month," a statement read. UNHCR said it was still working to confirm the exact circumstances surrounding the shipwrecks but preliminary information indicated that a first vessel carrying 267 people sank on May 9, with only 66 people surviving. A second ship with 247 Rohingya on board capsized on May 10, with just 21 survivors, the UN agency said. The Rohingya on board were either leaving Bangladesh's huge Cox's Bazar refugee camps or fleeing Myanmar's western state of Rakhine, the statement said. Rakhine state has been the scene of fierce fighting between the military and the Arakan Army, an ethnic minority rebel group, over control of the territory. "The dire humanitarian situation, exacerbated by funding cuts, is having a devastating impact on the lives of Rohingya, with more and more resorting to dangerous journeys to seek safety, protection and a dignified life for themselves and their families," said Hai Kyung Jun, who leads UNHCR's regional bureau for Asia and the Pacific. In 2024, some 657 Rohingya died in the region's waters, according to UNHCR.
