Social Democrats split on whether to allow suspended TD Eoin Hayes back into party
The Social Democrats are split on whether to bring suspended TD Eoin Hayes back into the fold, with concerns that Sinéad Gibney could leave party if he is readmitted.
On Wednesday, Ms Gibney repeatedly declined to rule out leaving the party if Mr Hayes was readmitted to the Social Democrats parliamentary party.
Ms Gibney, a TD for Dublin Rathdown, said she would not be commenting on 'hypotheticals', despite being repeatedly asked if she would leave the party if Mr Hayes was re-admitted.
Mr Hayes was suspended from the Social Democrats after it emerged that he did not sell his shares in US company Palantir until a month after he was elected as a Dublin city councillor.
This contradicted information previously given by Mr Hayes to the effect that he had sold the shares in the company, where he worked from 2015 to 2017, before he entered politics.
Palantir has supplied software and technology to the Israel Defense Forces.
Other TDs within the party have flagged concerns about readmitting Mr Hayes, with one saying they would not be comfortable with his return.
'If I had my way, I'd be telling him to sling his hook,' the TD said.
However, there is a limit to what the party can do, with some saying that total expulsion is a bridge too far for Mr Hayes's offence.
'The danger is that it eats up the party. We need to come to an agreement. Eoin Hayes cannot be the thing that splits us apart," a source said.
There is also a recognition that the undefined nature of Mr Hayes's suspension means that the Social Democrats are likely to be dogged by questions surrounding a possible return which takes focus away from the work being carried out by other TDs.
There is an interest from some in drawing a line under the situation sooner rather than later so that attention could return to the daily work at hand.
Whatever the outcome, the party needs to remember that its values must remain at its core, a source said.
Other TDs were happy on Wednesday to keep the issue on the long finger rather than face into the tough decisions with some just months into the role of TD.
There was an overall view that any decision made would be done as a collective.
'It is a deeply difficult issue for us,' a TD said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
5 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Opposition accuses Government of making 'sacrificial lambs' of renters
The Taoiseach has been accused of turning renters into "sacrificial lambs" under the Government's new rent rules. The Government announced sweeping changes to the rent system on Tuesday that will cap rent increases at the rate of inflation. However, in times of high inflation, hikes for most tenancies will be limited to a maximum of 2%. The changes will also end 'no-fault evictions' for larger landlords — those with four or more tenancies — who will no longer be able to terminate a tenancy where the tenant has met their obligations, except in very limited circumstances. However, speaking during Wednesday's leaders' questions, Social Democrats deputy leader Cian O'Callaghan said the Government was "gambling" with the changes. Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald branded them "a shambles". Mr O'Callaghan said the reality of the rental market was "dystopian". "Instead of protecting renters, [the Government's] big plan is to use them as sacrificial lambs and to bleed them dry. Incredibly, yesterday the minister for housing, James Browne, claimed that rents would eventually come down but he could not tell us when this was going to happen. Before being put in charge of housing, the minister was responsible for gambling. It now seems he is gambling with renters' future and betting against them. Taoiseach Micheál Martin rejected the criticisms, saying renters would not be affected in the short-term. 'The bottom line is, I repeat again, all existing tenants will not have their rents increase beyond 2% and no attempts by you to sow confusion will change that reality,' he said. Meanwhile, the minister for further and higher education has been accused of agreeing a decision that will deepen the accommodation crisis for students. People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy criticised James Lawless as he attended the Oireachtas committee on further and higher education and research. Mr Murphy said he noted how in the minister's opening statement to the committee he referred to the lack of affordable accommodation is a 'big barrier' for students attending tertiary education. 'Yet, you are part of the Government that yesterday signed off on a plan that is going to make that crisis for students a lot worse. 'Students are arguably the group that is hit hardest, so students who are in rental accommodation will effectively not have any rental protection whatsoever.' 'When asked about it, you say that you'll be meeting with Minister Brown to trash out how this will work,' Mr Brown said. I don't understand; You're there at the Cabinet. Student accommodation is one of the biggest issues in higher education. How have you not already thought this through? Mr Lawless rejected the criticism in an — at times — tense exchange with Mr Murphy. The plans will come into effect next March, he said. 'There's a lot of water under the bridge between now next March." He plans to sit down with James Browne and 'delve into the detail about how it affected student accommodation sector', he added. Committee chair Erin McGreehan said she did not think it was fair to interrogate the minister on plans that have not yet been finalized. 'Respectfully, I think your job as chair is not to defend [or] to protect the minister from questioning,' Mr Murphy said.
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Protest at Leinster House ahead of Central Bank vote
A protest is being held outside Leinster House ahead of a vote on a motion seeking to ban the Central Bank from facilitating the sale of so-called Israeli war bonds. The day-long 'Stop Funding Genocide' action was organised by the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign (IPSC). Government TDs will tonight vote on whether to ban the facilitation of the war bonds in Ireland, a cross-party motion brought forward by the Social Democrats. Last month, a similar motion brought forward by Sinn Féin was defeated by 87 votes to 75. Social Democrats TD Sinéad Gibney spoke at the protest, saying the Government had a second opportunity to stop the sale of Israeli bonds in Europe. She said: "Our Central Bank is currently facilitating Israeli bonds in Europe by approving the prospectus of Israeli bonds. "Every country has the right to raise bonds and sell them but the bonds that are being raised and sold by Israel right now are being used to fund this genocide. "The weapons, the bombs and the bullets that have killed 55,000 people, that have injured 126,000 people, they are partly funded by the sale of those bonds. "Our Central Bank says there's nothing they can do, but we can in the Dáil. So today we offer the Government another opportunity to stop the Central Bank from approving that prospectus, to play our part in stopping the sale of Israeli bonds in Europe." During the protest a group of women dressed in black held a 15-minute "keening" outside the gates of Leinster House - the action of wailing in grief. Senator Frances Black, who was among the attendees, said the "keeners" represented what the crowd was feeling. She said: "Our hearts are broken at this time by what we're seeing in Gaza and the West Bank, it's absolutely outrageous and we've seen that now for over a year and a half. "We've been confronted with scenes in Gaza that are so horrific they will haunt us and certainly haunt me as long we can remember." The Government has posed a counter-motion that outlines the actions the Coalition has taken so far against Israel. Earlier, the governor of the Central Bank told politicians that it cannot refuse to facilitate the sale of Israel war bonds as doing so would break EU capital markets rules. Gabriel Makhlouf outlined the position to the Oireachtas Committee on Finance and Public Expenditure this afternoon. He said the Central Bank was "absolutely appalled" by what is happening in Gaza. However, the bank is "required to perform" certain actions under EU rules, he said, adding "we are established by law, we are empowered by law, and we must always act within and in line with the law".
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Palestinian lives being weighed against bond markets,' Dáil hears in debate over Israeli bonds
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has been accused of 'speaking the truth in order to bury it' by acknowledging genocide in Gaza but failing to prevent the Central Bank's role in the sale of Israeli war bonds. In a Dáil debate calling for an end for the bank's involvement in the sale of the bonds, Social Democrats TD Gary Gannon said the Israeli bonds prospectus advertisement says ''stand with Israel. Israel is at war.' These bonds bankroll the bombs, the starvation, the extermination,' he said. He said that while the Government states that genocide is happening, 'Ireland must do nothing that might affect our GDP, that might affect our relationship with the US. This is what it comes down to - Palestinian lives being weighed against bond markets and bilateral trade flows'. What is happening 'by virtue of the fact that we're refusing to meet our obligations for the prevention of genocide is collusion. And what the Taoiseach is doing is speaking the truth only in order to bury it'. READ MORE Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe insisted the Government 'is working relentlessly with partners and with others to affect the type of change that Israel may not be able to ignore'. He said 'our efforts are making a difference, but I accept that they need to deliver more'. Ireland's approach to the unfolding tragedy is one of 'principled conviction, but also a recognition of the realities that we face, that we have to build up a diplomatic coalition to achieve more. 'We also have to be conscious of laws that are already in place,' he said as he introduced a countermotion. He said that, similar to the Sinn Féin motion, the Social Democrats proposal 'would be unworkable, will contravene EU law and would not achieve its intended objective'. The Social Democrats introduced the motion two weeks after Sinn Féin introduced legislation which was voted down , to stop the Central Bank's involvement in the sale of Israeli bonds. Party deputy leader Cian O'Callaghan said 'men, women, and children are being starved to death'. 'Mothers have been forced to try and boil grass to feed their children and starvation is being used as a weapon of war against innocent people. 'The Governor of the Central Bank says that the Central Bank cannot act on this, that it's beyond their competency to decide whether or not genocide is taking place.' But he said in January 2024 'the International Court of Justice confirmed the plausibility of the charges of genocide taken against Israel by South Africa'. The Government recognised that 'what's happening in Gaza is genocide' but 'it is not simply enough to say that what is happening is genocide'. The Government 'must do everything you can to stop and prevent genocide in Gaza.' The Israeli government 'is selling these bonds to help finance the genocide. And the Irish Central Bank is facilitating the sale of those bonds in Europe. That is a direct link between these bonds and the genocide that is taking place and this has to stop.' Sinn Féin finance spokesman Pearse Doherty described the Government's response as 'shameful' and that they would be 'on the wrong side of history' as 'genocide is staring us in the face'. People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy asked 'is your argument seriously that a regulation on financial prospectuses should override the UN Convention on the prevention and punishment of the crime of genocide'. Minister of State Robert Troy said measures have to be negotiated and agreed internationally 'at EU and UN level for them to have real impact and credibility'. He added that 'any attempt to act unilaterally could undermine the unified approach that we're beginning to see form at EU level. We cannot seek to uphold international law by breaking EU law.'
