
Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court
Labour dismissed her letter as 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense', but several of its own local authorities have already suggested they too could mount legal action against asylum hotels in their areas.
Epping secured a temporary injunction from the High Court on Tuesday, blocking the use of the Essex town's Bell Hotel as accommodation for asylum seekers on planning grounds.
The decision has prompted councils controlled by Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK to investigate whether they could pursue a similar course of action.
Kemi Badenoch said she would back Tory councils that wanted to pursue similar action to Epping (Lucy North/PA)
These include Labour-run Tamworth and Wirral councils, Tory-run Broxbourne and East Lindsey councils and Reform's Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire councils.
But Labour's Newcastle City Council and Brighton and Hove City Council have both ruled out legal action.
Tuesday's High Court decision has also caused a potential headache for the Home Office, which has a legal duty to house destitute asylum seekers while their claims are being dealt with.
If planning laws prevent the Government from using hotels, ministers will face a scramble to find alternative accommodation, potentially in the private rented sector.
In her letter, Mrs Badenoch praised Epping Council's legal challenge and told Tory councils she would 'back you to take similar action to protect your community'.
But she added that the situation would 'depend on individual circumstances of the case' and suggested Tory councils could pursue 'other planning enforcement options'.
She also accused Labour of 'trying to ram through such asylum hotels without consultation and without proper process', saying the Government had reopened the Bell Hotel as asylum accommodation after the Conservatives had closed it.
The hotel had previously been used as asylum accommodation briefly in 2020 and then between 2022 and 2024 under the previous Conservative government.
A Labour spokesperson said Mrs Badenoch's letter was a 'pathetic stunt' and 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system', saying there were now '20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories'.
The letter comes ahead of the publication on Thursday of figures showing how many asylum seekers were being temporarily housed in hotels at the end of June this year.
Home Office figures from the previous quarter show there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March.
This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier.
Figures on those staying in hotels date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023, when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels.
Data is not released on the number of hotels in use, but it is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023.
Labour has said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Spectator
4 minutes ago
- Spectator
Dirty tricks have gone too far
Last week, John Power reported on Labour's alleged 'dark arts' strategy: a cynical ploy to damage Nigel Farage and his allies not through debate, but through reputational sabotage. As a target of such smears for many years, I was not hugely surprised to see my name mentioned in the piece. I can attest to the venom of the attacks on Reform – in stark contrast to the 'kinder, gentler politics' once promised from Labour. We should expect robust debate where ideas clash, but instead what we often encounter is a reliance on smears and innuendo. In this week's Spectator, James Heale notes that my lawyers have written to Labour. Downing Street sources have reportedly denied the existence of any new 'attack team' in No. 10 with the remit of challenging Reform. But key questions remain unanswered. In recent weeks, anonymous online accounts and attack blogs have engaged in a sophisticated and targeted disinformation campaign against me. Following the allegations in The Spectator last week, some of these soon vanished. Who was behind them? Where did the money come from to fund various X accounts? And what, exactly, are the limits of Labour's 'opposition research' – better known as the 'dark arts'? The emergence and subsequent disappearance of these accounts come just as Labour ramped up its attacks on Reform UK. Over the weekend, Nigel Farage has been subject to an unrelenting barrage of slime from the Labour party's official X account, stating that he would 'put women and girls at risk' because of his position against the Online Safety Act. Peter Kyle, the Science Secretary, previously suggested that Farage was on the side of Jimmy Savile. Just how low is Labour prepared to go? My association with Nigel Farage, exacerbated by my family's financial support of Reform UK, has painted a bullseye on my back – and theirs. The assaults are manifold: in 2016, at the Republican National Convention supporting Donald Trump, I was arrested on allegations of a money-laundering conspiracy from my finance days, when I was 20. The tabloids had a field day, transforming it into a sensational saga of intrigue and excess prompting scurrilous claims of Russian interference. There were farcical allegations of illicit political financing in Montenegro, where I have lived for years, and lurid tales of investigations and arrests, along with whispers of shadowy business dealings with gangsters and despots. These tales disintegrate under scrutiny – but they were never intended to be proven. They are designed to depict me as a Bond-esque rogue. What's changed is how these attacks are amplified. Anonymous social media accounts use generative AI tools like ChatGPT and X's Grok to spread misinformation. By feeding these models with attack blogs and unreliable sources – often of their own creation – they generate misleading responses, auto-translate them, and inject them into the feeds of British journalists. This manipulation plays on well-known vulnerabilities of large language models, which can reflect the assumptions of their prompts and dream up plausible-sounding falsehoods. It is digital defamation at scale. The personal toll is profound. They imperil my petition for a US presidential pardon, following my 2017 plea deal, and have necessitated a 24-hour security team and an army of libel lawyers and investigators amid intimidation that endangers my family's safety and privacy. At the heart of this campaign lies a concerted effort to discredit me and Geostrategy, my global polling and strategy consultancy. Critics brand it a 'shady' vehicle for 'dark money', claims which are not just inaccurate, but malicious. Our polls, which align with other respected outfits, showing, for instance, majority US support for a free Ukraine, are conducted to the highest standards, belying claims of pro-Russia bias. Yet activist groups, colluding with the press, push such narratives without evidence. This approach, reminiscent of efforts against figures such as Trump, risks undermining liberal democracy by failing to accommodate dissenting voices within the system, potentially leading to greater instability. If we aim to restore faith in our institutions, we must return politics to its proper form: a competition of visions and ideas, rather than a battle of character assassination. Our democracy deserves civility, integrity and the courage to engage in open debate.

The National
11 minutes ago
- The National
Universal free bus travel should be Greens' 'top proposal'
The West Scotland MSP believes the policy would help Scots to deal with the cost of living crisis, tackle the climate emergency and bring the backing of new voters – if the party membership got on board. Greer is one of four contenders for the party's two co-leadership positions. Dominic Ashmole and fellow MSPs Gillian Mackay and Lorna Slater are also vying to take on the top job. While the party's core mission is tackling climate change, Greer argues that the 'high watermark' for climate politics was during the series of strikes in 2019, and that now, the main issue for voters is the cost of living. 'That's why the Scottish Greens need to put together our climate and our cost of living policies,' he told The National. READ MORE: Labour refuse to release files on secret meeting with Gideon Sa'ar 'It's why I'm proposing that one of our top proposals going into the next election is universal free bus travel.' Greer pointed to free travel for under 22s, a policy brought in by the party under the Bute House Agreement with the SNP, and that countries like Malta and Luxembourg have already adopted the policy. In Luxembourg, all public transport was made free in March 2020, as part of a bid to reduce emissions and encourage more people to use it. 'We need to put forward policies that will tackle the climate emergency, because we know how urgent that is,' Greer added. 'But those policies also need to help people with the cost of their daily lives. That's why I think universal free bus travel is one of the policies that will really resonate with the public. It will save people money.' He added that it would allow people to travel across Scotland for work, or leisure, and spend money in their local economies. 'The opportunities of free bus travel from a social perspective are massive,' Greer added. 'It's also one of the things that we need to do to tackle Scotland's single worst source of emissions, which is transport. We've reduced emissions in Scotland in a whole range of sectors over the last couple of decades. In transport, emissions have gone up, and it's because private car use has gone up.' Greer argued that this leaves two options - either make driving harder and more expensive, or public transport cheaper and easier. He added: 'It costs almost £20 to get a return bus ticket from Fraserburgh to Aberdeen. That is absolutely outrageous, and it is really isolating people who live in communities like Fraserburgh, the folk who own the bus companies though are making an absolute fortune off stuff like this. 'Universal free bus travel is the perfect example of combining climate justice, social justice and economic justice.' In the Scottish Parliament, he adds, more time is given to debate cars and trains in comparison to buses. 'It's frankly tiny, and that shows the inequality,' he adds. READ MORE: Thousands object to Tesla bid to supply energy in UK – how to sign the petition 'Because overwhelmingly, it's people who drive or even take the train who are making the big decisions in Scotland, and a lot of the kind of people who take the bus are very rarely in our Parliament, very rarely have the opportunity to have their voices heard on that. 'I know that's the kind of policy that resonates, and it resonates in every kind of community.' Need for 'common political strategy' Greer, long seen as a successor to Patrick Harvie who is still contesting the Holyrood election but is stepping back as co-leader, said that he believes the Greens have 'drifted a bit' over the past year after the power-sharing agreement ended. 'We've lacked that sense of shared direction and shared purpose,' he said. 'What we need is to agree a common political strategy. It's the co-leaders job to put that forward. It's for our party's council, which represents all of our branches and other groups, to debate it, amend it, agree it, reject it. But the co-leaders need to be the ones to, as our constitution says, provide political leadership and put that forward. 'One of the first things I would be doing if I was elected as co-leader is putting forward a strategy that says we focus on a handful of really simple, easy to understand, easy to communicate ideas that combine climate justice and social justice, and top of my list would be free bus travel for everyone.' With Nigel Farage's Reform UK undoubtedly set to feature in the 2026 Holyrood campaign, Greer insists that the party 'cannot dismiss' the anger voters are feeling as 'establishment centrist' parties do. He explained: 'The job of the Scottish Greens is to make it clear to people that it's not the fault of asylum seekers or trans people that everybody's lives are getting harder. 'It's the fault of billionaires, tax avoiders, greedy landlords like polluters. 'They're the people making it harder to get by. They're the people making everything more expensive. And it's all so that they can hoard more wealth themselves and they're going to spend in a thousand lifetimes. 'We can harness that anger rather than dismiss it, and we can channel it into something positive. We can give people hope that this can actually be a better and a fairer and a greener country.'


Glasgow Times
29 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Lucy Connolly set to be released from prison following jail term for hate tweet
Connolly, the wife of Conservative councillor Raymond Connolly, will be released on Thursday after being sentenced last year to 31 months in custody, the Telegraph reported. She had posted on X on the day of the murder of three children by Axel Rudakubana in Southport: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it.' She pleaded guilty to inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X and was jailed at Birmingham Crown Court in October last year. Her sentence has been criticised as being too harsh, but Sir Keir Starmer defended it earlier this year. The Prime Minister was asked in May about Connolly's case after her Court of Appeal application against her jail term was dismissed. Asked during Prime Minister's Questions whether her imprisonment was an 'efficient or fair use' of prison, Sir Keir said: 'Sentencing is a matter for our courts, and I celebrate the fact that we have independent courts in this country. 'I am strongly in favour of free speech, we've had free speech in this country for a very long time and we protect it fiercely. 'But I am equally against incitement to violence against other people. I will always support the action taken by our police and courts to keep our streets and people safe.' Connolly's post was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it. Lord Young of Acton, founder and director of the Free Speech Union, said: 'The fact that Lucy Connolly has spent more than a year in prison for a single tweet that she quickly deleted and apologised for is a national scandal, particularly when Labour MPs, councillors and anti-racism campaigners who've said and done much worse have avoided jail. 'The same latitude they enjoyed should have been granted to Lucy.'