logo
Tariff Deadline Extension: Which nations may get benefitted? Read all details here

Tariff Deadline Extension: Which nations may get benefitted? Read all details here

Time of India4 hours ago

The White House is reviewing its tariff strategy as the July 9 deadline approaches. Talks with several countries remain incomplete. One confirmed trade deal has been signed with the United Kingdom. Stephen Miran, White House chief economist, suggested an extension of the tariff pause for countries showing sincere negotiation efforts.
Countries Showing Progress May Avoid Tariff Hike
Stephen Miran, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, shared his views on trade talks during an interview with Yahoo Finance. He said the US government may extend the tariff pause for countries making steady progress in ongoing negotiations. The July 9 deadline was earlier set for the end of the temporary tariff relief.
Miran said it would not make sense to disrupt productive discussions with sudden tariff increases. He added that agreements should not be undermined when countries are working in good faith to reach fair trade terms.
Also Read:
Who sent mysterious radio burst in 2024? Study reveals the presence of a 'zombie' NASA Satellite. Here's truth
Only UK Trade Agreement Finalized
So far, the US has finalized a trade deal with the United Kingdom. Other trade discussions are still under way. Countries like Canada and Japan are continuing talks with the US, but no deals have been concluded yet. The pressure is building as the July 9 deadline comes closer.
Live Events
Canada's government has responded by warning that it may increase tariffs on US steel and aluminum if no deal is reached by the end of July. Talks between the two countries are expected to conclude by mid-July.
Trump Admin Considering Tariff Adjustments
President Trump has said he will soon announce new tariff rates for different countries. Some nations might secure more favorable terms. Others could face the return of the steeper "Liberation Day" tariffs.
Stephen Miran explained that while the average US tariff rate is unlikely to fall below 10% overall, specific countries might achieve better outcomes through direct negotiations. Others may see higher duties reinstated if talks fail.
Also Read:
Attention all green card holders! US can revoke citizenship, residency rights or visas if… All details here
EU Considers Response to Tariff Threats
The European Union has warned of possible retaliation if the US maintains its base tariff level. EU leaders are deciding whether to move ahead with a trade deal or risk entering a trade conflict. The Trump administration has previously suggested tariffs on EU goods could reach up to 50%.
Bloomberg reported that EU officials were meeting to decide their response. Their choice could either reduce trade tension or result in higher tariffs for both sides.
US Tariffs Begin on Household Appliances
New tariffs will go into effect on Monday. They will affect imported appliances such as washing machines, ovens and refrigerators. These tariffs could raise costs for everyday consumer goods. Businesses and consumers may experience the impact as prices begin to rise.
At the same time, the US government is trying to push its tax legislation forward. It remains unclear how tariffs will affect inflation and economic growth. The Federal Reserve is still assessing how prices are being influenced before deciding on any interest rate changes.
FAQs
What could happen to tariffs after the July 9 deadline?
Countries in active talks may see the pause extended. Others could face higher tariffs if negotiations fail or slow down.
How will new tariffs affect US consumers?
Starting Monday, appliances like washing machines and ovens will cost more. This could affect household budgets and increase prices in stores.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. requires visa applicants to share social media used in 5 years: U.S. Embassy in India
U.S. requires visa applicants to share social media used in 5 years: U.S. Embassy in India

The Hindu

time29 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

U.S. requires visa applicants to share social media used in 5 years: U.S. Embassy in India

Describing each visa adjudication as a 'national security decision', the U.S. has asked applicants to share their social media usernames or handles for each platform they have used in the last five years. The U.S. Embassy in India shared the information in a brief statement issued on Thursday (June 26, 2025), which also cautioned against 'omitting' social media information, as it could lead to 'visa denial and ineligibility for future visas.' The statement that was posted on X read, 'Visa applicants are required to list all social media usernames or handles of every platform they have used from the last 5 years on the DS-160 visa application form. Applicants certify that the information in their visa application is true and correct before they sign and submit it.' The communication continued, 'Omitting social media information could lead to visa denial and ineligibility for future visas.' On June 23, the U.S. Embassy asked those applying for an F, M, or J non-immigrant visa to switch the privacy settings of their social media accounts to 'public' to facilitate vetting, which it said was necessary to establish their identity and admissibility to the US under law. The embassy had also said since 2019, the U.S. has required visa applicants to provide 'social media identifiers' on immigrant and non-immigrant visa application forms. The F or M category is for student visas, and the J category is for exchange visitor visas. In Thursday's (June 26, 2025) communication, the embassy also attached two related digital posters. National security decision 'Every U.S. visa adjudication is a national security decision,' read the caption on the top of a poster, followed by a note. The note read, 'The United States requires visa applicants to provide social media identifiers on visa application forms. We use all available information in our visa screening and vetting.' It comes against the backdrop of an immigration crackdown by the Trump administration in Los Angeles recently. On June 24, the embassy's statement said that the U.S. had increased enforcement of immigration laws, and violators would face detention, deportation, and permanent consequences for future visa eligibility. The U.S. further warned that those entering the country illegally would face jail time and deportation. The U.S. Embassy in India has issued a series of statements on the subject of visas and immigration this month. On June 19, the embassy said a U.S. visa was 'a privilege, not a right,' and its screening did not stop after a visa was issued, as authorities might revoke it if one broke the law. The embassy had also said that using illegal drugs or breaking any of the U.S. laws while on a student or visitor visa could make one ineligible for future U.S. visas. Earlier this month, the U.S. Embassy in India also issued statements, underlining that while people travelling legally to America were welcome, illegal entry or abuse of visas won't be tolerated by the country. The United States 'will not tolerate' those who facilitate illegal and mass immigration to the U.S., its embassy said on June 16, 2025. The U.S. Embassy had said the U.S. had 'established new visa restrictions' targeting foreign government officials and violators.

No evidence Iran moved enriched uranium before strikes: US defence chief
No evidence Iran moved enriched uranium before strikes: US defence chief

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

No evidence Iran moved enriched uranium before strikes: US defence chief

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear program during the weekend.U.S. military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities early Sunday local time using more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far they may have set back Iran's nuclear "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth told an often fiery news President Donald Trump, who watched the exchange with reporters, echoed his defense secretary, saying it would have taken too long to remove anything."The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the was taken out of (the) facility," Trump wrote on his social media platform, without providing experts have cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near-weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes, and could be hiding it in locations unknown to Israel, the U.S. and U.N. nuclear noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance to the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the 60% highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the OF URANIUMThe Financial Times, citing European intelligence assessments, reported that Iran's highly enriched uranium stockpile remains largely intact since it was not concentrated at comments denying such claims came at the news briefing where he also accused journalists of downplaying the success of the U.S. strikes following a leaked preliminary assessment from the Defence Intelligence Agency suggesting they may have only set back Iran by said the assessment was low confidence, and, citing comments from CIA Director John Ratcliffe, said it had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran's nuclear program was severely damaged and would take years to Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, held a classified briefing on the strikes on Thursday for all 100 members of the U.S. Gabbard, who would normally conduct such briefings as director of national intelligence, was not scheduled to participate. Trump said last week that she was wrong in suggesting there was no evidence Iran was building a nuclear Senate briefing had been scheduled for Tuesday, but was postponed. Senators are expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval for strikes against Iran, although the measure is not expected to be the Pentagon news conference, Hegseth described the strikes as "historically successful." His comments came after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday Iran would respond to any future U.S. attack by striking American military bases in the Middle claimed victory after 12 days of war, and promised Iran would not surrender despite Trump's 'HATRED'During the news conference, Hegseth criticised the media, without evidence, for having an anti-Trump bias."It's in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad," Hegseth said."There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that ... because of the hatred of this press corps, are undermined," he praised Hegseth's news conference as: "One of the greatest, most professional, and most 'confirming' news conferences I have ever seen!"advertisementOn X, Hegseth thanked Trump for his the press conference, Caine, the top U.S. general, largely stuck to technical details, outlining the history of the bunker-busting bombs used. Caine showed a video testing the bombs on a bunker like the ones struck on declined to provide his own assessment of the strike and deferred to the intelligence community. He denied being under any pressure to change his assessment to present a more optimistic view of the U.S. also said he would not change his assessment due to politics. Uniformed military officials are supposed to remain apolitical and provide their best military advice."I've never been pressured by the president or the secretary to do anything other than tell them exactly what I'm thinking, and that's exactly what I've done," he said.- EndsMust Watch

They should be prosecuted: Trump claims Democrats leaked US Intel on Iran
They should be prosecuted: Trump claims Democrats leaked US Intel on Iran

India Today

timean hour ago

  • India Today

They should be prosecuted: Trump claims Democrats leaked US Intel on Iran

US President Donald Trump on Thursday accused Democrats of leaking classified intelligence about US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, calling for those responsible to be prosecuted, despite no public evidence supporting the a post on Truth Social, Trump wrote: 'The Democrats are the ones who leaked the information on the PERFECT FLIGHT to the Nuclear Sites in Iran. They should be prosecuted!'advertisementThe accusation follows the leak of a Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment earlier this week, which suggested that Iran's nuclear program had only been delayed by a few months, contradicting Trump's public claims of a complete destruction. The document was drafted shortly after the US strikes and leaked to the media on Tuesday. The FBI is investigating the source of the leak. But as of now, no officials have identified a specific individual or provided clear evidence pointing to a political party. Trump's fights with the intelligence community were a running theme of his first term as he raged against an investigation into his campaign's alleged links to a sequel is playing out as Trump battles to shape the public's understanding of his foreign policy gamble in Iran, the Associated Press dispute is unlikely to fade anytime soon. Top administration officials are pressing Trump's case, with Hegseth scolding the media at a Pentagon briefing Thursday for 'breathlessly' focusing on an intelligence report he downplayed as preliminary. Briefings are also scheduled for lawmakers, though the White House plans to limit the sharing of classified information after the initial assessment leaked this White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'It could have been someone in the intelligence community, or it could have been someone on Capitol Hill who had access to this document'. 'We don't know — but I believe the FBI is investigating to find out who that leaker was, because it's illegal and they should be held accountable,' Leavitt neither Trump nor the White House has offered concrete proof that Democrats were behind the asked about Iran supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's defiant message, the White House brushed off the comments. 'When you have a totalitarian regime, you have to save face,' Leavitt said. 'Any commonsense, open-minded person knows the truth about the precision strikes on Saturday night. They were wildly successful.'- EndsTune InMust Watch

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store