
Trump administration demands $1B from University of California-Los Angeles
The proposal outlines a pitch to transform UCLA's hiring practices and campus climate, plus its athletics and medical programs. It would require the university to designate a senior administrator responsible for reviewing UCLA's policies and programs for diversity, equity and inclusion. That would include hiring practices, campus expression and anti-discrimination policies.
'As a public university, we are stewards of taxpayer resources and a payment of this scale would completely devastate our country's greatest public university system as well as inflict great harm on our students and all Californians,' said James Milliken, who recently took over as president of the University of California system, in a statement that acknowledged the university had received the $1 billion settlement proposal from the Justice Department on Friday.
The outlines of the proposed settlement were first reported by CNN.
The settlement demand stems from tumultuous, sometimes violent demonstrations and protests against Israel's war against Hamas that consumed the campus. The administration alleges that university officials did not protect Jewish students and faculty from discrimination by pro-Palestinian protesters.
The proposed agreement suggests strict limits on campus protests, including prohibitions on overnight demonstrations and requirements that mask-wearing demonstrators remove their face coverings and present identification to campus personnel upon request.
It also demands the university scrap scholarships that are based on race or ethnicity, and eliminate faculty programs that provide incentives for hiring candidates based on race, gender or ethnicity. And in provisions similar to those reached in recent settlements with Columbia University and Brown University in July, the Trump administration is demanding UCLA halt the use of proxies for race in their admissions process — and provide access to admissions and hiring data, including test scores, grade point averages and the race of applicants.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Vance Tries to Convince Americans That Trump Wants ‘Full Transparency' in Epstein Case
If you believe J.D. Vance, Donald Trump wants 'full transparency' when it comes to the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking case. Of course, if that were true, we'd know what the Epstein files say about the president and others who were close with the billionaire who trafficked underage girls. Instead, the administration — through Vance — is trying to distract Americans from focusing on Trump's relationship with Epstein and is instead pointing the finger at 'left-wing politicians and left-wing billionaires.' 'We know that Jeffrey Epstein had a lot connections with left-wing politicians and left-wing billionaires,' Vance said in an interview with Maria Bartiromo that aired Sunday on Fox News, 'and now President Trump has demanded full transparency from this, and yet somehow the Democrats are attacking him and not the Biden administration which did nothing for four years.' Far from demanding 'full transparency,' Trump and his administration have evaded calls to release the contents of the files. Although Attorney General Pam Bondi claimed that Epstein's infamous client list was 'sitting on my desk right now to review' in February of this year, last month, the DOJ released a memo stating that after an 'exhaustive review,' officials decided there was no evidence of an 'incriminating 'client list.'' Hence, the administration's PR policy of distract and deflect. 'Democrat billionaires and Democrat political leaders went to Epstein island all the time,' Vance accused on Fox News. 'Who knows what they did.' It's true that Epstein had ties to former president Bill Clinton and billionaire Bill Gates as well as former British prime minister Tony Blair and Prince Andrew. In 2019, after Epstein was arrested and indicted for sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors, Clinton said through a press secretary that he 'knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which he has recently [been] charged in New York.' One Epstein victim testified that, according to Epstein, Clinton liked 'young… girls.' '[Epstein] said one time that Clinton likes them young, referring to girls,' Johanna Sjoberg testified in a 2016 deposition. But there are no records of Clinton going to Epstein's private island, despite Trump's recent allegation that the former president visited the island '28 times.' Of course, one way to clear all this up would be for Trump's administration to release the contents of the Epstein files with victims' identification redacted. But the president might not want to do that, considering his own once close relationship with Epstein and reports that he is named multiple times in the files. In recorded conversations with author Michael Wolff, Epstein once called himself 'Donald's closest friend for 10 years.' Trump also described himself and Epstein as friendly. 'I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He's a lot of fun to be with,' Trump told New York Magazine in 2002. 'It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.' Maria Farmer, a former Epstein employee, even said she warned law enforcement in 1996 and 2006 about Trump and Epstein's relationship. But by 2019 — after Epstein was arrested by the FBI — Trump claimed, 'I was not a fan of his, that I can tell you,' and said they had not been friends for 15 years. Americans thus far are mostly not fooled by the Trump administration's ham-handed attempts to distract them from the issue. A recent UMass Amherst poll revealed that 70 percent of respondents believe Trump is not handling the Epstein case well, and 63 percent said that the Trump administration 'is hiding important information' about the case. More from Rolling Stone Pritzker: Trump Is 'Cheating Americans Out of Their Votes' With Gerrymandering Plans Trump Declares War on Unhoused D.C. Residents: 'No MR. NICE GUY' Six Ways Trump Is Screwing Solar Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Europe pushes for Ukraine role in Trump-Putin talks
European leaders on Sunday pushed for Ukraine to be a part of the negotiations between the United States and Russia, ahead of talks between presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. The two leaders will meet in the US state of Alaska Friday to try to resolve the three-year war, but Europe has insisted that Kyiv and European powers should be part of any deal to end the conflict. EU foreign ministers will discuss the next steps before the talks in a meeting by video link on Monday, joined by their Ukrainian counterpart. The idea of a US-Russia meeting without Zelensky has raised concerns that a deal would require Kyiv to cede swathes of territory, which the EU has rejected. "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine," leaders from France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Britain and Finland and EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said in a joint statement, urging Trump to put more pressure on Russia. In a flurry of diplomacy, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky held calls with 13 counterparts over three days including Kyiv's main backers Germany, Britain and France. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Sunday he hoped and assumed that Zelensky would attend the leaders' summit. Leaders of the Nordic and Baltic countries -- Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden -- also said no decisions should be taken without Kyiv's involvement. Talks on ending the war could only take place during a ceasefire, they added in a joint statement. - 'Testing Putin' - Top EU diplomat Kaja Kallas said any deal between the United States and Russia to end the war in Ukraine had to include Kyiv and the bloc. "President Trump is right that Russia has to end its war against Ukraine," Kallas said in a statement Sunday. "The US has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously. Any deal between the US and Russia must have Ukraine and the EU included, for it is a matter of Ukraine's and the whole of Europe's security," she added. "I will convene an extraordinary meeting of the EU foreign ministers on Monday to discuss our next steps." Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga will also take part in the Monday afternoon meeting, the ministry said. NATO head Mark Rutte told ABC's This Week broadcast on Sunday that Trump was "putting pressure on Putin". "Next Friday will be important because it will be about testing Putin, how serious he is on bringing this terrible war to an end," he added. Ukraine's military said on Sunday it had taken back a village in the Sumy region from the Russian army which has made significant recent gains. The village is on the frontline in the north of the country and about 20 kilometres (13 miles) west of the main fighting between the two armies in the northern region. - A 'just peace' - As a prerequisite to any peace settlement, Moscow has demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of the regions and commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Kyiv said it would never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged that getting land captured by Russia back would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield. The EU's Kallas backed Kyiv's position on Sunday. "As we work towards a sustainable and just peace, international law is clear: All temporarily occupied territories belong to Ukraine," the EU foreign policy chief said. NATO's Rutte said it was a reality that "Russia is controlling some of Ukrainian territory" and suggested a future deal could acknowledge this. "When it comes to acknowledging, for example, maybe in a future deal, that Russia is controlling, de facto, factually, some of the territory of Ukraine. It has to be effectual recognition and not a political de jure recognition," Rutte told ABC's This Week. Zelensky thanked those countries backing Ukraine's position in his Sunday evening address. "The war must be ended as soon as possible with a fair peace," he said. "A fair peace is needed. "Clear support for the fact that everything concerning Ukraine must be decided with Ukraine's participation. Just as it should be with every other independent state." burs-jj/sbk
Yahoo
a few seconds ago
- Yahoo
Trump on Pelosi's Investments: 'INSIDE INFORMATION,' 'Is Anybody Looking Into This?'
President Donald Trump has leveled allegations against Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and her husband Paul Pelosi, accusing them of leveraging insider information for stock market profits. What Happened: Trump took to his Truth Social platform on Saturday to voice his criticism of the Pelosis' stock market activities. He referred to Nancy Pelosi as a 'disgusting degenerate' and hinted that the couple's stock market success was a result of insider information. 'Crooked Nancy Pelosi, and her very 'interesting' husband, beat every Hedge Fund in 2024. In other words, these two very average 'minds' beat ALL of the Super Geniuses on Wall Street, thousands of them. It's all INSIDE INFORMATION! Is anybody looking into this???' Trump wrote. Trump's remarks follow Pelosi's recent backing of Senator Josh Hawley's (R-MO) bill, now dubbed the HONEST Act. The proposed law seeks to ban members of Congress, the president, and the vice president from trading stocks. Also Read: Marjorie Taylor Greene's Palantir Bet Has Skyrocketed 142% Since She Bought It Pelosi, who has often been under fire for her profitable stock portfolio, expressed that 'the American people deserve confidence that their elected leaders are serving the public interest — not their personal portfolios.' Just last week, Pelosi dismissed any allegations regarding her stock trading as 'ridiculous' during an interview on CNN's The Lead. Why It Matters: The allegations by Trump add fuel to the ongoing debate about the involvement of political figures in stock trading. The endorsement of the HONEST Act by Pelosi, who herself has been a subject of criticism for her stock market gains, signifies a shift in the stance of political leaders towards stricter regulations. However, the dismissal of the allegations by Pelosi indicates the complexity and sensitivity of the issue. As the debate continues, the outcome could have significant implications for the intersection of politics and finance. Read Next Nancy Pelosi's Portfolio Crushed Wall Street Hedge Funds With Jaw-Dropping Returns Last Year Image: Shutterstock/Alexandros Michailidis UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Trump on Pelosi's Investments: 'INSIDE INFORMATION,' 'Is Anybody Looking Into This?' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data