Auburn's Bruce Pearl needles Obama over statement on Gaza
Obama suggested aid must flow to Palestinians regardless of whether Israel can secure a hostage deal.
Pearl, who is the chair of the U.S. Israel Education Association, criticized the former president on Monday for failing to demand that Hamas return the hostages it has held since the Oct. 7, 2023 terror attacks.
"You gave billions to Iran and Hamas creating this mess and not one word from you calling for THEM to release the hostages, surrender and end the War! Tell Hamas to 1) Quit stealing and reselling aid 2) Stop attacking GHF workers who are feeding Gazans. 3) Leave and end suffering," Pearl wrote on X.
Obama made the statement on social media on Sunday in reference to reporting from the New York Times stating that "Gazans are dying of starvation." Israel, which blocked aid to Gaza earlier this year, has recently begun to airdrop aid resources into the region, and its leaders argue reports of starvation are a false campaign promoted by Hamas.
Reporting from Fox News' Trey Yingst has indicated that hunger is indeed spreading across the region, however.
"While a lasting resolution to the crisis in Gaza must involve a return of all hostages and a cessation of Israel's military operations, these articles underscore the immediate need for action to be taken to prevent the travesty of innocent people dying of preventable starvation," Obama wrote on X, providing a link to the Times.
"Aid must be permitted to reach people in Gaza. There is no justification for keeping food and water away from civilian families," he added.
President Donald Trump touted U.S. efforts to provide aid to Gaza when asked about the situation on Sunday. While meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at the time, he stated that Europe has not provided aid to Gaza. He also said that Hamas is stealing much of the aid being sent to Palestinians, a claim Israel has put forward repeatedly.
"When I see the children and when I see, especially over the last couple of weeks people are stealing the food, they're stealing the money, they're stealing the money for the food. They're stealing weapons, they're stealing everything," Trump told reporters.
"It's a mess, that whole place is a mess. The Gaza Strip, you know it was given many years ago so they could have peace. That didn't work out too well," he added.
Pearl, who is Jewish, has been more outspoken against Hamas terrorists and the ongoing conflict in the Middle East since the terror attacks.
He explained on the "Being Jewish Podcast" in June about why he speaks out.
"Here's the deal. One of the reasons why I do it, it's really simple. What is your Middle Eastern studies course teaching you in high school? Oh, you don't have one? Oh, so then let's go on social media and let's read the lies and the propaganda," Pearl explained.
"In the back of their minds it's, 'Maybe they are right. Maybe the Jews did steal the land. Maybe they did run them out of their home. I don't know.' Well, that's because you've never been taught. So you're listening to the loudest voices, [which is] a very, very loud minority."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Freed hostage Emily Damari accuses Starmer of being on wrong side of history
A British-Israeli woman who was held hostage by Hamas for more than a year has said Sir Keir Starmer is 'not standing on the right side of history' after his pledge to recognise a Palestinian state. Emily Damari accused the Prime Minister of 'moral failure' over the move. Sir Keir announced on Tuesday that the UK could take the step of recognising statehood in September, ahead of a major UN gathering. The UK will refrain from doing so only if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months. The move has been criticised by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who claimed it 'rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism'. Ms Damari, who was released from Hamas captivity in January, said in a post on Instagram on Wednesday: 'Prime Minister Starmer is not standing on the right side of history. Had he been in power during World War II, would he have advocated recognition for Nazi control of occupied countries like Holland, France or Poland? 'This is not diplomacy — it is a moral failure. Shame on you, Prime Minister. 'As a dual British-Israeli citizen who survived 471 days in Hamas captivity, I am deeply saddened by Prime Minister Starmer's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood. This move does not advance peace — it risks rewarding terror. It sends a dangerous message: that violence earns legitimacy. 'By legitimising a state entity while Hamas still controls Gaza and continues its campaign of terror, the Prime Minister is not promoting a solution; he is prolonging the conflict. Recognition under these conditions emboldens extremists and undermines any hope for genuine peace. Shame on you!!!' In a statement from Downing Street on Tuesday after an urgent Cabinet meeting on Gaza, Sir Keir said the UK's 'message to the terrorists of Hamas is unchanged but unequivocal: they must immediately release all of the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm, and accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza'.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Voices: Will Keir Starmer's decision to recognise Palestine shore up his waning popularity?
Keir Starmer's decision that the UK will recognise Palestinian statehood is a bold move. The prime minister must often feel he can't win; some of the 130 Labour backbenchers clamouring for recognition are unhappy he has set conditions for Israel's actions, which implies he might not go ahead with the move. Sarah Champion, chair of the international development select committee, is 'troubled' by the conditions. Predictably, the Conservatives and Reform UK are sniping from the sidelines. They complain Starmer is playing "gesture politics", saying his initiative is all about party management as he again caves in to his own MPs. But it is the opposition parties who are playing silly political games. Starmer has a proven track record of opposing gesture politics, preferring a lawyerly, sometimes painstaking approach of looking at a problem from all sides before declaring a plan to resolve it. In the national interest, rival parties and restive Labour MPs should now get behind Starmer's serious attempt to bring peace to the Middle East by reviving a two-state solution on life support. It might not work. Benjamin Netanyahu and Hamas want different one-state solutions – without the existence of Palestine and Israel, respectively. But Starmer's plan is worth a try. It might spur Donald Trump into putting more pressure on Israel, as Starmer did successfully on Gaza when they met in Scotland on Monday. It is hard to imagine the US president, who boasted at Turnberry he had already stopped "six wars" and wants to win the Nobel peace prize, getting behind a Starmer or European blueprint agreed by the UK, France and Germany. The latter does not recognise Palestine yet, but other nations, including Canada and Australia, may change their policy to back the French president Emmanuel Macron's move at the UN General Assembly in September. Critics complain that Starmer did not impose any specific conditions on Hamas, only Israel. But his allies insist all the remaining Israeli hostages must be released, and that Hamas could not be involved in any talks on a two-state solution. However, the absence of a plan to transition away from Hamas rule in Gaza will have to be addressed. The PM always said he would play the Palestinian card at a time of maximum benefit; it was a question of "when, not if." The humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza made it a case of "if not now, when?" Starmer allies tell me he has been working on his plan for months. Arguably, he could have moved earlier. A third of the cabinet were pressing him to, including David Lammy, the foreign secretary. Senior UK diplomats are privately frustrated by Starmer's approach: 'He is too cautious,' one told me. Sometimes, Starmer's closest allies have viewed the Middle East as part of his battle against the "pro-Palestinian left" symbolised by Jeremy Corbyn. That might have been the right approach in the aftermath of the horrific 7 October attacks, but not now; Israel's unspeakable actions in Gaza have changed everything. The PM was also becoming out of step with public opinion. According to YouGov, 45 per cent of people say the government should recognise Palestine as an independent state, while only 14 per cent disagree, with 41 per cent undecided. The figures mask big differences: about two-thirds of Labour, Green and Liberal Democrat supporters back recognition, but only 32 per cent of Tory and 15 per cent of Reform voters do. The strongest support for a Palestinian state is among 18- to 24-year-olds, at 61 per cent. The issue poses a real threat to Labour's prospects at the next general election. As well as adding to the four seats won by 'Gaza independents' last year, candidates running for Corbyn's new socialist party on a pro-Palestinian ticket could split the left-of-centre vote and allow Reform or the Tories to win marginal seats from Labour. In theory, Starmer's move should limit the electoral damage to his party, but some Labour MPs worry privately that it might have already been done. The Corbyn party will not give the PM an ounce of credit; it suits them to portray him – wrongly – as an Israeli stooge who is complicit in the suffering in Gaza. The lesson for Starmer: he cannot continually be behind the curve of the mainstream of his party. He was in that position on the winter fuel allowance, disability benefit cuts and Palestine, and so had to change his policy on all three. It made him look weak; such perceptions are very difficult to shift once they take hold in the public's mind. The vacuum where there should be a narrative about where Starmer wants to take the country has been filled by the image of a PM who looks like he is being pushed around by his party. Any leader needs to take their party with them. True, they and their troops won't always agree. But a leader cannot perpetually define themselves against their own party, and Starmer is in danger of running out of road with his MPs. He will need to work with them if he is to mount a political recovery. Solve the daily Crossword
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
‘Worst-case scenario of famine' is unfolding in Gaza, UN-backed food security initiative says
A UN-backed food security agency has warned that 'the worst case scenario of famine' is unfolding in Gaza, its starkest alert yet as starvation spreads and Israel faces growing international pressure to allow more food into the territory. 'Conflict and displacement have intensified, and access to food and other essential items and services has plummeted to unprecedented levels,' the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) said in an alert, adding that 'mounting evidence shows that widespread starvation, malnutrition, and disease are driving a rise in hunger-related deaths.' The IPC said that the alert is intended to 'draw urgent attention to the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian situation' but doesn't constitute a formal classification of famine. 'Given the most recent information and data made available, a new IPC analysis is to be conducted without delay,' it added. More than 20,000 children were admitted for treatment for acute malnutrition between April and mid-July, the IPC said, with more than 3,000 severely malnourished. 'Latest data indicates that famine thresholds have been reached for food consumption in most of the Gaza Strip and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City,' the alert said, calling for 'immediate action' to end the hostilities and allow for 'unimpeded, large-scale, life-saving humanitarian response.' In May, the IPC reported that the enclave's entire population was experiencing 'high levels of acute food security' and the territory was at 'high risk' of famine, the most severe type of hunger crisis. Israel has come under mounting pressure by the international community to break its blockade, allow aid into Gaza and end the war. In some of his strongest remarks on the crisis, US President Donald Trump on Monday said there is 'real starvation' in Gaza, contradicting earlier statements by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who insists there is no starvation. President Donald Trump contradicted Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's assessment on starvation in Gaza and announced a plan for new "food centers" in the enclave. CNN's Nic Robertson reports from Jerusalem. 'That's real starvation stuff,' Trump told reporters in Turnberry, Scotland. 'I see it, and you can't fake that. So, we're going to be even more involved.' Trump added that the United States will set up 'food centers' in Gaza to address the crisis. Vice President JD Vance also lamented images coming out of the besieged territory. 'I don't know if you've all seen these images. You have got some really, really heartbreaking cases. You've got little kids who are clearly starving to death,' Vance told reporters Monday during a visit to Canton, Ohio. 'Israel's got to do more to let that aid in,' he said, adding that 'we've also got to wage war on Hamas so that those folks stop preventing food from coming into this territory.' Over the weekend, Israel announced a daily 'tactical pause in military activity' in three areas of Gaza to enable more aid to reach people. The military said the move would 'refute the false claim of deliberate starvation in the Gaza Strip.' Israel has also allowed foreign countries to airdrop aid into the territory, but the practice has in the past been deemed by the UN and other aid groups as costly, dangerous and insufficient. Meanwhile, the health ministry in Gaza said on Tuesday that more than 60,000 Palestinians have been killed in the territory since Israel's war on Hamas began nearly two years ago. The ministry reported that 113 people were killed in the past 24 hours, bringing the death toll to 60,034. The announcement comes as hopes dim for a ceasefire anytime soon, after talks broke up last week without an agreement. The war began after Hamas' October 7, 2023 attack on Israel killed around 1,200 people and saw another roughly 250 people taken hostage. Authorities in Gaza do not distinguish between civilians and Hamas fighters when reporting casualty figures, but the health ministry and the UN say the majority of deaths are women and children. And the true toll could be much higher, with many thousands still believed to be buried under rubble. Israel does not dispute that a significant number of Palestinian civilians have been killed in its war in Gaza. But it has long argued that figures from the Hamas-controlled health ministry are exaggerated, and that Hamas embeds itself between civilians, using them as 'human shields.' On Monday, a pair of leading Israeli human rights groups accused Israel of 'committing genocide against Palestinians in Gaza,' becoming the first such organizations to make the claim. B'Tselem said it came to that 'unequivocal conclusion' after an 'examination of Israel's policy in the Gaza Strip and its horrific outcomes, together with statements by senior Israeli politicians and military commanders about the goals of the attack.' A second Israeli group, Physicians for Human Rights Israel (PHRI), announced it was joining B'Tselem in calling Israel's actions in Gaza genocide. It published a separate legal and medical analysis documenting what it called 'deliberate and systematic extermination of the health system in Gaza.' Israeli government spokesman David Mencer dismissed the report. 'We have free speech in this country but we strongly reject this claim,' he told reporters, adding that Israel has allowed aid into Gaza. CNN's Eyad Kourdi, DJ Judd and Ivana Kottasová contributed reporting.
