logo
Upper house pushing Labor on 'secret' gambling ads plan

Upper house pushing Labor on 'secret' gambling ads plan

Yahoo5 days ago
The federal government is about to be forced to release a draft response to a landmark gambling reform report, which has been left untouched for more than two years.
Communications Minister Anika Wells, who picked up the portfolio after Labor's May 3 election win, has flagged upcoming changes to gambling advertising.
Her first meeting outside of department briefings was with Rod Glover, the husband of late Labor MP Peta Murphy, who championed a ban on gambling ads.
A draft response by the communications department to the "you win some, you lose more" report handed down by a bipartisan parliamentary committee was prepared for the previous minister in November 2024.
But the department refused to release the 32-page document under freedom of information laws.
The Murphy report's key recommendation was to phase out gambling advertising on television and online, which received unanimous support from Labor, coalition and crossbench MPs on the committee.
Labor's draft policy, which was never formally released but briefed to stakeholders in mid-2024, included banning betting ads during, before and after live sports broadcasts and limiting them to two an hour outside of that parameter.
Independent senator David Pocock is pushing to have the draft recommendations and ministerial briefings released under a Senate order for the production of documents, after freedom of information requests were similarly rejected.
The Liberals and the Greens have given their support, meaning his order is set to pass the Senate on Wednesday, giving Labor until the end of the month to comply or explain why they will continue to keep the documents secret.
A third order requests correspondence between the prime minister and gambling sector representatives and lobbying efforts from sporting codes after he intervened to shelve any action before the election.
Labor's inaction was "one of the biggest failures of the last parliament and a wrong I hope we can right this time", Senator Pocock told AAP.
Reform advocates are keen to find a middle ground, arguing the longer the status quo goes on, the more people are being hurt as there are few restrictions on gambling advertising.
While stakeholders are pushing for a blanket ban, there is an openness to compromise on restricting when betting ads can be broadcast on live TV.
They're also pushing hard for a complete advertising ban on social media and on inducements, which is when gambling companies entice people to bet more by offering incentives such as bonus bets.
But the gambling lobby is strongly against a blanket social media ban, instead saying technology could be used to avoid targeting children.
The sector is similarly opposed to stopping inducements.
There is a willingness to discuss stopping broad inducement advertising, but gambling companies want to retain the right to push advertising to people signed up to their platforms.
The Murphy review recommended that the government immediately prohibit online gambling inducements and their advertising.
Commercial broadcasters and sports codes argued they needed advertising revenue to stay viable, while gambling companies warned a blanket ban would push Australians into using illegal overseas wagering sites.
The AFL and NRL receive tens of millions of dollars a year as a cut from gambling agencies.
Some advocates are hopeful there will be an announcement on the next steps before the end of the year, with the federal government yet to respond to the landmark report 25 months after it was handed down.
National Gambling Helpline 1800 858 858
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Several Insiders Invested In Firetail Resources Flagging Positive News
Several Insiders Invested In Firetail Resources Flagging Positive News

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Several Insiders Invested In Firetail Resources Flagging Positive News

Generally, when a single insider buys stock, it is usually not a big deal. However, when several insiders are buying, like in the case of Firetail Resources Limited (ASX:FTL), it sends a favourable message to the company's shareholders. Although we don't think shareholders should simply follow insider transactions, we would consider it foolish to ignore insider transactions altogether. We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. Firetail Resources Insider Transactions Over The Last Year The insider Brett Grosvenor made the biggest insider purchase in the last 12 months. That single transaction was for AU$80k worth of shares at a price of AU$0.04 each. We do like to see buying, but this purchase was made at well below the current price of AU$0.092. Because it occurred at a lower valuation, it doesn't tell us much about whether insiders might find today's price attractive. While Firetail Resources insiders bought shares during the last year, they didn't sell. They paid about AU$0.048 on average. It is certainly positive to see that insiders have invested their own money in the company. However, you should keep in mind that they bought when the share price was meaningfully below today's levels. The chart below shows insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year. If you want to know exactly who sold, for how much, and when, simply click on the graph below! Check out our latest analysis for Firetail Resources Firetail Resources is not the only stock insiders are buying. So take a peek at this free list of under-the-radar companies with insider buying. Insider Ownership Another way to test the alignment between the leaders of a company and other shareholders is to look at how many shares they own. A high insider ownership often makes company leadership more mindful of shareholder interests. From our data, it seems that Firetail Resources insiders own 8.4% of the company, worth about AU$2.9m. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. Overall, this level of ownership isn't that impressive, but it's certainly better than nothing! So What Does This Data Suggest About Firetail Resources Insiders? It doesn't really mean much that no insider has traded Firetail Resources shares in the last quarter. However, our analysis of transactions over the last year is heartening. We'd like to see bigger individual holdings. However, we don't see anything to make us think Firetail Resources insiders are doubting the company. So these insider transactions can help us build a thesis about the stock, but it's also worthwhile knowing the risks facing this company. For example, Firetail Resources has 4 warning signs (and 2 which are a bit unpleasant) we think you should know about. If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Australia Signs Defense Pact With UK
Australia Signs Defense Pact With UK

Bloomberg

time17 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Australia Signs Defense Pact With UK

Happy Monday, it's Carmeli in Sydney here to bring you all the latest news to start your week. Today's must-reads: • Australia and the UK sign submarine pact • Australia strengthens India trade • EU wins lowered 15% tariff rate from US Australia and the UK signed a landmark 50-year defense treaty on Saturday to underpin the construction of nuclear-powered submarines, senior ministers from both nations said. Both sides stressed that the treaty doesn't impact the Aukus security partnership between Australia, the UK and the US — currently under review by the Trump administration.

'Ramifications' for Demons' leaders after mistake labelled 'worst in AFL history'
'Ramifications' for Demons' leaders after mistake labelled 'worst in AFL history'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

'Ramifications' for Demons' leaders after mistake labelled 'worst in AFL history'

Questions are being asked of the leadership of the Melbourne Demons after they coughed up the biggest three-quarter-time lead in VFL/AFL history on Sunday. Nasiah Wanganeen-Milera was the hero as St Kilda erased a 46-point deficit for a staggering 15.6 (96) to 13.12 (90) victory at Marvel Stadium. The aftermath has been swift and severe for the Demons, with serious questions being asked of their leaders. With the score level at 90-all with eight seconds remaining, Melbourne conceded a 6-6-6 infringement from the restart. What ensued was absolutely diabolical for Simon Goodwin's side, with Wanganeen-Milera given an unchecked run into the 50m circle to take an easy mark to slot the winning goal. The Demons didn't appear to know the rules around the 6-6-6 restart, and a number of players lost their heads on the final passage of play. Jack Viney was standing on the wing marking no-one, when he should have been back behind the ball. Skipper Max Gawn sprinted back without checking any of the St Kilda players, while the Demons' coaching staff didn't appear to be communicating either. Dissecting the final passage of play for on Sunday night, Kane Cornes said it was the "worst 69 seconds in the game's history". Cornes pointed out the Demons were given a whole minute to get their defensive structure in place after the umpire called the 6-6-6 infringement, but still got it horribly wrong. "Look at Jack Viney there, look at Kozzie Pickett (marking nobody)," Cornes said. "They let Wanganeen-Milera mark the ball inside the forward 50 with no-one on him. It's the worst 69 seconds I've ever seen. "You just wonder about Simon Goodwin and what that means for the challenges that he's had with his coaching, and whether they're sitting back wondering 'gee is he the right man?'. Not only after this year but the mistakes that were made in this last quarter. "I saw Simon Goodwin on the interchange bench and he was just standing there. There was no instruction, there was no direction. To me it appeared as though Melbourne were so defeated once they realised they couldn't win that game of footy." "This is the worst 69 seconds in the game's history."Kane unpacks the Saints' incredible fourth-quarter comeback on First Up. — AFL (@AFL) July 27, 2025 David King critical of Melbourne Demons' leaders Speaking on Fox Footy, David King was just as critical of the Demons' leaders. King suggested the Dees players didn't know the rules and where they were allowed to stand on the restart from the 6-6-6 infringement. 'Name me the leaders at Melbourne. They're all there," King said. "They've got (Christian) Petracca, Gawn, you've got (Christian) Salem behind the footy, (Tom) McDonald. They're everywhere there. They should have understood this situation. 'They should have understood the 6-6-6. Instead of getting confused here … why is Max back in the middle? I just spoke with (ex-AFL umpire) Ray Chamberlain, he said there is no rule that says Max has to go back in and reset. He should be the loose man." RELATED: Toby Greene banned over contentious act against Sydney Swans AFL fans shower Joel Selwood with praise as Geelong hero returns King continued: 'What the hell is Viney doing in the middle of the wing when his opponent has gone to the left edge to charge forward? So, as the fourth midfielder comes in no one is communicating. No one knows who's got who. "I don't understand how they've capitulated so poorly in the space of 30 seconds. They haven't assessed the situation. They haven't assessed the likely danger zones and they've allowed Wanganeen-Milera to charge unopposed into that dangerous area through a lack of understanding of what's going to happen and a lack of communication. "This comes back to coaching, I don't care what anyone says. It comes back to learnt habits, learnt skills at training... They should have known these things. This is their profession. It's the dumbest thing I've seen this year." AFL world blown away by Demons' mistakes Reporter Mitch Cleary wrote on social media: "Was 55 seconds from the Demons' 6-6-6 infringement to the Saints actually getting the ball. How on earth has no one on the Dees' bench told Jack Viney to get to the defensive edge of the centre square?! Would've been in the exact hole where NWM marked it." While Daniel Garb suggested it could have 'major ramifications' for some at Melbourne. Was 55 seconds from the Demons' 6-6-6 infringement to the Saints actually getting the ball. How on earth has no one on the Dees' bench told Jack Viney to get to the defensive edge of the centre square?! Would've been in the exact hole where NWM marked it — Mitch Cleary (@cleary_mitch) July 27, 2025 There were about 60 seconds between knowing there'd be a 6-6-6 free kick and the play actually after that not only does no-one track Wanganeen-Milera, Caminiti also floated down from his wing into so much space the Dees just in a haze thinking 'eight… — Ricky Mangidis (@rickm18) July 27, 2025 Oh, Melbourne …. How the hell did that just happen! 0.4 to 9.2 in the last term … not just a 6x6x6 infringement at the end, but leaving NAS loose in the final play! That has to be a brutal, brutal review. — Glenn McFarlane (@MaccaHeraldSun) July 27, 2025 What an insane finish. Nasiah the biggest one man team in the league. And not far off the best ramifications coming at Melbourne you feel. #AFLSaintsDees — Daniel Garb (@DanielGarb) July 27, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store