logo
Long wait for court criticised

Long wait for court criticised

An Oamaru resident says the justice system is "flawed" and "very stressful," after waiting nearly a year for a Family Court hearing — far longer than the legal standard of six weeks.
The North Otago resident, who contacted the Otago Daily Times , lodged an application for a protection order and occupation order with the Oamaru District Court in September 2024. However, a hearing date was not set until late April 2025 — scheduled for August 7 — almost 11 months after the application was filed.
"I believe the system is flawed, and my fundamental right to protection and fair access to justice was ignored," the resident said.
They added that the delay has taken a toll on their wellbeing, and say others in the region have given up on the process entirely or transferred their cases to other courts.
"That wasn't an option for me, as I never had a court date allocated — until nearly a year had passed, which is well outside the six-week timeframe required by law."
Under current New Zealand law, if a protection order application is made "on notice"—meaning the respondent is aware of the application and has the chance to respond — a hearing must be set as soon as practicable, but no later than six weeks after filing.
In the meantime, the resident said they were forced to make two additional "on notice" applications to address their situation, which they described as "very stressful".
While the delays in Oamaru remain a source of frustration for some, the government said progress was being made nationally to address court backlogs and improve timeliness.
Last week, Minister for Courts Nicole McKee said initiatives launched under the District Court Timelines Programme are showing promising results. The programme, established in 2023 and jointly led by the Ministry of Justice and the judiciary, includes a range of measures designed to reduce delays, particularly in criminal cases.
"Delays in the justice system affect everyone, from victims and applicants to their families," Mrs McKee said. "The delays can erode confidence in the system. That's why I'm pleased to say we've turned a corner."
Nationally, criminal court backlogs have dropped by 11%. In the High Court, progress has also been made in probate cases, with 84% now resolved within 15 days—up from just 9% in 2023.
However, Mrs McKee acknowledged that much of the initial focus has been on metropolitan courts — especially in Auckland, where delays have been most severe. The new initiatives were only rolled out to South Island District Courts, including Oamaru, in February 2025 — too recently to assess their impact.
She added that timeline standards for the Family Court are currently being developed and will be finalised soon to improve performance and ensure accountability.
In June 2024, the Chief District Court Judge also introduced the Timely Access to Justice Protocol, which sets a goal of resolving 90% of criminal cases within designated timeframes. Some rural courts, including Waihi, Opotiki and Kaikoura, are already meeting or exceeding this benchmark. Oamaru presently sits just below, at 89%.
Mrs McKee said the improvements will help ease pressure on court resources and ensure people experience faster decisions and greater confidence in our justice system.
jules.chin@oamarumail.co.nz

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Long wait for court criticised
Long wait for court criticised

Otago Daily Times

timea day ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Long wait for court criticised

An Oamaru resident says the justice system is "flawed" and "very stressful," after waiting nearly a year for a Family Court hearing — far longer than the legal standard of six weeks. The North Otago resident, who contacted the Otago Daily Times , lodged an application for a protection order and occupation order with the Oamaru District Court in September 2024. However, a hearing date was not set until late April 2025 — scheduled for August 7 — almost 11 months after the application was filed. "I believe the system is flawed, and my fundamental right to protection and fair access to justice was ignored," the resident said. They added that the delay has taken a toll on their wellbeing, and say others in the region have given up on the process entirely or transferred their cases to other courts. "That wasn't an option for me, as I never had a court date allocated — until nearly a year had passed, which is well outside the six-week timeframe required by law." Under current New Zealand law, if a protection order application is made "on notice"—meaning the respondent is aware of the application and has the chance to respond — a hearing must be set as soon as practicable, but no later than six weeks after filing. In the meantime, the resident said they were forced to make two additional "on notice" applications to address their situation, which they described as "very stressful". While the delays in Oamaru remain a source of frustration for some, the government said progress was being made nationally to address court backlogs and improve timeliness. Last week, Minister for Courts Nicole McKee said initiatives launched under the District Court Timelines Programme are showing promising results. The programme, established in 2023 and jointly led by the Ministry of Justice and the judiciary, includes a range of measures designed to reduce delays, particularly in criminal cases. "Delays in the justice system affect everyone, from victims and applicants to their families," Mrs McKee said. "The delays can erode confidence in the system. That's why I'm pleased to say we've turned a corner." Nationally, criminal court backlogs have dropped by 11%. In the High Court, progress has also been made in probate cases, with 84% now resolved within 15 days—up from just 9% in 2023. However, Mrs McKee acknowledged that much of the initial focus has been on metropolitan courts — especially in Auckland, where delays have been most severe. The new initiatives were only rolled out to South Island District Courts, including Oamaru, in February 2025 — too recently to assess their impact. She added that timeline standards for the Family Court are currently being developed and will be finalised soon to improve performance and ensure accountability. In June 2024, the Chief District Court Judge also introduced the Timely Access to Justice Protocol, which sets a goal of resolving 90% of criminal cases within designated timeframes. Some rural courts, including Waihi, Opotiki and Kaikoura, are already meeting or exceeding this benchmark. Oamaru presently sits just below, at 89%. Mrs McKee said the improvements will help ease pressure on court resources and ensure people experience faster decisions and greater confidence in our justice system.

Exam delayed over cheating allegations
Exam delayed over cheating allegations

Otago Daily Times

time5 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Exam delayed over cheating allegations

The University of Otago was forced to postpone a law exam due to alleged cheating. The Otago Daily Times has been told information was disseminated after a student took the company law exam a day early due to a timetable conflict. A spokeswoman for the university did not comment on the details of the alleged cheating, but confirmed the exam had been postponed and "an investigation is under way into what has occurred". "The law faculty dean made the difficult decision to postpone the exam on Friday. "For the affected students, a new exam will be run on Wednesday for those who can make it, and a second version will be run in the special exam period at the start of semester 2." Company law is a 400-level paper about "what a company incorporated under the Companies Act 1993 is and how it operates", the university's website said. Universities New Zealand chief executive Dr Chris Whelan said all New Zealand universities took cheating or other allegations of academic misconduct very seriously, and all had very vigorous and clear policies on the matter. "At Universities New Zealand, we work with the sector to enable the sharing of information and best practice in the wake of new technologies and other changes and challenges, but how each university implements and responds to incidents is up to them." Otago University's latest academic misconduct report showed there were 55 examples of misconduct last year, of which four related to exams and 51 to internal assessments. This compared with 79 examples in 2023, of which 12 related to exams and 67 to internal assessment.

War explained
War explained

Otago Daily Times

time5 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

War explained

A French doctor tends wounded Algerians at a dressing station at Tanouat during the war in Morocco. — Otago Witness, 4.8.1925 Paris, June 9: A bulletin from Fez reports that contingents of rebel tribesmen were proceeding in the direction of the Tanouat heights, where they were outflanked by the French cavalry and friendly tribesmen and forced to retreat with heavy losses. The French artillery stopped a fresh enemy attack. The Paris correspondent of The Times states regarding the Franco-Spanish Government conversations which are now proceeding that the French hope that an agreement may be reached for a joint blockade of the Moroccan coast. Th correspondent emphasises that, by this means, Abd-el Krim's sources of supply will be effectively cut off, and his military position seriously injured, though there is reason to believe that he is already in possession of a large stock of rifles and ammunition. The situation of the Riff, along the southern shore of the Straits of Gibraltar, with a frontage to the busiest seaway of the world, makes it too important to leave in disputed ownership. If Spain were driven out, France might well be moved to take her place, either by conquest or negotiation. That would never be accepted without protest by Italy, who jealously watches the balance of power in the Mediterranean, while as regards ourselves it would have the effect of reducing Gibraltar from a fortress guarding our communications with the East to a picturesque relic as ineffective as the Tower of London. Trams will cope To the editor: Sir, I have read your article in Monday's issue of the Otago Daily Times and let me assure you that my committee and the management are devoting their attention towards our requirements during the six months' period. It is not always advisable in business negotiations for a public body, especially where it is concerned in competition for rolling stock suitable only for a limited period, to broadcast or divulge its intentions. In company with the manager I interviewed the chairman and manager of the Christchurch tramways to see if we could secure the hire of any Christchurch cars and trailers. May I add, further, that the manager and myself have conferred on several occasions as to securing temporary rolling stock and buses and, for some time past, inquiries have been made through various sources throughout the dominion. Your statement that all our available rolling stock was in operation during Show Week is contrary to fact. Our present rolling stock, for the city system only, consists of 58 cars, three trailers, and two buses. During Show Week only 48 cars, with the trailers and buses, were in use. At the present time we are building, to be completed in time for the Exhibition, three more trailers, four more buses, and another box car will be available, giving a total of 72 cars, trailers and buses, against 53 used during Show Week, and capable of carrying 1250 additional persons. — I am, etc, James S. Douglas, Chairman Tramways Committee NZ women's place At the International Conference of the Council of Women, held in Washington recently, 42 countries were represented. Mrs Fraer, president of the Christchurch branch of the Women's National Council, sat on the committees of the conference dealing with education, suffrage and an equal moral standard for men and women. "They would persist in thinking New Zealand a little Garden of Eden," said Mrs Fraer, "and they would not believe us when we told them that we had no women justices of the peace, no women magistrates, no women jurors, no woman member of Parliament, no women police. 'It is simply not possible,' they said. 'We have always heard that New Zealand is so progressive'." Mrs Fraer came to the conclusion that, apart from those matters, New Zealand had no reason to be ashamed of itself in regard to progress and social conditions. — ODT, 10.6.1925 (Compiled by Peter Dowden)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store