logo
What happened when Mark Zuckerberg moved in next door

What happened when Mark Zuckerberg moved in next door

Time of India16 hours ago
Academy
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
For decades, the Crescent Park neighbourhood of Palo Alto represented the dream of California living.Doctors, lawyers, business executives and Stanford University professors lived in charming homes under oak, redwood and magnolia trees. The houses, an eclectic mix including Craftsman homes and bungalows, were filled with families who became fast friends. The annual block parties heaved with people. Daily life was tranquil, and the soundtrack was one of children laughing as they rode their bicycles and played in one another's gardens.Then Mark Zuckerberg moved in.Since his arrival 14 years ago, Crescent Park's neighbourhood tranquility and even many of its actual neighbours have vanished. Residents hardly ever see the Facebook founder, now worth about $270 billion, but they feel his presence every day.Zuckerberg has used Edgewood Drive and Hamilton Avenue like a Monopoly game board, spending more than $110 million to scoop up at least 11 houses. He has offered owners as much as $14.5 million, double or even triple what the homes are worth, and neighbours have seen one family after another leave.Several of his properties sit empty in a notoriously crunched housing market. He has turned five of them into a compound with a main house for him; his wife, Priscilla Chan; and their three daughters, along with guest homes, lush gardens, a nearby pickleball court and a pool that can be covered with a hydrofloor. A seven-foot statue depicting Chan in a silver, flowing robe that Zuckerberg commissioned last year sits on the property.The compound is encircled by a high row of hedges, and there is no such thing as knocking on the front door to borrow a cup of sugar. One of the unoccupied buildings is used for entertainment and as a staging ground for outdoor parties.Another property has been used for the past few years as a private school for 14 children, even though that is not an allowable use of a house in the neighbourhood under city code. Six adults, including four teachers, worked there this past school year.Underneath the compound, Zuckerberg has added 7,000 square feet of space -- cavernous areas that his building permits refer to as basements, but that his neighbours call bunkers or even a billionaire's bat cave. The work has led to eight years of construction, filling the streets with massive equipment and a lot of noise.Zuckerberg has also brought intense levels of surveillance to the neighbourhood, including cameras positioned at his homes with views of his neighbours' property. He has a team of private security guards who sit in cars, filming some visitors and asking others what they are doing as they walk on public sidewalks.Aaron McLear, a spokesperson for Zuckerberg and Chan, said the couple tried hard to do right by their neighbours. Meta requires heavy security for its chief executive, he said, because of specific, credible threats. Cameras are not trained at neighbours, and they adjust them when asked, he said.The family's staff provides neighbours with notice of potentially disruptive events and gives them a contact's phone number to report problems, he said. Staff members are reimbursed for ride shares to encourage them not to park their own cars in the neighbourhood."Mark, Priscilla and their children have made Palo Alto their home for more than a decade," McLear said. "They value being members of the community and have taken a number of steps above and beyond any local requirements to avoid disruption in the neighbourhood."Zuckerberg's expansion in Crescent Park was revealed through interviews with nine neighbours, seven of whom would not speak publicly for fear of retribution, as well as a review of building permits, affidavits, certificates of formation of limited liability companies, home deeds, recordings of local commission meetings, and emails between neighbours and city officials.Zuckerberg has laid claim to the neighbourhood as tech billionaires have made headlines for increasingly brazen shows of their wealth. Jeff Bezos launched his fiancee, Lauren Sánchez, and other women into space on a Blue Origin flight before taking over Venice, Italy, for the couple's wedding. Elon Musk has created a compound in Texas for his numerous children and their mothers, and Marc Benioff has been buying up a wide swath of the Big Island of Hawaii.But few know firsthand the decade-long disruption, noise, surveillance and uncertainty one extremely rich person can create better than the neighbours in Crescent Park."No neighbourhood wants to be occupied," said Michael Kieschnick, whose home on Hamilton Avenue is bound on three sides by property owned by Zuckerberg. "But that's exactly what they've done. They've occupied our neighbourhood."Kieschnick and some of his neighbours are angry with Zuckerberg for taking over Crescent Park rather than building a compound in a nearby town with far more space, as other tech titans have done. Atherton, Los Altos Hills, Portola Valley and Woodside are known for large, gated estates for wealthy people seeking space and privacy.But they are also angry with the city of Palo Alto. In 2016, a key city board rejected Zuckerberg's application to build a compound, and he withdrew it. But the city then allowed him to create it anyway, just more slowly and piecemeal. The city has been told by neighbours for years that Zuckerberg is operating a private school in a house but has done little to address it.Just the other day, the Police Department provided signs to affix to trees, creating a long tow-away zone on the public road, blocking neighbours from parking their own cars there for five hours on a Wednesday evening. The reason, Kieschnick said he learned, was that Zuckerberg was hosting a backyard barbecue and the police had assigned its officer in charge of dignitaries to assist him.To the neighbours, it feels as if city officials and police officers give extreme deference to Zuckerberg at the expense of everybody else."Billionaires everywhere are used to just making their own rules -- Zuckerberg and Chan are not unique, except that they're our neighbours," Kieschnick said. "But it's a mystery why the city has been so feckless."Kieschnick is a co-founder of a cellular phone company and now works as a green energy advocate. His phone company founded a political action committee to support candidates who fight climate change.He said that Zuckerberg, through his staff, had offered to buy his house. But he said he loved his home of more than 30 years and was daunted by the thought of moving.So far, his answer has been no.Zuckerberg has been on a big real estate buying and selling spree. In 2022, he sold his seven-bedroom home near Dolores Park in San Francisco for $31 million after creating a similar disruption with construction in that neighbourhood.He owns 2,300 acres on the Hawaiian island of Kauai, where he is building a compound with two mansions, tree houses connected by rope bridges and an underground shelter. He is building a third compound on the shores of Lake Tahoe and this year paid $23 million in cash for a 15,000-square-foot mansion in Washington, D.C.But his home base has long been Palo Alto. His entry into Crescent Park began in 2011 when he purchased a 5,600-square-foot home on Edgewood Drive. The local heritage society says the house is the oldest one in Palo Alto. It sits just 3 miles from Meta headquarters at 1 Hacker Way in Menlo Park.At first, neighbours mostly shrugged. In Palo Alto, heavyweights in the tech industry have long been part of the landscape. Hewlett-Packard was founded in a garage about a mile away, and the seeds of Google sprouted nearby at Stanford. Steve Jobs, the founder of Apple, lived a quiet life in Palo Alto.But neighbours grew concerned when Zuckerberg started purchasing more property. In 2012 and 2013, he spent more than $40 million buying four more houses that form an L-shape around his first one.He resumed his spending spree in 2022, buying six more homes, including four in the past 15 months. The purchases fly under the radar because they are made with limited liability companies, each time with a different nature-themed name, such as Pine Burrow or Seed Breeze. Zuckerberg usually requires sellers to sign nondisclosure agreements, neighbours who are friendly with the sellers said.His appetite for more Crescent Park property is so well known that in the three most recent home sales, the owners approached him offering to sell, his spokesperson said. Some of the homes are empty and need repairs, while others are housing extended family members of Zuckerberg and Chan.In 2016, Zuckerberg asked Palo Alto for permission to demolish the four homes that border his main family house and rebuild them much smaller with big basements. City officials had approved it, but because it involved construction on three or more properties at once, the municipal code required that the project go before the Palo Alto Architectural Review Board Peter Baltay, a Palo Alto architect who was then a member of the review board, said he found the proposal odd, so he went to the site to see it in person before casting a vote. He said a security guard approached him and asked what he was doing."I said, 'I'm standing on the sidewalk looking at this project for review.' He said, 'Well, we'd appreciate it if you could move on,'" Baltay recalled. "I was pretty shocked by that. It's a public sidewalk!"Zuckerberg did not attend the meeting, but an architect, a builder and an arborist he had hired tried to convince the board that they were not removing single-family housing stock. The board did not buy it.Baltay during the meeting said he found it "a real shame" that four beautiful homes were being demolished so a wealthy person could have a giant estate complete with a movie theater in the middle of an already established neighbourhood.The board quashed the plan back then, but Zuckerberg moved ahead with it anyway -- just more slowly, one or two homes at a time, avoiding going back before the review board.The city has approved 56 permits for Zuckerberg's properties, its online permit search system shows.He demolished three homes completely and built smaller ones in their place, and performed a major remodel on the fourth. He filled in pools, creating one large central garden. The permits show the work includes wine storage, a fountain, a guesthouse, courtyards, a pool house and a storage shed connected by a trellis, and a movable floor on the remaining pool to allow the water to be covered for safety reasons or parties.Meghan Horrigan-Taylor, a spokesperson for the city of Palo Alto, said there was no preferential treatment in granting the permits, and the work was compliant with city code."The city does not regulate who can buy nearby or adjacent properties, whether on the open market or privately," she said.Greer Stone , a member of the Palo Alto City Council who lives near Crescent Park, said the city has followed the letter of its own code but not the spirit in allowing Zuckerberg to take over a neighbourhood. Stone said he was working on legislation to address the problem."He's been finding loopholes around our local laws and zoning ordinances," Stone said of Zuckerberg. "We should never be a gated, gilded city on a hill where people don't know their neighbours."When Zuckerberg and Chan first made plans for their compound about 10 years ago, they held a meeting for roughly 20 neighbours in the kitchen of their Edgewood home. They presented their vision of the project and assured the neighbours they would provide off-site parking for workers and would not tear down any homes, recalled Kieschnick, who attended the meeting.Both of those promises were broken, he said. The couple's spokesperson said no such promises had been made.In all, eight years of construction ensued. It has largely stopped over the past several months, but neighbours are still bitter and expect more to come. They said their driveways had been blocked, their tires flattened by construction debris and their car mirrors knocked off by equipment.neighbours said workers regularly parked cars and ate lunch in front of their homes. Zuckerberg, the workers told them, wanted the frontage of his home on Edgewood kept clear.Occasionally, numerous trucks rumble in, delivering food, decorations and furniture for parties. Sometimes, the street is blocked for days, neighbours said. Those on Hamilton said their road was used as the compound's shipping and receiving dock, and parking lot.Party time usually includes valet parking for partygoers in gowns and tuxedos, or costumes if the theme calls for them, neighbours said. The music is often loud, sometimes prompting complaints to the nonemergency police line. neighbours said they did not usually get a response.Zuckerberg and Chan held their wedding at the property. In October, they held a disco party there, Zuckerberg in white pants and a gold chain and Chan in sequined gold pants and a one-shouldered top. "Disco queen wanted a party," Zuckerberg wrote on Instagram Smaller events, including those for Meta employees, neighbours said, take place more frequently. In late July, when police provided the free signs to affix to trees, three big, dark vans stopped in front of the compound. Scores of people, mostly young men in hoodies, filed out and into the compound. Security guards stood outside, eyeing passersby.Peter Forgie, a retired lawyer who has lived in Crescent Park for 20 years, said he and his partner have long had an open-door policy for their neighbours, welcoming them over and giving gifts when people move in or have babies. None of that has worked on Zuckerberg."We tried to bring him into the fold," Forgie said. "It's been rebuffed every time."Kieschnick said when Zuckerberg bought the home next door, Zuckerberg's staff members informed him the wooden fence that separated the two homes -- and had a gate for children to scurry through -- did not meet Facebook standards. It has since been rebuilt twice, thicker and taller each time, he said.He said the staff also installed security cameras in Zuckerberg's garden looking into his own garden. When he threatened to install cameras in his own yard looking into Zuckerberg's property, employees promptly took them down.Zuckerberg's staff has made some accommodations. The security guards now sit in quiet electric vehicles rather than in louder gas-powered cars. Zuckerberg does not attend the annual block parties, which are very small these days, but he did send an ice cream cart to the last one.And his staff has sent gifts to neighbours when the racket has gotten particularly loud, including bottles of sparkling wine, chocolates and Krispy Kreme doughnuts.One memorable gift delivery? Noise-cancelling headphones.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Scared' of Mark Zuckerberg offers, OpenAI gives special one-time bonus to some employees
‘Scared' of Mark Zuckerberg offers, OpenAI gives special one-time bonus to some employees

Time of India

time9 hours ago

  • Time of India

‘Scared' of Mark Zuckerberg offers, OpenAI gives special one-time bonus to some employees

OpenAI has announced "special one-time" bonuses worth millions of dollars for about 1,000 employees – roughly one-third of its workforce – as the company battles to retain top AI talent, according to The Verge. The bonuses, announced just before the launch of GPT-5, target researchers and engineers in key departments including applied engineering, scaling, and safety. The highest payouts will reportedly reach the mid single-digit millions for OpenAI's most coveted researchers, who already earn millions annually. Engineers are expected to receive bonuses averaging hundreds of thousands of dollars. The payments will be distributed quarterly over two years, with recipients choosing between OpenAI stock, cash, or both. Rivals offer $100 million signing bonuses to lure OpenAI's top talent This marks the first time OpenAI has offered bonuses to such a large number of employees, highlighting the fierce competition for AI talent. The move comes after CEO Sam Altman revealed that Meta has been offering signing bonuses as high as $100 million, with even larger annual compensation packages, to poach OpenAI staff. Speaking on a podcast, Altman claimed that "so far none of our best people have decided to take them up on that," but acknowledged Meta's aggressive strategy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo Meta has led the charge in recruitment efforts, recently naming Shengjia Zhao , one of ChatGPT's creators, as chief scientist of Meta Superintelligence Labs. OpenAI's research officer Mark Chen has internally compared Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg 's poaching tactics to "a home invasion." The talent wars extend far beyond Meta's efforts. Elon Musk's xAI has also made aggressive offers to lure away OpenAI's top researchers, while former CTO Mira Murati recently recruited several technical leaders for her rival venture, Thinking Machines. Industry sources suggest that Zuckerberg has become so frustrated with Meta's AI progress that he's willing to invest billions in top talent, personally involving himself in recruitment efforts. Altman has criticised Meta's strategy of offering massive upfront guaranteed compensation, arguing it detracts from actual innovation work and fails to build a winning culture. "That basically never works," he said, suggesting competitors are "always going to where your competitor was" rather than fostering genuine innovation. Not all staff eligible for million-dollar payouts CEO Sam Altman acknowledged the competitive pressures, stating "we have been looking at comp for our technical teams given the movement in the market" and emphasised the company's intention to "keep increasing comp as we keep doing better and better as a company". The selective nature of these bonuses means two-thirds of OpenAI's workforce won't receive the additional compensation, raising questions about employee morale across different departments. The move could potentially deepen the very retention problems OpenAI was trying to solve. However, OpenAI is reportedly planning another retention strategy: allowing current and former employees to sell their company stock to investors, potentially at valuations approaching $500 billion

BlueStone IPO: Can the digital-first jeweller justify its  ₹7,823 crore valuation?
BlueStone IPO: Can the digital-first jeweller justify its  ₹7,823 crore valuation?

Mint

time10 hours ago

  • Mint

BlueStone IPO: Can the digital-first jeweller justify its ₹7,823 crore valuation?

BlueStone, India's second-largest digital-first omni-channel jewellery brand, is stepping into the public markets with an initial public offering (IPO) that is notably cheaper than the ₹578 per share its promoters paid just eight months ago. Priced at ₹492- ₹517, the ₹1,540.65 crore issue raises the question: does this discount outweigh the risks of steep valuations and ongoing net losses? The offer, which opened today, comprises a fresh issue of ₹820 crore and an offer-for-sale worth ₹720.65 crore. Selling shareholders include Accel India, Saama Capital, and Kalaari Capital, each locking in substantial returns of 480%–962% on their early bets. With 275 stores across 117 cities, BlueStone sells contemporary lifestyle jewellery in diamond, gold, platinum, and studded designs. At the upper end of the price band, the IPO values BlueStone at roughly ₹7,823 crore. Of the fresh proceeds, ₹750 crore will fund working capital, with the rest going toward general corporate purposes. But before considering an investment, it's worth unpacking BlueStone's growth drivers, competitive edge, and valuation. How does BlueStone's business model work? BlueStone runs an omni-channel jewellery business under its flagship brand, blending a digital-first, direct-to-consumer (DTC) approach with a rapidly expanding offline presence. It sells through its website and mobile app, as well as its 275 stores across 117 cities, 200 company-owned and 75 franchised. Its online and offline channels are tightly linked: customers often browse designs online before visiting a store, or place orders online for store pickup or home delivery. This integration not only lifts conversion rates but also guides decisions on where to open new stores, boosting the odds of early profitability. Roughly 75% of outlets turn profitable within three months of opening. As of March, the company offered 7,400 designs across 91 collections, including rings, earrings, necklaces, pendants, solitaires, bangles, bracelets, and chains. Studded jewellery is its core strength, contributing 68% of FY25 revenue, far ahead of Titan (27%) and Kalyan (30%). Prices range from under ₹5,000 to over ₹17 lakh, with average order values rising from ₹32,038 in FY23 to ₹47,671 in FY25. Key strengths BlueStone's brand positioning is tuned to changing buying behaviour. In 2024, an estimated 50-60% of jewellery purchases were digitally influenced. The company's online-first approach drives discovery, engagement, and store traffic. Its social reach includes 2.65 million Facebook followers, 713,000 on Instagram, and 161,000 on YouTube. This strategy has paid off: unique online sessions jumped from 818 lakh in FY23 to 2,988 lakh in FY25, while its active customer base nearly doubled from 390,959 to 771,845 over the same period. While physical stores contribute 93.3% of revenue, the online platform remains a powerful lead generator. Moreover, unlike legacy jewellers focused on bridal or high-value investment pieces, BlueStone targets lighter, design-led jewellery for daily wear and special occasions. This appeals to the 25-45 age group, younger, design-conscious buyers more influenced by digital engagement. This segment remains underpenetrated by large incumbents, offering room for growth. In-house manufacturing advantage Bluestone's vertically integrated model is another moat. It manufactures over 75% of its jewellery in-house, making it the largest retailer in India with such capacity. This vertical integration allows strict quality control, faster design-to-store timelines, and innovations such as same-day delivery and 'try-at-home" services. Repeat revenue rose from 34.67% in FY23 to 44.61% in FY25, among the highest in the industry. Despite its heavy marketing investments, BlueStone spent only 9% of revenue on advertising in FY25, down from 10.9% in FY23, placing it among the top four jewellers in India with the lowest marketing spends. This, however, is higher than Titan (5%) and Kalyan (1.9%). Store expansion and manufacturing footprint Between FY23 and FY25, BlueStone opened 120 new stores across India, averaging about 60 per year. The network is well-diversified, avoiding over-reliance on any single region. Of its 275 stores, 145 are in tier-I cities, 77 in tier-II, and 53 in tier-III. Same-store sales grew 32% in FY25, strong, but lower than the 72% growth in FY23, partly due to new store openings diluting the growth rate. Geographically, the North leads with 83 stores, followed by the South (77), West (65), and East (50). Store-level economics remain healthy, with nearly 75% breaking even within three months of launch. For outlets operational for more than three years, average monthly revenue has risen from ₹55.9 lakh in FY23 to ₹76.8 lakh in FY25. Of the total stores, 75 stores are owned by franchisees who provide the entire capital for these outlets, including investment and inventory costs. In return, Bluestone offers a high minimum guaranteed return on investment or store revenue. This model helps the company to grow rapidly with low upfront costs and low risk. However, BlueStone plans to expand its network of company-owned stores to reduce dependence on franchise capital. Bluestone intends to open over 290 new stores between FY25 and FY27, expanding across existing cities and new markets. As of March, BlueStone had three manufacturing facilities in Mumbai, Jaipur, and Surat. Capacity utilization at these plants has steadily improved over FY23-25, reflecting both strong demand and the efficiency of its vertically integrated model. Financial performance The company's revenue has doubled, from ₹771 crore in FY23 to ₹1,770 crore in FY25. This growth has been driven by growth in customer base, store count, and average order value. The company commands a gross margin of 37.9%, up from 31.9% in FY23, which is higher than Titan's (21.5%) and Kalyan's (13%). The margin is higher due to a greater contribution from higher-margin studded jewellery. The company has also turned profitable at the Ebitda level, with a margin of 4.1% in FY25 compared to a loss margin of 7.3% in FY23. Ebitda swung from a loss of ₹56 crore in FY23 to a profit of ₹73 crore in FY25. Despite operational improvement, BlueStone remains loss-making at the net level. Its losses widened from ₹167 crore to ₹222 crore over the same period. Rising finance costs, employee benefits and depreciation expenses have eroded the benefits of strong revenue growth and weighed on overall profitability. On the balance sheet, total borrowings have risen from ₹228 crore in FY23 to ₹729 crore in FY25. However, its net-debt-to-equity ratio remains comfortable at 0.67 times, supported by cash and other deposits exceeding ₹500 crore. Inventory levels have risen sharply, from ₹395 crore in FY23 to ₹1,652.5 crore in FY25. A demand slowdown could risk excess inventory or under-stocking, impacting business performance. Nonetheless, the company believes its store revenue productivity has significant room for growth. Same-store sales growth across existing and new outlets is expected to drive expansion in store-level margins and return metrics. Valuation and outlook From a valuation standpoint, BlueStone's asking price appears steep, at over 4x sales and about 115x Ebitda, significantly higher than peers. In comparison, Senco Gold is at 0.8x and 15.8x, PN Gadgil at 1x and 21.3x, and even the fastest-growing Kalyan Jewellers trades at about 2x and 32x. For more such analysis, read Profit Pulse. That said, the IPO pricing is below the ₹578 per share that the company allotted to its promoter in December 2024, offering some comfort to investors. Still, profitability challenges and the valuation premium remain concerns. Key risks include sustained losses, gold price volatility, and rising competition from lab-grown diamonds. Yet, with India's daily-wear jewellery segment projected to grow 15-18% annually to ₹5 trillion, and account for 40-45% of the total jewellery market, BlueStone is well-positioned to capture an expanding niche. Madhvendra has over seven years of experience in equity markets and writes detailed research articles on listed Indian companies, sectoral trends, and macroeconomic developments. The writer does not hold the stocks discussed in this article. The purpose of this article is only to share interesting charts, data points, and thought-provoking opinions. It is NOT a recommendation. If you wish to consider an investment, you are strongly advised to consult your advisor. This article is strictly for educational purposes only.

PhDs, elite lab experience, and AI brilliance: Mark Zuckerberg's secret recruitment list for superintelligence lab revealed
PhDs, elite lab experience, and AI brilliance: Mark Zuckerberg's secret recruitment list for superintelligence lab revealed

Economic Times

time12 hours ago

  • Economic Times

PhDs, elite lab experience, and AI brilliance: Mark Zuckerberg's secret recruitment list for superintelligence lab revealed

Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, is on an aggressive hunt for the brightest minds in artificial intelligence, personally spearheading recruitment for his new superintelligence lab. At the heart of this effort is a carefully curated document known as 'The List'—a roster of top-tier AI talent targeted for Meta's ambitious projects. According to The Wall Street Journal , most names on The List hold PhDs from elite institutions like UC Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon, with stints at leading AI hubs such as OpenAI in San Francisco and Google DeepMind in London. Typically in their 20s or 30s, these researchers share a rarefied skill set—deep expertise in calculus, linear algebra, and probability theory—paired with the ability to tackle highly complex, computation-heavy problems. Zuckerberg has been personally involved in the chase, diving into technical research papers and coordinating candidate outreach with two senior Meta executives via a group chat dubbed 'Recruiting Party.' Prospects are contacted through email, text, or WhatsApp, with priority given to those who have made significant contributions to AI breakthroughs. One recent Meta hire, passionate about algorithm design, perfectly fits this profile. The AI research world is close-knit, with scientists networking in private Slack and Discord groups to exchange offers and sometimes leverage competing bids to increase their value. Sources confirm Meta has approached dozens of OpenAI researchers, heating up Silicon Valley's AI talent war. At the helm of Zuckerberg's superintelligence initiative is 28-year-old Alexandr Wang—founder of Scale AI and son of Chinese immigrant physicists—whose $14 billion deal with Meta marks one of the costliest hires in history. In response to Meta's recruitment drive, OpenAI has revamped its pay structure, with its CTO even issuing an open letter urging staff to resist Zuckerberg's offers. At one point, the company reportedly paused operations for almost a week. Former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati also revealed that Zuckerberg offered engineers in her team multi-million-dollar packages—yet, remarkably, not a single one has accepted.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store