Yeoh must address racism in sports
As the minister responsible, Yeoh should not deflect criticism by accusing others of racialising the issue. What is truly baffling is her apparent acceptance of Selangor's decision, as if her ministry is powerless to intervene.
If the host state can include and exclude sports at its whims and fancies, then why do we even have a Youth and Sports Ministry headed by a federal minister?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
3 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
MIC at a crossroads: Time to reclaim relevance
AS MALAYSIA edges closer to its 16th General Election (GE16), the Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC) finds itself at a critical political juncture. Once a dominant voice for the Indian community within Barisan Nasional (BN), MIC now appears increasingly adrift by lacking clear messaging, decisive leadership, and the strategic agility necessary for survival in a rapidly shifting political landscape. Recent developments in Kedah have raised eyebrows. MIC's local leaders have been signalling support for Perikatan Nasional (PN) through indirect channels, relying on non-Muslim wings and secondary-tier representatives to express political positions. While such moves may be attempts to test the waters, they also reveal a worrying absence of national-level coherence. This low-profile political posturing suggests a party unsure of its direction, grappling with identity, and failing to recognise the urgency of its situation. The contrast with the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) is striking. Like MIC, MCA has suffered heavy electoral losses and faces significant questions about its relevance. Yet, unlike MIC, MCA has maintained an active, visible presence in public discourse. Its leadership continues to issue timely statements, engage with community concerns, and assert the party's stance on national issues. While results have been mixed, this strategy has preserved MCA's leverage within BN and positioned it more favourably in ongoing seat negotiations. Visibility matters, especially as coalitions prepare for GE16. Seat allocations are expected to be based on incumbency, perceived electability, and party relevance. MCA's willingness to speak up, even symbolically, grants it political currency. MIC, by contrast, seems content with silence or ambiguous positioning, a dangerous miscalculation at a time when political capital is earned through engagement, not deference. The problem goes deeper than just poor communication. MIC's reliance on indirect proxies to signal political intent shows an organisation out of touch with modern political dynamics. At a time when issues such as education, employment, minority rights, and equality before the law dominate the discourse among Indian Malaysians, MIC has failed to place itself at the forefront of these conversations. Meanwhile, major parties like UMNO, PKR, and DAP have consolidated their narratives around national unity, multiracial platforms, and economic reform. They shape the broader political terrain and influence coalition direction. MIC, with its narrowly ethnic appeal and outdated approach, risks becoming politically irrelevant if it continues to misread the moment. Crucially, MIC lacks a visible strategic brain trust. Rather than positioning itself as a robust voice for Indian Malaysians or a necessary coalition partner, it appears to be hedging its bets by quietly leaning toward PN in hopes of future favour or fallback relevance. This is not strategy; it's drift. Coalitions reward utility, not nostalgia or quiet loyalty. Without a strong electoral base or meaningful public engagement, MIC offers little to entice either its traditional partners or potential new allies. The allure of aligning with PN may seem tactically viable to some within MIC's ranks, especially in states where PN appears to have momentum. However, such a move is fundamentally flawed. The coalition's track record shows limited commitment to minority rights beyond symbolic gestures. Non-Malay support for PN remains low, and MIC's credibility could be seriously damaged if it is seen as abandoning its community's interests for uncertain political gain. Additionally, MIC risks alienating its current coalition allies. Public flirtation with PN, even if unofficial or regionally confined, sends mixed signals and projects weakness, not confidence. It suggests desperation rather than strategic foresight that a damaging perception ahead of high-stakes seat negotiations. GE16 presents a make-or-break moment. MIC cannot afford to continue operating as it has. It must reclaim its space through bold, coherent, and consistent public engagement. National leaders must speak directly to the electorate, articulate a vision for the Indian community, and engage in coalition politics from a position of strength, not subservience. The blueprint is clear. MIC should take a cue from MCA's approach through assertiveness, relevance, and public messaging. Even when symbolic, these efforts help a party remain visible and necessary. MIC must stop issuing endorsements through obscure platforms or relying on backchannels. Instead, it needs a reinvigorated public presence and a strategy that reflects the real concerns of Indian Malaysians. Education, economic empowerment, social justice, and equitable development are key areas where MIC can still make a difference. But this requires more than policy papers and closed-door meetings. It demands direct engagement with communities, strategic alliances, and clear communication from top-tier leadership. The party's historic legacy does not guarantee a future. Relevance must be earned, and time is running out. If MIC fails to recalibrate and if it continues to wait for recognition rather than claim its place, it risks being reduced to a political footnote. GE16 is not just another election cycle for MIC. It is, quite possibly, the final opportunity to prove that it still matters. Politics rewards those who adapt, communicate, and negotiate. For MIC, the silence and ambiguity of the present are not signs of strategy but they are symptoms of decline. It's time to reshape the narrative decisively and take swift, purposeful action. ‒ Aug 12, 2025 R Paneir Selvam is the principal consultant of Arunachala Research & Consultancy Sdn Bhd, a think tank specialising in strategic national and geopolitical matters. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Bernama
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
Games-'Strong candidate' India upbeat about 2030 Commonwealth Games after delegation visit
FILE PHOTO: An aerial view shows the western city of Ahmedabad, India, February 11, 2022. REUTERS/Amit Dave/File Photo NEW DELHI (Reuters) -Robust backing from the government and a desire to stage big-ticket events make India a strong candidate to host the 2030 Commonwealth Games, a top Indian Olympic Association (IOA) official told Reuters. The world's most populous nation is bidding for the 2030 edition of the Commonwealth Games in Ahmedabad to boost its bigger dream of hosting the 2036 Olympic Games at the western Indian city. A Commonwealth Sports delegation visited Ahmedabad last week to share their experience from the previous Games and help the Indian organisers prepare a comprehensive bid to be submitted by the August 31 deadline. "First and foremost, the mood of the country is upbeat for sporting activities and there is strong will of the government to host global sporting events," IOA executive council member Harpal Singh said by telephone. "India wants to host larger sporting events - be it Commonwealth Games, Asian Games, or Olympics - and we have the full backing of the government. "The existing infrastructure is very good and the roadmap for future infrastructure gave a lot of confidence to the delegation." "Overall, I would say India is a very strong candidate and we'll be very competent to host the 2030 Games," said Singh. The IOA is not taking anything for granted though, and is making sure Ahmedabad ticks every box to be unveiled as the host city at the Commonwealth Sport General Assembly in Glasgow in November. "The delegation is looking into various issues - like sustainability, gender-balance and eco-friendliness," said Singh, also a member of the sports committee of the Commonwealth federation. "They are looking particularly into the sustainability issue. The Games has to be sustainable beyond 2030 and must also align with the UN sustainable development goals. "It must inspire the youth of the Commonwealth community while showcasing our diverse culture." India hosted the 2010 Commonwealth Games in New Delhi, but the event was blighted by allegations of corruption and mismanagement. The country is determined to make a better impression in 2030 to bolster its bid to host the Olympic Games six years later. "We've not hosted (since 2010) a major sports event with so many countries across all six regions," Singh said. "So it will be a right step in that direction for our final dream of 2036." Canada and Nigeria are also in the fray to host the 2030 edition of the Games featuring athletes from 70-odd Commonwealth nations and territories. (Reporting by Amlan Chakraborty in New Delhi; editing by Christian Radnedge)
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Takiyuddin, Rayer clash in Parliament over Indian community housing budget
KUALA LUMPUR: A war of words broke out in the Dewan Rakyat between Datuk Seri Takiyuddin Hassan and RSN Rayer regarding the housing budget for the Indian community under the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP). Takiyuddin (PN-Kota Baru) questioned why there was none for the Indian community, particularly estate workers without homes under the 13MP. "And since there is a master plan for Chinese New Villages, I also want to ask why there is no master plan for the development of the Indian community, especially for the plantation workers, who we know do not have their own houses," he said while debating the 13MP, in parliament Tuesday (Aug 12). This irked Rayer (PH-Jelutong), who then stood up to interject, saying that he was factually wrong about the allocations for the Indian community. Rayer then cited Standing Orders against Takiyuddin for allegedly trying to mislead the Parliament. Datuk Mohd Shahar Abdullah, who was standing in to chair the proceedings, reminded Rayer to respect the standing orders and to allow Takiyuddin to explain his remarks. Rayer then accused Takiyuddin of ignoring allocations in the 13MP after the Chinese New Village provision, stating that funds would be provided to repair dilapidated homes for the Indian community. Takiyuddin denied such accusation, repeatedly saying: "I never said that… listen properly." Takiyuddin clarified that he had inquired about a development plan for the Indian community, particularly for estate workers without homes. Earlier, another commotion broke out when Rayer expressed dissatisfaction over the lack of action taken against Datuk Awang Hashim (PN-Pendang), who raised racial issues while linking them to the May 13, 1969 racial riots during the RMK13 debate session last week. The situation became more chaotic when Awang also stood up to inform that he had not yet received the letter submitted by the Speaker, Tan Sri Johari Abdul, regarding the matter. However, Johari said that he would make a ruling after receiving a written explanation from Awang over the matter.
