Murshidabad violence: HC-appointed panel says police were inactive at some places
Kolkata, A report by a committee set up by the Calcutta High Court for identification and rehabilitation of victims of anti-Waqf protests-related violence in West Bengal's Murshidabad district said that the local police were "inactive and absent" during the incidents at Dhulian on April 11.
It also mentioned that a local councillor directed the attacks at Dhulian town in Murshidabad.
The report, submitted to the high court by the three-member committee, stated that a garments mall in Dhulian was also looted.
Noting that the "main attack" occurred on the afternoon of April 11, the report said "Local police were completely inactive and absent."
The panel, comprising Joginder Singh, Registrar, , National Human Rights Commission , Satya Arnab Ghosal, member secretary, West Bengal Legal Services Authority and Saugata Chakraborty, Registrar, WBJS, submitted the report to the high court last week after visiting the affected areas and speaking to the victims as directed by the division bench hearing the matter.
The high court had on April 17 ordered the formation of the committee for the identification and rehabilitation of people displaced by the violence during the protests over the Waqf Act in Murshidabad district.
The division bench, comprising justices Soumen Sen and Raja Basu Chowdhury, noted that the committee had stated in its report that "appointing qualified valuation experts is the only possible remedy to the state's failure to protect a section of its citizens.
"The victims of the affected areas need individualised and customised rehabilitation packages and for this, securing the services of valuation experts appears to be the sine qua non ,' it said, according to the court.
Another report earlier submitted by the West Bengal government to the division bench hearing the petitions related to the Murshidabad violence detailed widespread incidents of violence between April 8 and April 12 by mobs in connection with protests over the Waqf Act.
It stated that following intervention by the police and civil administration, the situation in Suti, Dhulian, Samserganj and Jangipur was under control.
The report said that agitational programmes over the Waqf Act, 2025 started on April 4 in all police station areas of Jangipur police district in Murshidabad district.
It stated that the protests turned violent from April 8.
The report said that two persons - Haragobinda Das and his son Chandan Das - were killed by a mob on April 12 at Jafrabad under Samserganj police station.
It stated that central forces were deployed in Samserganj on April 11 as the situation went out of control, and thereafter more CF were deployed on orders of the high court on April 12.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
HC orders action against 2 judges for letting accused go undefended in court
1 2 Kolkata: Calcutta High Court's Jalpaiguri circuit bench on Wednesday directed action against two judges — the chief judicial magistrate and the district and sessions judge (NDPS), Alipurduar — for not providing an advocate from legal aid to an accused in a drug case at the time of court production. Granting bail, Justice Krishna Rao held that the arresting officer violated Article 22 (1) of the Constitution by not informing the accused of the grounds for arrest. It is a fundamental right that an accused cannot be detained in custody without being informed of this. In ordering action against the two judicial officers, the court noted that a written complaint was made after the arrest on March 28, 2024, and after the initiation of the FIR, a case diary was started. The forwarding report submitted before the NDPS court was not served to the accused. At the time of production before the court on March 29, 2024, no advocate was provided and the court granted three days of police remand. After three days, the accused was produced before the NDPS court judge on April 1, 2024. He was taken into judicial custody, but the judge did not provide any advocate from legal aid to defend him. "This order be forwarded to the registrar general of the high court for information of the hon'ble Chief Justice and necessary action against the chief judicial magistrate and district and sessions judge (NDPS), Alipurduar for not offering an advocate from legal aid to the petitioner as at the time of production, the petitioner was undefended," the judge directed. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo It was noted that even though it was mentioned in the written complaint, case diary and forwarding report that the grounds for arrest were explained, the state did not disclose any document or evidence proving the same. The accused was arrested on the allegation that the police seized 40 100ml bottles of Rc-Kuff cough syrup from him on March 28, 2024. Follow more information on Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad here . Get real-time live updates on rescue operations and check full list of passengers onboard AI 171 .
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
No Survivors Aboard Air India Plane? Top Cop's Big Claim Amid Reports Of At Least One Survivor
LA Riots: Widespread Looting In U.S. City; Grocery Stores, Shops Robbed, Police Attacked | Watch There is no need to arson and looting in Los Angeles, which is facing massive anti-ICE protests for nearly a week. Videos on social media have shown widespread looting at grocery stores and destruction of government properties. In Los Angeles, a youth was caught on camera hitting a sheriff with a bottle before being overpowered. The protests against Donald Trump's immigration crackdown has spread outside LA. 313 views | 58 minutes ago
The Hindu
33 minutes ago
- The Hindu
CBI, Madurai, registers corruption case against its own staff
The Central Bureau of Investigation, Madurai, has booked one of its lower division clerk, R. Dinesh Kumar, under the provisions of Prevention of Corruption Act-1988. Based on a news report and social media posts, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of CBI, Madurai, conducted a preliminary enquiry which revealed that Dinesh Kumar had allegedly demanded a bribe money of ₹7 lakh from one K. Ramachandran, for removing his name from the chargesheet in a 2021-case filed by ACB, CBI. Ramachandran had secretly recorded the bribe demanding conversation with Dinesh Kumar in June and December 2023 and had circulated the video clippings in the social media. The probe revealed that Dinesh Kumar had approached Ramachandran when he had come to the CBI office to sign the register as part of complying with bail conditions. He took Ramachandran to a shop and used a man to translate his conversation and demanded ₹2 lakh in advance to remove his name from the chargesheet. After getting consent from authorities concerned, the case was registered on May 30.
