A tungsten-tipped answer to the West's critical metals dilemma: Andy Home
LONDON, Feb 19 (Reuters) - The critical minerals war is escalating.
China's response to U.S. President Donald Trump's 10% tariff hike on Chinese imports includes restricting exports of another five esoteric components of the periodic table.
Exports of bismuth, indium, molybdenum, tellurium and tungsten will only be allowed subject to Ministry of Commerce approval they will not be used in military applications.
That's a big problem for tungsten in particular.
In a world where just about every metal is critical for someone, the word may be losing its meaning, as my colleague Clyde Russell has argued.
But, for want of a better word, tungsten is a critical component of the 21st-century industrial supply chain, both civilian and military.
So critical indeed that users are starting to embrace new pricing mechanisms to guarantee non-Chinese supply.
GREEN AMMO
Tungsten has the highest melting point of any element, is extremely hard and has good electrical and thermal conductivity.
The metal lit up the last century in the form of the incandescent light bulb and is now used in an extraordinarily wide range of applications.
Tungsten carbide is the hardest material after diamond and its use in drills spans every other metallic supply chain from mine to machining. Tungsten crucibles make it possible to melt just about any other element.
The metal has seeped stealthily into telecoms, electronics, semiconductor and power sectors.
Tungsten is a small market with global output of just over 100,000 metric tons and an estimated value of around $5 billion in 2023. But the industries that depend on it are exponentially bigger, which is why it is on everyone's critical mineral list.
It is also the material of choice for what the military calls penetrators - high-density, armour-piercing projectiles.
The only other material that can match its kinetic performance is depleted uranium, which makes tungsten the environmentally friendly battlefield option.
And one that is in high demand in Ukraine.
DECOUPLING
China dominates the tungsten market, accounting for 83% of last year's global mine production of 81,000 tons, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.
Tungsten has not been mined commercially in the United States since 2015 and the country relies heavily on imports, 37% of which came from China last year.
The Joe Biden administration kick-started the process of weaning U.S. companies off their dependence on Chinese tungsten with a 25% duty, opens new tab on imports from China imposed in December last year.
The U.S. military faces a 2027 deadline, opens new tab for halting any purchases of tungsten manufactured or mined in China or Russia, which is the world's third largest producer.
The Defense Logistics Agency holds stocks of tungsten concentrate and is in the market, opens new tab for up to 2,040 tons more in the current fiscal year to September 2025.
The Department of Defense has awarded $15.8m, opens new tab to Canada's Fireweed Metals Corp (FWZ.V), opens new tab to accelerate the development of the Mactung tungsten mine in Yukon.
The money will fund test work and a feasibility study, which suggests it will be a while before a final go-ahead decision, let alone production.
NO DOWNSIDE
Until the DoD's money can deliver results in Yukon, the West's tungsten fortunes hang largely on the restart of the Sangdong mine in South Korea.
Sangdong was once the jewel in the country's mining crown but closed due to low prices in the 1990s.
It is being reactivated by Almonty Industries (AII.TO), opens new tab with commissioning of the first 2,300-ton per year phase already in progress. A second phase of similar size could follow 12 months down the line.
All of the first-phase production has been committed to Global Tungsten & Powders, the U.S. arm of Austria's Plansee Group, opens new tab.
The contract comes with a minimum floor price of $235 per metric ton unit (mtu) basis the price of ammonium paratungstate and no upside cap. The current price is $342.50 per mtu.
Floor prices are by no means uncommon in the mining industry but normally they come in the form of fancy financial hedging programmes paid for by the producer.
But there is no futures market in tungsten, which makes this particular contract unique - or almost unique: Almonty has pulled off the same trick, opens new tab with its Sangdong Molybdenum project, locking in a hard floor price of $19 per lb with SeAH M&S, Korea's largest processor.
The idea is to insulate the projects from the sort of destructive Chinese supply surge that is playing out in battery metals such as lithium, cobalt and nickel. Lacking any floor price protection, battery-metal start-ups have been crushed by low prices.
AT ANY COST?
Almonty may not have to worry too much about floor prices if China starts choking off the supply of tungsten products to the West.
Although there is no outright ban yet, it is worth noting that germanium, gallium and antimony all got the special licensing treatment before Beijing put a total ban on exports of all three to the United States.
As buyers scramble for non-Chinese material at any price, antimony has rocketed to $47,250 from $11,000 per kilogram at the start of 2024.
Plansee Group's granting of what is in effect a free put option on Amonty's tungsten output bears testimony to how critical it thinks Sangdong's output will be to the non-Chinese tungsten market.
The lesson for other critical mineral users is that relying on market prices alone to ensure supply will not guarantee you get the stuff you really need.
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
here.
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Kent County Council to be subject of Reform's first Doge audit
Reform has announced it will send its first Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) team into local party said the first council to be audited will be Kent County Council, one of the councils the party took control of in May's local a statement released late on Sunday, party chairman said it would be "led by one of the UK's leading tech entrepreneurs", although it is not yet known who that leader of the Liberal Democrat opposition in Kent said he believes it will be "more performance than substance". Reform said a team of software engineers, data analysts and forensic auditors will "visit and analyse" local follows the US Doge, which was launched during Donald Trump's presidency to cut federal spending. Billionaire Musk was involved but has since left his position spearheading the the elections on 1 May the party took control of eight authorities from the Conservatives, along with Doncaster and Durham from Labour. What is Doge and why has Musk left?Trump says Elon is "not really leaving"Five ways world's richest man has changed White HouseMr Yusuf said: "For too long British taxpayers have watched their money vanish into a black hole. Their taxes keep going up, their bin collections keep getting less frequent, potholes remain unfixed, their local services keep getting cut. Reform won a historic victory on a mandate to change this."As promised, we have created a UK D.O.G.E to identify and cut wasteful spending of taxpayer money. Starting with Kent, our team will use cutting edge technology and deliver real value for voters." But Antony Hook, the Liberal Democrat opposition leader on Kent County Council, questioned the need for a team of outside told BBC Radio Kent: "We have at KCC a governance and audit committee, that was due to have its first meeting since the election next week."Reform have cancelled it."The health and scrutiny committee was meant to meet, Reform have cancelled it. Reform have cancelled most of the committee meetings for this week or next week, without any explanation."They haven't even named who their nominees are to chair these important committees are."If Reform were serious about making the council work well they would be getting their councillors to do this job, not bringing in unnamed anonymous people who haven't been elected."
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
China vows ‘forceful measures' after accusing US of violating tariffs truce
China said the US 'severely violated' the consensus reached during their recent trade talks in Geneva and threatened 'forceful measures' in response, dealing a big blow to the prospect of a thaw in the trade war between the two largest economies. The Chinese commerce ministry on Monday accused Washington of seriously undermining progress in mending trade relations with its series of actions, including the revocation of visas for Chinese students. The statement marked the latest sign of deteriorating relations between China and the US under Donald Trump, who imposed sweeping import levies on Beijing and sparked a tit-for-tat tariff war. The two sides had managed to dial down tensions after a meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, last month led to the lowering of tariffs on goods imported from each nation and even raised hopes of a phone call between Mr Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. The commerce ministry said China was 'strictly implementing' the consensus reached in Geneva but the US was taking steps that 'seriously undermine' it, state media reported. 'The United States has been unilaterally provoking new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating the uncertainty and instability of bilateral economic and trade relations,' it said. 'If the US insists on its own way and continues to damage China's interests, China will continue to take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests.' This came after Mr Trump said in a Truth Social post on Friday that China had 'TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US'. The president said he had agreed to a fast deal with Beijing to 'save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation'. 'So much for being Mr NICE GUY!' he added. Mr Trump told reporters he wanted to speak with Mr Xi to resolve their ongoing disputes. China, on the other side, accused Washington of violating trade agreements by issuing "export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and announcing the revocation" of visas for students from the Asian country. As tensions resurfaced, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent said on Sunday the negotiations with China were "a bit stalled'. "What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe, and that is not what a reliable partner does," Mr Bessent told CBS News. He suggested that a phone call between Mr Trump and Mr Xi would be necessary to break the stalemate. Mr Trump had signaled his wish to have a phone call with Mr Xi as early as February and even said he was willing to visit his counterpart, although no such arrangement was scheduled.
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
The fundamental battle which unites Donald Trump and Nigel Farage
There is a fundamental contest under way - with those who purport to be on the side of the people pitching themselves against those whom they decry as the failing Establishment. Look at the recent elections in the UK and the USA. Sir Keir Starmer did not enter Downing Street on a tide of love. Rather, he benefited from loathing directed at the departing Tories. A revulsion he helped foment. That does not mean that his election was illegitimate. Rather, that it is predicated upon disquiet and discontent, rather than optimism and hope. Read more by Brian Taylor In the USA, Donald Trump regained the White House by positing himself as the voice of a disgruntled people. A siren yelling at an Establishment which he chose to depict as anyone opposed to him. This political turmoil has common origins on both sides of the Atlantic; a sluggish, static economy. It can thus be traced back to the banking crash of 2008. Folk feel unsettled and discontented. Looking for scapegoats, they blame – or are exhorted to blame – those who have held power over a prolonged period. In EU countries like Germany and France, that has resulted in the rise of the populist Right, held off – just, so far – by more mainstream offers. In the USA, that has meant the election of a President – whose supporters previously stormed the Capitol building and who is now in direct conflict with counter-balancing elements of the Constitution he is pledged to uphold. Donald Trump won by decrying the entire political structure in the US. He won by pitching a populist appeal against elements he claimed had weakened America in search of self-interest. While corporate America sought calm constraint, he surrounded himself with individualistic, oligarchical figures whose chief talents lie in disruption, in challenging the status quo. Elon Musk has now left Team Trump, with a whimper of disquiet. He was never a team player, happier issuing orders rather than compromising. But, more, he fears that Trump's 'big beautiful bill' will counter his own cost-cutting efforts by devoting far too many dollars to defence spending. But, as we wish so long to Elon, there is now a far more significant controversy. A federal court has ruled that President Trump exceeded his powers on trade tariffs. Nigel Farage (Image: free) That is out to appeal. But President Trump's initial response is intriguing. He seeks to depict his rivals and the judiciary as part of an Establishment rump which he blames for undermining him – and, by extension, the America for which he purportedly stands. It is a quite deliberate and specific challenge to the entire structure of countervailing power upon which America is founded. President Trump summons up a crisis – then offers himself as the sole, incontestable solution. A tactic not unknown elsewhere down the decades and centuries. Generally associated with despots. Not that such a term should be applied to the elected 47th President of the United States of America. Across the US northern border, there is turmoil of a different kind – and the positing of an intriguing solution. While President Trump identifies and excoriates his enemies within, the Canadians are angry and unhappy over an external challenge. From Donald J. Trump who wants to annexe Canada as the 51st American state. Enter, briefly, King Charles. Opening the Canadian Parliament. Delivering the Speech from the Throne, as his mother did in 1977. The task usually falls to the Governor General, a term that speaks of times past. But the King sought to look to the future, from this troubled present. And his choice of language echoed our age of anxiety. A diplomatic nod to the annexation issue, vaunting Canada as 'strong and free'. His audience will not have missed the significance of the freedom reference. But he went further, adding: 'The Crown has for so long been a symbol of unity for Canada. It also represents stability and continuity from the past to the present.' In essence, the King was responding to a decidedly North American political conflict by offering a regal hand across the ocean. Equating monarchy with permanent reassurance. But what of the sovereign's regular home, this United Kingdom? Here too there is disquiet. But, more than that, there are signs of fragmentation in the political system, exemplified above all in the rise of Reform UK. Nigel Farage may attract adulation and loathing to varying degrees – but he is reading contemporary politics well. To be frank, that is scarcely difficult. Folk are thoroughly unhappy and, indeed, angry. They are upset over the cost of living, energy bills, taxation. They are discontented with the familiar political system, feeling it pays no heed to their concerns. Enter Nigel. He discloses a hitherto understated concern for those on benefits by offering to reverse Labour government constraint. Read more Mr Farage presents established parties with a conundrum. Do they ignore him and hope he fades away? Or do they, like the Prime Minister this week, assail his policies as unfunded, damaging drivel? Then there is Scotland. Firstly, that row with Anas Sarwar. Mr Farage plays innocent. He was only quoting the Scottish Labour leader who had hoped people of Asian heritage might enter politics. The Reform version had Mr Sarwar prioritising the Pakistani community. Mr Sarwar stresses he intended no such thing – and calls Mr Farage a spiv for good measure. This particular controversy will subside – although canine whistles can persist, faintly. But there is a broader issue, which has featured in the Hamilton by-election. Does Reform represent an enduring challenge to the already fractured Scottish political system? Scots are very far from immune in the age of anxiety. Plus, as The Herald disclosed, they now count immigration among their chief concerns. Each of the major political parties knows the response. They need to focus upon delivery, upon popular concerns. But they need to do so through measured, thoughtful discourse. The people will tolerate no less. Brian Taylor is a former political editor for BBC Scotland and a columnist for The Herald. He cherishes his family, the theatre - and Dundee United FC
