New UK Government update for people on RTS energy meter ahead of switch-off this month
The Radio Teleswitch Service will start to be phased out from June 30.
Winter Fuel Payments to be reinstated for all people over State Pension age in Scotland
The UK Government has announced that thousands of households using the Radio Teleswitching System (RTS) 'will not unexpectedly lose access to their heating and hot water' once the deadline passes on June 30.
Thousands of Scottish households with ageing energy meters will be affected when the mass RTS deactivation begins at the end of this month. The latest figures from Ofgem indicate that as of April 4, 2025, there were 129,814 RTS meters remaining in Scotland.
However, Energy Minister Miatta Fahnbulleh gave reassurance to RTS customers in a written response to Labour MP John Whitby, who asked what steps are being taken to 'ensure that people in rural areas retain access to functioning energy meters' following the RTS switch-off.
Ms Fahnbulleh responded: 'Customers will not unexpectedly lose access to their heating and hot water after 30th June, and we will not allow widespread disconnection.
'Suppliers must fulfil all of their legal obligations to their customers, and that any future, localised phase-out of RTS meters after 30th June must be controlled, planned, and communicated properly to all customers in order to proceed.
'The UK Government will do everything it can to ensure that all customers are protected, and will work with Ofgem to hold suppliers to account if required. We expect energy suppliers to be taking measures, such as deploying roaming teams of installers including in rural areas, to ensure consumers receive replacement meters in a timely manner.'
The head of Scotland's national advice service recently raised the alarm over the slow replacement of thousands of ageing energy meters, warning of a 'looming crisis' just weeks before the deadline.
Andrew Bartlett, chief executive of Advice Direct Scotland, said vulnerable households were among those at risk of being 'left in the cold' with less than a month to go.
In a letter to Ofgem chief executive Jonathan Brearley, he warned that many households remain unaware of what will happen if their RTS meter is not replaced.
A similar letter has also been sent to the regulator by Consumer Scotland, the independent statutory body which represents the interests of customers.
In his letter, Mr Bartlett called for energy suppliers to proactively identify and prioritise vulnerable customers for meter upgrades, as well as a fresh public information campaign.
With the RTS deadline fast approaching, Advice Direct Scotland, which runs the national energy advice service energyadvice.scot, has been receiving more calls from worried households.
Anyone who has not received a letter or email should contact their supplier now. Support is also available at energyadvice.scot or by calling 0808 196 8660.
Mr Bartlett said: 'With less than a month to go until the RTS signal starts being switched off across the country, it is increasingly clear that progress on replacing them has not been fast enough. Ofgem needs to urgently clarify if it intends to stick to the June 30 deadline and if a phased approach is being taken, which parts of Scotland will be affected first.
'We are picking up a lot of confusion among affected customers, some of whom are trying to have their RTS meters replaced but have been told it isn't possible until after the switch-off.
'At a time when thousands of people are struggling with energy debts and the cost of living, nobody should be left out of pocket for replacing their meter either.
'Our message to consumers is that if you know someone with an RTS meter, especially if they are vulnerable, encourage them to get it replaced before the deadline if they can.
'The most important thing to remember is that free help and advice is available. Anyone who is worried should visit www.energyadvice.scot or call 0808 196 8660 for assistance.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
27 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
SNP rebels in bid to oust Swinney after by-election defeat
They warned there could be a "clear out' in the internal elections, with challenges for key positions including depute leader and national secretary. SNP badges and stickers (Image: PA) It is understood the meeting was ostensibly about forcing the party to move forward on independence, but there was a unanimous view that the First Minister 'has no intention of putting independence anywhere near the party's narrative whatsoever.' One source said: 'If there is nothing in the next couple of weeks from the leadership, then conference will be a bloodbath.' READ MORE Though they doubted that any MSP or MP would challenge Mr Swinney directly, they said it did not matter if the only competition came from an activist, as any contest would be 'hugely damning and damaging, and make the party look utterly ridiculous.' Under SNP rules, any member who can secure 100 nominations from 20 different branches ahead of party conference can trigger a leadership vote. An SNP insider said: 'NEC members better start looking for new hobbies unless the leadership announces a change of direction soon — because at this rate we are heading for a mass clear-out. 'It feels like Groundhog Day. The last time John was in charge he dropped independence, surrounded himself only by people who agreed with him, and pushed out the likes of Margo [McDonald] and anyone who challenged his devolutionist strategy. 'For those with short memories, that ended in a bruising defeat. If he stays, we will be heading for a repeat. What is left of the membership will not tolerate it. 'The ability to make the case for independence is not a desirable part of the job description — it is essential — and he has failed on probation. 'The Presbyterian schoolmaster might fly in Perthshire — but in the rest of Scotland it just does not land. Stabilising the party only works for a short time. There is no energy, no fire, no boldness, no long-term vision.' READ MORE Last week's Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election saw the SNP lose to Labour by 602 votes. The party had been favourites, with Mr Swinney insisting Labour were out of the contest and that it was a two-horse race between his party and Nigel Farage's Reform UK. Yesterday, the constituency's new MSP, Davy Russell, took his oath at Holyrood and, in a speech on the steps of the garden lobby, said his win could be a 'springboard' to Labour winning power next year. Labour's newest MSP, Davy Russell's first day in Holyrood (Image: Andrew Milligan/ PA Wire) The seat had been held by Scottish Government minister Christina McKelvie until her death earlier this year at the age of 57. At a press conference on Friday, Mr Swinney insisted there had been progress for his party when the result was measured against their dire performance at last year's general election. One MSP told The Herald on Sunday that that was not enough. They said it was time for Mr Swinney to make changes to his top team. 'I think a proper ministerial reshuffle is required, and an exercise undertaken to seek new policies. For example, I would call in the former MPs who have experience but have had time to refresh their perspective. 'I can sense that many — for the first time — are now nervous, and rightfully so. 'On independence — again, it can never be enough to simply run a competent devolved government without a vision of what could be.' On Friday, Mr Swinney said he would 'consider all issues around the ministerial team'. Cabinet Secretary for Net Zero, Màiri McAllan, he added, would return from maternity leave soon. Mr Swinney's previous time in charge saw the party's vote share and number of seats fall. He resigned in 2004, paving the way for the return of Alex Salmond. Asked by the BBC on Sunday if he was still the man to lead the party, Mr Swinney said: 'Yes. Twelve months ago, the party turned to me. 'I was not seeking high office — I had held high office for a long time in my life — and the party turned to me, at a moment of real jeopardy, and asked me to use all of my skills and experience, and the loyalty I command in the party, to bring people together and focus us on the future.' Professor Sir John Curtice said the close battle for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse did not mean Anas Sarwar was a shoo-in for Bute House. The election expert told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'The recent message from opinion polls is the SNP is running at just over 30%, Labour is around 20%, so it seems a reasonable expectation that such a result would not mean Anas Sarwar is Scotland's next First Minister.' The First Minister avoided a leadership challenge last year when veteran SNP activist Graeme McCormick was talked out of a bid following a 'lengthy and fruitful conversation' with Mr Swinney. Mr McCormick said he had secured enough nominations to trigger a contest but would 'instead support John Swinney's nomination for Party Leader and First Minister of Scotland.' He said at the time: 'John and I agreed the challenges which the SNP, our Government and our people face, and explored new thinking on a range of issues which I am confident, as they are advanced, will inspire activists both within the SNP and wider independence movement in the following weeks and months. 'This is a fresh start for our members and our politicians, and I am sure that John's determination to deliver independence will be rewarded at the forthcoming General Election." The SNP has been approached for comment.
The National
32 minutes ago
- The National
Labour holds same contempt and arrogance towards Scotland as Tories
THE pattern is now clear and established. Keir Starmer's promised "reset" of the relationship between Westminster and Holyrood meant resetting it to the same old contempt and high-handed arrogance which we witnessed under the previous Conservative administration. When Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that she was going to axe the universal winter fuel payment for pensioners, the Scottish Government was reportedly given a mere 40 minutes' notice despite the fact that control of the equivalent benefit in Scotland is devolved to Holyrood. Holyrood was given little notice of the swingeing benefits cuts which Labour announced in March, even though some of the benefits affected in England and Wales are devolved in Scotland and the benefits cuts will entail a reduction in the annual block grant which forms the backbone of the Scottish budget. This week, the Labour government announced a U-turn on its massively unpopular axing of the winter fuel payment. The UK Government has so far failed to inform the Scottish Government how much extra the Scottish Government will receive as a result of this U-turn. Yet again, there has been no consultation with the Scottish Government on a critical issue affecting thousands in Scotland. READ MORE: Labour MSP Davy Russell sworn in to Scottish Parliament after by-election win Speaking on BBC Scotland's Good Morning Scotland this morning, Governor General Ian Murray first tried to insist that Scottish pensioners will now receive less than their counterparts in England and Wales as a result of Labour's U-turn, a Unionist talking point which had been calmly debunked by Scottish Secretary for Social Justice Shirley-Anne Somerville on the same programme just minutes before. Murray then fell apart when asked how much extra funding the Scottish Government will get after Labour's winter fuel U-turn. He didn't know and ended up rambling on about NHS waiting lists as a distraction. If the Scottish Secretary, the man supposedly Scotland's voice in the UK Government cabinet, doesn't know what the financial implications of this U-turn are for the Scottish budget, then how exactly is the Scottish Government supposed to know? (Image: PA) In yet another instance of Scotland being marginalised and ignored by a Westminster government which continually assures us that it has Scotland's interests at heart, the SNP has pointed out that since taking office, this Labour government has committed £36 billion to energy projects in England since taking power last year but Scotland has scarcely registered at all, with the telling exception of the £3.4 billion electrical interconnection projects which will see two new high capacity electrical cables run from Scotland to England, one on the west coast and one on the east. This project is not about energy production, it is rather a means to facilitate the export of cheap Scottish energy to consumers in England. It's a project which some view as a form of colonialist resource extraction. As the BBC coyly put it in its report announcing the construction of the cables: "Although the link can carry electricity in both directions, the majority is expected to flow out of Scotland." That's like describing the British Museum as a benefit to Athens and the Parthenon. These are the only kinds of energy projects which the UK Government is willing to fund in Scotland. It's almost as though they expect Scotland to become independent and are determined to grab what they can before we go. (Image: PA) This week, Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced a £14.2 billion UK Government investment in the Sizewell C nuclear power station in Sussex. The nuclear plant is expected to take between nine and 12 years to build and cost around £20bn, according to initial estimates from 2020. However, in January, The Financial Times reported that the true cost of the reactor is expected to exceed £40 billion, and will not be ready until 2031 at the most optimistic date. When construction began on the Hinkley Point C nuclear plant in Somerset in 2017, it was expected to go on stream this year, but the project has been plagued by delays and cost overruns. The plant is now expected to be ready between 2029 to 2031 and is forecast to cost £41.6–47.9 billion rather than the original price tag of £18 billion when the project was commissioned. Meanwhile, the UK Government has still not spent any of the £200 million it promised to invest in Grangemouth, while GB Energy's budget has been repeatedly cut. The SNP opposes nuclear power in Scotland, and the party's energy spokesperson at Westminster Dave Doogan, accused the UK Government of pouring money into 'white elephants'. (Image: House of Commons) He said the Labour government was 'treating Scotland as an afterthought because of its prioritisation of English industries with a litany of investments made south of the Border over Scotland'. The SNP added: 'In total, since coming to office last year, the Labour Party has now committed £36bn to nuclear and carbon capture projects in England, whilst the Acorn Project has been forced to live with Labour's warm words, but not a penny of commitment.' Doogan said: 'Yet more billions has been committed to English nuclear projects, yet we have no investment in the Acorn Carbon Capture project, Grangemouth has been shut down and Westminster's fiscal regime has ruined North-East energy jobs – Scotland isn't just an afterthought, it's barely a thought at all. 'The evidence is clear that nuclear is extortionate, takes decades to build and the toxic waste is a risk to local communities – Scotland's future is in renewables, carbon capture and links to Europe, not more money for white elephants. 'It is absurd that energy rich Scotland is home to fuel poor Scots and that while energy bills go up, Scottish energy jobs are going down – that's directly as a consequence of Westminster policy and the further squandering of cash on expensive nuclear won't change that. 'Only the SNP firmly believe money from Scotland's natural resources should benefit Scotland's people – something that's an alien concept to Scottish Labour MPs who cheer on investment in England at the expense of Scottish industry.'
Glasgow Times
an hour ago
- Glasgow Times
Controversial Loch Lomond Flamingo Land plans recalled
In September 2024, the Yorkshire-based theme park operator, Flamingo Land Ltd, had their planning permission in principle rejected by all 14 board members of the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs Planning Authority. Now, plans for the development at Lomond Banks have been recalled by Scottish Ministers reports our sister title The National. Minister for Public Finance, Ivan McKee (below), said he has recalled the plans as the proposed development raises issues of 'national significance'. He said: 'I have decided to recall the Lomond Banks appeal as the proposed development raises issues of national significance in view of its potential impact on Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park. 'This means that the appeal should be determined at a national level.' The news comes after more than 50,000 people wrote to McKee in just two weeks, demanding that the Scottish Government withdraw its approval of the mega-resort planning application. Scottish Greens MSP Ross Greer said the public's opinion on the proposal, which is the most opposed in Scottish planning history with more than 155,000 individuals lodging objections, 'couldn't be clearer'. He said: 'In just two weeks the Planning Minister has heard directly from over 50,000 people calling on him to block these proposals. Public opinion couldn't be clearer and it is backed up by experts including the Government's own environment watchdog.' Organisations such as the National Trust for Scotland, the Woodland Trust, the Ramblers, and the Scottish Government environment watchdog, SEPA, also raised objections against the plans.
