
City of Joburg billing failure wrongly connects meters, costs resident thousands
What started as a minor billing query last June turned into a year-long nightmare for Peter Maher, a resident in Orange Grove, who found himself paying thousands of rands each month for his neighbour's water consumption.
Despite repeated complaints and formal appeals, the mix-up was only recently resolved – but not before costing Maher dearly, both financially and emotionally.
Read more: Johannesburg Water is building a valve chamber on 16th Street and 1st Avenue in Parkhurst
The trouble began in June 2024 when Maher noticed an unexpected surge in his water bill. 'My usual water bill is around R1 000 a month as I live alone,' he explained, 'but suddenly my bills jumped to R6 000 and sometimes even R8 000 a month.' Upon investigating, he discovered that his account was being charged for the water meter belonging to his neighbour at 19 5th Street.
Despite early reports to Johannesburg City customer services in August 2024, it took until November for a meter reader to confirm that Maher's account included the neighbour's new-style water meter readings – a finding that should have resolved the issue swiftly. Instead, confusion and bureaucratic delays set in. 'Joburg Water sent SMSs saying the matter was closed and the billing was correct, even though their own meter reader's report contradicted that,' Maher said.
The impact on Maher was severe. Unable to keep up with inflated bills, his electricity was cut off in May 2025 due to non-payment. He had to borrow money to settle his outstanding account and have power restored. The prolonged stress of the situation took a toll on his health.
Attempts to resolve the matter through the City of Johannesburg's Ombudsman proved fruitless, with little to no feedback provided. Maher grew increasingly frustrated, suspecting internal blockages and systemic inefficiencies. 'It felt like being passed from pillar to post with no one taking responsibility.'
The situation only turned around after a media inquiry and an on-site inspection in May 2025. Johannesburg Water officially acknowledged the error. According to spokesperson Nombuso Shabalala, 'An internal investigation identified that the water meter from 19 5th Street had been mistakenly linked to 21 5th Street due to a data entry error. This was corrected on May 23, and all incorrect charges will be reversed.'
Also read: Water restored after Rosebank pipe burst
Following media involvement, the issue was resolved swiftly. Maher received his municipal account on May 27 and confirmed that his correct meter number now appears on the bill. He has also been credited with the amount he was wrongly charged. 'It's a huge relief to finally see my correct meter on the account and to have been credited the correct amount. But it's incredibly disappointing that it took media involvement to get the city to take action. This should have been resolved months ago.'
This case highlights broader concerns about the efficiency and reliability of municipal billing systems in Johannesburg. Residents complain that billing errors cause undue financial strain and stress, with many facing disconnections despite being law-abiding ratepayers. It raises urgent questions about accountability and the need for stronger oversight to protect vulnerable community members.
Ward councillor Eleanor Hugget said the issue was part of a wider problem, with many Johannesburg residents facing ongoing stress due to repeated billing errors and poor resolution from the city. She described the system as inefficient, with residents often pushed from one department to another without proper help, forcing them to pay large sums to avoid service disconnections. Hugget called the situation unacceptable and a form of abuse.
For Maher, the resolution brings closure, but also a sense of injustice. 'I'm glad it's finally been sorted out, but it shouldn't take the media to get basic service delivery. I just want to make sure no one else has to go through what I did.'
Residents are urged to scrutinise their municipal accounts and report any anomalies immediately and regularly. The city's billing departments face mounting pressure to ensure transparency, responsiveness, and fairness for all.
Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration! Have a story idea? We'd love to hear from you – join our WhatsApp group and share your thoughts!
Related article: Water disruption in Rosebank and surrounding areas due to emergency repairs
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
City of Joburg billing failure wrongly connects meters, costs resident thousands
What started as a minor billing query last June turned into a year-long nightmare for Peter Maher, a resident in Orange Grove, who found himself paying thousands of rands each month for his neighbour's water consumption. Despite repeated complaints and formal appeals, the mix-up was only recently resolved – but not before costing Maher dearly, both financially and emotionally. Read more: Johannesburg Water is building a valve chamber on 16th Street and 1st Avenue in Parkhurst The trouble began in June 2024 when Maher noticed an unexpected surge in his water bill. 'My usual water bill is around R1 000 a month as I live alone,' he explained, 'but suddenly my bills jumped to R6 000 and sometimes even R8 000 a month.' Upon investigating, he discovered that his account was being charged for the water meter belonging to his neighbour at 19 5th Street. Despite early reports to Johannesburg City customer services in August 2024, it took until November for a meter reader to confirm that Maher's account included the neighbour's new-style water meter readings – a finding that should have resolved the issue swiftly. Instead, confusion and bureaucratic delays set in. 'Joburg Water sent SMSs saying the matter was closed and the billing was correct, even though their own meter reader's report contradicted that,' Maher said. The impact on Maher was severe. Unable to keep up with inflated bills, his electricity was cut off in May 2025 due to non-payment. He had to borrow money to settle his outstanding account and have power restored. The prolonged stress of the situation took a toll on his health. Attempts to resolve the matter through the City of Johannesburg's Ombudsman proved fruitless, with little to no feedback provided. Maher grew increasingly frustrated, suspecting internal blockages and systemic inefficiencies. 'It felt like being passed from pillar to post with no one taking responsibility.' The situation only turned around after a media inquiry and an on-site inspection in May 2025. Johannesburg Water officially acknowledged the error. According to spokesperson Nombuso Shabalala, 'An internal investigation identified that the water meter from 19 5th Street had been mistakenly linked to 21 5th Street due to a data entry error. This was corrected on May 23, and all incorrect charges will be reversed.' Also read: Water restored after Rosebank pipe burst Following media involvement, the issue was resolved swiftly. Maher received his municipal account on May 27 and confirmed that his correct meter number now appears on the bill. He has also been credited with the amount he was wrongly charged. 'It's a huge relief to finally see my correct meter on the account and to have been credited the correct amount. But it's incredibly disappointing that it took media involvement to get the city to take action. This should have been resolved months ago.' This case highlights broader concerns about the efficiency and reliability of municipal billing systems in Johannesburg. Residents complain that billing errors cause undue financial strain and stress, with many facing disconnections despite being law-abiding ratepayers. It raises urgent questions about accountability and the need for stronger oversight to protect vulnerable community members. Ward councillor Eleanor Hugget said the issue was part of a wider problem, with many Johannesburg residents facing ongoing stress due to repeated billing errors and poor resolution from the city. She described the system as inefficient, with residents often pushed from one department to another without proper help, forcing them to pay large sums to avoid service disconnections. Hugget called the situation unacceptable and a form of abuse. For Maher, the resolution brings closure, but also a sense of injustice. 'I'm glad it's finally been sorted out, but it shouldn't take the media to get basic service delivery. I just want to make sure no one else has to go through what I did.' Residents are urged to scrutinise their municipal accounts and report any anomalies immediately and regularly. The city's billing departments face mounting pressure to ensure transparency, responsiveness, and fairness for all. Follow us on our Whatsapp channel, Facebook, X, Instagram and TikTok for the latest updates and inspiration! Have a story idea? We'd love to hear from you – join our WhatsApp group and share your thoughts! Related article: Water disruption in Rosebank and surrounding areas due to emergency repairs At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!


The South African
3 days ago
- The South African
Will Joslin Smith state witness get indemnity or face JAIL?
The state witness in the Joslin Smith trafficking trial, Laurentia Lombaard, is awaiting her fate of indemnity or a prison sentence in a special hearing under the Western Cape High Court. The woman – a former accused who turned State 204 witness – has previously stated under oath that the missing girl's mother, Kelly Smith, allegedly sold her daughter to a sangoma for R20 000. Last week, Kelly, her boyfriend Jacquin 'Boeta' Appollis, and pal Steveno van Rhyn were sentenced to life in prison for trafficking and kidnapping. The trio has 14 days to apply for leave to appeal the sentence. Joslin went missing from her home in Saldanha Bay on 19 February 2024. She has not been found. Speaking to the SABC, National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) prosecutor Zelda Swanepoel revealed Western Cape High Court Judge Nathan Erasmus would hear evidence and arguments from both the prosecution and the defense pertaining to state witness, Laurentia Lombaard. He would impose her sentence in a separate hearing. Swanepoel said: 'We will be called upon to argue and indicate why we say she should or should not be granted indemnity. 'Our argument is that she should be granted indemnity.' State witness Lourentia Lombaard testified that Kelly Smith sold her daughter Joslin to a sangoma. Will she be granted indemnity for her testimony? Images via YouTube screenshot: SABC News. Laurentia Lombaard – a State 204 witness – previously stated under oath that Joslin Smith's mother, Kelly Smith, allegedly sold her to a sangoma for R20 000. Lombaard also claimed in her testimony that Kelly had offered her R1 000 in 'hush money'. She added that she had not received the money, even after confronting Kelly about it. Late last year, charges were withdrawn against Lombaard, who was granted provisional indemnity from criminal prosecution. However, her credibility was questioned when she admitted to lying to police in a recorded statement after Joslin Smith's disappearance. Her version of events from her March 2024 statement differs from her confession to police in October, when she agreed to turn state witness. In court, she admitted to being under the influence of drugs when making the initial statement. According to the Criminal Procedure Act, a Section 204 witness can receive indemnity from criminal charges, provided that their testimony and evidence help incriminate the accused. In the case of Joslin Smith, the NPA offered Lombaard witness protection in exchange for her testimony against Kelly Smith, Boeta Appollis, and Steveno van Rhyn, who have since been convicted and sentenced. If the court does find that Lombaard did not testify truthfully, she could face prosecution for perjury and related charges. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.


The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
Cartoon of the day: 4 June 2025
If the water maintenance is complete, where is the water? While Rand Water has completed the first phase of its large-scale maintenance project, some residents in Gauteng continue to struggle with water supply issues. Since Thursday, 29 May, the utility has been conducting multiple concurrent maintenance operations to clean and repair its existing infrastructure. The water utility announced the completion of the B16 project on Monday morning, easing the suffering of thousands of residents who had been experiencing water shortages for several days. 'We're pleased to share that all work on the B16 project is complete, and pumping at Mapleton has officially started,' Rand Water said. While the project is complete, the water supply was not restored immediately across all affected areas. Rand Water explained that the distribution system requires time to rebuild pressure and capacity before normal supply can resume. What affects supply? It provided no timeline for full restoration but said it may vary significantly based on where you stay. Low-lying areas are expected to get water supply first, while residents in high-lying areas will likely wait longer before their taps flow normally again. 'Recovery depends on overall demand, so if your supply is back, please use water sparingly to help the system stabilise,' the utility added. Johannesburg Water previously cautioned that the recovery process could take as long as two weeks. 'After each maintenance has been completed, it will take a maximum of 14 days for the system to fully recover, and for normal water supply to return,' Johannesburg Water stated in earlier communications with residents. ALSO READ: Rand Water completes maintenance, but municipal failures may leave taps dry Second phase The second phase of maintenance started on Tuesday and is set to affect the following areas: Sandton Systems, Alexander Park Reservoir, South Hills Tower, Randjieslaagte Reservoir, Linksfield Reservoir, and Midrand Systems. The overall maintenance project is expected to continue well into July. NOW READ: Here's where to find water tankers in your area