More people could get help to navigate their financial lives, says regulator
'Once-in-a-generation' proposals to help more people navigate tricky financial decisions and boost confidence when getting to grips with investments and pensions have been set out by the City regulator.
The proposals would enable firms to offer a new type of help called 'targeted support' and make suggestions to groups of consumers with common characteristics.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is aiming to reduce the 'advice gap' – so that people have timely access to the help they need, at a cost they can afford, to make informed decisions about their financial lives.
The FCA said people who may be currently drawing down on their pension unsustainably, not saving enough for retirement or who have excess cash sitting in a current account, could potentially be helped.
Sarah Pritchard, deputy chief executive of the FCA, said: 'We want to help consumers navigate their financial lives and plan for the long term. Some of the most difficult financial decisions we face are how to save, invest and prepare for a comfortable retirement.
'These once-in-a-generation reforms will help people navigate their financial lives and give them greater confidence to invest. This is a win-win for consumers and firms alike.'
The reforms should set the framework for the next 20 to 30 years, the regulator said.
The FCA said that as well as targeted support, it wants to see a thriving and trusted market for full financial advice, simplified advice and guidance.
It said the advice gap is 'stark'. Just 9% of adults received financial advice about their pensions or investments in the previous 12 months, according to the FCA's latest Financial Lives survey 2024.
Of those who did not receive financial advice, but hold £10,000 or more in cash savings, 24% said they do not invest because they do not know enough about it, 12% because they feel overwhelmed by the number of options available, and 8% said they would need more support before they invest.
The FCA said there are around seven million adults in the UK with £10,000 or more in cash savings who may be missing out on the benefits of investing throughout their lives.
Its consultation is open for eight weeks.
The regulator said it is also working with the Government to help resolve issues that might prevent firms communicating with consumers.
Dan Olley, chief executive at Hargreaves Lansdown, said the changes 'will be truly transformational in kick-starting a thriving retail investment culture in the UK over the coming years'.
He continued: 'For the first time, we will be able to provide targeted support that is much more relevant for each of our clients.
'We will be able to tailor conversations and the digital experience to where they are in their investing journey, helping them see the potential of certain choices, which could have large positive impacts on their financial outcomes over the long term.'
Tom Selby, director of public policy at AJ Bell, said: 'Ensuring people can access the help and support they need, either through regulated advice or guidance, is critical to building financial resilience in the UK. The existing regulatory framework makes it difficult for firms to offer anything beyond relatively basic information to non-advised customers without risking straying over the boundary from guidance to advice.
'This means millions of people who don't take regulated advice are essentially left to make often complex retirement decisions on an island, without receiving the help they require.'
Claire Exley, head of financial advice and guidance at JP Morgan-owned wealth manager, Nutmeg said: 'Targeted support is a much needed and welcomed first step in closing the advice gap.
'We know clients are looking for guidance that is relevant to them, their situation at the time it's right for them. ' People like you' scenarios will hopefully help consumers to build confidence in their own decision making – we're aware that often people are looking for reassurance that they've arrived at the 'right' decision – rather than being told what the decision should be.'
James Heal, director of public policy at St James's Place, said: 'We are moving closer to a new form of support that will help consumers make better investment decisions.'
Yvonne Braun, director of long-term savings policy at the Association of British Insurers (ABI) said: 'We know facing complex financial decisions can feel overwhelming, especially in retirement, which is why we've long championed targeted support. The FCA's decision to press ahead with this crucial proposal is very welcome and should be a relief to millions of savers.
'We expect targeted support to be free and widely available. To ensure its success, it should be backed by a clear process for fair compensation if things go wrong. Giving firms the freedom and flexibility to roll out targeted support across a range of products and scenarios will make sure everyone can benefit. We also welcome the drive for simplified advice. While no single solution will entirely close the advice gap, this package is a major leap forward.'
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'Too many people are missing out on the support they need build a more secure financial future for themselves and their families.
'Today's reforms will make a real difference to help working people make better long-term financial decisions, ultimately putting more money in their pockets as part of our plan for change.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
43 minutes ago
- Reuters
NATO fund backs biotech startup in push to counter biological threats
STOCKHOLM, June 30 (Reuters) - The NATO Innovation Fund has made its first investment in a biotechnology company, it said on Monday, seeking to enhance defences against biological threats The fund is co-leading a $35 million fundraising round for Portal Biotech, which uses protein sequencing to detect engineered threats and defend against biological warfare. UK-based Portal Biotech's capability is essential for biosecurity defence and security, said Ana Bernardo-Gancedo, senior associate at NATO Innovation Fund. "We believe that it is absolutely imperative that we are able to detect, monitor and create countermeasures," she said. The fund, created in 2022 after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, plans to invest more than $1 billion in technologies that would enhance NATO's defences. Portal Biotech uses an AI-backed technology with biological sensors that can work at the single molecule level on-site, giving results within hours. "It's for everything from measuring diseases to better pandemic prevention ... you can take this out of large labs with long turnaround times and into the field," CEO Andy Heron told Reuters. Heron said the company's instruments can detect any pathogen and can be used for continuous monitoring of anything from a field to water supply. "It allows you not just to detect what you did know was out there, but it allows you to detect what you didn't know," he said. Beyond biosecurity, Portal Biotech expects its portable equipment to aid in drug discovery and precision medicine. The company's investors include Earlybird Venture Capital, Science Creates VC, Pillar VC, 8VC, We VC and British Business Bank.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
With friends like Andy Burnham, who needs Jeremy Corbyn?
Former Labour MPs, now safely ensconced in powerful positions in local government and having little to do with benefits, can taste blood in the water. They are using their national profiles to make life as difficult as possible for their party leader and the Prime Minister. Last week we had London Mayor, Sadiq Khan, encouraging Labour MPs to rebel over the cuts. And now that other aspiring party leader, Manchester's Andy Burnham, has helpfully put the boot into the Government too, urging his former parliamentary colleagues to continue their rebellion. This is despite last week's humiliating U-turn by Keir Starmer, who agreed to water down the cuts in the face of the prospect of more than 100 Labour MPs voting against the Bill. Starmer must be wondering if the last Labour Government's (and the last Tory one's) eagerness to set up powerful mayors across the country was wise after all. Both Khan and Burnham are not accountable to the Labour whip at Westminster, and neither has any power to impact on the levels of benefits paid out by the Department of Work and Pensions, yet both are keen to burnish their soft-Left political credentials by jumping on the anti-cuts bandwagon and making life even less comfortable for Starmer than it already was. With friends like these, etc. Any kind of genuine benefit reform – reform aimed squarely at those who have given up trying to get a job and have decided they would prefer to rely on benefits long-term – requires a degree of consensus, not just across the political spectrum but within the Labour Party itself. Starmer's majority in the Commons is higher than the total number of Conservative MPs, so it is Labour who will decide how serious the current appetite for change actually is. The problem for the Government is, firstly, the Treasury. Any reforms worthy of the label will initially cost more money than they save – for example, moving wholesale to face-to-face interviews. The benefit to the Government would be obvious in terms of the number of claimants who would develop cold feet and choose not to press ahead with their application based solely on their reluctance to defend their claim face-to-face. Yet for the bean-counters at the Treasury, any increase in costs, even in the short term and even if such costs would pay for themselves within a year or three, this would be unacceptable. It is this kind of change that is missing from the Bill currently set to go before the House and which would reduce the benefits bill – in time – far more effectively than the piecemeal and miserly short-term cuts currently planned. There are others that could be enacted even without legislation, for example, the scrapping of monetary bonuses to staff who get through a high number of claims in as short a period as possible, which only encourages approval of claims without proper assessment. But even these changes would meet political opposition from within Labour, including from the King in the North and the Bus Driver's Son in City Hall. The key to progress lies with neither of these ambitious men, but with Rachel Reeves herself. Consider this quote from the Chancellor: 'We are not the party of people on benefits. We don't want to be seen, and we're not, the party to represent those who are out of work. Labour are a party of working people, formed for and by working people.' Granted, Reeves said this long before the burden of responsibility for the nation's finances was placed on her shoulders. In fact she said it ten years ago when she was the shadow work and pensions secretary under Ed Miliband. But as her leader continues to struggle with what he actually believes about welfare reform and grapples with his more recalcitrant parliamentary colleagues, perhaps some of Reeves's erstwhile radicalism could help rescue her party from the quagmire it has constructed for itself. Aid is certainly not going to come from those who left parliament years ago to grandstand from afar.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Fuel margins remain high despite lower prices at the pump, watchdog finds
Drivers are still being hit with high fuel margins despite lower prices at the pump, the competition watchdog has said. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said retailers' margins – the difference between what they pay for fuel and what they sell it at – remained high compared to historic levels. Fuel prices across the UK fell for both petrol and diesel over the three months to the end of May by 7.6 pence per litre (ppl) and 8.4 ppl respectively. But the CMA found that fuel margins were similar to the high levels seen during its road fuel market study – a review of the market to understand the factors influencing fuel prices undertaken in 2023 – which suggested overall competition in the UK's road fuel retail market remained 'weak'. Supermarket fuel margins fell from 8.9% in December 2024 to 7.9% in February 2025, before rising to 8.3% in March 2025, the regulator found. Non-supermarket fuel margins fell from 9.9% in December 2024 to 8.9% in January 2025, before rising to 10.4% in March 2025. The CMA also looked at the retail spread – the average price that drivers pay at the pump compared to the benchmarked price that retailers buy fuel at – across the UK from March 2025 to May 2025. It found that petrol retail spreads averaged 15.4 ppl, which was 1.5 ppl higher than the previous four-month period – and still more than double the average of 6.5 ppl over 2015 to 2019. Diesel retail spreads averaged 18.8 ppl, which was 4.6 ppl higher than the previous four-month period and more than double the average of 8.6 ppl in 2015 to 2019. Dan Turnbull, senior director of markets at the CMA, said: 'While there is uncertainty over how global events will impact the price of oil, our report shows fuel margins remain high compared to historic levels despite lower prices at the pump in recent months. 'The Government committed to launching a 'fuel finder' scheme following our recommendation to help drivers compare real-time prices and boost competition. 'Once launched, it will make it easier than ever to shop around and find the best deals.'
