New Zealand Coroner Raises Alarm Over 'Perilous' Collision Sport
A New Zealand coroner Thursday condemned a "perilous" rugby-inspired sport in which competitors sprint and crash into each other without protective gear.
"Runit" competitors line up 20 metres (65 feet) apart and run directly at each other, with the winner being the person who "dominates the collision".
Coroner Bruce Hesketh issued the warning as a separate comment in his report into a club player who died after being tackled in a traditional rugby league game.
The Australian-based Runit Championship League set up a base in New Zealand this year.
It offers a NZ$20,000 (US$12,000) prize to winners of regional competitions and NZ$200,000 to the overall winner of the tournament.
Fuelled by social media, unsanctioned splinter events have been held in both Australia and New Zealand.
In May, 19-year-old Ryan Satterthwaite died in New Zealand after suffering a serious head injury during one such event.
Hesketh, who is not looking into the teenager's death, said he was concerned about the Runit events.
"The competition has all the hallmarks of perilous activity that makes no attempt to mitigate head injury," he said.
"There appears to be no governing body, the activity is not regulated and has no written publicly accessible rules of participation.
"Neither is there any information to players around the signs and dangers of concussion or concussion management."
Hesketh said the goal in rugby union or rugby league is to avoid tackles, whereas the goal in Runit competition is the opposite.
"Furthermore, all the applicable team sporting bodies involved have invested heavily in concussion awareness, prevention, identity and management," Hesketh said.
Runit events "should not be recognised as an official sport", he said.
The Runit Championship League touts itself as the "home of collisions".
After Satterthwaite's death, New Zealand police warned people to be wary of the "significant" injury risks.
In the Runit Championship League's first event in Auckland in May, two people were knocked out, and one man ended up having seizures after suffering a head injury.
The collision that led to the seizures was greeted with loud cheers from a crowd of more than 1,000 people.
The league organisers had planned to host the final event in Auckland but moved it to Dubai after calls for it to be banned in New Zealand.
The league is flying all competitors to the June 28 final at the Agenda Arena in Dubai.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
12 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Mushroom Murder Suspect Fell Sick From Same Meal: Defence
An Australian woman accused of killing three lunch guests with toxic mushrooms fell sick from the same meal, her defence said Thursday, rejecting claims she faked her symptoms. Erin Patterson, 50, is charged with murdering her estranged husband's parents and aunt in July 2023 by spiking their beef Wellington lunch with death cap mushrooms. She is also accused of attempting to murder a fourth guest -- her husband's uncle -- who survived the lunch after a long stay in hospital. Patterson has steadfastly maintained her innocence during a seven-week-long trial that has made headlines from New York to New Delhi. As the trial came to its closing stages, defence lawyer Colin Mandy poked holes in the prosecutor's case, saying his client, too, fell ill after consuming the beef-and-pastry dish. Patterson's medical tests at the hospital revealed symptoms "that can't be faked", including low potassium and elevated haemoglobin, he said. "She was not as sick as the other lunch guests, nor did she represent she was," Mandy said. The prosecution maintains Patterson did not consume the fatal fungi and faked her symptoms. Mandy said his client lied in panic in the days after the lunch, trying to "conceal the fact that foraged mushrooms went into the meal". "If that was found out, she feared she would be held responsible," her defence said. "She panicked when confronted with the terrible possibility, the terrible realisation, that her actions had caused the illness of people she liked." Mandy said he was not "making an excuse" for Patterson's behaviour after the lunch, but that it did not mean she meant to harm or kill her guests. Patterson originally invited her estranged husband Simon to join the family lunch at her secluded home in the farming village of Leongatha in Victoria state. But he turned down the invitation on the eve of the meal, saying he felt uncomfortable going, the court heard earlier. The pair were long estranged but still legally married. Simon Patterson's parents Don and Gail, and his aunt Heather Wilkinson, attended the lunch. All three were dead within days. Heather Wilkinson's husband Ian fell gravely ill but eventually recovered. The trial in Morwell, southeast of Melbourne, is in its final stages. Media crews assemble outside Latrobe Valley Magistrates' Court where Erin Patterson is due to attend her trial in Morwell on May 2, 2025. Erin Patterson, 50, is charged with three murders -- the parents and aunt of her estranged husband -- and one attempted murder. AFP
Int'l Business Times
13 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
New Zealand Coroner Raises Alarm Over 'Perilous' Collision Sport
A New Zealand coroner Thursday condemned a "perilous" rugby-inspired sport in which competitors sprint and crash into each other without protective gear. "Runit" competitors line up 20 metres (65 feet) apart and run directly at each other, with the winner being the person who "dominates the collision". Coroner Bruce Hesketh issued the warning as a separate comment in his report into a club player who died after being tackled in a traditional rugby league game. The Australian-based Runit Championship League set up a base in New Zealand this year. It offers a NZ$20,000 (US$12,000) prize to winners of regional competitions and NZ$200,000 to the overall winner of the tournament. Fuelled by social media, unsanctioned splinter events have been held in both Australia and New Zealand. In May, 19-year-old Ryan Satterthwaite died in New Zealand after suffering a serious head injury during one such event. Hesketh, who is not looking into the teenager's death, said he was concerned about the Runit events. "The competition has all the hallmarks of perilous activity that makes no attempt to mitigate head injury," he said. "There appears to be no governing body, the activity is not regulated and has no written publicly accessible rules of participation. "Neither is there any information to players around the signs and dangers of concussion or concussion management." Hesketh said the goal in rugby union or rugby league is to avoid tackles, whereas the goal in Runit competition is the opposite. "Furthermore, all the applicable team sporting bodies involved have invested heavily in concussion awareness, prevention, identity and management," Hesketh said. Runit events "should not be recognised as an official sport", he said. The Runit Championship League touts itself as the "home of collisions". After Satterthwaite's death, New Zealand police warned people to be wary of the "significant" injury risks. In the Runit Championship League's first event in Auckland in May, two people were knocked out, and one man ended up having seizures after suffering a head injury. The collision that led to the seizures was greeted with loud cheers from a crowd of more than 1,000 people. The league organisers had planned to host the final event in Auckland but moved it to Dubai after calls for it to be banned in New Zealand. The league is flying all competitors to the June 28 final at the Agenda Arena in Dubai.
DW
a day ago
- DW
Major oil companies face first 'climate death' lawsuit – DW – 06/18/2025
A US complaint against oil and gas giants including BP and Shell claims they fueled the extreme heat that killed a woman in Seattle. Can the first death by 'climate disaster' claim succeed? On June 28, 2021, a heatwave saw temperatures rise to over 42 degrees Celsius (108-degrees Fahrenheit) in Seattle, the hottest ever recorded in the US coastal city. On that day, Juliana Leon was found unconscious in her car and died soon after from hyperthermia — the overheating of the body. Now her daughter, Misti Leon, is suing seven oil and gas companies for wrongful death in a Washington State court. She alleges that they accelerated the extreme heat that led to her mother's death by manufacturing and marketing fossil fuels. The filing claims the companies — including ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell and BP — had known for decades "that their fossil fuel products were already altering the earth's atmosphere." These defendants willfully created a "fossil fuel-dependent economy" that would result in "more frequent and destructive weather disasters and foreseeable loss of human life," the complaint alleges. Record temperatures continued into the evening on June 28, 2021 in Seattle as some residents, including Juliana Leon, succumbed to severe heat stress Image: Ted S. Warren/AP/picture alliance In the first wrongful death claim of its kind, a win for Leon would "represent a landmark shift in climate litigation," said Maria Antonia Tigre, director of Global Climate Litigation at the New York City-based Sabin Center for Climate Change Law. While very few cases have "awarded damages" in climate litigation, success in Seattle could see individuals seek "compensatory and even punitive damages" from fossil fuel corporations for their role in climate change, Tigre explained. Besides seeking damages, the plaintiff also wants the defendants to fund a "public education" campaign to rectify "decades of misinformation" — which Leon says has fueled "consumer confusion" about the link between burning fossil fuels and planetary heating. Chevron, BP, Shell and ConocoPhillips did not respond to a DW request for comment on the case. What heat waves do to our bodies and brains To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Big Oil rejects claims in case The Chevron Corporation, one the world's largest oil and gas producers, rejects the claims made in the lawsuit. "Exploiting a personal tragedy to promote politicized climate tort litigation is contrary to law, science, and common sense," Chevron spokesperson Theodore Boutrous Jr. said in a statement to US public broadcaster, NPR. "The court should add this far-fetched claim to the growing list of meritless climate lawsuits that state and federal courts have already dismissed," he added. But according to Tigre, the case "could create a novel but plausible basis for liability." The filing is based on tort law as opposed to national statutes such as emission regulations that have underpinned most climate litigation cases. Inside the oil industy's massive lobbying efforts To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Tort law claims seek damages for individuals impacted by climate change, noted Rebekkah Markey-Towler, a research fellow at the Melbourne Climate Futures think tank. In the past, such civil lawsuits have been a vital means for individuals to "seek redress" against big tobacco or asbestos companies, the researcher explained. A Pennsylvania man was awarded $3.8 million (€3.5 million) from his employer in 2024 for contracting mesothelioma due to asbestos exposure. Climate cases are "no different," she added. "Big Oil companies are already facing climate fraud and damages lawsuits from dozens of state and local governments," noted Alyssa Johl, vice president of legal and general counsel at the Center for Climate Integrity, a US-based climate think tank. But as this latest case is "the first filed on behalf of an individual climate victim," she said, it represents "another step toward accountability." Markey-Towler said prior tort law climate cases — even those in other countries — could be "tangentially relevant" to this claim. In 2015, a landmark Dutch climate change lawsuit known as the Urgenda case, employed the tort law principle of "hazardous negligence" to argue that government inaction on climate change constituted a breach of its duty of care towards its citizens. The ruling forced the Dutch government to raise emission reduction targets. A more recent case in Germany where a Peruvian farmer sued energy giant RWE for its contribution to the glacial melt and flood risk posing a danger to his house, was another attempt by an individual to seek climate damages. "While the case did not succeed at the merits stage, the court acknowledged that, in principle, a private emitter could be held liable for a proportion of the damages," Markey-Towler noted of the final judgement in May. Peruvian farmer Saul Luciano Lliuya's lost case against RWE still upheld the principle that a fossil company can be be held liable for climate damage Image: Alexander Luna/Germanwatch e.V. 'Attribution science' key in proving responsibility for heatwave The science of weather attribution, which estimates the probability of climate change making extreme weather events such as wildfires, floods or heatwaves more likely, will "be central to the case," said Tigre. The 2021 heatwave along the US west coast — dubbed the Pacific Northwest Heat Dome — would have been "virtually impossible" without human-made climate change, according to rapid analysis at the time. The record temperatures that continued for three days would have been "at least 150 times rarer" without climate change, the research noted. Estimated to happen only once every 1000 years, such extreme heat would instead occur around every 5 to 10 years if, as predicted, global temperatures rise 2 C (3.6 F) by the early 2040s. Temperatures soar in Pakistan heat wave To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Heat is called a "silent killer" and caused the deaths of 489,000 people annually between 2000-2019, noted a 2024 UN report. The Pacific Northwest Heat Dome event resulted in around 850 deaths related to high temperatures across the US and Canada. But Tigre says the problem for Misti Leon's claim against the oil companies will be convincing the court of the defendants' "specific" contributions to global emissions. "Even if we are able to say that climate change caused an event, how much did one company contribute to this?" asked Markey-Towler. "That's difficult." A potential 'new wave' of litigation Nonetheless, she says "health arguments" are becoming common in climate lawsuits, which now number nearly 3,000 in the US and around the world, according to the Climate Change Litigation Database run by the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law in New York. If the Washington state case is successful, it would establish a landmark precedent "directly connecting the actions of fossil fuel companies to harm suffered by individuals," said Markey-Towler. Evolving legal theories such as "climate homicide or corporate manslaughter," which take the step of seeking a criminal as opposed to a civil conviction, could be helped by a successful trial, noted Maria Antonia Tigre. "Such a precedent would likely spark a new wave of litigation," she added. Edited by: Jennifer Collins
