Suspect charged with federal hate crime in attack on Colorado rally for Israeli hostages
Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, is alleged to have shouted 'Free Palestine' as he attacked the crowd on Sunday. The FBI said Soliman told police he planned the attack for a year and had specifically targeted what he described as the 'Zionist group', the Associated Press reported.
At a press conference on Monday the Boulder county district attorney said Soliman would be prosecuted for a federal hate crime and 16 counts of attempted murder. If convicted, he would be jailed for the rest of his life, with a cumulative of more than 600 years.
At the press conference, US attorney for the district of Colorado said in a statement that Soliman had resorted to molotov cocktails when he wasn't able to obtain a gun. There were at least 16 unused molotov cocktails recovered from the scene, according to the US attorney's office, district of Colorado.
An FBI affidavit said Soliman – upon confessing to Sunday's attack after his arrest – told the police he would do it again.
Officials said there was no indication that the attack was associated with any group. NBC reported Soliman was an Egyptian national, and the White House claimed Soliman was in the US without legal status.
Four women and four men between 52 and 88 years old, including a woman that a Department of Justice official said was a survivor of the Holocaust, were transported to hospitals, Boulder police said, with injuries ranging from minor to 'very serious'. Four additional victims had minor injuries but were not hospitalized.
The attack took place on the Pearl Street Mall, close to the University of Colorado, during an event organized by Run for Their Lives, a group which aims to draw attention to the people taken hostage following Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel.
Soliman is alleged to have thrown a device into a group of people who had assembled in a pedestrianized zone for the peaceful rally. The Boulder police chief, Stephen Redfearn, said the department received calls at about 1.26pm local time on Sunday of a man with a weapon near a downtown courthouse and that people were being set on fire.
Brooke Coffman, a 19-year-old University of Colorado student, told Reuters she saw four women lying or sitting on the ground with burns on their legs. One of them appeared to have been badly burned on most of her body and had been wrapped in a flag by someone, Coffman said.
She said she saw a man whom she presumed to be the attacker holding a glass bottle of clear liquid and shouting.
'Everybody is yelling: 'Get water, get water,'' Coffman said.
Alex Osante, from San Diego, told the Associated Press he was having lunch on a restaurant patio across the pedestrian mall when he heard the crash of a bottle breaking on the ground, a 'boom' sound followed by people yelling and screaming.
In a video of the scene filmed by Osante, people could be seen pouring water on a woman lying on the ground who Osante said had been burned during the attack.
After the initial attack, Osante said the suspect went behind some bushes and then re-emerged and threw a molotov cocktail but appeared to accidentally set himself on fire as he threw it. The man then took off his shirt and what appeared to be a bulletproof vest before the police arrived. The man dropped to the ground and was arrested without any apparent resistance in the video that Osante filmed.
The justice department said one of the victims was a Holocaust survivor.
'She endured the worst evil in human history. She came to America seeking safety,' said Leo Terrell, a senior counsel on civil rights in the justice department. 'This is all caused by the same type of hatred: antisemitism.' Terrell, who leads the Trump administration's antisemitism taskforce, was criticized in March after he shared a post by a white supremacist.
Mark Michalek, the FBI special agent in charge of the Denver field office, identified Soliman as the lone suspect.
'It is clear that this is a targeted act of violence and the FBI is investigating this as an act of terrorism,' Michalek told a press conference, citing witnesses.
Kash Patel, the director of the FBI, described the incident as a 'targeted terror attack', and Colorado's attorney general, Phil Weiser, said it appeared to be 'a hate crime given the group that was targeted'.
Soliman is due to appear in court at 1.30pm local time on Monday, according to Boulder county jail records. He is being held on a $10m bond. Law enforcement officials said Soliman was also injured and was taken to the hospital to be treated, but did not elaborate on the nature of his injuries.
On his Truth Social platform Monday, Donald Trump said the attack 'will not be tolerated in the United States of America'. The US president also said acts of terrorism 'will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law'.
In a post on X, Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff for policy, described Soliman as an 'illegal alien' who had overstayed his tourist visa. Miller criticized Joe Biden's presidential administration, whom he said had given Soliman a work permit.
CNN, citing law enforcement officials, reported that Soliman arrived in the US in August 2022 as a non-immigrant visitor. It reported that the officials said he was granted a work authorization in March 2023, which expired at the end of March this year, more than two months into Trump's presidency.
Soliman had previously applied for asylum in the US, CNN reported. He was denied a visa to enter the country in 2005.
Miller said the attack was further evidence of the need to 'fully reverse' what he described as 'suicidal migration'.
In his Truth post, Trump linked Soliman's presence in the US to 'Biden's ridiculous Open Border Policy, which has hurt our country so badly'.
Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Homeland Security, said Soliman was 'illegally in our country'.
'He entered the country in August 2022 on a B2 visa that expired on February 2023. He filed for asylum in September 2022,' McLaughlin said.
The attack comes amid heightened tensions over Israel's war on Gaza, which in the US has spurred both an increase in both antisemitic and anti-Muslim hate crimes.
It follows the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy employees in Washington DC who had attended an event hosted by the American Jewish Committee, an advocacy group that fights antisemitism and supports Israel.
Conservative supporters of Israel have branded pro-Palestinian protests as antisemitic, and Donald Trump's administration has detained several protesters of the war without charge, while cutting off funding to elite US universities where protests against Israel's war on Gaza have taken place.
Hamas launched an attack on Israel on 7 October 2023, killing about 1,200 people. It is still holding 58 hostages in Gaza, of whom 20 are believed to be still alive. Israel responded to the attack by launching a bombing campaign on Gaza which has killed more than 54,000 people.
The Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, said in a statement that the Colorado victims were attacked 'simply because they were Jews' and that he trusted US authorities would prosecute 'the cold blood perpetrator to the fullest extent of the law'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
14 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Britain, Germany, France threat Iran sanctions over nuclear talks
Aug. 13 (UPI) -- Britain, Germany and France told U.N. officials that snapback sanctions are on the table if Iran does not sit down to negotiate over its nuclear weaponry. The letter delivered to United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, signed by the three foreign ministers, indicated the E3 was prepared to enforce severe sanctions if Iran did not agree to limit it's nuclear program and gave Iranian officials until the end of the month. "We have made it clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism," read a letter in part signed by Britain's David Lammy, Jean-Noel Barrot of France and Germany's Johann Wadephul. The sixth round of American-Iranian negotiations were abandoned in June after a joint U.S.-Israeli attack on known parts of Iran's nuclear facilities. The 12-day conflict escalated regional tension amid Israel's war in Gaza and spiked oil prices. The "snapback" guardrail built into Iran's 2015 nuclear deal, officially titled the "Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action," was set to trigger if an instance arose in which Iran committed an act of "significant non-performance." Signed by Tehran with Britain, France, Germany, Russia, China, the European Union and United States it removed sanctions and curbed Iran's nuclear program. Initially the United States left the JCPOA in 2018 during U.S. President Donald Trump's first term in the White House. Iran, however, has periodically violated parts of the agreement for years and the snapback mechanism threatened more than once by Europe and the E3 as far back as 2019 nearly four years after the deal was inked. In addition to limiting Iranian nuclear activities, it thawed U.S. sanctions against Tehran that hampered its economy for years. On Wednesday, Germany's Wadephul said Iran "must never acquire a nuclear weapon" and reiterated that the E3 had "every right" to resort to snapback. "Iran has the opportunity to return to diplomacy and resume full cooperation with the IAEA," he wrote in an X post a little before 11 a.m. local time. "The ball is now in Iran's court," Germany added. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.


NBC News
15 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump administration ordered to partially restore grants to UCLA after seeking $1 billion settlement
A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration late Tuesday night, ordering the government to partially restore science funding to UCLA in a major class action lawsuit filed by researchers from the University of California school system. U.S. District Judge Rita Lin ordered the National Science Foundation to reinstate suspended grants to UCLA, following a hearing on the case earlier that day over what the plaintiffs describe as the Trump administration's 'arbitrary, capricious, and unlawful' termination of research grants. She gave the Trump administration one week to show that it is complying with the order. The decision comes weeks after the Trump administration suspended some $584 million in federal grants for the school, roughly a third of which are from NSF, due to claims of inadequate handling of antisemitism on campus. The funding freeze, Lin wrote, was in violation of a preliminary injunction on science grant terminations that she had handed down in June. The University of California school system said in a statement to NBC News that the development was a positive one. 'While we have not had an opportunity to review the court's order and were not party to the suit, restoration of National Science Foundation funds is critical to research the University of California performs on behalf of California and the nation,' the statement said. The White House did not immediately respond to NBC News' request for comment. The funding from the NSF could be worth over an estimated $101 million, across 306 grant projects, based on data maintained by Grant Witness, a project spearheaded by a group of researchers and volunteers that tracks the termination of grants of scientific research agencies under the Trump administration. Lin's ruling follows the Trump administration's allegations that UCLA had violated federal civil rights law by acting with 'deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students.' To restore funding, the administration proposed a $1 billion settlement with UCLA last week. While the Trump administration argued in the Tuesday hearing that the UCLA cuts were 'suspensions' rather than 'terminations,' Lin wrote in her ruling that the difference in wording still produced the same effect. 'NSF claims that it could simply turn around the day after the Preliminary Injunction issued, and halt funding on every grant that had been ordered reinstated, so long as that action was labeled as a 'suspension' rather than a 'termination,'' she wrote. 'This is not a reasonable interpretation of the scope of the Preliminary Injunction.' The class action lawsuit was filed in early June, and accused the Trump administration of unlawfully terminating or suspending previously approved grants in a series of cuts implemented through controversial then-Elon Musk headed agency the Department of Government Efficiency. The plaintiffs alleged in the suit that the mass termination of grants, without individual review or due process, violated administrative laws. A review of the grants terminated across the UC system by NSF, for example, appears to have taken place because the grant titles included the 'now-suspect DEI-related words' like 'equity,' the suit said. Claudia Polsky, a UC Berkeley law professor who spearheaded the class action lawsuit, praised the ruling. 'Judge Lin readily understood that the suspension actions, like the prior terminations she had enjoined, unlawfully failed to contain grant-specific rationales for halting grants mid-stream,' Polsky said in an email. 'NSF nowhere considered researchers' reliance on the grants, nor the waste of public money from abandoning research prior to completion.'


UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Britain, Germany, France threat Iran sanctions over nuclear talks
Britain, Germany and France signalled in a letter to the United Nations that they were prepared to implement so-called 'snapback' sanctions against Iran if it failed to return to nuclear talks. File Photo by Vahid Reza Alaie/Fars News Agency | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- Britain, Germany and France told U.N. officials that snapback sanctions are on the table if Iran does not sit down to negotiate over its nuclear weaponry. The letter delivered to United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, signed by the three foreign ministers, indicated the E3 was prepared to enforce severe sanctions if Iran did not agree to limit it's nuclear program and gave Iranian officials until the end of the month. "We have made it clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism," read a letter in part signed by Britain's David Lammy, Jean-Noel Barrot of France and Germany's Johann Wadephul. The sixth round of American-Iranian negotiations were abandoned in June after a joint U.S.-Israeli attack on known parts of Iran's nuclear facilities. The 12-day conflict escalated regional tension amid Israel's war in Gaza and spiked oil prices. The "snapback" guardrail built into Iran's 2015 nuclear deal, officially titled the "Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action," was set to trigger if an instance arose in which Iran committed an act of "significant non-performance." Signed by Tehran with Britain, France, Germany, Russia, China, the European Union and United States it removed sanctions and curbed Iran's nuclear program. Initially the United States left the JCPOA in 2018 during U.S. President Donald Trump's first term in the White House. Iran, however, has periodically violated parts of the agreement for years and the snapback mechanism threatened more than once by Europe and the E3 as far back as 2019 nearly four years after the deal was inked. In addition to limiting Iranian nuclear activities, it thawed U.S. sanctions against Tehran that hampered its economy for years. On Wednesday, Germany's Wadephul said Iran "must never acquire a nuclear weapon" and reiterated that the E3 had "every right" to resort to snapback. "Iran has the opportunity to return to diplomacy and resume full cooperation with the IAEA," he wrote in an X post a little before 11 a.m. local time. "The ball is now in Iran's court," Germany added.