
Rewind Review: 1959 Cadillac Cyclone XP-74 Concept Is What Dreams Are Made Of
This article first appeared in the Summer 2011 issue of MotorTrend Classic.
He's encrusted in the hub of the steering wheel, St. Christopher. He's the patron saint of travelers, embossed in the medal typically found on the dashboards of faithful Roman Catholics worldwide. 'St. Christopher, protect us,' it reads.
Indeed. Ed Welburn doesn't want me to drive the car. MotorTrend Classic always drives the subject, even priceless Motorama dream cars that can't, or shouldn't, be driven more than a quarter mile at 30 mph tops. Slow, careful drives say something about acceleration, braking, handling, ride, and what kind of vibe a car exudes.
Welburn was about 9 years old when he saw the Cadillac Cyclone at an auto show in his native Philadelphia, probably in early 1960.
'I just remember it was white, with big fins, in a bed of angel hair.'
Welburn's father had taught Ed how to draw at age 3. When he saw the XP-74 Cadillac Cyclone six years later, the younger Welburn decided, right then and there, what he wanted to be.
'At age 11, I wrote GM and told them I wanted to be a car designer when I grew up. I asked for information, schools, training. They sent good information,' Welburn said in a 2008 Motor Trend interview.
GM hired Welburn, its first African-American designer, in 1972.
The XP-74 was Harley Earl's last gasp, his final 'dream car' before retiring and turning the candy-store keys over to Bill Mitchell. Alfred P. Sloan hired Earl, GM's first design chief, in 1927. Earl hired Mitchell in December 1935, and after serving in the Navy during World War II followed by a stint at Earl's private company, Mitchell returned to GM. He finally replaced his mentor on December 1, 1958, just as the automaker's 1959s were catching up with Chrysler's longer, lower, wider 1957 models.
Though Earl was 65, timing was key. Earl's aesthetic was slipping as he added more chrome and gingerbread to cars like the 1958 Oldsmobiles, Buicks, and Cadillacs. His proposals for the '59 models would have carried over '58 bodies. A year before Earl's retirement, he was 'assigned' overseas while Mitchell took over '59 styling, resulting in new bodies from the 'batwing' Chevrolet Impala to the outrageously finned Cadillacs.
Earl returned to Detroit in time to foster XP-74 in spring 1958. Called a running show car in memos preserved at the GM Heritage Center, it's rendered in steel, not fiberglass. Cadillac unveiled the Cyclone on February 21, 1959, part of the week-long grand opening of the Daytona International Speedway in Florida. Though Earl had already retired, he appeared as a 'consultant' to introduce the Cyclone, which by now belonged to Mitchell.
Veteran GM designer Carl Renner is credited with drawing the '59 Cyclone, which predicts the '61 Cadillac profile. Single large, round, afterburner taillamps hint at the '61's dual round lamps housed in chrome nacelles. Though jet aircraft-inspired, the nose cones bookending the grille are as much Jayne Mansfield as McDonnell F3H Demon. Quad headlamps flip up from the grille. Built as a unibody, the Cyclone is 196.9 inches long on a 104-inch wheelbase, and is 44 inches tall. All 1959 Cadillacs, except for Series 75, were 225 inches long on a 130-inch wheelbase.
'It was Mitchell's first opportunity to impact Cadillac,' Welburn says. 'It's lean, more sheer, a smaller Cadillac.
This is the bridge car. It's more Harley Earl than Bill Mitchell, but it has Bill Mitchell's influence.'
The 390-cubic-inch V-8 is out of the '59 Cadillac catalog. Early memos indicate Cadillac was supposed to supply a fuel-injection system, though it has a low-profile four-barrel Carter carburetor to clear the low hood. It's listed at 325 horsepower, 20 ponies short of the production Cadillacs. There are no specs for maximum rpm or torque. Other modifications include a crossflow aluminum radiator and two fans. A two-speed rear axle doubles the Hydramatic transmission's gear ratios. The floor-mounted gearshift offers, from top to bottom, right and left, P, N, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 and R, with a red lever to switch from the odd-numbered forward gears on the left to the even-numbered forward gears on the right.
The car has proximity sensors in the nose cones, designed to follow sensors imbedded in a road, preventing crashes and allowing hands-free driving. The jet-fighter bubble top was designed to rise automatically when sensors detected rain. The two doors slide back minivan-style and the one-piece rear clip stows the bubble-top, clamshell-style.
GM rushed its Phase I build up one month to December 1958, and unveiled the Cyclone without such items as the proximity sensors or a properly working transmission, in order to get it to Daytona by February. Mitchell scheduled Phase II and Phase III after Daytona. Phase II returned XP-74 'to Styling for modifications, repairs and completion, and installation of originally planned equipment,' so the Cyclone would be ready for 'various displays around the country,' or car shows, according to a March 4, 1959, memo from GM program planner R.L. Dressel. Phase III would prepare XP-74 for road use.
Earl's XP-74 was painted white, with GM Air Transport logos on the outer faces of the tailfins. Mitchell wanted to quickly replace the '59-high tailfins with the ones you see now and to respray the car Silver Pearlescent Lucite. His new fins would have hinted at the '61 Cadillacs' upper fins. The fins on the lower-rear fuselage of both versions already predicted the '61 models' styling.
Redoing an existing Motorama, dream, or concept car was Mitchell's style more than Earl's. Under Earl, Motoramas seemed to have at least one new concept per division virtually every year beginning in 1949. With Motoramas winding down, Mitchell regularly updated and upgraded certain concepts without building an all-new 'property,' as they're known. Consider the way he regularly updated running Corvette concepts.
Mitchell first hoped to redo the paint and tailfins immediately after Daytona, for the 1959 auto show circuit. A memo dated April 2, 1959, reversed this. 'According to Mr. W.L. Mitchell's verbal instructions, the existing tailfins on the rear deck panel of the subject automobile will remain intact for Phase II. The fabrication of the new-design tailfins will continue, and the finished parts will be installed for Phase III,' reads the memo, signed by one W.C. Skelly.
Phase II installed a locking mechanism to hold the canopy onto the body rather than the windshield header, while Delco installed the radar components in the nose cones. A luggage rack planned since Phase I apparently never happened. One memo suggested St. Christopher would be replaced with a speed sentinel in the steering-wheel hub, but that change was scrubbed as well.
The Cyclone made the rounds of the auto-show circuit with its '59-style fins through early 1964, according to the memos. It appears Mitchell lost interest in updating Earl's car after Phase II. With the Motoramas ending after 1961, Mitchell was incredibly prolific during these years, in charge of designs of numerous Corvette concepts, the C2 and C3 Stingrays, the Buick Riviera, the '64 A-bodies (Chevelle et al) and the '65 B- and C-bodies, to name a few.
The fins finally came down about April 1964. GM planned to present the revised XP-74 at the New York International Auto Show that month, then delayed its reintroduction for the New York World's Fair, where it replaced the XP-777 Monza GT Coupe on the United Delco display. Mitchell's new fins came with a paint job, a new eggcrate radiator grille, redesigned center knockoff hubs for the wheel covers, and revised backup and brake lamps. The Cyclone was scheduled to be on display at the World's Fair through November 1964. By that time, Cadillac would have introduced all-new 1965 models, which replaced the '64 fin design that more closely resembled the Cyclone's. The XP-74 went on to appear in a few Canadian shows in 1966 and '67.
Welburn became GM's design vice president in 2003. In the last eight years, he's revitalized the department, reviving Studio X, the super-secret design chamber few top executives could find on their own. On the side, he's brought out such gems as the Cadillac Cyclone for inspiration. He's no more interested in 'retro' styling than peers at competing companies. The Earl and Mitchell era define each GM brand's DNA. The Cyclone represents the epoch of the aerospace influence, which Earl launched with soft, subtle fins on the 1948 Cadillac, 'to the point that the whole body was a fuselage,' like the 1959-60 Cyclone.
Designers often sketched a proposal with the car parked next to a jet aircraft. 'Car design got really inspired from that,' he says. The XP-74 is part of the very fabric of GM, and especially Cadillac, design.
I must drive the XP-74, even if Welburn would rather talk about it and have it photographed. The design chief finally gives in with these chilling words: 'Just keep in the back of your mind that you're driving my childhood dream.'
The limited speeds allowed on GM's Warren, Michigan, campus won't be a concern, though employees in Chevy Volts, GMC Terrains, and Buick LaCrosses zip around without concern for a 52-year-old heirloom lumbering about. The Cyclone is a real car and can be driven like any Eisenhower/JFK-era Caddy. Like all those surviving '57-60 Pinin Farina Eldorado Broughams, the Cyclone's air suspension has been replaced with period-correct steel springs.
It's a chilly morning as I climb in, with the bubble top stowed in the trunk. The long, stainless-steel-encrusted steering column puts the St. Christopher medal in my gut, like the driving position in a '50s Formula 1 racer. The seat cushion is long, and the seatback seems short.
'This was done for Harley Earl's proportions,' Welburn says of the seating position. He had long legs and a short torso. I need to stretch my right leg to reach the throttle and brake pedals, both hinged on the floor.
The dashboard mixes 1959 state-of-the-art features with future tech that never happened. Proximity and stopping distance gauges atop the center stack were for the nose-cone sensors. Other gauges cover manifold pressure, fuel, amps, an 8000-rpm tachometer, a 200-mph speedometer, and the biggest surprise, a Breitling clock. The odometer shows just 904 miles and, aircraft-style, 14,730.9 hours.
If the proposed transaxle ever was hooked up, my limited drive on the grounds of the Eero Saarinen-designed GM Tech Center and design studios doesn't reveal any more than three Hydramatic gears.
There's a public address system, to speak with pedestrians when the canopy is up.
The XP-74 would make a good rainy-day parade car. There are seek/scan AM radio controls forward of the center armrest, a Chrysler Turbine-like grooved cylindrical transmission-hump cover, and a grab handle where the glovebox should be. The driver's door has a mail slot for toll roads, for when the bubbletop is up. I start with it down.
'If you smell raw gas, there's no air cleaner,' the handler, a longtime GM employee, warns. It turns over quickly, with a twist of the key. Raw gas? The top is down, and the dual exhaust pipes open between the doors and front wheels. I'm more concerned with burnt gas blowing into the cockpit. No wonder it has just 904 miles. The 390-cube V-8 has oodles of torque, and my tip-ins are too heavy at first, prompting considerable squat from the soft rear suspension. The steering is as you'd expect: Lean back in the seat, choose a convenient finger, and use it to make turns. It turns in quickly, though, and is exceedingly easy to maneuver for a two-seater that's 5.3 inches longer than a modern CTS. After all, the wheelbase isn't much longer than its dash-to-axle ratio.
One-two shifts are smoother than I'd expect from an aging Hydramatic. The car can get up and go, even if not to 200 mph, and I'm wishing I could take it out, unlicensed, on the freeway. Hold on, St. Christopher, here's an idea. If the Cyclone isn't licensed for public roads, let me fly it.
The handler hesitates to raise the bubble top. He does it with the help of our photographer. It was supposed to have a power top, but the two must carefully lift it out of the trunk, then slide it up and over me as I'm in the driver seat. Getting in and out through the low sliding door with the top up requires the kind of limbo dance I could manage better back in the early '60s.
Still…whoa! Top-up is cool. The Cadillac Cyclone isn't just the bridge between Earl and Mitchell. It's the bridge between the cars we got and the flying cars we were promised. With the 360-degree view just slightly yellowed, the bubble-top Cyclone feels like a fighter jet ready to accompany Slim Pickens' B-52, flying under the radar in 'Dr. Strangelove.' It's an aerospace-future version of the cars I remember from my childhood, though a notch or three higher up the Sloan price ladder. If I could drive it faster, I'd catch and shoot down that Soviet MiG, or at least pass George Jetson's family car.
'I think of this car as a concept, up there on that angel hair,' Welburn says. 'Look at the shape of the windshield. It's so much newer than anything else from its time.'
Welburn then reveals why he didn't want me to drive it: He never has.
'I worry that driving it will take a little bit of the magic.' Spoken like a car designer. It's about the way it looks. There's nothing in a late '50s Cadillac's driving dynamics that will add to the car's cachet.
Similarly, you've got to love Earl and Mitchell for what they did, not who they were. Take Mitchell. As our photographer clicks his last shots of the Cyclone behind GM's Design Dome and the sun begins to set, the GM car handler recalls the day he retrieved Bill Mitchell's Ferrari-powered 1971 Pontiac Firebird Pegasus [Motor Trend Classic, March/April 2006] from Mitchell's garage after he retired in 1977.
'It took me days to get all the NRA stickers off the car. Mr. Mitchell loved his guns.' The handler pauses, then attempts to make the firearm obsession benign. 'He collected guns.'
Welburn, the handler, and I are standing side by side, watching David Freers shoot photos as the sun lowers behind the Design Dome. The brief silence is long enough to consider all the car guys I know who also love guns. Just as I begin to wonder about my car-guy credentials because I've never fired a gun, Welburn breaks the silence in his low, soft voice, offering a better second obsession, one Tom Waits and St. Christopher might appreciate. One exceedingly appropriate for the style and lifestyle the XP-74 exudes.
'I don't collect guns …' Another long pause. 'I collect cocktail shakers.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People Are Sharing The 'Brokest' Things They've Ever Done, And This Is Sadly Very Relatable
Years ago, I was a broke college kid living on a very tight budget. Times were dire – I took advantage of every event I could to score free food, "borrowed" toilet paper from buildings on campus, and became all too familiar with struggle meals. So, when I saw people in one Reddit thread share the "brokest things they've ever done," I felt so seen. If you've ever had to live on a tight budget (like nearly half of Americans), you'll probably be able to relate. I've rounded up 18 different responses from the thread, below: 1."My battery ran too low on my piece-of-junk car. I couldn't afford a tow truck. I carried the battery a mile to my apartment, recharged it for several hours, then I carried it back to the parking lot where I'd left the car. It worked, I got the car home again." –Miskatonic_Graduate 2."I opened a food pantry on campus by starting an internship with a grant, so I could have food and share my scavenging effectively." "It was for everyone – the single parents living in the tiny dorm rooms, the babies sleeping in closets, the homeless people in the woods. I'd already been dumpster diving and sharing, so it became a great thing to put on my resume and a legacy for future students." –BigFitMama 3."I didn't know anything about HVAC. I called two different companies, and both wanted me to change the whole outside unit for more than $4K because the motor was fried." "I went on eBay, and looked at some numbers on the old motor that seemed like serial numbers. I found it online, opened the outside unit, took out the whole fan with the motor on it, and banged it with a hammer to detach the fan. Then, I connected the wires, color-matching them to the old ones because it seemed reasonable, put it back on, and the thing has been running for 10 more years since then. It's a 30-year-old unit, it's insane." –Independent-Show1133 4."I ate pancakes for about 2 weeks for every meal until I got paid again." –san323 Related: 23 Cute, Happy, And Wholesome Posts I Saw On The Internet This Week That You Absolutely Need To See 5."I lived a couple of blocks down from a big funeral home in college. They hosted multiple funerals a day. Well, I ended up losing my full-time job at Winn-Dixie and couldn't find a new one right away. So I would look up the obituaries, learn small things about the deceased, and then go to the funeral so I could attend the repass and eat." –Franklyn_Gage 6."I've used toilet paper for pads. I've walked around the office looking for various candy bowls to eat something. I've also rotated various soaps (dish, laundry, body, etc) if one was out." –Ill_Reception_4660 7."When there were big meetings at work, they would always put the leftover catered sandwiches in the fridge. I'd purposely stay late cause I didn't want to ask in front of everyone. I'd take them home for lunch or dinner for the week. I always used the bathroom at work one more time before leaving because I'd tell myself that saving one flush at home saved money over time." –So-Durty 8."I washed mine and my kids' clothes by hand in the bathtub and hung them all over the apartment to dry." –30222504cf Related: 40 Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Creepy Wikipedia Pages 9."I worked as a waitress and ate the food off the plates I bussed. I'd even pull it out of the trash, idgaf. I had just been kicked out of my folks' place, so all my money was for bills and gas." –Iwhohaveknownnospam 10."Gleaning. I know of a peach tree and an apple tree near the parking lots of local businesses that I've picked fruit off of. Nobody from these businesses (coffee shop and car dealership) can be arsed to pick the fruit so I save it from just rotting. And it's probably why they don't bother me if they see me (IRL or on camera after hours)." –mlo9109 11."I'd cut the lid off shampoo bottles or lotion or toothpaste to scrape out every last morsel of product." –frostedmule 12."I stole a bridesmaid's dress for my friend's wedding. I returned it secretly to the same spot the day after the wedding because I felt so bad." –rethinkingfutures 13."I carry a plastic baggie around just in case there is free food anywhere." –DesertGirl84 14."I visited friends in the college dorms, where toilet paper was provided by the college, and took a few rolls back with me to the on-campus apartments, where toilet paper had to be purchased by the residents." "I was an RA, so I had my room and a meal plan. I was recently talking to my husband, who grew up much wealthier than I, and somehow it came out that he would have leftover credits on his meal plan at the end of the semester that he would just let expire because he didn't need them. And I was just like, wow, I was always worried I would run out before the semester was over, and I'd go to every event that had free food on campus! It's just mind-blowing to me that something essential to my existence was no big deal to him at all." –enjoyingPsandQs 15."I snuck into a gym to take a shower." –Kafkabest 16."I wore my contacts (that were supposed to last two weeks) for months. I got eye surgery a few years ago, so thankfully, I don't need contacts anymore." –Badmouths 17."I ate a deli sandwich while I fake-shopped at the grocery store. I got to the register and told her I forgot my wallet, and that I'll be right back... I didn't. I was broke." –Wonderful_Pie223 finally, "I ate bags of frozen veggies for lunch so my kids could have sandwiches for theirs." –Itchy–Aide7408 Do you have any stories that belong on this list? Let me know in the comments! Also in Internet Finds: Lawyers Are Sharing Their Juiciest "Can You Believe It?!" Stories From The Courtroom, And They're As Surprising As You'd Expect Also in Internet Finds: People Are Sharing "The Most Believable Conspiracy Theories," And Now I'm Questioning Everything I Thought I Knew Also in Internet Finds: 51 People Who Quickly Discovered Why Their Hilariously Clueless Partner Was Single Before Meeting Them

The Drive
an hour ago
- The Drive
2025 Audi Q7 Pros and Cons Review: Proper German Luxury, Kid-Only Third Row
The latest car news, reviews, and features. Audi piques the interest of three-row luxury SUV buyers with a simple script: refined luxury that doesn't stand out and delivers solid build quality. As competitors continue to get gaudier with gaping nostrils or lit logos, Audi holds the line with temperate design, terrific road manners, and rock-solid build quality. But the 2025 Audi Q7 falls short with a small third row, a gruff turbocharged V6, and cupholders that drew complaints from my kids. In a time when BMW's twin-kidney grilles are getting bigger by the minute and the Mercedes-Benz logo is now larger than my hand, Audi stands alone from the German brands and in solidarity with Volvo with a tempered exterior design. It blends in sitting in a parking lot and doesn't radiate one-percenter vibes. Joel Feder Inside, the 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster sits in a housing, and the central 10.1-inch infotainment and 8.6-inch climate and secondary control touchscreens are integrated into the dashboard. This is the opposite look and feel of the virtual tablets sitting on the dashboards of Mercedes and BMW SUVs. The slap-a-tablet-on-a-dash look is borderline lazy, but Audi's approach, like the rest of the Q7's design, is more elegant and grown-up. Sure, Audi spent time making it so users can waste time changing the LED daytime running light pattern, but that's not nearly as boisterous as the competition. Whether it's carving around a clover leaf, blasting down a highway, or inching along in the school bus drop-off lane, the Q7's a gem to ride in or drive. My loaded $88,790 (including $1,195 destination charge) Prestige model had the available $1,350 rear-wheel steering option that helped the Q7 virtually shrink while entering the neighborhood, going around tight corners, or maneuvering in tight parking spots. The Q7 drives smaller than it is. The steering is never too heavy, and the suspension balances road comfort with controlled moves. It's never jarring, even over broken Midwest pavement or highway expansion joints. Open the door to the Q7, and it clicks. Shut the door, and you can feel a thunk. This isn't a Mercedes-Benz G-Class, but it certainly sounds and feels like it's built better than the tinny (and more expensive) Lexus LX. Every knob, switch, and button in the cabin clicks into place with satisfying feedback. The Q7 is built with care and pride. Joel Feder Mercedes, BMW, and even Volvo have better third-row seats. While the Audi's third row does fold flat, it's a kid zone, at best, with limited leg, knee, and foot room. It's not ideal for regular use. Adults aren't going to want to sit back there for more than a quick coffee run, if at all. The current generation Q7, which is only the second Q7 in history despite launching in 2006, offers a choice of a 2.0-liter turbo-4, a turbocharged 3.0-liter V6, or a twin-turbo 4.0-liter V8 under the hood. There's no hybrid to be found, which is a shame, and the turbodiesel is long gone. The turbo-4's fine, but it isn't going to raise anyone's heart rate. The twin-turbo V8 amounts to overkill. That makes the turbo-6 just right in terms of balancing power and efficiency, but it's not smooth. It's a little coarse compared to the supercharged 3.0-liter V6 the second-generation Q7 launched with. Turbo lag is present for a short time at launch, which means power delivery isn't as smooth as the supercharged V6 that's now dead. We miss that old engine, and the turbo-sixes in the BMW X7 and Mercedes GLS-Class are smoother. 'What are these, cupholders for ants?' Both my children loudly voiced their opinions that the cupholders, which are revealed from under a flip-up cover on the fold-down rear center armrest, were tiny and 'useless.' They didn't hold any water bottles or cups that my kids had during the week we spent with the Q7. Both kids were frustrated, and no father wants to deal with that. The Q7 is aging, but it's still a standout choice against flashier competition. That is, as long as your kids don't care about the rear seat cupholders. 2025 Audi Q7 55 TFSI Quattro Specs Base Price (as tested) $61,795 ($88,790) Powertrain turbocharged 3.0-liter V-6 |8-speed automatic | all-wheel drive Horsepower 335 Torque 369 lb-ft Seating Capacity 7 Curb Weight 5,049 pounds Towing Capacity 7,700 pounds Cargo Volume 14.2 cubic feet behind third row | 35.7 cubic feet behind second row | 69.6 cubic feet behind first row Ground Clearance 7.3 inches 0-60 mph 5.5 seconds Top Speed 155 mph EPA Fuel Economy 18 mpg city | 23 highway | 20 combined Score 8.2/10 The Audi Q7 doesn't rely on flashy bits for its appeal, in fact that's part of its charm.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Better Electric Vehicle (EV) Stock: Lucid Group vs. Rivian
Right now, Lucid Group is growing faster than Rivian. However, Rivian holds a huge, undervalued advantage. Lucid is going to need to produce more affordable vehicles. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Demand for electric vehicles is expected to surge over the next several decades. While much of this growth is expected globally, penetration for EVs is still expected to rise substantially in the U.S., the primary market for both Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) and Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ: RIVN). If you're looking to invest in a company with the potential to be the next Tesla, there are reasons to consider both Lucid and Rivian. But which is a better stock to buy today? When it comes to growth, Lucid is the clear winner right now. In fact, Lucid should be one of the fastest-growing EV makers over the next year or two. Analysts predict 73% sales growth this year, and another 96% growth expected in 2026. Rivian, for comparison, is expected to grow sales by just 5% this year, though that is expected to pick up to a roughly 40% pace in 2026. Why is Lucid growing faster than Rivian? Demand growth for both conventional and electric vehicles does vary from year to year. But for EV pure-plays, by far the biggest driver of growth is the introduction of new models. Earlier this year, Lucid began scaling up the production of its new Gravity SUV. SUVs are one of the highest-selling and fastest-growing categories of vehicles in the U.S. The introduction of the Gravity SUV also doubles Lucid's lineup. Previously, it only had a single model -- the Lucid Air sedan -- available to purchase. Now, its more diversified lineup and greater overall production should fuel heavy sales growth in both 2025 and 2026. There's just one problem: An EV from Lucid still costs anywhere from $70,000 to $249,000 depending on the exact model and package. The top of that range is for its luxury Air Sapphire model, but even the low end prices out the majority of North American buyers. To really fuel massive and long-term growth, more affordable options are needed. And while Lucid has teased plans for three affordable models, details about them have been scarce. Moreover, with less than $1.9 billion in cash on the books, it's not clear that the company has the capital to get these new vehicles into production anytime soon. Rivian, by contrast, has a huge advantage in this department. Over the past few decades, numerous electric car start-ups have gone under. Why? They ran out of money. Designing, building, and marketing a vehicle from scratch typically takes billions of dollars and perhaps a decade or more. All of this typically occurs when the start-up is still deeply unprofitable. To keep such companies afloat requires investors to willingly plug the gap, providing more and more capital until management can turn its vision into reality. Small missteps or timeline delays along the way can cause investors to lose faith. That can restrict capital availability, often sending once-promising start-ups into financing free fall. Lucid is still operating in this critical phase. It may want to roll out new mass-market models, but will need to raise a significant amount of cash in order to do so. It's not clear yet whether that will happen. Rivian, meanwhile, is in a significantly better financial position. Its three upcoming mass-market vehicles -- the R2, R3, and R3X -- appear much further along in the development pipeline than Lucid's new models. Rivian confirmed last month that it is still on track to start production of the R2 in the first half of 2026 with a starting price of around $45,000. The R3 and R3X will follow sometime later. While Lucid only has around $1.9 billion in cash, Rivian has nearly $4.7 billion on its books. Plus, over the past two quarters, Rivian has achieved positive gross margins, which Lucid has never managed. This all makes it much more likely that Rivian will successfully launch its first mass-market vehicles. And as Tesla has proven, that is perhaps the most important milestone an EV maker can achieve on its journey to unlock long-term growth. So while Lucid is growing faster right now, Rivian looks like the better EV stock to own over the next few years and beyond. Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better Electric Vehicle (EV) Stock: Lucid Group vs. Rivian was originally published by The Motley Fool