logo
Oklahoma Senate approves bill that includes a trigger for an income tax cut

Oklahoma Senate approves bill that includes a trigger for an income tax cut

Yahoo11-04-2025

After more than an hour of discussion, the Oklahoma Senate voted mostly along party lines Thursday to approve a bill that would trigger an income tax cut if the state met certain revenue collection thresholds in the future.
House Bill 1539, authored by Rep. Mark Lepak, R-Claremore, and sponsored in the Senate by Sen. Micheal Bergstrom, R-Adair, passed by a 36-9 vote and will move back to the House for final consideration. Should the House approve the Senate's version of the bill without changes, it would go to Gov. Kevin Stitt's desk.
All seven Democrats in attendance in the Senate chamber opposed the bill, along with two Republicans, Sen. Brent Howard, of Altus, and Sen. Darcy Jech, of Kingfisher. Howard said during debate he didn't think the bill 'went through the process it should have' and said the Senate committee that considered the bill noted the legislation 'has problems.' Howard did not say what those problems were.
Senate President Pro Tempore Lonnie Paxton, R-Tuttle, supported the bill. He said there's always discussion about when is a good time to cut income taxes.
'When it comes to cutting taxes, I've found that we always find reasons not to do that,' Paxton said. 'It's a worthy discussion. … The caucus decided that we were ready to move forward with this.'
For years, Stitt has pushed for an income tax cut without success. Last year, the Senate, under then-President Pro Tem Greg Treat — stopped any such cut in its tracks. This year, Stitt has requested what he calls 'a half and a path' plan — a 0.5% cut from the state's current 4.75% income tax and a path toward having no income tax.
"I couldn't be more excited that a path to zero income tax is becoming a reality for our state," Stitt said. "We are headed in the right direction. Now, let's deliver an immediate income tax cut for the people of Oklahoma."
Paxton said Thursday a potential income tax bill this year is 'not off the table' despite the Legislature having slightly less funds to appropriate this year, compared to last year. Behind the scenes, though, legislative leaders have said such a cut is unlikely, given the revenue situation.
If it becomes law, the bill by Lepak and Bergstrom wouldn't result in an immediate income tax cut. But a tax cut would occur if state revenues — as estimated by the state Board of Equalization each December — rise by $300 million or more when compared against revenues collected during the just-completed fiscal year. The bill said any cut would be 'twenty-five hundredths of one percent (0.0025).'
More: Stitt renews call for tax cut, wants investigation of wildfire response
Multiple Republican senators used negative language when referring to the income tax. Bergstrom said Oklahoma should join nine other states with 'no state penalty on work.' Sen. Dusty Deevers, R-Elgin, called income tax 'legal plunder' by the government.
During debate, the Senate's two top Republicans, Paxton and Sen. Julie Daniels, R-Bartlesville, both expressed strong support for the bill. Daniels called it a 'fiscally conservative sound measure' and a 'sound way to slowly reduce the income tax.'
Democrats disagreed, with four of the seven present on Thursday arguing against it.
Senate Minority Leader Julia Kirt, of Oklahoma City, said the Senate should be prioritizing tax cuts targeted toward lower-income Oklahomans, noting the percentage cut included in the bill would, per capita, provide greater financial benefit to wealthier taxpayers.
Kirt also said any such cut would 'put at risk critical state services' in a time of financial uncertainty for states, particularly when it comes to federal revenues, given the cost-cutting by President Donald Trump.
Sen. Mary Boren, D-Norman, said cutting taxes would mean not having enough money to provide core services, such as law enforcement and education, should the state's population grow. She called the bill 'a four-day school week … waiting to happen.' Four-day school weeks are a measure used in recent years by some Oklahoma school districts to try and stretch financial resources.
'It was presented as if it was a conservative plan, but it actually did not have any measures or ways to determine what's going to happen with revenue in the future,' Kirt said. 'It's a trigger, which we've had problems with before. Other states have had problems with triggers.'
She said it was concerning that any such trigger would occur in December, well ahead of the legislative session that starts in February. That wouldn't provide the Legislature with an opportunity to 'course correct in real time' if necessary, she said.
According to an Oklahoma Tax Commission document attached to the bill's summary page, the agency noted it annually publishes income tax withholding tables in early December to ensure employers can withhold the appropriate amount of Oklahoma income tax for the upcoming tax year. The agency noted the two most recent December Board of Equalization meetings occurred on Dec. 22, 2023, and Dec. 20, 2024. That might cause logistical issues should the bill pass, the agency noted.
'This is a short time frame for employers to update income tax withholding for the potential new rate structure,' according to the document.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Oklahoma Senate approves bill with trigger for income tax cut

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns
Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns

Newsweek

time16 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Weighs In on 'Civil War' Concerns

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On Monday, President Donald Trump was asked about Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom's remarks that his Republican administration wants "civil war on the streets" amid ongoing protests against raids by Los Angeles Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The president was asked by a reporter, "What do you make of the fact that [Newsom] says you want a civil war?" Trump responded, "No, it's the opposite. I don't want a civil war. Civil war would happen if you left it to people like him." REPORTER: Gavin Newsom says you want a Civil War. TRUMP: "It's just the opposite, I don't want a Civil War. Civil War would happen if you left it to people like him." — Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 9, 2025 This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

Trump isn't done with Musk yet, Michael Cohen says
Trump isn't done with Musk yet, Michael Cohen says

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump isn't done with Musk yet, Michael Cohen says

President Trump's ex-personal attorney Michael Cohen on Saturday said that Trump isn't done with tech billionaire Elon Musk yet, after tensions between the two men became incredibly heated in a public social media spat last week. 'They're going to really go after Elon Musk like nobody has seen, ever, in this country, because they can,' Cohen told MSNBC's Ali Velshi. 'And one thing Elon doesn't understand is this political guerilla warfare that they're going to conduct against him,' he added. On Thursday, a fight between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big, beautiful bill' earlier in the week escalated rapidly on Musk's X platform and Trump's Truth Social platform. The president said the tech billionaire 'just went CRAZY!' and threatened Musk's government contracts. Musk alleged that Trump had ties to convicted sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein on X. The public spat followed the end of Musk's recent service in the Trump administration and an alliance with the president that appeared to start off strong. Musk endorsed Trump in July 2024 in the wake of Trump surviving an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. Musk's administration service was marked by intense backlash from those on the left and Democrats over actions taken by Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) on the federal government. 'He doesn't care about Elon Musk,' Cohen said in his MSNBC appearance, talking about Trump. 'He used Elon Musk for what he needed. Initially it was the money, so that he didn't have to lay out any of his own, and also, more importantly, for his access with X.' The Hill has reached out to the White House and X for comment.

Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'
Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'

San Francisco Chronicle​

time17 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Newsom blasts Trump's arrest threat as ‘unmistakable step toward authoritarianism'

President Donald Trump on Monday endorsed the idea of arresting California Gov. Gavin Newsom over the state's resistance to federal immigration enforcement efforts in Los Angeles, intensifying a clash that has already drawn legal challenges and fierce rebukes from Democratic leaders. 'I would do it if I were Tom,' Trump said, referring to Tom Homan, his border czar, who over the weekend suggested that state and local officials, including Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, could face arrest if they interfered with immigration raids. 'I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,' Trump added. Trump's remarks signal a sharp escalation in the administration's crackdown on sanctuary jurisdictions and a willingness to target political opponents in unprecedented ways. Newsom responded swiftly, calling Trump's words a chilling attack on American democratic norms. 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor,' Newsom wrote on X. 'This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.' Tensions escalated sharply after Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles following days of civil unrest related to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. The deployment marked the first time a president has federalized a state's National Guard without the governor's consent since 1965. Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced plans to sue Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, alleging the deployment was unlawful. 'Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the President's authority under the law,' Bonta said at a press conference. 'There is no invasion. There is no rebellion.' Meanwhile, David Huerta, president of SEIU California, was charged with felony conspiracy to impede an officer after his arrest during the L.A. protests. Despite the furor, legal experts note that Homan lacks the authority to arrest elected officials, and his role remains advisory. Still, Trump's rhetoric has raised alarms among critics who view his comments as part of a broader pattern of undermining democratic institutions. 'This is a preview of things to come,' Newsom warned in an interview with Brian Taylor Cohen that he shared on social media. 'This isn't about L.A., per se,' the Democratic governor added. 'It's about us today, it's about you, everyone watching tomorrow. This guy is unhinged. Trump is unhinged right now, and this is just another proof point of that.' At a news conference held by lawmakers in Sacramento to discuss the protests in Los Angeles, Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, D-Hollister, said Trump's threat to arrest Newsom is a 'direct assault on democracy and an insult to every Californian.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store