US lawmakers advance bill that could sanction South Africa over its foreign policy
JOHANNESBURG - United States lawmakers have voted to advance a bill that proposes reviewing the U.S. relationship with South Africa due to objections over its foreign policy and potentially imposing sanctions on South African officials.
The U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee voted 34-16 on Tuesday to send the "U.S.-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act" to the full House of Representatives, where it could be subject to a vote, according to a video of the proceedings.
The measure would need to pass both the House and the Senate before it could be signed into law. Many bills at this stage never go to a vote.
However, the committee's approval took the bill a step further and underscored tensions between Washington and Pretoria as South Africa seeks to fend off a looming 30% U.S. tariff and counter false claims of white "genocide" made by President Donald Trump.
South Africa's foreign ministry and a spokesperson for President Cyril Ramaphosa declined to comment.
The bill was introduced in April by Ronny Jackson, a Republican congressman from Texas who cheered the move on X, writing: "South Africa made its choice when they abandoned America and our allies and sided with communists and terrorists".
The bill accuses South Africa of undermining U.S. interests by maintaining close relationships with Russia and China, which are among its allies and trading partners. It also accuses South Africa of backing Palestinian militant group Hamas that is at war in Gaza with Israel, which South Africa has denied.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Judge asks prosecution for more information on Kpods in first case involving etomidate-laced vapes
Singapore Male victim of fatal Toa Payoh fire was known to keep many things, say residents
Singapore 5 teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt
Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in
Sport Bukayo Saka the difference as Arsenal beat AC Milan at National Stadium
Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him
Singapore Over 1.15 million Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 have claimed SG60 vouchers
Singapore Singapore Oceanarium will enhance tourism while supporting sustainability: Grace Fu
South Africa has long been a supporter of the Palestinian cause and filed a case accusing Israel of genocide at the International Court of Justice in 2023, which is mentioned in the bill as one of its concerns.
The bill proposes "a full review of the bilateral relationship" and to "identify South African government officials and ANC leaders eligible for the imposition of sanctions".
It later says that these would be people determined by Trump to have engaged in corruption or human rights abuses. No individuals are named.
South Africa's relationship with the United States has sharply deteriorated during Trump's second term, during which he has accused the government of anti-white racism and started a refugee programme for Afrikaners, who are descendants of European settlers. REUTERS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
8 minutes ago
- Business Times
Trump says there could be distribution of money from tariff revenues
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump on Sunday said some Americans could get some kind of dividend or distribution of money as a result of tariffs being imposed on US trading partners. 'There could be a distribution or a dividend to the people of our country, I would say for people that would be middle income people and lower income people, we could do a dividend,' Trump told reporters before boarding Air Force One after leaving his golf club in New Jersey. REUTERS
Straits Times
39 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump's tariffs are making money. That may make them hard to quit
US President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs have already started to generate a significant amount of money for the federal government. WASHINGTON – US President Donald Trump's extensive tariffs have already started to generate a significant amount of money for the federal government, a new source of revenue for a heavily indebted nation that American policymakers may start to rely on. As part of his quest to reorder the global trading system, Mr Trump has imposed steep tariffs on America's trading partners, with the bulk of those set to go into effect on Aug 7 . Even before the latest tariffs kick in, revenue from taxes collected on imported goods has grown dramatically so far in 2025 . Customs duties, along with some excise taxes, generated US$152 billion (S$196 billion) through July, roughly double the US$78 billion netted over the same time period in fiscal year 2024 , according to Treasury data. Indeed, Mr Trump has routinely cited the tariff revenue as evidence that his trade approach, which has sowed uncertainty and begun to increase prices for consumers, is a win for the United States. Members of his administration have argued that the money from the tariffs would help plug the hole created by the broad tax cuts Congress passed in July , which are expected to cost the government at least US$3.4 trillion. 'The good news is that Tariffs are bringing Billions of Dollars into the USA!' Mr Trump said on social media shortly after a weak jobs report showed signs of strain in the labour market. Over time, analysts expect that the tariffs, if left in place, could be worth more than US$2 trillion in additional revenue over the next decade. Economists overwhelmingly hope that does not happen and the United States abandons the new trade barriers. But some acknowledge that such a substantial stream of revenue could end up being hard to quit. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Live: Ong Beng Seng set to plead guilty in case involving ex-transport minister Singapore The past and future of Choa Bungalow, a 'last reminder' of Marine Parade's former shoreline Multimedia How Singapore is rethinking nature in the city Business Are Gen Z-ers in Singapore worried about generative AI coming for their jobs? World Trump is winning his trade war, but Americans will pay the price Singapore No plans to fully liberalise cross-border ride-hailing services between Singapore and Johor: LTA Singapore LTA, Singapore bus operators reviewing Malaysia's request to start services from JB at 4am World Hamas says it will allow aid for hostages if Israel halts airstrikes, opens humanitarian corridors 'I think this is addictive,' said Professor Joao Gomes, an economist at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. 'I think a source of revenue is very hard to turn away from when the debt and deficit are what they are.' Mr Trump has long fantasised about replacing taxes on income with tariffs. He often refers fondly to American fiscal policy in the late 19th century, when there was no income tax and the government relied on tariffs, citing that as a model for the future. And while income and payroll taxes remain by far the most important sources of government revenue, the combination of Mr Trump's tariffs and the latest Republican tax cut does, on the margin, move the United States away from taxing earnings and toward taxing goods. Such a shift is expected to be regressive, meaning that rich Americans will fare better than poorer Americans under the change. That is because cutting taxes on income does, in general, provide the biggest benefit to richer Americans who earn the most income. The recent Republican cut to income taxes and the social safety net is perhaps the most regressive piece of major legislation in decades. Placing new taxes on imported products, however, is expected to raise the cost of everyday goods. Lower-income Americans spend more of their earnings on those more expensive goods, meaning the tariffs amount to a larger tax increase for them compared with richer Americans. Tariffs have begun to bleed into consumer prices, with many companies saying they will have to start raising prices as a result of added costs. And analysts expect the tariffs to weigh on the performance of the economy overall, which in turn could reduce the amount of traditional income tax revenue the government collects every year. 'Is there a better way to raise that amount of revenue? The economic answer is: Yes, there is a better way, there are more efficient ways,' said Mr Ernie Tedeschi, director of economics at the Yale Budget Lab and a former Biden administration official. 'But it's really a political question.' Mr Tedeschi said that future leaders in Washington, whether Republican or Democrat, may be hesitant to roll back the tariffs if that would mean a further addition to the federal debt load, which is already raising alarms on Wall Street. And replacing the tariff revenue with another type of tax increase would require Congress to act, while the tariffs would be a legacy decision made by a previous president. 'Congress may not be excited about taking such a politically risky vote when they didn't have to vote on tariffs in the first place,' Mr Tedeschi said. Some in Washington are already starting to think about how they could spend the tariff revenue. Mr Trump recently floated the possibility of sending Americans a cash rebate for the tariffs, and Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri , recently introduced legislation to send US$600 to many Americans. 'We have so much money coming in, we're thinking about a little rebate, but the big thing we want to do is pay down debt,' Mr Trump said in July of the tariffs. Democrats, once they return to power, may face a similar temptation to use the tariff revenue to fund a new social program, especially if raising taxes in Congress proves as challenging as it has in the past. As it is, Democrats have been divided over tariffs. Maintaining the status quo may be an easier political option than changing trade policy. 'That's a hefty chunk of change,' Mr Tyson Brody, a Democratic strategist, said of the tariffs. 'The way that Democrats are starting to think about it is not that 'these will be impossible to withdraw.' It's: 'Oh, look, there's now going to be a large pot of money to use and reprogramme.'' Of course, the tariffs could prove unpopular, and future elected officials may want to take steps that could lower consumer prices. At the same time, the amount of revenue the tariffs generate could decline over time if companies do, in fact, end up bringing back more of their operations to the United States, reducing the number of goods that face the import tax. 'This is clearly not an efficient way to gather revenue,' said Mr Alex Jacquez, a former Biden official and the chief of policy and advocacy at Groundwork Collaborative, a liberal group. 'And I don't think it would be a long-term progressive priority as a way to simply collect revenue.' NYTIMES
Business Times
39 minutes ago
- Business Times
India hasn't stopped Russian oil purchases after Trump rebuke
[DELHI] India has not given the country's oil refiners instructions to stop buying Russian oil, according to sources familiar, days after US President Donald Trump blasted New Delhi for the energy purchases. No decision has been taken as yet on stopping imports from Russia, the sources said, asking not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter. Both state-run and private refiners are allowed to buy from their preferred sources, and crude purchases remain a commercial decision made by them, several of the sources said. Trump rebuked India on Wednesday (Jul 30) for continuing to buy most of its military equipment and energy from Russia. The US leader imposed a surprise 25 per cent tariff on India and threatened an additional penalty for its close ties with Moscow. Two days later, Trump told reporters he 'heard' India would no longer be buying oil from Russia, calling it 'a good step'. India has maintained that its energy purchases are driven by market forces and price. Last week, refiners were told to come up with plans for buying non-Russian crude, sources familiar said to Bloomberg. The government asked state-owned processors to prepare an outline of where alternate barrels can be sourced and at what volume if Russian flows get stopped, they said. One of the sources said the instruction amounted to scenario planning in case Russian crude were to become unavailable. The New York Times reported on Saturday that India will keep buying Russian crude despite a threat of penalties from Trump, citing two senior Indian officials it did not identify. An oil ministry spokesperson did not reply to messages from Bloomberg seeking comment outside of regular business hours. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up India's refiners have been singled out by the European Union and the US for supporting Moscow during its war in Ukraine with the oil purchases. It has become the world's biggest buyer of Russian seaborne exports of crude, soaking up discounted barrels and ramping up its purchases from almost zero to about one-third of its imports. Reducing or stopping Russian oil purchases would force India to source oil once again from Gulf nations, which costs a premium, and New Delhi is not keen on adding to its import bill, one of the sources said. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi maintains close ties with Russian President Vladimir Putin, having visited the country in October. Putin is scheduled to visit India later this year. State-owned Indian Oil bought at least five million barrels of US crude, on top of two million barrels of supplies from Abu Dhabi, traders told Bloomberg last week. The purchases were both large and for relatively immediate delivery by the company's usual standards. BLOOMBERG
