Who won the first NYC Democratic mayoral primary debate?
Ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo won Wednesday night's Democratic mayoral primary debate — because his opponents' relentless attacks did more to elevate him than drag him down, a Post panel of veteran campaign strategists said.
The thrice-elected Democrat took some gut punches, but there was no knockout blow or major blunder on his part, the political analysts on both sides of the aisle said.
'I tuned in to see a mayoral debate, not a debate about Andrew Cuomo,' quipped campaign strategist Ken Frydman of the nine-person debate moderated by NBC 4 NY and Politico.
'By making Andrew the debate, they elevated him,' said Frydman.
Because Cuomo was constantly under fire, he got more airtime to respond to each jab and by default dominated the more than two-hour debate, the political experts said.
'Everyone tried to land a punch on Andrew Cuomo, but failed,' said campaign strategist O' Brien 'OB' Murray.
'The first 20 minutes gave Cuomo the center stage, literally and figuratively,' he said, referring to the ex-gov's position in the middle of the group of candidates standing on the dais at 30 Rockefeller Center.
'He handled the attacks and was able to deflect. They actually gave him more airtime than they should have,' Murray said.
Republican campaign strategist Bill O'Reilly said the verbal pummeling Cuomo received from most of his eight primary rivals does not alter his status as the front-runner for the Democratic nomination.
'It was Andrew Cuomo vs. the Lilliputians, and the Lilliputians fell short. That's the bottom line,' O'Reilly said.
'Someone needed to trip up the former governor to slow his momentum, but it was clear from the jump that wouldn't happen. Cuomo hasn't lost a step since leaving Albany, and the field lacked the skill to crack him.'
Cuomo also counter-attacked, taking shots at his biggest threats in the polls — 33-year-old Democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani, a state Assembly member from Queens, and City Comptroller Brad Lander.
The former governor delivered the best line when he said, '[President] Trump would go through Mamdani like a hot knife through butter,' O'Reilly noted.
Frydman said the candidates and moderators did force Cuomo to squirm to defend his record as governor, including his controversial nursing home policy during the COVID-19 pandemic and his approval of the unpopular 2019 bail reforms.
They also tried to make him answer for the spate of sexual misconduct accusations leveled against him — which he denied, but which forced his resignation in 2021.
Some of the other candidates had 'breakout moments' — including former Bronx Assemblyman Michael Blake, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and Mamdani, said political adviser Yvette Buckner.
'That will have voters wanting to learn more about them, their policies and their candidacy,' she said.
Frydman too said Adams' performance 'moved the needle' for her campaign, which has been slow to gain momentum despite support from state Attorney General Letitia James.
'She introduced herself to Democratic voters well enough on substance to move up in ranked-choice voting,' he said.
But Cuomo's comfortable lead over second-place Mamdani in recent polls should hold, Frydman said.
O'Reilly agreed, but said Mamdani remains Cuomo's 'greatest threat' for the nomination in the June 24 primary.
Two of the panelists agreed that Lander is competent, but his persona didn't translate on TV.
'He oozes insincerity in a car-salesman-type way,' O'Reilly said.
But he said Brooklyn state Sen. Zellnor Myrie's sincerity came across 'easily,' calling him a rising star in the Democratic Party.
Murray concurred, saying Lander has a 'stage presence for radio and a delivery for print. He confirmed why he has his wife and daughter on videos, instead of himself.'
Another candidate, former city Comptroller Scott Stringer, who previously ran for mayor in 2021, didn't break through, the panelists said.
'Stringer was Stringer — flat, and after a second run for mayor, still didn't connect to voters,' Murray said.
All but two of the Democratic contenders will debate again on June 12, save for Blake and state Sen. Jessica Ramos, who failed to meet the campaign funding threshold.
Nine days of early voting will precede the primary, beginning on June 14.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee promises ‘relentless effort' at community inauguration
Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee promised during a community inauguration Sunday to lead with 'openness, honesty and relentless effort' and invited the community to join her to make the city better. 'If we match hope with hard work, there's nothing that this city can't do, so let's do it,' Lee said on a stage at Jack London Square. 'Let's grab whatever you can grab — a paintbrush, a policy idea, a neighbor's hand, because the next chapter of Oakland starts now.' She added: 'All of you are co-authors of this next chapter.' Lee was elected in April and sworn in last month. The former congresswoman replaced former Mayor Sheng Thao, whom voters ousted in November in a recall fueled by a federal investigation that resulted in bribery charges against her. Thao pleaded not guilty to the charges. Lee takes over as the city confronts a historic budget deficit, public safety concerns, homelessness and illegal dumping, among other issues. By the end of this month, the city must balance its budget, which includes an annual deficit of about $140 million. Lee previously said the city will address the deficit through both short- and long-term solutions, though she did not provide specifics. During her remarks Sunday, after she again took the oath of office, Lee spoke of her work in the first few weeks of her administration. The goal from the start was to 'turn hope into action,' the Democrat told the crowd, which included faith leaders, business owners and other dignitaries, including California Attorney General Rob Bonta, California Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis and San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie. Already she's met with faith and business leaders to discuss public safety strategies. She acknowledged that despite violence prevention efforts and a decrease in homicides last year, some residents still don't feel safe. 'We've got to work to change this narrative in Oakland,' she said. Lee also said she traveled to the state Capitol to advocate for the city, 'because Oakland deserves its fair share of state resources,' she said. 'I made it clear: Investing in Oakland lifts the entire Bay Area.' State Sen. Jesse Arreguín, a Democrat whose district includes Oakland, said the city needs a 'proven leader with integrity and experience' to unite the city and region. 'That leader is Mayor Barbara Lee,' he said. Arreguín, who serves as chair of the public safety standing committee, said he's committed to working with Lee to curb crime in Oakland and make the city safer. He pledged to support the city's Ceasefire strategy and other violence-prevention programs. Oakland City Council President Kevin Jenkins called Sunday 'a beautiful day in Oakland.' He noted that Lee is the city's fourth mayor in two years. 'But I think we got it right this time,' he quipped. Jenkins described Lee as a mayor for all, especially Oakland residents 'who don't know where City Hall is.' 'The way she campaigned is the way she's going to govern: with integrity,' he added. Selena Wilson, CEO of the East Oakland Youth Development Center, urged the public to support Lee. 'We must continue to stand with her.' Barbara Leslie, president and CEO of the Oakland Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, picked by Lee as a co-chair of her transition team, said she can attest that Lee 'hit the ground running.' 'Frankly, my goal is just to keep up,' Leslie said, joined by members of the Rotary Club of Oakland #3 and Oakland Restaurant Collective. 'We are here to support you, as your success is Oakland's success,' Leslie said.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Politico's AI tool spits out made-up slop, union says
Politico's new AI product has generated garbled or made-up Washington intelligence, including a lobbying effort by a fictional basket-weaver guild, the outlet's unionized staff has complained. Last year, Semafor first reported that Politico was working on a new product with Capital AI: a new AI tool for its high-paying subscribers that promised to allow them to instantaneously generate detailed reports on topics with information collected by Politico's reporters. Earlier this year, Politico's editorial union filed a complaint against the company over its use of AI, which editorial staffers said violated language in their contract that stipulated that if AI is used, it 'must be done in compliance with POLITICO's standards of journalistic ethics and involve human oversight.' In several examples printed out and shared in Politico's Rosslyn, Virginia, newsroom last week, staff pointed to instances where the tool appeared to garble the publication's reporting, or generate reports filled with completely made-up information. Queried by a staffer about what issues the fictional 'Basket Weavers Guild' and 'League of Left-Handed Plumbers' are lobbying Congress about, the AI tool generated a plausible report: Staff also found what they said were egregious errors in other reports. When the product was first rolled out several months ago, the company's AI did not seem to know that Roe v. Wade had been overturned — an ironic twist, considering Politico broke the news of its reversal months before the decision was formally announced in 2022. an AI-generated report said.'The most requested feature by our subscribers was a customizable summary of our POLITICO content,' the company said in a statement to Semafor. 'We responded and our subscribers have been thrilled with the early results of our beta test. As with any new technology, especially AI, this is a work in progress.' Politico's leadership has previously pushed back on the union's criticism, saying the report generator is not a replacement for journalists' jobs and is more akin to a search engine of Politico's existing reporting. Politico's report generator also emphatically emphasizes to users that it remains in beta testing, and is largely intended to be a search engine-like guide. Some earlier errors flagged by the newsroom, including the Roe v. Wade example, were corrected by Politico's product Springer, Politico's parent company, has been one of the more aggressive digital media companies in testing out new AI tools, despite some wariness from editorial staff. The Politico Pro report generator was created in response to demand from many of the publication's most important subscribers, who pay premium rates for access to its information. In a note to staff last month, Axel Springer CEO Mathias Döpfner said that artificial intelligence will be crucial to the company's success and will help it 'work more efficiently and simply deliver better content.' 'In the future, there will be only two types of companies: those that use artificial intelligence extensively to break new and better ground, and those that fail to grasp this and will therefore disappear. There will only be disruptors and the disrupted,' he said. 'The excellent will become even better, while the mediocre will vanish. Anyone who believes differently is fooling themselves.' Both Politico and Business Insider, which is also owned by Axel Springer, have been aggressively embracing AI in recent months, sparking some internal debates about these still-nascent technologies and tools. As Semafor reported last week, an attempt to better educate staff on business journalism was thwarted when an editor suggested a reading list for employees that contained nonexistent books, potentially the result of an AI hallucination. In an all-staff meeting last week first reported by Semafor, Business Insider Editor in Chief Jamie Heller assured staff that despite a recent 21% reduction in staff, no jobs were being replaced by automated tools.


San Francisco Chronicle
2 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump and Musk's bromance breakup has the internet in stitches
Donald Trump and Elon Musk 's relationship has officially imploded, captivating the internet as if it were a high-profile celebrity breakup. 'Normally a breakup this messy is on Bravo not C-Span,' wrote Ben Jacobs, a reporter at Politico, on X. The president and Tesla founder developed a quick bond after the then-candidate was nearly assassinated on stage at a Pennsylvania rally last July. Musk spent approximately $250 million backing Trump's campaign and remained a close supporter throughout the 2024 election. When Trump took office earlier this year, Musk was appointed head of the new administration's Department of Government Efficiency, a role that he held until last week. But it wasn't until Musk's criticism of Trump's controversial so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' that set off an internet war that culminated on Thursday, June 5, with both men hurling strongly-worded accusations and criticisms at each other on social media. Early in the day, Musk called on Trump to 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' Musk then claimed that without him, Trump would not have secured the presidency, setting off threats from Trump to cut off government contracts with Musk's companies, including Starlink and Space X. 'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk replied. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Senator Scott Wiener was one among those who reacted to the allegation online, specifically calling out Trump supporters who have labeled him and other members of the LGBTQ community pedophiles. 'Let's see if the MAGAs who've been slandering me & other queer people as pedophiles for years say a damn thing about Trump's close association with an actual pedophilia network,' Wiener wrote on BlueSky. Social media users were quick to turn the dramatic feud into comedic gold, with some cracking jokes about the irony of this drama unfolding at the beginning of Pride Month, likening their broken bond to the end of a romance. Both public figures have made homophobic statements and actions in the past. Another irony: Trump threatening to rip away Musk's federal funding when they have been doing that to the arts and science communities for months. 'must be incredibly frustrating and disheartening to have federal funding that was promised to you for important work suddenly and arbitrarily ripped away,' Adam Sternberg, Culture editor for the New York Times, posted to Bluesky. Amid the public spectacle, many couldn't help but mock the emotional nature of the feud, describing the bickering immature given their ages — Musk is 53, while Trump is 78. The phrase 'THE GIRLS ARE FIGHTING' quickly became a top trending topic on X. 'hey @realDonaldTrump lmk if u need any breakup advice,' Ashley St. Clair, the mother of one of Musk's children, wrote in a post. In addition to firing off no less than 80 tweets and endorsing other users' posts criticizing the president, including one that called for Trump's impeachment, Musk also unfollowed several of the president's supporters, including Charlie Kirk and Stephen Miller. 'Today is a huge win for every woman concerned she acted like a psycho during her last breakup,' wrote comedian Ginny Hogan, the star of 'Regression.' Poking fun at the misogyny that Trump and Musk have been known to display, MSNBC reporter Sam Stein wrote 'Are men maybe too emotional for positions of leadership?' Some internet users even likened the drama to that between rappers Drake and Kendrick Lamar, who have infamously been feuding for about a year. Mike Nelson, a political commentator with more than 25,000 followers, simply shared a photo of the moment Lamar name dropped Drake during his Super Bowl LIX performance of 'Not Like Us,' captioning the post 'Elon dropping that tweet.' Even Ye, the rapper formerly known as Kanye West, weighed in on the feud. He has been a vocal supporter of both Trump and Musk in the past. 'Broooos please noooooo,' he wrote on X. 'We love you both so much.' Trump and Musk continued their online brawl for several hours Thursday, each on their respective social media platforms — Trump on his Truth Social and Musk on X, which he owns. The president was supposed to spend the day discussing an end to the Russia-Ukraine war with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. As the online spat hit fever pitch on Thursday, Musk paused his attacks on Trump briefly for a moment to take stock of the carnage. 'One thing's for sure,' Musk wrote on X, 'it ain't boring!'