B.C. logging industry needs to do more to cut wildfire risk, report finds
British Columbia's forestry industry isn't doing enough to help prevent cut the risk of wildfires, a new report has found.
The report, released Thursday, caps a two-year investigation by B.C.'s Forest Practices Board, and concluded that much of the problem is based on outdated rules and unclear responsibilities.
The probe looked at forestry activities between 2019 and 2022 in the Sea to Sky, Chicotin and Peace regions, specifically in interface areas deemed 'high' or 'extreme' wildfire threats.
The wildland-urban interface is a roughly two-kilometre area where human development, such as homes and infrastructure, meets or intermingles with wildland vegetation.
'It's been a well-known area of concern in the province for making communities safe from wildfire,' Keith Atkinson, chair of the Forest Practices Board, told Global News.
Story continues below advertisement
'Is our work helping or hurting risk reduction in the wildland-urban interface?'
2:01
New UBC research shows threat to rivers, oceans from wildfires
Among the report's key findings was that important fire hazard assessments at forestry sites were often late or incomplete.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Fewer than a quarter of such assessments were completed on time, while 30 per cent didn't meet legal content standards, according to the report.
The report also raised concerns about fire abatement work at logging sites, a process that includes chipping, piling and burning debris to reduce fire risks.
It found that while a majority of operators are meeting their obligations, about one-third of the cutblocks the board reviewed failed to meet their legal requirements or else needed more work to comply on time.
It also raised concerns about the current Wildfire Regulation, which allows companies to leave logging debris on sites for up to 30 months, meaning flammable debris can be on the ground through multiple fire seasons.
Story continues below advertisement
'In today's environment, we know the risks are high, we know the climate, the drought conditions really bring attention to that risk as being too high, and we think that should change,' Atkinson said.
'Policies should change to require them to abate that problem as soon as possible.'
Municipalities, meanwhile, are not currently included in the province's legal definition of interface zones.
'This omission undermines risk reduction and can contribute to fuel hazards sitting unabated near communities for multiple fire seasons,' the report concludes.
'Fuel hazards closer to the interface must be assessed and abated sooner.'
4:06
B.C.'s 2025 wildfire season forecast
It also notes that maps of legally defined interface areas, which lay out how and when forestry companies must do fire hazard assessment and abatement, aren't available to the public, making it hard to verify and enforce compliance.
Story continues below advertisement
Forest Practices Board is making five recommendations it says would encourage the forestry industry to more actively reduce wildfire risk, modernize guidelines and improve coordination.
Those include setting new proactive fire management objectives for the interface zone, rather than simply preventing new hazards, and speeding up fire hazard abatement timelines to 'as soon as practicable' rather than the current 30 months.
'Right now, a licensee can operate but just don't increase the risk of hazard,' Atkinson said. 'We're really saying you need to reduce that risk… If you are going to go in there and do work, part of the result should be a reduction in risk, not just the status quo.'
The board is also calling on the province to update the legal definition of the wildland-urban interface to include municipalities and other high-risk populated areas, and make those maps public.
The province should also create a publicly accessible hub of wildfire risk reduction plans, and revise and update its 2012 fuel hazard abatement guidelines, the board says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
3 hours ago
- Global News
Conservationists demand end to gravel extracton on B.C. creek
A coalition of conservation groups is calling on the federal and provincial governments to stop gravel extraction from a creek near Mission, B.C., saying it's destroying salmon habitats. The groups say gravel mining has lowered the level of Norrish Creek and its tributaries. Retired biologist John Werring said it was the sight of dead salmon dried up in teh creekbed last December that spurred him and others to try and figure out what was going on. Werring said he noticed the water level had been intentionally lowered by gravel extraction, work completed by the Canadian Pacific Kansas City Railroad to protect a bridge there. 1:56 Anger and frustration in Fraser Valley over railway dredging of creek He suspects that caused the neighboring creek to dry out and damage the Fish Habitat….and over the past six months he's been pushing government to reveal what they know about the situation. Story continues below advertisement He said he's recieved 'absolutely nothing' in the way of ansers since then. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Normally Firsheries and Oceans Canada and the provincial govenrment would be involved in any activity that could affect fish habitat and involved mining of a public resource. After months of frustration Werring and his colleagues have turned to the lawyers at Ecojustice for help. This week they sent demand letters to Victoria and Ottawa, alleging that the digging is being done without a provincial permit and goes beyond the scope of work authorized by the federal government. 2:08 Gravel removal blamed for salmon habitat damage near Mission They say that's destroying the spawning habitat of tens of thousands of salmon, and drastically altering water levels that are vital to the survival of wild chum and coho. They accuse the company of expanding its operations without provincial approval and beyond the scope of its federal permission. Story continues below advertisement 'Massive amounts of gravel have been extracted, hundreds of meters upstream and hundreds of meters downstream of the bridges that are supposed to be protected,' Werring said. Fisheries and Oceans Canada wasn't able to respond in time for this report. The provincial Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship said it had not given any permits for gravel removal on Norrish Creek, and that they have forwarded complaints to the federal agency. Werring said given that his group involves professional biologists, getting anwsers will be a daunting task for anyone else. ' If we're facing that, one has to wonder like, what about the public if they want to get involved in something like this?' he asked.
Global News
7 hours ago
- Global News
B.C. logging industry needs to do more to cut wildfire risk, report finds
British Columbia's forestry industry isn't doing enough to help prevent cut the risk of wildfires, a new report has found. The report, released Thursday, caps a two-year investigation by B.C.'s Forest Practices Board, and concluded that much of the problem is based on outdated rules and unclear responsibilities. The probe looked at forestry activities between 2019 and 2022 in the Sea to Sky, Chicotin and Peace regions, specifically in interface areas deemed 'high' or 'extreme' wildfire threats. The wildland-urban interface is a roughly two-kilometre area where human development, such as homes and infrastructure, meets or intermingles with wildland vegetation. 'It's been a well-known area of concern in the province for making communities safe from wildfire,' Keith Atkinson, chair of the Forest Practices Board, told Global News. Story continues below advertisement 'Is our work helping or hurting risk reduction in the wildland-urban interface?' 2:01 New UBC research shows threat to rivers, oceans from wildfires Among the report's key findings was that important fire hazard assessments at forestry sites were often late or incomplete. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Fewer than a quarter of such assessments were completed on time, while 30 per cent didn't meet legal content standards, according to the report. The report also raised concerns about fire abatement work at logging sites, a process that includes chipping, piling and burning debris to reduce fire risks. It found that while a majority of operators are meeting their obligations, about one-third of the cutblocks the board reviewed failed to meet their legal requirements or else needed more work to comply on time. It also raised concerns about the current Wildfire Regulation, which allows companies to leave logging debris on sites for up to 30 months, meaning flammable debris can be on the ground through multiple fire seasons. Story continues below advertisement 'In today's environment, we know the risks are high, we know the climate, the drought conditions really bring attention to that risk as being too high, and we think that should change,' Atkinson said. 'Policies should change to require them to abate that problem as soon as possible.' Municipalities, meanwhile, are not currently included in the province's legal definition of interface zones. 'This omission undermines risk reduction and can contribute to fuel hazards sitting unabated near communities for multiple fire seasons,' the report concludes. 'Fuel hazards closer to the interface must be assessed and abated sooner.' 4:06 B.C.'s 2025 wildfire season forecast It also notes that maps of legally defined interface areas, which lay out how and when forestry companies must do fire hazard assessment and abatement, aren't available to the public, making it hard to verify and enforce compliance. Story continues below advertisement Forest Practices Board is making five recommendations it says would encourage the forestry industry to more actively reduce wildfire risk, modernize guidelines and improve coordination. Those include setting new proactive fire management objectives for the interface zone, rather than simply preventing new hazards, and speeding up fire hazard abatement timelines to 'as soon as practicable' rather than the current 30 months. 'Right now, a licensee can operate but just don't increase the risk of hazard,' Atkinson said. 'We're really saying you need to reduce that risk… If you are going to go in there and do work, part of the result should be a reduction in risk, not just the status quo.' The board is also calling on the province to update the legal definition of the wildland-urban interface to include municipalities and other high-risk populated areas, and make those maps public. The province should also create a publicly accessible hub of wildfire risk reduction plans, and revise and update its 2012 fuel hazard abatement guidelines, the board says.
CTV News
8 hours ago
- CTV News
B.C. Forest Practices Board says forestry changes could reduce wildfire risk
A helicopter works on the Dryden Creek wildfire north of Squamish, B.C., on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/ Tijana Martin British Columbia's Forest Practices Board says a two-year investigation has found 'outdated rules and unclear responsibility' are stopping forestry from becoming a wildfire prevention tool. The board — an independent body that audits B.C. forest practices — says it examined forestry operations between 2019 and 2022 in areas where communities and forests meet, including the Sea to Sky, Cariboo-Chilcotin and Peace districts. It says fire hazard assessments are a 'cornerstone of wildfire risk reduction,' and while the industry assessments met 70 per cent of the requirements, fewer than one-quarter were completed on time. The board says municipalities are excluded from the definition of legal interface, a term used for fires burning close to homes, which means logging debris can remain for up to 30 months, even in high-risk areas. The report makes five recommendations to the province that it says would help support 'faster fuel cleanup, better co-ordination and more consistent protection for people and communities throughout B.C.' The suggestions include encouraging forest operators to actively reduce fire risk, improve co-ordination between government and industry, update legal definitions to add municipalities in the interface, modernize hazard assessment guidelines and incentivize faster logging cleanup. Board chair Keith Atkinson says more than a million B.C. residents live in areas with high or extreme wildfire risk. 'Foresters are already active in these spaces. With better rules and incentives, their efforts can become part of the wildfire solution,' he says in the release. 'This is an opportunity to improve our policies and processes toward proactive, risk-reducing forestry. It starts with better policy and ends with safer, more fire-resilient communities.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 19, 2025. The Canadian Press
