logo
Survivors Call Out MSD For Redress Inaction, Travel Chaos, And Deep Harm - One Week Before National Wānanga (Part One)

Survivors Call Out MSD For Redress Inaction, Travel Chaos, And Deep Harm - One Week Before National Wānanga (Part One)

Scoop12-05-2025

With less than a week to go before a national wānanga for survivors of state abuse in Christchurch, the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) has still not confirmed consistent travel support for those trying to attend. Many have been left waiting, others have been declined outright, and some have received offers so low they feel like an insult.
'It's heartbreaking,' says Karl Tauri, spokesperson for NZCAST – the New Zealand Collective of Abused in State Care. 'We've had survivors calling us in tears, unsure if they'll be able to attend. Some have said they don't want to live anymore. And what's MSD's response? Silence, deferral, or ten dollars for a 5-hour round trip.'
This isn't an isolated failure. NZCAST says it's part of a larger pattern: a redress system that isn't working, and an agency that claims to care about survivors but won't even show up.
Travel support that harms more than it helps
Survivors attending the upcoming Whare Tapu Wānanga in Christchurch (23–25 May) have reported:
Receiving no confirmation of travel support
Being told they're ineligible because their 'claim is closed'
Being offered as little as $10–$20 for multi-hour journeys
Hearing different rules depending on the person who answers the phone.
'This is redress?' Tauri asks. 'Survivors are retraumatised just trying to attend an event that could help them heal.'
Deaf survivors excluded
The situation is no better for Deaf survivors. MSD has refused to fund New Zealand Sign Language (NZSL) interpreters for wānanga, redirecting organisers to Deaf Aotearoa who have no mandate or funding to cover redress-related events.
'This has left Deaf survivors completely shut out,' says Tauri. 'Or, again, the burden falls on us, a grassroots, unpaid organisation to try and find the money.'
Disability support that doesn't support
Survivors living with chronic pain, PTSD, or long-term illness are facing yet another barrier: the broken Disability Allowance system.
NZCAST reports survivors being forced to repeatedly prove their trauma by obtaining letters from GPs and specialists, a system over-stretched on its own, even when their conditions are permanent and well documented.
One mother cannot access basic allergy-safe food and unsubsidized medication for her and her children. They live with serious gluten and dairy allergies yet are denied support. 'She skips rent once a month just to feed her kids and buy her medication' says Tauri. 'What kind of system makes a woman choose between food and housing?'
Case management by postcode
In some parts of the country, Work and Income allows survivors to request dedicated case managers, a much needed and wanted advancement, so survivors don't have to relive their trauma with a new person every time.
In some regions, this request is refused. 'It's postcode-based discrimination,' says Tauri. 'The system you get depends entirely on where you live. That's not justice.'
No dignity in death
In one recent case, MSD refused to fund the headstone for a survivor's father, who was buried in an unmarked grave. He was a veteran of World War Two, and the only adult who supported and loved his daughter, before he passed away. Despite clear grounds for compassion and support, she has been left scrambling to piece together funding on a benefit.
'This was a man who stood by his daughter through everything,' says Tauri. 'And MSD told the whānau no. No help, no honour, no acknowledgment. That tells you exactly how broken this system is, when even the dead, a veteran at that don't get dignity.'
MSD: Present in some places, absent in others
Perhaps the most galling failure, NZCAST says, is MSD's refusal to attend the Christchurch wānanga, despite attending similar events in Wellington and Palmerston North.
'Christchurch has hundreds of MSD staff and multiple offices,' Tauri says. 'They claim it's due to 'conflicting commitments,' but the message survivors hear is: you're not important enough for us to show up. '
This matters, he says, because when MSD WINZ and Historic Claims does attend, it works. Survivors are able to connect with case managers, claims, ask questions, get real-time support, and rebuild trust with the public service.
NZCAST: Doing the work the Crown won't
NZCAST is running the entire three-day Christchurch gathering including food, accommodation, transport, wellness sessions, peer support, and facilitation entirely unfunded. The trust receives no Crown funding, and relies on community aroha, fundraising, and lived experience.
'We're holding people who are in crisis while MSD sends emails telling us to refer survivors to the website,' says Tauri. 'We are doing their job. Unpaid. And still doing it better.'
What NZCAST is calling for:
A consistent national travel support policy for all survivors, open claim or not
NZSL interpreter funding for all Crown-linked survivor events
A trauma-informed Disability Allowance process that stops punishing people
Equal access to case managers, no matter the postcode
A survivor-led inter-agency wellbeing and redress taskforce
Proper funding for survivor-led groups who are carrying the system's failures
Implentation of the recommendations provided by the Royal Commission.
'We're not asking for favours. We're asking for justice.'
At the heart of it, Tauri says, is a simple truth: redress is not money. Redress is showing up. It's access. It's care.
'MSD says it supports survivors, but survivors are not feeling supported. They're exhausted. They're retraumatized. And they're being left behind.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MSD to monitor whether stricter rules for accommodation supplement push people into hardship
MSD to monitor whether stricter rules for accommodation supplement push people into hardship

RNZ News

timea day ago

  • RNZ News

MSD to monitor whether stricter rules for accommodation supplement push people into hardship

Social Development Minister Louise Upston. Photo: VNP / Phil Smith The Ministry of Social Development (MSD) will assess requests for hardship assistance to determine whether new, stricter rules for the accommodation supplement are pushing people to seek help elsewhere. From 2 March next year, payments from all boarders will be included in income assessments to determine whether people qualify for accommodation supplements or temporary additional support, and to calculate how much income-related rent people pay in public housing. At the moment, board payments are only included in this calculation when people have three or more boarders, or when it is their main source of income. Work and Income said that could mean people were paid less in housing subsidies or paid higher income-related rents. A spokesperson for MSD said because the policy change would mean a decrease in the rate of assistance received by some people, there could be an increase in applications for other hardship and housing supports. In earlier analysis, it had suggested that the $150 million the government expected to save over four years could be overstated because of this. "We cannot predict how many people will access hardship assistance and housing support products as a result of the change. As part of internal reporting for this initiative, MSD will monitor hardship assistance to see if it is increasing more than forecasted prior to this change. "If MSD identifies significant changes that may require further investigation (such as significant increases in hardship assistance, above what had been forecasted), MSD will investigate those further and provide advice to ministers." It has been estimated that about 13,200 households with boarders will be affected. Ricardo Mendendez-March, Green Party spokesperson for social development, said people who were receiving the accommodation supplement were already facing unaffordable rents. He said the government had not adequately communicated the impact of the bill. "Poverty is a political choice and this government has chosen to leave thousands of low-income families considerably worse off. The changes to the accommodation supplement are unjustified, particularly in a cost of living crisis. The government is trying to pay for their tax cuts by pushing low-income families into debt or to Work and Income to ask for hardship grants to survive. "Being $100 worse off each week may not mean much to wealthy government ministers, but for many families it's the difference between making ends meet or having to access a foodbank. We know that more families will end up needing to access hardship support because of this bill, putting pressure on families and other parts of the system that are already struggling to keep with the growing material hardship families are experiencing." Social Development Minister Louise Upston said there are various forms of assistance that are available to clients who need help with their housing and living costs and who meet the eligibility criteria. "This assistance will continue to be available to those people who are eligible, after 2 March 2026," she said. The minister acknowledges the changes could be unsettling but said they were necessary to make the system more consistent. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Inside Economics: Should you take New Zealand Superannuation if you don't need it ... plus, is the Reserve Bank's focus too narrow?
Inside Economics: Should you take New Zealand Superannuation if you don't need it ... plus, is the Reserve Bank's focus too narrow?

NZ Herald

time3 days ago

  • NZ Herald

Inside Economics: Should you take New Zealand Superannuation if you don't need it ... plus, is the Reserve Bank's focus too narrow?

This hit home for me since it's a bit of a bone of contention in our family. I'm a Gen X-er and my Baby Boomer parents both get the pension despite owning assets worth millions. It's not a case of the family home skyrocketing in value – they both own very large, very expensive properties (separately; they're divorced), nice vehicles and live very comfortable lives. I'm really happy they're healthy and enjoying life, but I – and my siblings – think it's a bit gross that they draw the pension when they very obviously don't need it. My Dad's a bit embarrassed about it, but says he's asset-rich but cash-poor. My Mum gets defensive and says she's worked all her life and deserves it. Both my parents are smart and socially aware, so I'm surprised by their stance. My question is: how many retirees actually choose not to take NZ Super? Is there a mechanism to opt out? – Name withheld A: Fascinating question, thanks. I was curious about the numbers too and asked at the Ministry of Social Development (which administers New Zealand's pension scheme). There is no specific mechanism to opt out. But the way the scheme works is that you have to sign up (or opt in) when you turn 65. So, essentially, if you don't need the money, you can just do nothing, and you won't get it. I'm also told you that when you do apply, the registration process does point you to various charities you can donate it to if you think you don't need the money. is one such charity organisation purpose-built for the task. The Ministry of Social Development didn't have any numbers to hand as to how many Kiwis over 65 haven't signed up even though they are eligible. So I've put in an Official Information Act request and hopefully someone in the system will dig that out (watch this space). Benefit or right? The bigger question is the one you implicitly raise with your parents: should people take the super payment if they don't really need it? Framed in even more basic terms: is the super payment a benefit or a right? Everyone who is eligible does have the right to claim it. But the money is also part of the consolidated pool of Government revenue. It isn't held in a special fund, like the New Zealand Superannuation Fund (the Crown investment fund with the annoyingly similar name). That fund will be used eventually to help fund the cost of NZ Super as it balloons, based on the ageing population. NZ Super is also very different to KiwiSaver, which is actually your money that you have worked for over the years. Ultimately, the existence of the state pension (and how generous or universal it is) remains at the mercy of Parliament. It is a benefit, but for many Kiwis, especially those of a certain generation, it feels like a right. It has been promised to us by politicians over the years. That's one of the reasons even changing the age limit or means-testing it has been seen as a political no-go zone. But that seems to be changing as the sheer weight of the cost to the economy becomes apparent. According to Budget 2025 data, NZ Super costs $4352 per person per year, making it the third-largest area of government spending after welfare ($6181 per person) and health ($5804 per person). From the Treasury's long-term fiscal projections, spending on NZ Super is projected to grow from 4.3% of GDP in 2010 to 7.9% in 2060, an increase of 3.6 percentage points. National under Sir Bill English first proposed lifting the age to 67 in the election campaign of 2017. And National campaigned on a similar platform in 2023 with a commitment to keep the age at 65 until 2044, when it will be gradually lifted to 67. This change wouldn't affect anyone born before 1979. Finance Minister Nicola Willis has suggested National will campaign on a similar policy again in 2026. In my view, it will inevitably have to rise. I also understand why people are inclined to accept it as a right. It is free money, right? It will eventually pass through the generations. Perhaps those who want to enjoy the extra cash but feel some guilt could look to spend it with local businesses or support local artists. Does the Reserve Bank need a wider focus? Q: Kia ora Liam, I was reading your column on the future of the Reserve Bank under a new governor. I wonder how the bank can set its policy direction without a clear national economic strategy to work within. New Zealand doesn't seem to have one that I could clearly identify, the closest being the Reserve Bank's inflation target and that's about it. Is this because the nation is happy to muddle along on the global currents of laissez-faire economics instead? After watching a documentary recently on Xi Jinping and his 'China Dream' policy that has seen China become a global economic force, I found myself asking: where is the (suitably less authoritarian) New Zealand equivalent that I think we actually need? A more orderly economy could be highly beneficial in underpinning the woeful state of our physical and social infrastructure, but only if the politicians involved were actually competent enough to plan and execute successfully over multiple decades. Which begs another question: we had decades of stable government in the 20th century that built all the infrastructure, which we have failed to keep updating. If it could be done then, why can't it be done now? Regards, Steve-Tipene Callagher A: Some really interesting thoughts there, Steve. I agree that a more structured and orderly economic approach would benefit New Zealand. But I'll start with your point about the Reserve Bank (RBNZ) and try to explain why it has such a limited scope. The main reason that the central bank primarily targets inflation is that it is the one thing that monetary policy has some real control over. US economist Milton Friedman once said: 'Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon.' What he meant was that at some point, we can always trace inflation back to the supply of money in an economy. If we create too much money (unbacked by an increase in real physical wealth), then we always get inflation. By moving the cost of borrowing (and saving) up and down, central banks can control the money supply. When interest rates are low, there is less incentive to save and more incentive to borrow and spend, so the money supply expands. When interest rates are high, there is more incentive to save and it is harder to borrow, so the supply contracts. This has proved to be very effective at controlling inflation over the years. But even the world's top central bankers will admit that monetary policy isn't particularly effective at controlling more nuanced aspects of the economy. It is often described as a 'blunt tool'. Unemployment is sometimes included in central bank mandates because there is seen to be a correlation between unemployment and inflation. But even that is debatable and we've seen the new Government reverse Labour's policy, which had added unemployment to the mandate. The argument is that keeping inflation stable is such an important platform for an economy that central banks should do that one thing and do it well. The rest of the economic equation is left to the Government and/or markets to sort out. I don't want to completely dismiss any criticism of the monetarist approach to central banking. There are alternative ideas out there, like Modern Monetary Theory. I'm not going to do it justice here, but it effectively argues that Governments should focus on real resource constraints rather than financial constraints. It says Governments aren't the same as businesses or households and they can print money and ignore deficits and get away with it. Perhaps it might work in a world where it was universally adopted and well-regulated by efficient Governments around the world. It requires more trust in efficient Government than I have. Regardless, the current system is so deeply embedded in the global economy that even US Presidents are wary of messing with it. So we're kind of stuck with it. I wouldn't like New Zealand's chances of going it alone with a new system. More structure Ultimately, when it comes to the lack of coherent strategy in New Zealand's economic approach, I think a lot of it has to do with the inability of the two major parties to find a bipartisan agreement on big areas like infrastructure. So I agree that it is frustrating, given that we built so much amazing infrastructure in the 20th century, that we seem so bad at it now. Quite why is hard to say. Perhaps it is MMP? There is a lot more trading-off of policy than there used to be under First Past the Post. It also seems to take much longer to get construction started on things, which means we often see Governments change before plans come to fruition. Perhaps we need longer political terms. Or perhaps we just need to streamline the process to get construction under way sooner. I know I'm not alone in wishing we could get some sort of bipartisan accord done on a long-term infrastructure pipeline. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003. To sign up to my weekly newsletter, click on your user profile at and select 'My newsletters'. For a step-by-step guide, click here. If you have a burning question about the quirks or intricacies of economics send it to or leave a message in the comments section.

King's Birthday Honours 2025: The full list - knights, dames and all other recipients
King's Birthday Honours 2025: The full list - knights, dames and all other recipients

NZ Herald

time6 days ago

  • NZ Herald

King's Birthday Honours 2025: The full list - knights, dames and all other recipients

Emeritus Distinguished Professor Alison Stewart, CNZM, for services to plant science and the arable sector Emeritus Distinguished Professor Alison Stewart has been made a dame companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit for services to plant science and the arable sector. Photo / File Catriona Ruth Williams, MNZM, for services to spinal cord injury research and equestrian sport Catriona Williams has been made a dame companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit for services to spinal cord injury research and equestrian sport. Photo / Lynda Feringa Knights Companion (KNZM) Mark Leslie Smith Cooper, KC, for services to the judiciary Now-retired Justice Mark Cooper has been made a knight companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit for services to the judiciary. Photo / Courts of NZ Brendan Jon Lindsay, MNZM, for services to business and philanthropy Brendan Lindsay has been made a knight companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit for services to business and philanthropy. Photo / Jason Oxenham Ewan Francis Smith, CNZM, for services to Cook Islands business and tourism Ewan Smith has been made a knight companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit for services to Cook Islands business and tourism. Photo / LinkedIn Companions (CNZM) Catherine Joy Andersen, for services to the music industry Wayne Robert Boyd, for services to business, philanthropy and sport Professor George Charles Clifton, for services to structural engineering Anthony Edwin Falkenstein, ONZM, for services to philanthropy and business education Steven Leonard Joyce, for services as a Member of Parliament Steven Joyce has been made a companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit. Photo / Nick Reed Donald Angus Mackinnon, for services to sports governance Professor Emeritus Ian George Mayhew, for services to the veterinary profession, especially equine medicine Dr David Edwin McKee, for services to New Zealand Sign Language and the Deaf community William Charles Nathan, OBE, ED, for services to Māori Dr Lesley Kay Rameka, for services to Māori and early childhood education Ruth Margaret Richardson, for services as a Member of Parliament and to governance Dr Ai Ling Tan, for services to gynaecology Dr Mark Greenslade Thomas, for services to people living with HIV/Aids and antibiotic research Officers (ONZM) Emeritus Professor George David Baxter, for services to physiotherapy and health Gillian Lorraine Bohm, for services to health Associate Professor Philip Michel Jose Brinded, for services to psychiatry Fergus Graham Brown, for services to the tourism industry Graham Vincent Brown, for services to the venison industry David Paul Burton, for services to food writing Peter Hardy Ballantyne Carty, for services to fly-fishing Suzanne Noreen Cato, for services to music, television and education Hohepa Conrad, for services to Māori, particularly kaupapa waka Peter Michael de Blois, for services to music Dr Celia Jane Devenish Giddings, for services to women's health and education Sophie Frances Monique Devine, for services to cricket Judith Mary Dobson, for services to the community, broadcasting and historical preservation Jude Dobson has been made an officer of the New Zealand Order of Merit for services to the community, broadcasting and historical preservation. Photo / Supplied Professor Bernadette Kathleen Drummond, for services to dentistry and education Daryl Kelvin Eason, for services to wildlife conservation Susan Elizabeth Elliott, for services to the arts and governance Rear Admiral James Leslie Gilmour, (Rtd), for services to the New Zealand Defence Force Kirk Brian Hardy, for services to drug abuse prevention and education Dafydd (Dai) Morgan Henwood, for services to the entertainment industry and charitable fundraising Professor Patria Anne Hume, for services to sports science and injury prevention Gary Rodney Lane, for services to conservation and philanthropy Julia May Marshall, for services to children's literature Peter David Martin, JP, for services to the community, particularly Pacific and LGBTQ+ communities Murray Graham Mexted, for services to rugby David Ross Morgan, for services to aviation Panchanatham Narayanan, QSM, JP, for services to multicultural communities Peter Arnold Nation, for services to the agricultural industry and governance Gillian Christine Naylor, for services to rural communities, particularly women John Daniel O'Sullivan, for services to business and philanthropy Dr Fiona Dorothy Pardington, MNZM, for services to photography Dr Susan Parry, for services to gastroenterology David Robert Percy, for services to fire safety technologies, business and the community Eric Clive Power, for services to swimming Timothy Grant Southee, for services to cricket Gail Patricia Spence, for services to language education Distinguished Professor Emeritus Paul Spoonley, for services to sociology John Bradley Struthers, for services to cycling, the cycling industry and business Mark William Joseph Vela, for services to mental health care and education Jennifer Mary Wake, for services to theatre and television Neil William Walker, JP, for services to primary industries and the community Sarah Louise Walker, for services to BMX and sports governance Dr Richard John Wild, for services to animal welfare and the veterinary sector Portia Louise Woodman-Wickliffe, for services to rugby Wayne Wright, for services to education and philanthropy Members (MNZM) Anae Lupematasila Lima Arthur John Anae, for services to the Samoan community Ellesse Mote Andrews, for services to cycling Richard Balcombe-Langridge, for services to business Catherine Juliet Bell, for services to food education Dr Santosh Prasad Bhandari, JP, for services to the Nepalese community Darryl Bishop, for services to mental health Victor Kenneth Boyd, for services to survivors of abuse in care Anna Catherine Cottrell, for services to documentary filmmaking and migrant communities Simon Eric Denny, for services to art Welmoed (Chris) Duggan, for services to science education Ronald Bruce Ealam, for services to Search and Rescue Robert Tuahuru Edwards, for services to the community and governance Susan Ann Elley, for services to education Terri Jayne Fairhall (Terri Middleton), for services to the New Zealand Police and the community Allison Daphne Christina Franklin, for services to people with disabilities Okesene Uili Galo, for services to the Tokelau community Rez Gardi, for services to refugees and human rights advocacy Alan Charles Gilmore, for services to astronomy Francis Quinn Goldingham, for services to outdoor recreation and seniors Elizabeth Helen Graham, for services to Māori and education Patricia Pearl Gregory, for services to the fashion industry Aaron Mark Halstead, for services to Search and Rescue and the tourism industry Dr Nina Emilia Hood, for services to education Lesley Mary Huckins, for services to swimming Meleua Enda Ikiua, for services to Vagahau Niue language and education Martin Kaipo, for services to social services and the community Lalita Vanmali Kasanji, for services to the IT industry and the Indian community Brian Patrick Kelly, for services to broadcasting William James Kermode, for services to governance and philanthropy Pamela Margaret Kilmartin, for services to astronomy John Junior Kumitau, for services to the Pacific community Laurinne Marion Laing, for services to sports and people with intellectual disabilities Ross James Lawrence, for services to the ski industry Lisa Li, for services to the tourism industry James Eric Lilley, for services to conservation and the community Janet Crystal-Lee Lilo, for services to the arts Pauline-Jean Henrietta Luyten, for services to rugby and the Pacific community Reverend David Elliott Major, for services to the community and the State Ngatepaeru Marsters, for services to midwifery and Pacific communities Lloyd James McCallum, JP, for services to the dairy industry and the environment Suzanne Michelle McFadden, for services to sports journalism and women Ian Robert Flockhart McKelvie, for services to local government, governance and as a Member of Parliament Grant Allan McMillan, ED, for services to education and the community Victoria Mary Mee, for services to women and business Eugene Joseph Meredith, for services to American Football Allan George Mincher, for services to aviation engineering Margaret Mary Mitchell, for services to the Royal New Zealand Naval Women's Association Dr Alishia Rangiwhakawaitau Moeahu, for services to Māori culture Dr Malcolm George Davis Mulholland, for services to health and Māori Khoa Truong Nguyen, for services to New Zealand-Vietnam relations and the community Julia Louisa Pearse, for services to governance and the community Sunit Prakash, JP, for services to the IT industry and the Indian community Dr Maxine Mariri Ronald, for services to breast cancer treatment and research Gary James Herbert Rooney, for services to business and philanthropy Bruce Winston Ross, for services to cycling Charles Edward Ross, for services to the community Morrin Jackson Rout, for services to the arts, particularly literature Annie Burma Teina Tangata Esita Scoon, for services to softball and the Pacific community Diana Rosemary Shand, for services to the environment and the community Simon John Caufield Strombom, DSD, ED, for services to war commemoration and historical preservation Veronica Ngarutai Kaye Thompson, for services to basketball Diane Anita Turner, JP, for services to governance, seniors and Māori Hariata Ann Vercoe, for services to Māori, health, and the community Louise Annette Wallace, for services to the entertainment industry Andrew Norman Williamson, for services to agriculture Marilyn Kay Yeoman, for services to education and the community Honorary Member Viliami Teumohenga, for services to education and the Pacific community King's Service Order (KSO) Companions Dr Christopher Evan Longhurst, for services to survivors of abuse in care Tyrone Marks, for services to survivors of abuse in care Phillip Wayne Paikea, for services to the prevention of family violence and the community Dover Spencer Samuels, for services as a Member of Parliament Dover Samuels has been made a companion of the King's Service Order. Photo / Michael Cunningham Peter William Tipene, for services to Māori King's Service Medal (KSM) Heather Jayne Baldwin, for services to the community Tina May Barrett, JP, for services to the community Debra Ann Bell, for services to the community Narendra Bhana, for services to the Indian community Marius Jean Bron, for services to Search and Rescue and the community Judith Marion Browne, JP, for services to the community Julia Mary Castles, for services to language education and migrant communities John Albert Coleman, for services to the community and sport Lily Coleman, for services to the community and sport Ross Melville Cooper, for services to rugby Margaret Jean Cousins, for services to local government and the community Glenda Gaye Davies, for services to the community Aperira Ngahau Davis, for services to the community Deborah Grace Davis, for services to the community Gavin Lloyd Dennis, JP, for services to Fire and Emergency New Zealand and the community Edwin John Eeles, JP, for services to pipe bands Anthony William Norman Enderby, for services to conservation Jennifer Fay Enderby, for services to conservation Zora Estelle Feilo-Makapa, for services to the Niue community and the arts Penelope-Jane Frost, for services to children and social work Christine Ada Gilbertson, for services to midwifery Kaiaho (Butch) Kereama Green, for services to music Heidi Elizabeth Griffin, for services to the arts and the community Allyson Teresa Hamblett, for services to people with disabilities and the transgender community The Venerable Sohim Hay, for services to the Cambodian community Katerina Hauhaua Hepi, for services to Māori language education Nicola Linda Hickey (Nicky Rawlings), for services to Victim Support Luen Nanette Hoani, for services to Māori language education Parminder Kaur, JP, for services to multicultural communities Kevin Francis Loe, JP, for services to the community and agriculture Timothy Peter Marshall, for services to the community and waka ama Audrey Myra Mattinson, for services to Scottish Country Dancing and the community Annie Elizabeth McCracken, for services to the community Reverend Rosemary McMillan, for services to the community Clem Burnard Mellish, for services to Māori art and music Graham Frederick Charles Milligan, MStJ, for services to the Royal New Zealand Returned and Services Association Fergus Charles Denis More, for services to the community and the law Graham (Kereama) Douglas Nathan, for services to Māori Terence John O'Regan, for services to nursing and the community Alison Isabel Perrin, JP, for services to the community and music Narayanan Kutty Pulloothpadath, for services to ethnic communities Berry Jane Rangi, for services to the community, particularly Pacific peoples Karen Elizabeth Richards, for services to textiles history and conservation Papali'i Seiuli Johnny Siaosi, for services to health and the Pacific community Rosemary Jan Sloman, JP, for services to the community Roberta Jane Smallfield, JP, for services to historical research and the community Alan (Curly) Rex Troon, for services to Fire and Emergency New Zealand Jacqueline June Watson, for services to the community and the arts Glenys Margaret Weir, for services to health Merrilyn Joy Withers, for services to youth and the Baptist movement Yuanyong Yang, for services to bonsai and the Chinese community Honorary KSM Eteuati Fa'avae, for services to the Pacific community Siesina Ofahelotu Latu, for services to the Pacific community

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store