
‘They'll suffer, we'll suffer' – Irish MEPs on tariff threat
As a July deadline for Trump's threatened 50% tariff on EU goods looms, intense talks continue to take place between the US and the bloc.
Tariffs pose a 'big threat', and if they were to apply to agricultural products, the effect could be 'detrimental' for Ireland, MEP Sean Kelly said.
'If Donald Trump goes ahead with them and then we [EU] reciprocate, they'll suffer, we'll suffer – and it's not in anybody's interest to go down that line.'
Tariff talks
Kelly's comments to Agriland come as Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Simon Harris confirmed he took part in discussions this week with US trade representative, Ambassador Jamieson Greer.
This follows on from the Tánaiste's meetings in Washington in April, when he met with the US Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick.
The Tánaiste and Ambassador Greer discussed recent trade developments, including an exchange of views on the ongoing negotiations between the US and EU.
Speaking after the virtual meeting, the Tánaiste said he outlined the 'hugely successful two-way economic relationship between the US and Ireland', and that tariffs 'threaten this relationship and are bad for business, bad for consumers and bad for workers on both sides of the Atlantic'.
During the meeting the Tánaiste reiterated that negotiations remain the main focus for both the EU and Ireland and welcomed the 'recent positive momentum', including Ambassador Greer's recent meeting with EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic.
The Tánaiste added: 'I assured Ambassador Greer of Ireland's commitment to supporting a mutually beneficial agreement that works for the US and the EU and noted his recent positive meeting with Commissioner Šefčovič in Paris.
'The ambassador and I agreed to remain in contact as we seek to bring this trade dispute to an end.'
Uncertainty
According to Sean Kelly, the EU has to 'box clever' when dealing with the US, acknowledging the strong relationship Ireland has had with the US.
'I'm pleased that the EU are taking their time because the worst thing you could do at this stage is to rush into retaliatory measures that might be as harmful to us, and maybe with time, Donald Trump might back down and change his mind,' as negotiations continue, according to Kelly.
MEP Billy Kelleher told Agriland that there is 'grave uncertainty' at the moment around international trade, with the impact of Trump's proposed tariffs coupled with the EU-Mercosur trade agreement.
He said Ireland must 'hold firm in terms of addressing some of the issues' of Mercosur, Kelleher said, including the need for 'mirror imaging of regulations and farming practices to ensure that any products that come in comply with the standards we expect our farmers to produce food by'.
The MEP warned: 'The other area I have concern about in Mercosur is deforestation.
'I am still convinced if we don't put measures in place to ensure there isn't further destruction of the Amazon rainforest, that could incentivise further destruction, and importation of cheap food, and that in itself doesn't serve the conditions of climate change and the impact that would have on global warning.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
an hour ago
- RTÉ News
Macron in Greenland to 'show French, EU solidarity'
French President Emmanuel Macron said as he arrived in Greenland that his visit aimed to show the solidarity of France and the European Union over the Arctic island's "sovereignty" and "territorial integrity". US President Donald Trump has said he wants the United States to take over the minerals-rich and strategically-located Arctic island for reasons of national and international security, and has not ruled out the use of force to do so. Greenland is a self-governing part of the Kingdom of Denmark with the right to declare independence. Both the Greenland and Danish governments say it is not for sale and only Greenlanders can determine their future. US Vice President JD Vance visited a US military base there in March. President Macron, the first foreign leader to visit Greenland since Mr Trump's explicit threats to "get" the island, was invited by the prime ministers of Greenland and Denmark. He has said his visit is meant to prevent any "preying" on the territory. "France has stood by us since the first statements about taking our land emerged. "This support is both necessary and gratifying," Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen wrote on Facebook days ahead of Mr Macron's visit. Asked if President Macron would deliver an explicit message to the United States during his visit, an adviser to Mr Macron told reporters: "The trip is a signal in itself," without mentioning Donald Trump. Earlier, speaking on RTL radio, French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said: "Greenland is a European territory and it is normal that Europe and notably France show their interest." According to an IFOP poll for published yesterday, 77% of the French and 56% of Americans disapprove of an annexation of Greenland by the US and 43% of the French would approve using French military power to prevent a US invasion. Mr Macron is visiting the capital Nuuk, as well as a hydropower station funded by the EU and a glacier, and discuss Arctic security and climate change with his hosts. Though Denmark is an EU member, Greenland is outside the EU. The French adviser said the visit would be an opportunity to discuss how to give Greenland's association partnership with the EU a "new dimension". Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen made several visits to Paris after Mr Trump's threats to seek French and European backing, and has placed orders for French-made surface-to-air missiles, in a shift of focus for Copenhagen. Enlisting the EU's only nuclear power is a way for Denmark, long one of the US's most loyal allies in Europe, to project a form of hard power towards a suddenly more aggressive United States, said Florian Vidal of the Paris-based IFRI think tank. "The Trump administration's more aggressive posture is a shock that makes the French vision of Europe, one that is more autonomous, appear more reasonable for Denmark," he said. "From a Nordic point of view, France is a military power that counts," he added.


The Irish Sun
3 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Football could introduce new transfer rule to let players buy out their contracts in radical move that would slash fees
MASSIVE transfer fees could soon become a thing of the past — with players' chiefs wanting stars to have freedom to break their contracts for a fixed compensation payment. The international players' union FifPro has accused Fifa of dragging its feet over new transfer rules after the 5 A major case involving ex-Chelsea star Lassana Diarra could make massive transfer fees a thing of the past Credit: Getty 5 The ruling from the European Court means inflated transfer fees could be a thing of the past Credit: EPA 5 The likes of Alexander Isak would be able to buy out their contract rather than being marooned while clubs argue over a transfer fee Credit: Alamy Major agents claimed the October ruling was the But now FifPro has told stars and their lawyers to be FifPro legal chief Alexandra Gomez Bruinewoud said: 'Every worker should have the right to end a contractual relationship. READ MORE IN FOOTBALL 'Knowing how much you will have to pay as compensation is part of that right. 'Also, the fact you leave your job should not prevent you from being hired in another job, which is what was happening in football.' Even the giants of the game may be forced into a major rethink by the repercussions of a row sparked in Moscow a decade ago. Former Most read in Football BEST ONLINE CASINOS - TOP SITES IN THE UK Yet Diarra's win at the European Court of Justice looks increasingly likely to significantly change the way the transfer market works. If FifPro is right, the result will be for all players to have the right to break their contracts. Transfer fees could be SCRAPPED forever after Lassana Diarra wins landmark court case against Fifa It would see players worth £100m on the open market suddenly available for a fraction of that sum. Of course, any new regulations will not be introduced this summer. Fifa rushed through a series of temporary transfer regulations, with dire warnings of the 'collapse' of the transfer market unleashing 'chaos'. But FifPro remains unconvinced the latest moves from Zurich meet the demands of EU law. One insider explained: 'This could be the last few years of the inflated transfer fees we have all seen. 'The European Court has said that football must operate within EU law. 5 'Football is the outlier. There's no other industry — other than maybe thoroughbred horses — where you see employees change hands for millions of pounds and it is time for the game to be brought in step.' Gomez Bruinewoud added: 'The judges in the Diarra case explained why the system was against EU law. 'I'm not afraid to say the same Fifa rules are probably also against most national labour laws.' Top players will benefit from higher wages and longer deals, though with budgets finite, that would mean less cash and shorter deals for players further down the pecking order — and limited job security in the lower tiers. Prem club bosses also fear the consequences, arguing the effective abolition of fees would blow up the entire footballing pyramid as money would no longer 'trickle down'. It is likely that, as with the Jean-Marc Bosman courtroom saga that turned European football on its head 30 years ago, it will need another player to be the test case to break the current system. But it seems that challenge is a matter of time from being made. And with the players' union backing, the most fundamental change the game has ever seen. 5

The Journal
7 hours ago
- The Journal
Aircraft spot checks under consideration to ensure weapons not flown through Ireland
TRANSPORT MINISTER DARRAGH O'Brien has confirmed his department is reviewing what additional checks the state can carry out to ensure that no weapons destined for Israel are flown through Ireland. Speaking to The Journal , the minister said the review being carried out by his department regarding weapons being flown through Irish airspace and Irish airports is nearing conclusion. 'What I would say this is that I've been informed, and it is something I take very seriously, that no licenses have been granted for flying weapons from Ireland to Israel or over Irish airspace,' he said. The issue had been raised with Tánaiste and Minister for Defence Simon Harris previously, when People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy walked across the Dáil chamber to give Harris documents which he claimed proved thousands of tonnes of weapons are being flown through Irish airspace. During the debate on the matter the Tánaiste outlined that the existing legislation doesn't provide for a system of random inspections. However, he said at the time that he believed it would be 'legitimate for government to consider whether to amend our own domestic legislation' to allow for such measures. The Department of Transport is carrying out 'a robust examination' of the allegations, Harris said at the time. Advertisement Asked about the review, the O'Brien told The Journal this week that it is underway, but provided no timeline for when it will conclude. Any allegations of 'munitions of war' being flown through Irish airspace or airports is taken 'very seriously', he said. 'Where someone brings forward an allegation that weapons or components of have been flown through an Irish airport or airspace or landed in Ireland by an international carrier, they are investigated,' said O'Brien. The minister said lots of aircrafts are registered in Ireland, though they don't necessarily fly through Irish airspace. 'So I think we have to be cognisant of what we're able to do,' he said. 'There are other things that we can actually do,' he said, stating that his department is assessing if there are 'certain checks' that can be carried out to assure the state that no munitions are coming through Ireland. 'They're the type things we're looking at,' he said. It is understood that random inspections of aircraft suspected of carrying weapons or parts could see agents boarding US aircraft stopped in Shannon, for example, and searching the planes to see if there are any undeclared munitions on board. O'Brien ruled out the possibility of grounding flights that fly through Irish airspace with weapons, stating that if a plane is flying from one international city to another continent through Irish airspace it is 'not realistic' that the Irish state could force the grounding of the aircraft. International carriers are 'well aware of their obligations with regard to the laws that already exist in Ireland and their legal obligations', O'Brien said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal