MLS Fan Kicked Out of Stadium for Wearing MAGA Hat
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A Major League Soccer (MLS) fan said he was booted from a Missouri stadium and threatened with arrest for wearing a red Make America Great Again (MAGA) hat.
A man, who identified himself as Michael Weitzel in footage he filmed from a match on July 26, said he was "asked to leave" the St. Louis City SC soccer game at Energizer Park by security personnel over the hat, which is widely recognized as a symbol associated with President Donald Trump and his political movement.
Newsweek has reached out to MLS and St. Louis City SC for comment.
Why It Matters
The MAGA hat is often characterized by a red baseball cap featuring the slogan Make America Great Again, in white embroidered lettering, although colors can vary. Some caps simply say MAGA.
The phrase was popularized during Trump's 2016 U.S. presidential campaign, with the MAGA cap often worn by the president himself, and it has since become a culturally significant and often divisive emblem.
What To Know
Footage of the incident has gone viral on X, formerly Twitter, gaining more than 2 million views at the time of writing, with some critics argue that the man's ousting infringes on his rights of freedom of speech. The St. Louis City SC Energizer Park rules ban political banners and signs.
When I heard this young man state his name and saw that this was in STL I wondered if he was related to my fraternity brother who is from St. Louis and still lives there. Turns out, he's his nephew. Proud of this family for standing up. https://t.co/pjjaiXabTP — David Limbaugh (@DavidLimbaugh) August 3, 2025
"I am Michael Weitzel and I have been asked to leave because of the Donald Trump hat," he said in the video, in which he can be seen engaging with security personnel and law enforcement.
A security official responded by saying they "don't want any kind of political" messaging.
According to published rules for Energizer Park, political banners are prohibited, though no explicit mention is made of political clothing or accessories such as hats.
Banners should not contain "commercial, political or offensive content," the rules state.
Weitzel challenged whether the rules were being enforced consistently, pointing to a nearby section where fans were waving flags.
During the exchange, Weitzel was told he could return to his seat if he removed the hat. "If you take the hat off, you can go back in," a staff member said. After briefly removing the hat, another voice off-camera responded, "We are way past that point," prompting Weitzel to put the hat back on.
Before leaving, Weitzel said , "So this is what happens when you wear a Donald Trump hat at a St. Louis City SC game." He also noted that the security officer was simply enforcing venue policy, saying, "It is not his fault. He is just following the rules."
What People Are Saying
David Limbaugh, a lawyer and author, said on X: "When I heard this young man state his name and saw that this was in STL I wondered if he was related to my fraternity brother who is from St. Louis and still lives there. Turns out, he's his nephew. Proud of this family for standing up."
T.J. Moe, a former professional football wide receiver, said on X: "A man got kicked out of @stlCITYsc game for wearing a MAGA hat. He asked why they allowed pride flags everywhere and they had no answer. This is happening in 2025. Absolute absurdity. The backlash to STL City SC should be immense and severe."
Internet personality Mario Nawfal post on X: "Is there major discrimination against showing public support for Trump? What's the fix?"
Other X users wrote:
"My boys love soccer, but if the @MLS is going to remove fans with MAGA hats they can forget about my family ever attending! Also, I just canceled my MLS subscription on Apple TV!"
Another said: "To those who somehow think only MAGA is held to the 'no political' standard in @MLS stadiums, particularly @stlCITYsc. When I sang the national anthem for the Pride match, I had this shirt one [sic] when I arrived and they made me change. It's not one side. Quit whining and grow up."
"Completely unconstitutional. It is open to the general public AND if you allow 'Pride' flags … then that hat should be OK too. I hope he sues," wrote another account.
What Happens Next
Gregg Keller, a GOP strategist, said on X that the footage is "now being looked at by the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
5 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Russia sees victory in summit as Trump adopts Putin approach to ending war
MOSCOW — For Russia, the results of the Alaska summit between President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin marked a turning point in U.S.-Russian relations underlined by the United States subsequently abandoning its demand for a halt in fighting in Ukraine.
Forbes
5 minutes ago
- Forbes
Saturday, August 16. Russia's War On Ukraine: News And Information From Ukraine
Dispatches from Ukraine. Day 1,270. Trump's meeting with Putin meeting in Alaska U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, met in Anchorage, Alaska, on Aug. 15 for one of the most consequential in-person summits in years. The meeting, which lasted for nearly three hours, ended without a concrete deal. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said he would travel to Washington on Monday, while Kyiv's European allies vowed to back Ukraine and tighten sanctions on Russia. Pro-Ukrainian demonstrators filled downtown streets in Anchorage, holding signs condemning the high-level meeting between Moscow and Washington. A joint press conference is expected following the closed-door meeting between the two presidents. In 2023, the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin for alleged war crimes involving accusations that Russia has forcibly taken Ukrainian children. Trump's hosting of him in the US and giving Vladimir Putin a warm public welcome ended Putin's diplomatic isolation over the past three years and legitimized him as a player on the international scene. In Ukraine, most of the public didn't perceive the summit as a positive development. The normalization of relations with Russia's ruling elite is seen as a clear step toward removing accountability. The makeup of the Russian delegation suggests that future economic cooperation will be on the table. President Trump is reportedly considering offering Russia opportunities to access valuable natural resources in the narrow strait that separates the two countries. Alaska, divided from Russia by just three miles across the Bering Strait, is believed to contain substantial untapped reserves, including oil. Russian Attacks and War Developments Between Aug. 12-15, Russian strikes killed at least 22 and injured more than 64 civilians across Ukraine. Eight civilians were killed and 33 were wounded in the eastern province of Donetsk. Six people were killed in each of the Kherson and Kharkiv regions, with a total of 24 people injured. One person was killed in Dnipropetrovsk and Sumy regions, while seven others were wounded. Ukrainian military officials say they have 'stabilized' the front line in eastern Donetsk region after what some analysts called a Russian 'breakthrough' earlier this week. A recent Russian push near the town of Dobropillia, penetrating an estimated 6 miles into positions of Ukrainian forces, raised concerns over an upcoming broader collapse in the Ukrainian army. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has disclosed the exact daily military losses of Ukraine for the first time. On Aug. 12, He told reporters that on the previous day, the Armed Forces of Ukraine lost 340 troops: 18 killed, 243 wounded, and 79 missing. 'Usually, the missing are either dead, whose bodies we could not retrieve, or those taken prisoner,' he added.
CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: In Alaska, Trump gifts Putin more time to grind down Ukraine
It was not the applause, or the red carpet, or the ride in the Beast, or speaking first on the podium, that were the biggest gifts offered up to Vladimir Putin at the Alaska summit. President Donald Trump's greatest favor to his Russian counterpart was time. Russian success or failure on the front line will be measured in a matter of weeks. Putin has until mid-October until the weather cools, ground softens, and advances become harder. That is a full two months. His forces are on the brink of turning painfully incremental and costly micro-advances into 'nowhere' villages in eastern Ukraine into a more strategic gain. Almost every day, another settlement falls. The secondary sanctions Trump has threatened – which would penalize those buying Russian oil and gas – and has now twice backed away, would not stop Putin's war effort this year. But it has already clearly piled pressure on him, in the forms of calls from the leaders of India and China, and may have led him to accept the invitation to meet with Trump in Alaska, where he was welcomed so graciously. Putin does not want to maintain a lengthy war effort under economic pressure from his two main energy customers and effective sponsors, themselves having to endure tariff pain from the United States. And so, he is in a rush on the battlefield, but agonizingly slow at the negotiating table. Trump's instincts correctly assessed that reality in Anchorage, his pained expression belying the positive claims from Russian and American staffers of how well the meeting had gone. Getting on well with another president you have welcomed with clapping and a limousine is not real diplomatic progress. And he perhaps knew that. In truth, Alaska did not go as awfully as it could have for Kyiv. Ukrainians had to endure a relatively brief revisionist history lesson from Putin at the podium, and the distasteful repetition of how Ukraine and Russia are 'brotherly' nations, despite Moscow's nightly murder of Ukrainian civilians in air assaults. But there were two positive notes for Kyiv. Firstly, Trump and Putin did not cook up a madcap, real-estate, Sharpie-map peace deal in a hurry, that was short on detail and heavy on wins for Moscow, as some had feared they might. The opposite happened - no deal emerged. The second gain for Ukraine is that the intransigent nature of Putin – despite all of Trump's fawning – was widely on display. Trump appeared sullen: no lunch, no questions from the press, no return invitation to Moscow unequivocally accepted, and even the suggestion, in an interview with Fox News, that – of all things – he wished he hadn't agreed to talk to network host Sean Hannity. At the end, Trump apparently did not want to be there, and Putin may be in error to have made him feel that way. But the evolution of Trump's thinking is not all a win for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Paramount is the overnight evaporation of a demand for a ceasefire. It was the bedrock of European and Ukrainian thinking last week, and even crept into Trump's talking points ahead of Alaska. But Putin has never wanted one, as it would stop his military advances. And so, as of Saturday morning, the demand has vanished and the focus shifted to a quick, enduring peace deal. There is no such thing; a lasting deal could take weeks to formulate, if not much longer. But European leaders stepped back from their ceasefire demand in their Saturday joint statement and Zelensky even said the 'killing must stop as soon as possible' rather than preconditioning further talks on a ceasefire. Trump also took whatever the bad deal was that Putin proposed, and turned it into pressure on the resilient victim – Kyiv. It would be Zelensky's decision what to do next, and Trump urged him to take the deal. The proposed deal, from what we know, seems potentially quite bad for Ukraine. One European official told CNN that Putin had persisted with his demands for control of all of the Donbas region - something politically and practically impossible for Zelensky to concede, and which he's already rejected. This part-maximalist demand emerged after US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff's meeting in the Kremlin earlier this month, with added confusion over whether this demand meant Putin had given up on claiming the rest of the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions, now partially occupied by Russian forces. But Putin is a studied, patient pragmatist. He can take what he can now and then come back for the rest later. He has no electoral cycles to worry about, given his grip on the country, although likely knows his overheated and hyper-militarized economy cannot keep going like this indefinitely. In his post-talks remarks, Putin remained set on what he considers the 'root causes' of the conflict being fixed — which have previously included Ukraine's existence as a sovereign state and NATO's eastward expansion since the end of the Cold War – and on 'peace' for Ukraine, which effectively means its surrender and more dead civilians. He even ominously urged Europeans and Ukraine to not get in the way of whatever proposal he had floated at Trump. Trump has not fully fallen for this play. His Monday meeting in the Oval Office with Zelensky will likely reveal an evolution in their relationship, and Trump's view of Putin, since their ghastly February blowout. It will be another moment when, whatever Zelensky hears, he will have travelled with only one option available to him, and that is to nod along and play nice. But Kyiv has the massed ranks of European leaders on the phone with Trump now, and Trump perhaps is mindful they are better buddies to him than Putin has been. The problem for Ukraine is not how the circus of diplomacy plays out, but the horrors outside of the tent. The time it would likely take to bring the parties together for further talks could be all Putin needs on the battlefield to effect real change. The coming weeks are the slow limp forwards that Putin wants: Tension between Trump and Zelensky first, followed by European pressure on Trump to ease off on Zelensky, followed by awkward and technical stalling over a three-way meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelensky. Putin only has to claim scheduling or location conflicts for a week to buy yet more time. Then a trilateral meeting, if there is one, only risks repeating the cycle again; Putin makes unreasonable demands he knows Ukraine cannot accept, Trump pressures Zelensky to accept them to get quick points on the board, and European leaders lean on Trump to recall that Ukraine's security is also theirs. And rinse and repeat. Time. Putin needs it to conquer. Trump hates wasting it without points on the board. Zelensky's forces do not have it. European leaders hope it erodes Russia's economic ability to fight. Much of it has passed since Trump came to power promising to end the war in 24 hours, and while he is clearly wiser to Putin than in February, little in terms of the hard dynamics and demands of this war have changed.
