logo
Strategic acquisition, expanding reach key to future growth of IPO-bound Belrise

Strategic acquisition, expanding reach key to future growth of IPO-bound Belrise

Economic Times20-05-2025
Live Events
Business
Valuation
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
IPO dates: May 21-23, 2025IPO price: Rs85-90Issue size: Upto Rs2,150 croreImplied market cap: Upto Rs8,009 croreFace value: Rs5Lot size: 166Retail portion: 35%Pune headquartered Belrise Industries, an auto ancillary company, plans to raise Rs2,150 crore through a fresh issue of equity to repay partial debt. The promoter group's stake will fall to 73% after the IPO from 100%. Its product portfolio consists of automotive sheet metal & casting parts, polymer components, suspension & mirror systems. Its recent acquisition of H-One India is likely to improve the product portfolio. However, its operating margin before depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA margin) has been declining since the past two years. The debt-equity ratio at around one is higher than 0.1-0.4 for some of the peers. It is expected to reduce after the IPO, which in turn may bring down interest expenses. Though the IPO valuation is cheaper than peers, investors may wait to see improved financial performance after listing.Incorporated in 1996, Belrise Industries specializes in component manufacturing for automotive & white goods industries. It has also started delivering e-mobility components & subsystems. As of March 31, 2025, the company operated 17 manufacturing facilities across 10 cities in nine states across India. As of December 31, 2024, the company serviced 29 original equipment makers (OEMs) globally. Exports contributed 25% to revenue in the nine months to December. In March 2025, Belrise acquired H-One India, a subsidiary of Japan's H-One Company, to enhance capabilities in metal stamping and fabrication for 4-Wheelers. The company plans to expand the distribution network to over 150 points across India within the next 2 years.Revenue grew by 18% annually to Rs7,484 crore between FY22 and FY24 while net profit rose by 9% to Rs311 crore. EBITDA margin declined gradually from 14.2% in FY22 to 12.5% in FY24. In the nine-months to December 2024, revenue grew by a modest 1% to Rs6,013.4 crore while net profit reduced by 17% to Rs245.5 crore due to higher finance cost and higher deferred tax credit in the year-ago period. EBITDA margin remained constant at 12.8%.Considering the post-IPO equity and annualised net profit for the nine months to December 2024, the company demands a price-earnings (P/E) multiple of upto 24 compared with P/Es between 42 and 80 for peers including Motherson Sumi Wiring India Minda Corporation and JBM Auto
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Yellow Metro Line to provide relief to IT employees
Yellow Metro Line to provide relief to IT employees

Hans India

time17 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Yellow Metro Line to provide relief to IT employees

Bengaluru: The19.15-km Yellow Line, costing Rs7,616 crore, features 16 stations: RV Road, Ragigudda, Jayadeva Hospital, BTM Layout, Silk Board, Bommanahalli, Hongasandra, Kudlu Gate, Singasandra, Hosur Road, Beretena Agrahara, Konappana Agrahara (Electronic City), Huskur Road, Hebbagodi, and Bommasandra. Construction began in 2014 and was initially scheduled for completion in 2021, but delays pushed the inauguration to three metro trains will run on the line at intervals of 20–25 minutes, serving 20,000–30,000 passengers daily. By 2026, 12 more trains will be added, bringing the total to 15, with an estimated daily ridership of 350, Yellow Line is expected to significantly ease travel for employees commuting to Electronic City companies like Infosys and Biocon, improve access to the prestigious Jayadeva Hospital, and offer better connectivity for those travelling from Bengaluru to Hosur in Tamil Nadu — helping to reduce traffic congestion in the city.

Regaal Resources IPO opens for subscription; GMP at 22%. Should you bid?
Regaal Resources IPO opens for subscription; GMP at 22%. Should you bid?

Economic Times

time17 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Regaal Resources IPO opens for subscription; GMP at 22%. Should you bid?

(What's moving Sensex and Nifty Track latest market news, stock tips, Budget 2025, Share Market on Budget 2025 and expert advice, on ETMarkets. Also, is now on Telegram. For fastest news alerts on financial markets, investment strategies and stocks alerts, subscribe to our Telegram feeds .) Subscribe to ET Prime and read the Economic Times ePaper Sensex Today. Top Trending Stocks: SBI Share Price, Axis Bank Share Price, HDFC Bank Share Price, Infosys Share Price, Wipro Share Price, NTPC Share Price

Bet on 3 sectors generating value in this volatility, be wary in 2 sectors: Nilesh Shetty
Bet on 3 sectors generating value in this volatility, be wary in 2 sectors: Nilesh Shetty

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Bet on 3 sectors generating value in this volatility, be wary in 2 sectors: Nilesh Shetty

Live Events You Might Also Like: Pay Commission expected to benefit GDP, consumer categories: Aditya Sood (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel , Portfolio Manager,says tariff uncertainties create chances for long-term stock investments. Logistics and pharma sectors are becoming attractive. Private sector banks, asset management, insurance, and broking firms remain key allocations. IT services and consumer discretionary stocks offer reasonable valuations for the coming years. Investors are closely watching these sectors for potential gains. The focus is on strategic stock selection amidst market further says that for years, consumer staples traded at high P/E ratios, underperforming post-2022 due to valuation gaps, though defensive buying has spurred recent recovery. Capital goods experienced a boom in the last three years, but current valuations appear unsustainable as earnings normalize. Investors should exercise caution in these sectors where valuations deviate significantly from long-term the uncertainty around tariffs has given an opportunity for stock pickers to pick up stocks that they want to pick up for the long term. Again, the assumption is that a lot of this uncertainty will fade in a few months. We are seeing opportunities coming up in logistics where we are getting closer to a level where we want to buy. Some pharma stocks are getting interesting for us. We continue to have a large allocation to private sector banks as well as stocks linked to the savings side of the household balance sheet including asset management companies, insurance companies, as well as broking the valuations remain fairly okay for us where we continue to have allocation and also, we have large allocation in IT services and consumer discretionary stocks where at least for the next few years, valuations look reasonable.: Yes, in certain sectors, there has been a disconnect for many years now. We saw that in consumer staples. These stocks were trading at a very high price to earnings ratio for the better part of last decade. Post 2022, they have been underperforming because there was a big gap between the valuations that they were getting and the earnings that they were delivering. Recently, we saw some recovery in these stocks because investors wanted to have some defensive names in their portfolio. But otherwise, they still remain very, very expensive. We see that in capital goods as well. In the last three years, there has been a boom in these the assumption is these valuations are not sustainable. As earnings normalise for these companies, suddenly you realise why are you paying 70 times, 80 times to these sectors. So again, our sense is that investors need to be careful in these two pockets where valuations look not in line with their long-term have always favoured private sector banks. Sporadically, public sector banks tend to do well especially in times where NPA cycle remains very benign; but that is not the norm for these public sector banks. The norm is they continue to have much higher NPAs than private sector peers and which catches up with them. So, trying to value these companies when the NPA cycle is very low, is not the correct thing to do. You may want to normalise that and bring it back to long-term averages. Then suddenly the valuation does not look that attractive for public sector sector banks, of course, are far more efficient. They continue to price credit a lot better than public sector banks. At least our allocation has been favouring private sector banks and within that, quality private sector banks. We are not allocated that much to tier II private sector banks where we again because of this aggression in growth and trying to grow books they tend to sometimes rival public sector banks in non-performing the consumption space, you have to be careful because the festive season is slightly earlier than last year, and so the near-term numbers may show a spike in sort of demand and other things versus last year, but that is not sustainable because as the base shifts and last year because festive season was later. Suddenly you realise those numbers are not sustainable and you correct them. But over the medium-term, we continue to have large allocation to two-wheeler companies where we think valuations remain have trimmed a lot of them, but we continue to have a decent allocation there. We continue to have an allocation to a large tractor conglomerate where we think they are doing very well in the passenger vehicle space including some of their new launches, but these are the places where we are allocated IT services companies, we think long-term opportunities remain fairly bright. It is in the near term because of this uncertainty in terms of what is happening in the US which remains a major market for them. Even for their customers to commit large capex is not easy and you have seen a deferral of discretionary IT spends which has delayed a recovery in their numbers. But looking at where valuations stand relative to their sort of 5-year, 10-year averages, they remain very attractive right now. So, we continue to have a large allocation but you may need to be patient as an investor there. You may have to see a couple of quarters of more pain till things settle down in the cash levels are around 12%. Cash is a residual for us. If we do not find names where we can deploy capital and we are happy with the existing weights in the portfolio of the stocks that we own, what remains is cash. But again, if tomorrow we were to find opportunities where we think valuations are attractive and the company meets our liquidity and governance norms, we are happy to add. It is slightly above the long-term average. Our long-term average has been about 10%. It is currently about 12%. But like I said in this correction, there are a few names which are getting closer to the buy limits that we have for these stocks. And you may see those cash levels come it is just individual stock specific because we are a stock picker portfolio, the portfolio that we build. It is just that we have not found individual names that we cover in our research database of 200 companies coming below our buy limit at the moment. So, because we do not find opportunities to deploy, what remains is cash. But if tomorrow three stocks were to come below our buy limit in this correction we will aggressively buy into those names and suddenly you will see cash levels come are probably contrarian to the market view right now. We have a large allocation to quality private sector banks. We think valuations for that particular data set right now are far below their long-term averages. While for the PSU banks we think the valuations are above their long-term averages and for the quality of the banks that they are, perhaps you should be careful giving those valuations to these private sector high quality banks have been time-tested with proven management quality over the last multiple cycles. In the case of PSU banks, in every cycle, they tend to do very badly probably because of mispricing of risk which I do not think has changed materially. So, our allocation primarily tilts towards private sector banks. We have one PSU bank which is the largest in the space in our portfolio where we think pricing of risk is slightly better than other PSU terms of strategy, we are market cap agnostic. We will go where we think valuations are attractive as long as the company meets our liquidity and governance norms. But like I said, in the rally that has unfolded in the last five years especially after Covid, the small and midcap valuations have been very high and to get names which make sense at valuations that we are comfortable with has not been easy. We have a very low allocation to that space right now. In the process of trying to boost your returns and trying to allocate to this space, you may destroy a lot of returns because you are overpaying for some of these stock traditionally has been run by managements which are not of great quality and especially when liquidity dries up, the correction in share price can be very sharp. If you are trying to take an exit at that point in time, you might see significant losses to a portfolio. We have always been very careful of the valuations that we want to pay for businesses and right now across this space getting businesses that make sense in terms of valuations is not easy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store