Scottish Government drops plans for misogyny bill
Jamie Hepburn, Minister for Parliamentary Business, said that any legislation which sought to criminalise misogyny would have to contain 'clear and unambiguous provisions in regard to the circumstances in which they apply'.
READ MORE: Labour mayor rips into Keir Starmer after narrow victory over Reform
In a statement on Friday morning, Equalities Minister Kaukab Stewart also revealed that the Scottish Government would drop plans to ban conversion practices for LGBT Scots for the rest of the parliamentary term.
Both pieces of legislation formed part of the Bute House Agreement with the Scottish Greens, which ended in April 2024.
The Greens said the rollback on equality laws was a 'shameful' move.
In his response to SNP MSP Rona Mackay's question in Holyrood, Hepburn (below) said: 'The Scottish Government is committed to ensuring people are protected from misogynistic abuse and we had previously committed to the introduction of a Misogyny Bill.
'This is a complex area of policy and law, and it would be necessary that any Bill which brought misogyny into criminal law contained clear and unambiguous provisions in regard to the circumstances in which they apply. This would include the implications of the recent Supreme Court Judgment.
(Image: PA) 'Given the short time left in this parliamentary session, there is insufficient time for a Bill to be finalised and introduced in this session, therefore the Scottish Government has decided not to proceed with this Bill in this parliamentary session.'
He added that ministers are 'committed to ending conversion practices' and would negotiate with the UK Government over the contents of a UK-wide legislation.
Hepburn said if this is not successful then the SNP would commit to publishing legislation in the first year of the next parliamentary session, after the Holyrood 2026 election.
Equalities minister Stewart confirmed the move in a statement published on Friday morning.
She said: 'Scotland remains absolute in our commitment to equality, the rights of the LGBTQI+ community, and ending conversion practices.
READ MORE: Reform UK win by-election by six votes in major blow to Labour
'We will continue to work with the UK government on legislation extending to Scotland, that applies across all settings and protects all ages, is trans-inclusive and does not include any exemption for consent.
'However, if we do not make progress through a collaborative approach, the Scottish Government will get on with the job of ending these harmful practices in Scotland and intends to publish its own Bill in year one of the next Parliamentary session.'
Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman, who earlier this week survived a Tory-led bid to remove her from the equalities committee in Holyrood, said: 'Dropping these bills sends a worrying message about the government's commitment to equalities, and a shameful backward step.
'A lot of people have waited far too long for the protections in these bills, and they will be deeply disappointed that they will not be happening as promised.
'Violence against women and girls is a national emergency. The misogyny bill was a vital step in ensuring that reports of harassment and assault are taken seriously.
'LGBTQIA+ people are put at serious risk by cruel, harmful conversion practices that are currently flying under the radar. So-called conversion''therapies' are deeply immoral and leave lasting damage for survivors. These abusive practices have no place in a modern, progressive Scotland.
(Image: PA)'This sends a terrible message. Our government must offer compassion, kindness and reassurance, not only in words but also in laws.'
Chapman (above) said the Scottish Government should not be 'kicking these bills into the long grass'.
'The promises of support and justice tomorrow mean nothing to those being actively harmed by inaction today.
'I urge the Scottish Government to reconsider their shameful decision and make good on their promise to improve equalities and human rights in Scotland through these bills today.'
The misogyny legislation, introduced following a report by Baroness Helena Kennedy, was supposed to be published in Holyrood in 2023/24.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump branded a ‘baby with a hand grenade in shop specialising in glass'
The unflattering description of the US President from Neil Kinnock came as the ex-Labour leader hit out at the Mr Trump's 'completely inexcusable' global tariff policy. Donald Trump has been branded a "baby with a hand grenade in a shop specialising in crockery and glass". The unflattering description of the US President from Neil Kinnock came as the ex-Labour leader hit out at the Mr Trump's "completely inexcusable" global tariff policy. He warned it will inflict "terrible damage" on world trade and the American public. But he praised Keir Starmer, who has negotiated a deal with the US, for "playing a very, very difficult hand, extremely well" in relations with the erratic American President. Lord Kinnock said: "It's a recognition of where Britain really is in the modern world. The Prime Minister knows when he's dealing with a capricious, immature, ultimately powerful man, then he's not dealing with anything remotely normal in international relations. "He knows Donald Trump could on a tantrum and inflict terrible damage on our country. If he can keep Trump near stability and consistency he's done very well." It comes as Mr Trump prepares to jet to the UK on Air Force Once for an "unprecedented" second state visit in September. He was handed the invitation from King Charles during his first face-to-face meeting with Mr Starmer in the Oval Office back in February. Asked whether the PM was right to extend the invitation, Lord Kinnock told The Mirror: "We use whatever means we have." Recalling a tip from his late wife, Glenys Kinnock, he said: "I remember I had broken the radiator belt in my mini, and Glenys came up with a brilliant idea of using her tights, which I did, and it got us home. "The tights, I could tie them tight enough to replicate the belt. And got me home. International politics is a bit like that with Donald Trump around. "I mean he's a baby with a hand grenade in a shop specialising in crockery and glass." He added: "He's got to be dealt with in the same way that the brave people who defuse bombs do it. Quite extraordinary in their courage. Keir doesn't have to show quite the level of bravery, but he's got to be just as delicate with his spanner and his screwdriver."
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
Thousands of small boat arrivals since new migrant deal with France
More than 2,500 migrants have crossed the Channel in small boats in the eleven days since the new "one in, one out" agreement with France took effect, figures from the Home Office plan proposes that for each migrant the UK returns to France, another person with a strong case for asylum in Britain will be allowed to 28,000 people have reached the UK in small boats so far this year and more than 50,000 have crossed since Labour came into power in July a so-called mega dinghy capable of holding more than 100 people was reportedly sighted in the Channel this week, amid concerns that people smugglers could be using larger boats to illegally transport people. Violent Channel smuggling gang's French and UK network exposed by undercover BBC investigationBBC tracks down smuggler behind Channel crossing which killed Sara, 7 Home Office officials are trying to establish whether the presence of the mega dinghy was a one-off, or if it indicates gangs have started to use bigger boats. Rob Lawrie, a volunteer aid worker told the BBC's Today Programme on Friday smugglers estimate they can send up to 150 people on a boat."That's a lot more people, overcrowding an extra large boat," he said. "We've already had reports of children getting crushed, not only in the rush but within the dinghy itself."He added it was unclear how many people were falling overboard during tend to increase in the summer months when the weather is calm in the Channel. Last August, more than 4,000 people made the numbers can vary depending on factors including the supply of boat parts and how actively the police are patrolling the beaches in northern France, to try to prevent boats from launching. The "one in, one out" pilot scheme was set up as part of a deal announced by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron during his state visit to the UK in first group of people to arrive under the scheme were detained in Dover earlier this month. Removals to France have yet to take place and could take up to three Labour came to power it promised to smash the gangs organising the crossings, but warned that it would not be quick or easy to do. Ministers are now under pressure to deliver results, though the deterrent effect of the returns deal may not become clear until deportations begin in earnest and increase in about the first detentions, Sir Keir said: "If you break the law to enter this country, you will face being sent back. When I say I will stop at nothing to secure our borders, I mean it."Set to last 11 months, the project will see the UK accepting an equal number of asylum seekers who have not tried to cross and can pass security and eligibility home secretary Chris Philp criticised the government's new deal as "having no deterrent effect whatsoever".The National Crime Agency said it has had some success in disrupting the business model of the week, 20 inflatable boats believed to be destined for the Channel were seized from a lorry in Bulgaria - the second such discovery in less than three weeks. The government says it's an illustration of the need for international cooperation to tackle illegal immigration. Afghans were the top nationality arriving by small boat in the year to March 2025, according to Home Office made up the second largest group, followed by people from Iran, Vietnam and five nationalities accounted for 61% of all 2024, almost one third of the 108,000 people who claimed asylum in the UK arrived on a small Home Office can remove people with no legal right to stay in the UK, or refuse to let them enter. But the 1951 Refugee Convention establishes the right to claim asylum in a foreign state if an applicant can prove they face a serious threat to life or freedom in their country of origin.
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Why Dutch-style bin ‘smart meters' could solve Britain's waste crisis
Bins have never been more contentious. Strikes in Birmingham have left waste piling high, collection times across the country have been slashed and garden rubbish fees are commonplace. All the while, council tax bills continue to increase year-on-year. Numerous ideas to solve the nation's eternal bin gripe have been floated over the decades, yet both the Government and our councils are no closer to finding a solution. Birmingham's recent transformation into a rats' paradise with black bags stacked two metres high suggests we're further away than ever. But is the answer to Britain's bin misery embedded in a short-lived idea chucked on the rubbish heap 20 years ago? Pay-as-you-throw (PAYT), which was trialled by 50,000 homes in South Norfolk in 2005, involved residents paying a fee based on the amount of waste they put out for collection. Think smart meter, but for rubbish. Bin lorries weigh the contents of a wheelie bin (or bags), and the resident is billed accordingly. In turn, council tax can, in theory, be lowered. The Dutch and South Koreans have made a success of it, with households charged less overall and recycling figures healthily increasing. A research paper by the Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) found 'there has been little evidence of discontent with PAYT'. It continued: 'Indeed, studies suggest that populations which have been exposed to PAYT schemes are more likely to support them than counterparts with no experience of the system.' It's a policy which Mark Hall, of waste management firm Business Waste, believes should be revived in Britain. He said: 'Many of the Government's policies, such as landfill tax and low emission zones, are moving towards the polluter pays principle. 'A PAYT system would not be out of place in this new strategy. If it's proven to reduce council tax costs, it's hard to see how it wouldn't receive public backing in the current cost of living crisis.' One problem, however, is that there is no specific allocation for refuse collection in our council tax bills. It means it is hard to quantify whether a PAYT system would be more cost-effective for the individual. Residents mistakenly tend to think their council tax bills are predominantly for bin collection, when in reality, a much larger share of the tax bill is spent on social care provision. The Communities and Local Government Committee stressed in 2007 that the 'introduction of a financial link between the bin being taken and the householder's bank balance may be welcome', yet such clarity has never materialised. 'The technology just didn't work' A key hurdle to introducing PAYT in Britain is the fact the South Norfolk trial did not produce promising results. This was due to technological issues which caused inaccurate readings, missed collections and general confusion. Microchips in wheelie bins were supposed to monitor the weight of rubbish, and the billing information for each household was then downloaded to a database each week. At the time of the failed trial – which sparked a 250pc rise in fly-tipping – the former leader of the council, John Fuller, said: 'The technology just didn't work. If you want to base a tax system on it, it has to work in every bin, in every street on every day of the year. Otherwise the figures are nonsense.' There was also slightly less incentive for households to embrace the PAYT system two decades ago when council tax bills swallowed up a smaller share of household income. In 2002-03, the lowest income households in Britain spent just 2.4pc of their earnings on council tax. By 2020-21, this figure had risen to 4.6pc, according to the Resolution Foundation. Frustration with waste management services is also at an all-time high today after many councils introduced 'add-on' fees for disposing of residents' garden waste. Last month, the actor James Buckley, who starred in The Inbetweeners, vented his anger on a podcast after his council introduced an annual fee for emptying his garden waste bin. 'Has my council tax come down? No, is the answer to that question. Has it gone up? Yes, is the answer to that question. Everyone up and down the country is saying the exact same f-----g thing – what the f--- is going on?' A solution, it seems, is far more pressing today than it was in 2005. Netherlands and South Korea leading the way Other countries, however, have made a success of PAYT. In South Korea, smart bins are used for food waste – with residents using high-tech systems to weigh the waste and pay accordingly. For general waste, residents pay for local government-issued bags to dispose of rubbish. Recycling, however, carries no charge, encouraging residents to divert as much waste as possible to this stream. The countrywide benefits are there to see with South Korea boasting an 86pc recycling rate, compared to around 44pc in the UK. Weight-based fees are also utilised in the Netherlands – a country keen on using weight as a barometer for costs (car tax is calculated based on how heavy a vehicle is). Half of Dutch municipalities use PAYT for rubbish collections – equating to around 41pc of the population. Councils use various methods, yet the municipalities charging fees based on weight have seen the best results. 'Weight-based schemes appear to give the greatest reduction in overall waste quantity... but the vehicles used in such schemes are more expensive with on-board weighing equipment,' the IEEP said in 2016. The cost of retro-fitting, or buying brand new bin lorries with weight-monitoring technology is likely a fantasy that our cash-strapped councils this side of the Channel can ill afford. That's not to say, however, that simpler forms of PAYT could be considered. The World Economic Forum (WEF) found that 'once households begin paying directly for waste services, they tend to rapidly reduce how much they throw away'. More than 7,000 towns and cities in the US – including Seattle, Austin and Portland – have PAYT policies, yet they aren't based on weight. Instead, it is a simpler process. Residents are often required to purchase special trash bags or stickers so that they pay separately for every bag. Or, they may have to sign up for a certain level of waste collection service, which limits how much garbage they can set out on the kerb. In Seattle, residents are charged $45 (£33) per month for their waste to be collected from the kerbside.
