Watch the asteroid that had us all worried zoom harmlessly through space (video)
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
The potential risk of Asteroid 2024 YR4 impacting Earth in 2032 dropped to nearly zero following new observations that helped better predict the asteroid's trajectory.
Measuring about 131 to 295 feet (40 to 90 meters) wide, asteroid 2024 YR4 could have caused local devastation if it were to collide with our planet. But recent observations, including from the European Southern Observatory's (ESO) Very Large Telescope (VLT), reduced the asteroid's impact probability to around 0.001%, after rising to more than 3% just last week — the highest impact probability ever recorded for an asteroid of this size.
The ESO shared new videos showing the asteroid's path and possible locations on Dec. 22, 2032 in relation to Earth using new data from VLT observations collected on Feb. 20. The precise VLT observations, along with data collected by other observatories, allowed astronomers to more accurately model the asteroid's orbit and assess its impact probability, according to a statement from the observatory.
VIDEO NOT PLAYING?
Some ad blockers can prevent our video player from loading.
An asteroid's impact probability is expected to fluctuate as astronomers gain a better understanding of its path around the sun. Following its initial discovery, continued observations have allowed astronomers to refine 2024 YR4's trajectory. However, studying the asteroid has been particularly challenging as it is moving away from Earth and has become increasingly faint and difficult to observe.
"Because of the uncertainties, the orbit of the asteroid is like the beam of a flashlight: getting broader and broader and fuzzier in the distance," Olivier Hainaut, an astronomer at the ESO said in the statement. "As we observe more, the beam becomes sharper and narrower. Earth was getting more illuminated by this beam: the probability of impact increased. The narrower beam is now moving away from Earth."
Now, with a better understanding of the asteroid's orbit, astronomers have all but ruled out an impact with Earth in 2032 — and observations from the ESO's VLT have been crucial to gauging its impact probability. The VLT is equipped with large mirrors and heightened sensitivity, which allows astronomers to see fainter objects farther into space.
Located atop Cerro Paranal, an 8,645-foot-high (2,635 m) mountain in Chile's Atacama Desert, the VLT is also subject to clear, dark skies, enhancing its ability to track faint objects like 2024 YR4 and other potentially dangerous near-Earth asteroids.
RELATED STORIES:
— 'That's impact probability zero folks!' Earth safe from 'city-killer' asteroid 2024 YR4
— Odds of an asteroid impact in 2032 just went up. Here's why experts say you shouldn't worry
— World's largest telescope threatened by light pollution from renewable energy project
However, the pristine conditions under which the VLT operates may be at risk with a planned renewable energy project just 7 miles (11 kilometers) from the telescope. AES Andes, a subsidiary of the U.S. power company AES Corporation, aims to build an industrial-scale green hydrogen project called Inna. The light pollution created by the industrial facilities would have significant impacts on the quality of the skies above the Paranal Observatory, astronomers argue, and would limit the VLT's ability to detect faint cosmic objects.
"With that brighter sky, the VLT would lose the faint 2024 YR4 about one month earlier, which would make a huge difference in our capability to predict an impact, and prepare mitigation measures to protect Earth," Hainaut said in the statement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Does the color purple really exist?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The world is awash with the color purple — lavender flowers, amethyst gemstones, plums, eggplants and purple emperor butterflies. But if you look closely at the visible-light portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, you'll notice that purple (which is different from bluish hues of violet and indigo) is absent. That's because purple may be made up by our brains; It exists only because of how the brain processes color. So does that mean purple doesn't really exist? Not necessarily. The answer lies within the mind-boggling way that our brains perceive and combine different wavelengths on the visible light spectrum. "I would actually say that none of color actually exists," said Zab Johnson, an executive director and senior fellow at the Wharton Neuroscience Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania. "It's all the process of our neural machinery, and that's sort of both the beauty and the complexity of it all at the same time." Sign up for our newsletter Sign up for our weekly Life's Little Mysteries newsletter to get the latest mysteries before they appear online. All color begins with light. When radiation from the sun hits Earth, a range of wavelengths are present. There are long wavelengths, like infrared rays and radio waves, and shorter, high-energy wavelengths, like X-rays and ultraviolet rays, which are damaging to our bodies, Johnson told Live Science. Toward the middle of the electromagnetic spectrum lies visible light — the light our brains can see — which represents only about 0.0035% of the electromagnetic spectrum. This is what we perceive as the colors of the rainbow. On one end of the spectrum are longer wavelengths, which we perceive as red, and on the other are shorter wavelengths, which we perceive as indigo and violet. Our perception of color involves specialized receptors at the back of our eyeballs, called cones, that detect visible light. Human eyes have three types of cones: long wave, mid wave and short wave. Each is sensitive to particular wavelengths. Long-wavelength cones take in information on reddish light, mid-wavelength cones specialize in green, and short-wavelength cones detect blue. Related: What color is the universe? When light hits our eyeballs, these three receptors take in information about the light and their respective wavelengths and send electrical signals to the brain. The brain then takes that information and makes an average deduction of what it's seeing. "Our machinery is sort of doing this complex sort of calculation of these three different ratios all the time," which forms our perception of color, Johnson said. For example, if long-wavelength and mid-wavelength cones are triggered, the brain infers that we're seeing orange or yellow. If mid-wavelength and short-wavelength cones are activated, the brain will make a conclusion of teal. So what about purple? When short-wavelength (blue) and long-wavelength (red) cones are stimulated, your brain "makes something that's actually not out there in the world," Johnson said. Red and blue are on opposite ends of the visible spectrum: When the brain encounters these wavelengths, it ends up bending this linear visible spectrum into a circle. In other words, it brings red and blue together to make purple and magenta, even though that's not what light is really doing. As a result, purple and magenta are known as "nonspectral" colors, because they don't really exist as actual electromagnetic radiation. Nonspectral colors like purple are made of two wavelengths of light. In contrast, spectral colors — red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and, importantly, violet and indigo — are made of just one wavelength. RELATED MYSTERIES —Why is the sky blue? —Why do we see colors that aren't there? —What would colors look like on other planets? Regardless of its physical existence, purple has captivated people for millennia, noted Narayan Khandekar, director of the Straus Center for Conservation and Technical Studies at Harvard Art Museums. For example, ancient Phoenicians ground up sea snails to make a color known as Tyrian purple, which was reserved for royal or ceremonial robes. Today, purple is still often associated with wealth, power and even magic. "So that connection still exists, even though there are other versions of purple available now," he told Live Science. So, whether manufactured in our minds or made from ground-up shellfish, purple is unique and deserves closer look. "It doesn't really exist in nature. And so when you can create it, it has this extra value," Johnson said. "Now purple is even more special."
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Cosmic rings reveal new planet being born
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. For centuries, astronomers have tried to study the process of planetary formation. Thanks to modern technology like the European Southern Observatory's (ESO) Very Large Telescope (VLT), experts can now see this process with much finer detail. Taken on June 9, 2025, this photograph from the VLT shows star RIK 113 surrounded by clouds of gas and dust, which form a protoplanetary disk. These disks are common around younger stars like RIK 113, and will eventually condense due to the star's gravitational pressure, forming larger objects that will create the beginnings of a planet, known as a protoplanet. The star RIK 113, also classified as 2MASSJ16120668-3010270 is found in the constellation Scorpius, which is around 431 light-years away. The protoplanetary disk surrounding RIK 113 was initially discovered by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in 2024. The initial results showed gap in the clouds around the star, which could be created by a planetary embryo. Curious about this finding, researchers at the University of Galway, Ireland used the VLT to try to get a closer look at star RIK 113. Using the SPHERE or the Spectro-Polarimetric High-contrast Exoplanet REsearch instrument on the VLT, which is designed to look for new exoplanets, the team found that the inner ring of the star's protoplanetary disk had unique spiral features. According to the researchers, potential signals from two planets close to RIK 113 were also detected. You can read more about planetary formation and protoplanetary disks as astronomers continue to understand how planets are created throughout our universe.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
'Completely new and totally unexpected finding': Iron deficiency in pregnancy can cause 'male' mice to develop female organs
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Iron deficiency during pregnancy can cause a male mouse embryo to develop female features, a new study reveals. The low iron disrupts the activation of a key gene that spurs the development of male sex organs. This causes embryos with XY chromosomes — the most common combination seen in males — to develop female sex organs instead. "This is a completely new and totally unexpected finding," study co-author Peter Koopman, a professor emeritus of developmental biology at the University of Queensland in Australia, told Live Science. "It's never been shown before that iron can flip such an important developmental switch." Earlier research established that the SRY gene on the Y chromosome is the "master switch" for turning on the development of male organs in mammals. An enzyme called JMJD1A plays an important role in flipping this master switch, and it requires iron to function properly. However, the connection between iron levels and sex determination was not fully understood. Now, in a study published June 4 in the journal Nature, researchers report that iron is essential for the development of testes in XY mice. The results show that maternal iron deficiency disrupts the activity of JMJD1A, which lowers SRY expression and drives the development of ovaries in XY mouse embryos. However, it's too early to say whether this finding in mice might translate to human pregnancy and sex development, Tony Gamble, an associate professor of biological sciences at Marquette University in Milwaukee who wasn't involved in the study, told Live Science. Related: Is there really a difference between male and female brains? Emerging science is revealing the answer. In the study, the researchers used pharmaceutical treatments and low-iron diets to manipulate the iron levels in pregnant mice. When the pregnant mice experienced iron deficiency, this caused six out of 39 total XY embryos to develop ovaries instead of testes. Investigating further, they found that genetics appear to be a factor in which embryos are sensitive to this effect. To confirm this mechanism, the team also grew embryonic gonads — structures that develop into testes or ovaries in the womb — in lab dishes so they could directly observe the impact of iron depletion. These lab analyses showed that reducing the iron in cells to 40% of normal levels led to a large increase in histones on the SRY gene. Histones are proteins that bind DNA and help control which genes are switched on, and this effect almost completely blocked the SRY gene's expression. Normally, the JMJD1A enzyme rids the SRY gene of histones, allowing it to turn on. The researchers hypothesize that when iron levels drop, the enzyme's activity is compromised, so suppressive histones build up on the SRY gene. These results suggest that "some important developmental traits that were previously thought to be purely genetically controlled can also be seriously impacted by nutrition and metabolic factors," Koopman said. And "if iron can have such an impact on sex development, then maybe other organ systems may also critically depend on iron or other dietary factors in a similar way," he added. Because the research was conducted solely in mice, the question of whether iron may have similar effects in humans is still open. Although sex determination follows a broadly similar blueprint across mammals, there are some important differences between mice and humans, Gamble said. RELATED STORIES —Scientists made mice with Y chromosomes female by deleting just 6 tiny molecules —One in 500 men may carry an extra sex chromosome (most without knowing it) —These bacteria trigger a sex change in wasps — scientists finally know how For example, while both species rely on the same genes to drive the development of testes, the consequences of mutations in these genes differ between the two species. Their similarities to humans make mice important models for studying development and disease, Gamble said, "but the differences urge caution in simply assuming processes are acting identically across both species." Testing the new finding in humans won't be easy, since many of the experiments possible in mice can't ethically be done in humans, Koopman said. "So, the way forward will have to involve doing biochemical, cell culture and gene expression experiments to build a body of indirect evidence that what holds true in mice is also the case in humans," he said.
