Whistleblower complaint expands on claims that Facebook once built a censorship tool to win over China
A report from The Washington Post details allegations made by whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams about Facebook in a 78-page complaint filed last April with the SEC, including that the company built a censorship system in hopes to be allowed to operate in China and that it considered allowing the Chinese government to access users' data in the country. Claims that Facebook developed a content suppression tool to appease China, where it has been blocked since 2009, were first reported as far back as 2016 by The New York Times. Wynn-Williams has a memoir about her time at Facebook, Careless People: A Story of Where I Used to Work, coming out this week.
Wynn-Williams — a former Facebook global policy director who was fired in 2017 — said in the complaint that the company formed a team in 2014 focused on creating a version of Facebook that would comply with China's laws, under the code-name 'Project Aldrin,' The Washington Post reports. In addition to building a censorship system, it was reportedly proposed during negotiations with Chinese officials that the company allow a Chinese private-equity firm to review content posted by users in China, and that Facebook hire hundreds of moderators dedicated to the effort of squashing restricted content.
In a statement to The Washington Post, spokesperson Andy Stone said the company's past interest in the Chinese market is 'no secret,' and that CEO Mark Zuckerberg had announced a move away from these efforts in 2019. But Wynn-Williams' complaint paints a fuller picture of how far Facebook (pre-Meta) was allegedly willing to go to gain a Chinese userbase. Read The Washington Post's full report here.
Zuckerberg has since become vocal about 'free expression' and made changes to how Meta's platforms approach moderation. Earlier this year, Zuckerberg announced that Facebook and Instagram would end fact-checking and instead adopt X-style Community Notes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Your Eyes Do Not Deceive You, Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses Are Now 20% Off
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. The Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses are currently 20% off, bringing the price down from $299 to $239. This deal makes it much easier to explore wearable tech without breaking the bank. These are a bold fashion choice, but whether you're snapping photos on a walk or streaming live from your daily commute, you'll appreciate the convenience these glasses bring. So lets check the specs on these specs! These are for you if you love capturing life on the move, but hate fumbling for your phone. The glasses let you shoot from your point of view with a subtle tap or voice command, making them great for content creators, casual explorers, or anyone wanting to stay present in the moment. You can livestream directly to Facebook or Instagram and instantly transfer media to your phone using the Meta View app. The open-ear speakers are good enough for podcasts or tunes while still letting you hear what's going on around you, which is helpful if you're walking city streets or chatting at a café. You get all of this in a classic Wayfarer or Headliner frame that blends in with regular eyewear. There's a 12MP camera built into the upper corner that records 1080p video and snaps solid photos fit for your feed. Battery life gives you around 3.5 hours per charge, but the sleek case holds eight full charges for all-day coverage. You'll also find a responsive touchpad and five microphones that work well for calls and voice controls. 'It really does feel liberating to be able to take photos without having to grab your phone out of your pocket,' wrote , who rated them 'Good' in our . For hands-free photo capture and real-time sharing wrapped in a fashion-forward design, the Ray-Ban Meta Smart Glasses are an easy recommendation while they're still on sale. More Smart Glasses Deals on More Smart Glasses Deals on
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amazon wants to become a global marketplace for AI
Amazon Web Services isn't betting on one large language model (LLM) winning the artificial intelligence race. Instead, it's offering customers a buffet of models to choose from. AWS, the cloud computing arm of Amazon (AMZN), aims to become the go-to infrastructure layer for the AI economy, regardless of which model wins out. By making customer choice a defining principle, AWS hopes to win out against rivals that have aligned closely with specific LLM providers — notably Microsoft (MSFT), which partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI ( 'We don't think that there's going to be one model to rule them all,' Dave Brown, vice president of compute and networking at AWS, told Yahoo Finance. The model-neutral approach is embedded into Amazon Bedrock, a service that allows AWS customers to build their own applications using a wide range of models, with more than 100 to choose from. Brown added that after Chinese startup DeepSeek surprised the world, AWS had a fully managed version of the disruptive model available on Bedrock within a week. Two years after its launch, Bedrock is now the fastest-growing service offered by AWS, which accounted for over 18% of Amazon's total revenue in the first quarter. It's why Amazon CEO Andy Jassy sees Bedrock as a core part of the company's AI growth strategy. But to understand the competitive advantage AWS hopes to offer with Bedrock, you have to go back to its origin story. Bedrock dates back to a six-page internal memo that Atul Deo, AWS's director of product management, wrote in 2020. Before OpenAI's ChatGPT launched in 2022 and made 'generative AI' a household term, Deo pitched a service that could generate code from plain English prompts using large language models. But Jassy, the head of AWS at the time, didn't buy it. 'His initial reaction was, 'This seems almost like a pipe dream,'' Deo said. He added that while a tool that makes coding easy sounds obvious now, the technology was 'still not quite there.' When that project, initially known as Code Whisperer, launched in 2023, the team realized they could offer the service for a broader set of use cases, giving customers a choice of different models with 'generic capabilities' that 'could be used as a foundation to build a lot of interesting applications,' according to Deo. Deo noted that the team steered away from doubling down on its own model after it recognized a pattern of customers wanting choice in other AWS services. This led to AWS becoming the first provider to offer a range of different models to customers. With this foundational approach in mind, Amazon renamed the project Bedrock. To be sure, the model-agnostic approach has risks, and many analysts don't consider Amazon to be leading the AI race, even though it has ramped up its AI spending. If there is ultimately one model to rule them all, similar to how Google came to dominate search, Amazon could risk further falling behind. At the beginning of the year, Amazon and its peers Meta (META), Microsoft, and Google parent Alphabet (GOOG) expected to spend $325 billion combined, mostly on AI infrastructure. To keep pace, Amazon has hedged its bets with its own technology and one LLM provider in particular: Anthropic. In November 2024, AWS doubled its investment in Anthropic to $8 billion in a deal that requires Anthropic to train its large language model, Claude, using only AWS's chips. (For comparison, Microsoft has invested over $13 billion into OpenAI.) The $8 billion deal allows Amazon to prove out its AI training infrastructure and deepen ties with one LLM provider while continuing to offer customers a wide selection of models on Bedrock. 'I mean, this is cloud selling 101, right?' said Dan Rosenthal, head of go-to-market partnerships at Anthropic. 'There are some cases where it's been very clear that a customer wants to use a different model on Bedrock for something that we just frankly don't focus on, and that's great. We want to win where we have a right to win.' Amazon also launched its own family of foundational models, called Nova, at the end of 2024, two years after the launch of ChatGPT. But competition and expectations remain high: Revenue at AWS increased 16.9% to $29.27 billion in Q1, marking the third time in a row it missed analyst estimates despite double-digit growth. The Anthropic partnership also underscores a bigger competition AWS may be fighting with chipmakers, including Nvidia (NVDA), which recently staged a $1 trillion rally in just two months after an earnings print that eased investor concerns about chip export controls. While Amazon is an Nvidia customer, it also produces highly effective and more affordable AI chips based on power consumed (known as 'price performance'). On Bedrock, AWS lets clients choose whether to use its own CPUs and GPUs or chips from competitors like Intel (INTC), AMD (AMD), and Nvidia. 'We're able to work with the model providers to really optimize the model for the hardware that it runs,' Brown said. 'There's no change the customer has to make.' Customers not only have a choice of model but also a choice of which infrastructure the model should run and train on. This helps AWS compete on price — a key battleground with Nvidia, which offers the most expensive chips on the market. This 'coopetition' dynamic could position Amazon to take market share from Nvidia if it can prove its own chips can do the job for a lower sticker price. It's a bet that Amazon is willing to spend on, with capital expenditures expected to hit $100 billion in 2025, up from $83 billion last year. While AWS doesn't break out its costs for AI, CEO Andy Jassy said on an earnings call in February that the 'vast majority of that capex spend is on AI for AWS.' In an April letter to shareholders, Jassy noted that 'AI revenue is growing at triple-digit YoY percentages and represents a multibillion-dollar annual revenue run rate.' Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Confirms Musk-Bessent Argument, Denies Fight: ‘Didn't See a Lot of Physicality'
President Donald Trump on Monday confirmed that Elon Musk and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent got into a heated argument recently, but denied it turned violent, as The Washington Post had reported this past weekend. Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked the president if he ever saw the former Department of Government Efficiency boss and Bessent 'get physical' at the White House. 'No I didn't,' the president responded, before saying 'they did have an argument, but I didn't see a lot of physicality there.' The president's comment comes after The Washington Post said Musk threw his shoulder into Bessent 'like a rugby player' during an argument in mid-April — a move that led to the treasury secretary fighting back. The Washington Post's story was based on a conversation with former Trump advisor Steve Bannon, who has been one of Musk's biggest critics on the right. His other comments on Monday indicate the Trump-Musk feud that blew up last week is simmering down. If you somehow missed it, the Tesla and SpaceX boss accused President Trump of being named in the Epstein Files and said he supported his impeachment during a flurry of X posts on June 5. President Trump, on his end, said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk and questioned whether the U.S. government should end its contracts with SpaceX, the rocket company Musk runs. The battle was good for X, the social platform Musk owns, and the president's Truth Social platform, though, with the latter enjoying a record day for traffic amid the back-and-forth. On Monday, President Trump said the two 'had a good relationship' and that he wished him 'very well,' echoing comments he made over the weekend. Musk has also looked to cool down the battle on his end by deleting the X post in which he insinuated the president was a pedophile. The post Trump Confirms Musk-Bessent Argument, Denies Fight: 'Didn't See a Lot of Physicality' appeared first on TheWrap.
