UMaine professor wins $1M grant to take a new look at old plants
Jun. 9—A University of Maine professor has won a $1 million National Science Foundation award to develop faster, cheaper ways to study plants by developing technology to analyze the 390 million specimens already stored in archived collections around the world.
Jose "Dudu" Meireles, an assistant professor of plant evolution and systematics, will use the grant to develop an open source computer model that integrates genetic analysis and spectral imaging to assess the chemical makeup and function of collected plant leaves, ranging from nitrogen levels to defense mechanisms.
The five-year grant supports Meireles' plan to unlock centuries of hidden data stored in the world's herbariums, which hold vast archives of preserved plant specimens. Studying collected plants will save time and money by dispensing with a lot of field work and lab tests while protecting the plants themselves from destruction.
"It's sometimes hard to see the value in these places because it's a giant room full of dried plants," said Meireles, a Brazilian native who joined the University of Maine in 2019. "But the bottom line is we can do a lot of cutting-edge science using those specimens."
Meireles' approach combines advanced computing with a technique called spectral phenotyping, which uses light to measure plant traits much like airport scanners do with luggage. Multiple traits can be measured with one test without spending time and money to find the plants in the field or running multiple laboratory tests.
The result? A dramatic increase in the speed and scale of biodiversity research. If his methods are widely adopted, Meireles estimates that scientists could triple the amount of data they collect on plant function each year. He plans to teach these to University of Maine undergraduates in a class starting in the fall of 2027.
Students at UMaine will work alongside him in the lab, gaining hands-on experience with cutting-edge tools. The Meireles laboratory will also collaborate with other UMaine departments to produce a public biodiversity exhibit, aiming to bridge the gap between science and society, that will be displayed at Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens.
Meireles said his methods won't eliminate the need for field work, but instead will complement that boots-on-the-ground research to help understand how whole plant communities in an area adapt to environmental change over time. Just next week he plans to hike up Mount Washington to collect field measurements.
He plans to hold workshops across the U.S. and Latin America to help train other plant researchers on how to use the computer models and spectral analysis to plumb the secrets of the collections they already have on hand. Over 100 people will have had the opportunity to learn the new methods by the end of the grant.
"This will make biodiversity science faster, cheaper and more globally comprehensive," Meireles said.
Meireles' team will partner with curators and researchers from New York Botanical Gardens' Steere Herbarium, The Field Museum in Chicago and Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens in Boothbay and herbaria in Columbia and Brazil to develop protocols for the work, publicize it and train others on how to do it.
"Every herbarium specimen has a story to tell, even specimens that are decades or centuries old," said Emily Sessa, the director of the Steere Herbarium. "This work will create an exciting new avenue for herbarium collections to inform us about biodiversity and new tools for collecting data on important plant traits at large scales."
The implications stretch far beyond academia. Industries from agriculture to pharmaceuticals rely on plant-based products and services. A deeper understanding of how plants function and adapt, especially in the face of climate change, could lead to new crops, medicines and conservation strategies.
"There are over 300,000 species of flowering plants, and we only know how a tiny fraction work," Meireles said. "They hold a huge library of solutions that evolution came up with over a very long time. And so far, we've only been able to harness a tiny portion of that."
With this new funding, Meireles plans to show just how much those dried herbarium plants still have to teach us.
Copy the Story Link
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
UMaine professor wins $1M grant to take a new look at old plants
Jun. 9—A University of Maine professor has won a $1 million National Science Foundation award to develop faster, cheaper ways to study plants by developing technology to analyze the 390 million specimens already stored in archived collections around the world. Jose "Dudu" Meireles, an assistant professor of plant evolution and systematics, will use the grant to develop an open source computer model that integrates genetic analysis and spectral imaging to assess the chemical makeup and function of collected plant leaves, ranging from nitrogen levels to defense mechanisms. The five-year grant supports Meireles' plan to unlock centuries of hidden data stored in the world's herbariums, which hold vast archives of preserved plant specimens. Studying collected plants will save time and money by dispensing with a lot of field work and lab tests while protecting the plants themselves from destruction. "It's sometimes hard to see the value in these places because it's a giant room full of dried plants," said Meireles, a Brazilian native who joined the University of Maine in 2019. "But the bottom line is we can do a lot of cutting-edge science using those specimens." Meireles' approach combines advanced computing with a technique called spectral phenotyping, which uses light to measure plant traits much like airport scanners do with luggage. Multiple traits can be measured with one test without spending time and money to find the plants in the field or running multiple laboratory tests. The result? A dramatic increase in the speed and scale of biodiversity research. If his methods are widely adopted, Meireles estimates that scientists could triple the amount of data they collect on plant function each year. He plans to teach these to University of Maine undergraduates in a class starting in the fall of 2027. Students at UMaine will work alongside him in the lab, gaining hands-on experience with cutting-edge tools. The Meireles laboratory will also collaborate with other UMaine departments to produce a public biodiversity exhibit, aiming to bridge the gap between science and society, that will be displayed at Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens. Meireles said his methods won't eliminate the need for field work, but instead will complement that boots-on-the-ground research to help understand how whole plant communities in an area adapt to environmental change over time. Just next week he plans to hike up Mount Washington to collect field measurements. He plans to hold workshops across the U.S. and Latin America to help train other plant researchers on how to use the computer models and spectral analysis to plumb the secrets of the collections they already have on hand. Over 100 people will have had the opportunity to learn the new methods by the end of the grant. "This will make biodiversity science faster, cheaper and more globally comprehensive," Meireles said. Meireles' team will partner with curators and researchers from New York Botanical Gardens' Steere Herbarium, The Field Museum in Chicago and Coastal Maine Botanical Gardens in Boothbay and herbaria in Columbia and Brazil to develop protocols for the work, publicize it and train others on how to do it. "Every herbarium specimen has a story to tell, even specimens that are decades or centuries old," said Emily Sessa, the director of the Steere Herbarium. "This work will create an exciting new avenue for herbarium collections to inform us about biodiversity and new tools for collecting data on important plant traits at large scales." The implications stretch far beyond academia. Industries from agriculture to pharmaceuticals rely on plant-based products and services. A deeper understanding of how plants function and adapt, especially in the face of climate change, could lead to new crops, medicines and conservation strategies. "There are over 300,000 species of flowering plants, and we only know how a tiny fraction work," Meireles said. "They hold a huge library of solutions that evolution came up with over a very long time. And so far, we've only been able to harness a tiny portion of that." With this new funding, Meireles plans to show just how much those dried herbarium plants still have to teach us. Copy the Story Link
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Protect LIGO's science and local impact from Trump's budget cuts
The Trump administration wants to slash funding for America's two Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatories (LIGOs) as part of broader cuts to the National Science Foundation. That would be a devastating blow to the nation's global leadership in scientific research. When Congress writes its fiscal 2026 budget, it should ignore the president's anti-science request. One of the LIGO sites is on the Hanford nuclear site. The other is in Louisiana. The White House proposes cutting 40% of their funding – $48 million to $29 million. And it also dictates how that cut should be made. It wants one of the two sites shut down. Given that Washington is a blue state that is participating in multiple lawsuits against the Trump administration and Louisiana is a red state that voted for the president, the odds of LIGO Hanford surviving seem low. Either way, scientists' ability to explore the universe by detecting gravitational waves would suffer significantly. Shutting one site down would compromise scientists' ability to verify detections of cosmic events and weed out false readings originating from local disturbances. It also would prevent the two sites from triangulating where an event occurred in the sky, allowing telescopes that rely on light for observations to also find and research them. The two LIGOs work in tandem. In 2015, the Hanford observatory and its sibling in Louisiana detected gravitational waves for the first time when they measured the ripple in space-time caused by two black holes merging 1.4 billion light-years away. The findings provided fresh confirmation of Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity and earned researchers a Nobel Prize in physics. Since then, LIGO has detected hundreds of events, including black holes merging and neutron stars colliding. The Hanford site continues to refine its tools and push science forward. An upgrade a couple of years ago installed quantum squeezing technology that allows scientists to detect 60% more events and probe a larger volume of space. If funded, the observatories will continue to help humanity answer profound questions about the universe. Projects like LIGO are expensive. The National Science Foundation has spent more than $1 billion on detecting gravitational waves over four decades. At the start, skeptics deemed it risky, but it has provided tremendous return on investment. It epitomizes the sort of Big Science research that few institutions other than governments can afford. Think Europe's Large Hadron Collider, the Manhattan Project and the international Human Genome Project. Undercutting LIGO as it reaches its full potential and produces its most impressive results just to save a few million dollars would be a colossal mistake. As one commenter on the Tri-City Herald's website put it, 'It would be like inventing the microscope, seeing a cell for the first time, and then discarding it.' The best is yet to come. Even if a future administration were to restore funding, rehiring skilled researchers would be a monumental hurdle. A temporary shutdown will delay scientific progress and result in America losing ground to international researchers. LIGO has a local impact, too, and not just that it is visible from outer space. Its presence helps the Tri-Cities and the Hanford nuclear site evolve their scientific narrative from Cold War-era nuclear development to 21st-century astrophysics. It is a symbol of progress, diversification and positive global contribution that is invaluable for regional identity and attracting future talent and investment. LIGO staff go the extra mile by working with local STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) students. They speak in classrooms about science careers and explain the complex workings of the observatory in a way that young people can understand. An $8 million LIGO Exploration Center, which opened in 2022 and was funded by Washington state, further enhances that public-facing mission. Such direct engagement cultivates future STEM talent and inspires the next generation of scientists and engineers. The proposed cuts to LIGO would lead to an irreversible loss of U.S. leadership in gravitational wave astronomy and an immense loss to the Tri-Cities. The Trump administration must reconsider. If it does not, Washington's congressional delegation must convince their colleagues to preserve this cornerstone of American scientific preeminence.
Axios
3 days ago
- Axios
The great poaching: America's brain drain begins
The Trump administration's spending cuts and restrictions on foreign students are triggering a brain drain — and American scientists are panicking. Why it matters: U.S. researchers' fears are coming true. America's science pipeline is drying up, and countries like China are seizing the opportunity to surge ahead. 'This is such a race for being the science powerhouse that you never fully recover,' says Marcia McNutt, president of the National Academy of Sciences. 'You might accelerate back up to 60, but you can't make up for those years when you were at a standstill while the competition was racing ahead.' Driving the news: The National Science Foundation, which funds much of America's fundamental science research, is already doling out grants at its slowest pace in 35 years, The New York Times reports. More cuts to science could come with the "big, beautiful bill." Universities are also watching with bated breath as the administration tries to limit the number of foreign students studying in the U.S.. Harvard is pushing back, but could face a total ban on recruiting internationally. The Trump administration says it will " aggressively revoke" visas for Chinese students studying in "critical fields." By the numbers: While American universities are rescinding offers to incoming PhD students, other countries are recruiting heavily from U.S. labs. The journal Nature analyzed data from its jobs platform to track where scientists are looking for work. In the first few months of the Trump administration, there were jumps in the the number of U.S. applicants looking for jobs in Canada (+41%), Europe (+32%), China (+20%) and other Asian countries (+39%), compared to the same period in 2024. U.S. jobs saw fewer applications from candidates in Canada (–13%) and Europe (–41%). Case in point: France's Aix-Marseille University, which made headlines for earmarking millions of dollars for U.S. scientists, closed its application window after receiving a flood of apps. After American Nobel laureate Ardem Patapoutian's federal grant was frozen, he got an email from China offering 20 years of funding if he relocates his lab, The New York Times' Kate Zernike writes. He declined. 'This is a once-in-a-century brain gain opportunity,' the Australian Strategic Policy Institute wrote in a brief. The other side: The White House argues that its changes to the system will usher in a golden age of science and rebuild public trust. President Trump has also suggested that spots freed up by rejecting international students could be filled by American applicants. But professors say this isn't entirely realistic. "In hard sciences, in astronomy and physics and computer science, for example, there's no way you would fill that hole with local applicants of comparable quality," says Chris Impey, an astronomer at the University of Arizona. What to watch: 'The optimistic part of all of us thinks science is strong enough to outlast one administration, and for a while I thought that, but the hit to young people is at the center of the whole enterprise,' Impey says. 'It's like pulling the rug out from under the whole thing." It's not just brain drain of existing talent, he says. Students who are in high school and college now and thinking about a career in research might reconsider. "There's plenty of things smart kids can do. They don't have to go into science." At the same time, McNutt says she tells students: "If you went into graduate school in the fall of this year, by the time you get your PhD, this madness may be over. You come out with your new PhD ready to fill the gap."
