US federal trade court blocks Trump from imposing sweeping tariffs under emergency powers law
A US federal court on Wednesday blocked President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs from going into effect. The Court of International Trade in Manhattan ruled that the President overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board duties on imports from nations that sell more to the US than they buy. The three-judge panel said the US Constitution gives Congress exclusive powers to regulate commerce with other countries, which cannot be overruled by the President's emergency powers to protect the economy. Mr Trump has said he has the power to act because the country's trade deficits amount to a national emergency. He imposed tariffs on most of the countries in the world at one point, earlier putting levies on imports from Canada, China and Mexico to combat the illegal flow of immigrants and synthetic opioids across the US border. The moves sent markets reeling. The lawsuit, filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Centre on behalf of five small businesses that import goods from countries hit by the duties, was the first major legal challenge to Mr Trump's tariffs. The companies said the tariffs would hurt their ability to do business, and that the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorise the use of tariffs. Even if it did, they said, the trade deficit does not meet the law's requirement that an emergency be caused only by an "unusual and extraordinary threat". The US has run a trade deficit with the rest of the world for 49 consecutive years. The lawsuit is one of seven court challenges to Mr Trump's tariff policies, along with challenges from 13 states and other groups of small businesses. The administration is expected to appeal. It has argued that courts approved then-president Richard Nixon's emergency use of tariffs in 1971, and that only Congress, and not the courts, can determine the "political" question of whether the president's rationale for declaring an emergency complies with the law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
FBI investigating 'targeted terror attack' in Boulder, Colorado
Several people were injured and some may have been set on fire on Sunday at an outdoor mall in Boulder, Colorado, police said. The attack took place at a pedestrian mall where demonstrators had gathered to call for the release of hostages who remain in Gaza. Police received calls saying that a person there had been trying to set people on fire. Law enforcement said that a man was taken into custody in the assault that the FBI immediately described as a 'targeted terror attack". Boulder Police Chief Steve Redfearn told reporters that it was too early to discuss a motive but that witnesses were being interviewed. He added that the suspected attacker had been taken to hospital. 'It would be irresponsible for me to speculate on motive this early on,' Mr Redfearn said. FBI director Kash Patel posted on social media: 'Our agents and local law enforcement are on the scene already, and we will share updates as more information becomes available." Colorado Attorney General Philip Weiser said that the attack appears to have been a hate crime, given the group that was the focus. Boulder police said there were 'several victims' in the attack. The injuries authorities found were consistent with reports of people being set on fire, Mr Redfearn said, adding that local authorities were not calling it a terror attack at this time. Several blocks of the typically popular pedestrian mall area were evacuated, police said. Colorado Governor Jared Polis said in a statement that he was 'closely monitoring' the situation, adding that 'hate-filled acts of any kind are unacceptable". The Boulder attack occurred as law enforcement authorities in the US struggle with a sharp rise in anti-Semitic violence. It comes about a week after a man who was arrested on charges in the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy staff members shouted 'free Palestine' as he was being led away by police.
Gulf Today
6 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Trump's message to foreign students is alarming
Karishma Vaswani, Tribune News Service An Ivy League degree has long been central to the Asian Dream — a ticket to success and status. But President Donald Trump's message to international students is clear: Far fewer of you are welcome. The blunt statement and growing chaos across the university sector has left families wondering if sending their children to America is still worth it. The White House's immediate target is Chinese students allegedly connected to the Communist Party. On Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US plans to start 'aggressively' revoking their visas. Students affected would include 'those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.' The US will also enhance scrutiny 'of all future visa applications from the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong,' he added. It's unclear how these rules will be executed; the move follows a short period of improved ties between the superpowers after they agreed to a truce in the trade war. China's Foreign Ministry on Thursday expressed its dissatisfaction, saying it had lodged a protest with the US. The impact is wider than Washington and Beijing's geopolitical rivalry. The decision to ban Harvard from enrolling international students is focusing minds in Asia, even though a federal judge has temporarily blocked the policy. Many families are wondering if other universities will be next. The rhetoric coming out of the White House is hardly reassuring. 'We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools; they can't get in because we have foreign students there,' Trump said on Wednesday. This attitude, combined with a directive ordering US embassies worldwide to stop scheduling interviews for student visas sends a chilling message to Asian students: The Ivy aspiration is no longer as accessible as it once was. The worries are pouring in on my parent chat groups. Many have already spent thousands of dollars preparing children for a future at a prestigious American university — hiring expensive college counsellors, visiting campuses, and investing countless hours navigating complex application processes. That's not to mention time spent on preparing for standardised tests and extracurricular activities, all in an effort to perfect the profile for a prospective candidate. There are also legitimate concerns about what happens to deposits and scholarships, all of which are up in the air as students and their families figure out what the new rules mean for them. It's no small cost. An average American degree can set an international student's family back approximately $100,000 over four years, excluding living costs. An Ivy League degree? It's more than triple that. Parents spend decades making sacrifices and putting aside the massive investment required to help their kids go to their dream university. The money is worth it, the thinking goes, because eventually their child will reap the rewards. The schools get something out of this, too. Foreign applicants are more likely to pay full tuition, essentially subsidising American students who receive aid. Over a million international students studied in American universities in the 2023-2024 school year, according to data from Open Doors, an information resource for foreign students studying or teaching in the US Asians made up a significant proportion, with Indians and Chinese citizens accounting for over half. America is not going to lose its appeal overnight. It's still a coveted place to study, both because of its world-class tertiary education and the potential to find lucrative employment after graduation. But other countries are becoming more attractive because of the Trump administration's crackdown. Some parents I've spoken to will simply go elsewhere. Canada and the UK, already popular alternatives, are poised to scoop up disillusioned applicants. Closer to home, Australia and New Zealand are also promoting their schools. Asian universities that offer top-tier programs will appeal to anxious Asian families. Schools such as the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, the University of Tokyo, and Malaysia's Sunway University are offering credit transfers and other incentives to attract ambitious students and families looking for quality education without the uncertainties tied to American foreign policy. For many Asian students who have dreamt of studying and working in cities like New York or Los Angeles, the political gyrations affecting their futures are no doubt disappointing. But this is about more than visas and policies. It's about the hopes of a generation searching for a place to study, grow, and build their future. Trump has just made the U.S. seem like a far less inviting option.
Gulf Today
9 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Trump says will double steel and aluminium tariffs to 50 per cent
US President Donald Trump's announcement that he would double steel and aluminium import tariffs to 50 per cent from next week drew ire from the European Union Saturday in the latest salvo in his trade wars aimed at protecting domestic industries. The EU warned it was 'prepared' to retaliate against the latest tariffs, adding the sudden move 'undermines ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution' between the bloc and the United States. 'We're going to bring it from 25 per cent to 50 per cent, the tariffs on steel into the United States of America,' Trump said Friday while addressing workers at a US Steel plant in Pennsylvania. 'Nobody's going to get around that,' he added in the speech before blue-collar workers in the battleground state that helped deliver his election victory last year. Shortly after, Trump wrote in a Truth Social post that the elevated rate would also apply to aluminium, with the new tariffs 'effective Wednesday, June 4th.' Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump has imposed sweeping tariffs on allies and adversaries alike in moves that have rocked the world trade order and roiled financial markets. The tariffs had seen a brief legal setback earlier this week when a court ruled Trump had overstepped his authority, but an appellate court on Thursday said the tariffs could continue while the litigation moves forward. Trump has also issued sector-specific levies that affect goods such as automobiles. On Friday, he defended his trade policies, arguing that tariffs helped protect US industry. He added that the steel facility he was speaking in would not exist if he had not also imposed duties on metals imports during his first administration. On Friday, Trump touted a planned partnership between US Steel and Japan's Nippon Steel, but offered few new details on a deal that earlier faced bipartisan opposition. He stressed that despite a recently announced planned partnership between the American steelmaker and Nippon Steel, 'US Steel will continue to be controlled by the USA.' He added that there would be no layoffs or outsourcing of jobs by the company. Upon returning to Washington late Friday, Trump told reporters he had yet to approve the deal. 'I have to approve the final deal with Nippon, and we haven't seen that final deal yet, but they've made a very big commitment,' Trump said. Last week, Trump said that US Steel would remain in America with its headquarters to stay in Pittsburgh, adding that the arrangement with Nippon would create at least 70,000 jobs and add $14 billion to the US economy. Trump in Pennsylvania said that as part of its commitment, Nippon would invest $2.2 billion to boost steel production in the Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant where he was speaking. Another $7 billion would go towards modernizing steel mills, expanding ore mining and building facilities in places including Indiana and Minnesota. A proposed $14.9 billion sale of US Steel to Nippon Steel had previously drawn political opposition from both sides of the aisle. Former president Joe Biden blocked the deal on national security grounds shortly before leaving office. There remain lingering concerns over the new partnership. The United Steelworkers union (USW) which represents thousands of hourly workers at US Steel facilities said after Trump's speech that it had not participated in discussions involving Nippon Steel and the Trump administration, 'nor were we consulted.' 'We cannot speculate about the meaning of the 'planned partnership,'' said USW International President David McCall in a statement. 'Whatever the deal structure, our primary concern remains with the impact that this merger of US Steel into a foreign competitor will have on national security, our members and the communities where we live and work,' McCall said. 'The devil is always in the details,' he added. Trump had opposed Nippon Steel's takeover plan while on the election campaign trail. But since returning to the presidency, he signaled that he would be open to some form of investment after all. The European Commission said on Saturday that it 'strongly' regrets an announced increase of US tariffs on steel imports and that the EU is prepared to impose countermeasures. 'We strongly regret the announced increase of U.S. tariffs on steel imports from 25% to 50%,' a European Commission spokesperson said in an emailed statement. 'This decision adds further uncertainty to the global economy and increases costs for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic,' the spokesperson said, adding that 'the tariff increase also undermines ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated solution'. Agencies
