Druze Group ‘Rijal al-Karama' Rejects Disarmament, Calls for Weapons Regulation in Sweida
Bassem Abu Fakhr, spokesman for the 'Rijal al-Karama' movement, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the group's weapons were solely for defense and had never been used offensively.
'The matter of handing over weapons falls under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Defense, and no final decision has been made yet,' Abu Fakhr said. 'Our arms have never posed a threat to any party. We have not attacked anyone, and our weapons exist to protect our land and honor.'
He added that while the group does not object to regulating the presence of weapons, full surrender was out of the question.
'We have no issue with organizing arms under state authority, provided they remain within the province's administrative boundaries and under state supervision,' he said. 'But the matter of weapons remains unresolved.'
Formed in 2013, Rijal al-Karama was established to protect the Druze community and prevent its youth from being conscripted into fighting for any side in Syria's protracted conflict, which erupted after mass protests against then President Bashar al-Assad.
The group continues to operate as an independent local defense force, separate from state security institutions.
Abu Fakhr told Asharq Al-Awsat that a high-level meeting held last Thursday in Sweida—attended by senior Druze spiritual leaders Sheikh Hikmat al-Hijri and Sheikh Hammoud al-Hanawi, along with local dignitaries and community members—resulted in an agreement to reactivate the police and judicial police under the Ministry of Interior.
Abu Fakhr also denied recent reports claiming that Druze clerics, tribal leaders, and faction commanders had agreed to fully surrender their weapons to the state.
'This issue has not been resolved by all parties in Sweida,' he said, reiterating the group's position: 'We have no objection to organizing the weapons under state oversight, as long as they remain within the administrative boundaries of the province, but not to surrendering them.'
The statement underscores continuing tensions over the role of armed groups in Sweida, a province that has largely remained outside the control of both government and opposition forces throughout Syria's civil war.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
3 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Syrian president says unifying country ‘should not be with blood'
Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa has said the battle to unify his country after years of civil war 'should not be with blood,' rejecting any partition and accusing Israel of meddling in the south. His remarks, released by state TV on Sunday, came as hundreds demonstrated in south Syria's Sweida province, denouncing sectarian violence last month and calling for the right to self-determination for the Druze-majority province. 'We still have another battle ahead of us to unify Syria, and it should not be with blood and military force... it should be through some kind of understanding because Syria is tired of war,' al-Sharaa said during a dialogue session involving notables from the northwest province of Idlib and other senior officials. 'I do not see Syria as at risk of division. Some people desire a process of dividing Syria and trying to establish cantons... this matter is impossible,' he said according to a recording of the meeting, distributed overnight by state media. 'Some parties seek to gain power through regional power, Israel or others. This is also extremely difficult and cannot be implemented,' he said. At the protest in Sweida, some demonstrators waved the Israeli flag and called for self-determination for the region. A week of bloodshed in Sweida began on July 13 with clashes between Druze fighters and Sunni Bedouin, but rapidly escalated, drawing in government forces, with Israel also carrying out strikes. Al-Sharaa said that Sweida 'witnessed many violations from all sides... some members of the security forces and army in Syria also carried out some violations.' The state is required 'to hold all perpetrators of violations to account,' whatever their affiliation, he added. 'Israel is intervening directly in Sweida, seeking to implement policies aimed at weakening the state in general or finding excuses to interfere in ongoing policies in the southern region,' al-Sharaa said. Israel, which has its own Druze community, has said it has acted to defend the minority group as well as enforce its demands for the demilitarization of southern Syria. Syria's new authorities are also in talks with a semi-autonomous Kurdish administration that runs swathes of the country's north and northeast and has called for decentralization, which Damascus has rejected. Implementation of a March 10 deal on integrating the Kurds' semi-autonomous civil and military institutions into the state has been held up by differences between the parties. 'We are now discussing the mechanisms for implementation' of the deal, al-Sharaa said.
Arab News
3 hours ago
- Arab News
Syrian president says unifying country ‘should not be with blood'
DAMASCUS: Syrian President Ahmed Al-Sharaa has said the battle to unify his country after years of civil war 'should not be with blood,' rejecting any partition and accusing Israel of meddling in the south. His remarks, released by state TV on Sunday, came as hundreds demonstrated in south Syria's Sweida province, denouncing sectarian violence last month and calling for the right to self-determination for the Druze-majority province. 'We still have another battle ahead of us to unify Syria, and it should not be with blood and military force... it should be through some kind of understanding because Syria is tired of war,' Sharaa said during a dialogue session involving notables from the northwest province of Idlib and other senior officials. 'I do not see Syria as at risk of division. Some people desire a process of dividing Syria and trying to establish cantons... this matter is impossible,' he said according to a recording of the meeting, distributed overnight by state media. 'Some parties seek to gain power through regional power, Israel or others. This is also extremely difficult and cannot be implemented,' he said. At the protest in Sweida, some demonstrators waved the Israeli flag and called for self-determination for the region. A week of bloodshed in Sweida began on July 13 with clashes between Druze fighters and Sunni Bedouin, but rapidly escalated, drawing in government forces, with Israel also carrying out strikes. Syrian authorities have said their forces intervened to stop the clashes, but witnesses, Druze factions and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights have accused them of siding with the Bedouin and committing abuses against the Druze, including summary executions. Sharaa said that Sweida 'witnessed many violations from all sides... some members of the security forces and army in Syria also carried out some violations.' The state is required 'to hold all perpetrators of violations to account,' whatever their affiliation, he added. 'Israel is intervening directly in Sweida, seeking to implement policies aimed at weakening the state in general or finding excuses to interfere in ongoing policies in the southern region,' Sharaa said. Israel, which has its own Druze community, has said it has acted to defend the minority group as well as enforce its demands for the demilitarization of southern Syria. Syria's new authorities are also in talks with a semi-autonomous Kurdish administration that runs swathes of the country's north and northeast and has called for decentralization, which Damascus has rejected. Implementation of a March 10 deal on integrating the Kurds' semi-autonomous civil and military institutions into the state has been held up by differences between the parties. 'We are now discussing the mechanisms for implementation' of the deal, Sharaa said.
Arab News
a day ago
- Arab News
‘Deeply embarrassing': Afghan veterans hit by second UK data breach
LONDON: More than 3,000 Afghans, British troops and government officials have had their personal data breached following a cyberattack, the UK's Ministry of Defense has said. Some of the victims may have had their information hacked for a second time, following the ministry's high-profile Afghan data breach discovered in 2023, which was the subject of a superinjunction — preventing it from being publicly disclosed — until last month. The 2023 breach exposed the identities of thousands of Afghans who had served alongside British forces as part of the multinational decade-long conflict against the Taliban. Many of them reported receiving threats after the leaked database was apparently discovered by Afghanistan's Taliban rulers. Following the latest incident, an alert was sent to about 3,700 affected people on Friday, The Times reported. They were told that their personal information had been breached, including name, date of birth and passport number. The data was included in a record of information relating to evacuation flights from Afghanistan to England's Stansted Airport between January and March 2024. Inflite, a third-party subcontractor hired by the ministry, held the data. The firm suffered a ransomware attack thought to have been carried out by criminal gangs. More than 100 British personnel were victims of the breach. The rest of those affected are Afghans. The ministry said in its alert: 'There is a risk that some of your or your family's personal information may be affected. This may include passport details (including name, data of birth, and passport number) and Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy reference numbers.' Those alerted were requested to 'please remain vigilant and be alert to unexpected communication or unusual activity.' So far, there is no evidence that any of the information has been released publicly or on the dark web, ministry sources told The Times. The latest leak adds to growing embarrassment over the UK's handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal, which was completed in 2021. Sir Mark Lyall Grant, former UK national security adviser, told the BBC's 'Newsnight' program that both breaches were 'deeply embarrassing' for the government. Verification as part of the relocation process is necessary, but the British government must 'honor the commitment they made,' Grant added. 'We do need to move faster to protect people who genuinely are at risk of being victimized and persecuted by the Taliban if they go back,' he said. It was revealed that the government's multi-year superinjunction on the previous Afghan data breach cost taxpayers more than $3 million. An emergency government scheme that was hidden from the public in response to the breach may have cost more than $9 billion, as part of efforts to bring at-risk Afghans to Britain. Adnan Malik of Barings Law, which is representing 1,400 Afghans affected by the previous data leak, said: 'This is public money they used to cover their own backs. Barings Law will continue to pursue justice for all of those affected, and stop the deceit on behalf of the Ministry of Defense.' A former interpreter who suffered war injuries in Afghanistan and now campaigns for his Afghan ex-colleagues told The Times that he was 'truly worried' about how the ministry has mishandled the personal data of Afghan allies. 'Once again, they have failed to protect those who stood shoulder to shoulder with them in the fight against terrorism,' said Rafi Hottak. 'How can it be that we've now had three separate data leaks involving one of the most vulnerable group of people?' A spokesperson for Inflite said: 'While we cannot comment on specific details of the data security incident or any communications related to it due to the sensitivity of the matter, we remain fully committed to protecting our systems, data, and the interests of all our stakeholders.' A government spokesperson said: 'We were recently notified that a third-party subcontractor to a supplier experienced a cybersecurity incident involving unauthorized access to a small number of its emails that contained basic personal information. 'We take data security extremely seriously and are going above and beyond our legal duties in informing all potentially affected individuals. 'The incident has not posed any threat to individuals' safety, nor compromised any government systems.' -ENDS-
