Sadiq Khan plots tower blocks on London's green belt
The countryside on London's outskirts could soon be concreted over to make way for tower blocks as Sir Sadiq Khan throws his support behind building on the green belt.
The Mayor of London will on Friday announce plans to release more of the capital's green spaces for housing as he launches a consultation on the city's development strategy for the next two decades.
Sir Sadiq is expected to argue that parts of the green belt 'can often be low-quality land, poorly maintained and rarely enjoyed by Londoners' and would be better used as housing.
The mayor will say in a speech in Greenwich: 'Development on carefully chosen parts of the green belt – done in the right way – would allow us to unlock hundreds of thousands of good-quality new homes for Londoners.
'This would not only go a long way to ending the housing crisis but provide a huge boost to our economy.'
It represent a U-turn in his stance, having staunchly opposed green belt development in previous years in favour of construction on brownfield sites.
However, the change of heart comes as Sir Sadiq scrambles to hit has target to build 88,000 homes per year. His existing plan is only delivering around 40,000.
Recent findings by research company Molior show housebuilding in the capital has slumped to its lowest level since 2009, with works starting on just 1,120 private homes in the first quarter this year, and no works starting in 23 of London's 33 boroughs.
The move to open up London's green belt sparked an immediate backlash from campaigners and the Conservatives.
Alice Roberts, at CPRE London, the countryside charity, said: 'Our green belt is incredibly valuable. It's a home for nature, it's the countryside next door, it's important for agriculture close to the city, it's incredibly important for climate because of the need to plant trees, to absorb rainwater, to manage rainwater and surface flooding. There's no more important time to keep our green spaces green.'
David Mooney, chief executive of the London Wildlife Trust, said: 'We will fight hard to protect our nature-rich green belt and hold the mayor to account to make absolutely sure only the right sites are selected, and that nature is not shoved out the way.'
Susan Hall, leader of the City Hall Conservatives, said: 'Once again, Sadiq Khan has shown his true colours by dancing to the tune the Labour Government sets.
'This is a mayor who will sacrifice London's precious green spaces to appease his Labour paymasters.
'Londoners elected him on a promise to protect our environment, but it's now clear those promises weren't worth the recycled paper they were printed on.'
Andrew Boff, who represents the City Hall Conservatives on planning matters, said: 'The mayor has repeatedly stood in the London Assembly chamber and given categorical assurances that he would protect London's green belt.
'This announcement is a complete betrayal of those promises and shows utter contempt for Londoners who treasure these vital green spaces.'
A review is already under way in City Hall examining the scope to build on so-called grey belt land, but the mayor's plans are expected to go further than this.
A spokesman for the GLA said the focus will be on low-quality, poorly-maintained land rarely accessed by Londoners, with scope to build high-density housing and good transport links.
Earlier this year, Sir Sadiq was accused of presiding over a 'crusade' to build on parks in the capital, after a row broke out over suggestions from Transport for London to release historic land in Enfield for more than 10,000 homes.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Over-60s free travel costs taxpayers three times as much as fare dodgers
Providing free transport for over-60s in London is costing taxpayers £500m a year, prompting calls for the benefit to be scrapped. A rapidly ageing population means more than 1.5 million people now travel for free across London's buses, Tubes, trains and trams. They do so via the 60+ Oyster Card, for those aged between 60 and 65, and the Freedom Pass, available to those aged 66 and older. Telegraph analysis shows the 60+ Oyster Card alone will cost Transport for London (TfL) £135m this year, up from £60m in 2016. By 2027, costs are expected to reach £185m. The Freedom Pass, which now has more than 900,000 users, costs £350m a year – a bill that is forecast to reach £498m by the end of the decade. By comparison, traditional fare dodgers – such as those recently exposed by Tory MP Robert Jenrick for skipping barriers at Underground stations – cost the organisation £130m a year. According to TfL, the majority of 60+ Oyster card holders (60pc) are still in paid employment, and one in five use the free travel to get to and from work. This is despite the fact that those aged 60 and 64 earn an average salary of £42,000, double that of those aged between 20 and 24 at £24,000. Reem Ibrahim, of the Institute of Economic Affairs, said: 'It is difficult to justify a system where the wealthiest age group in the country is having their travel funded by taxpayers. 'The 60+ Oyster card and Freedom Pass schemes are financially unsustainable, and are not targeted to those genuinely in need of support. We urgently need a more targeted approach, rather than entrenching an unfair and costly system.' Liz Emerson, chief executive of the Intergenerational Foundation, a research charity, said: 'At the very least, the Freedom Pass should be aligned with the state pension age. 'It's a perfect example of intergenerational unfairness at work with younger workers having to subsidise their older colleagues free travel to work.' The 60+ Oyster Card was first introduced by then Mayor of London, Boris Johnson in 2012. It is funded by Sir Sadiq Khan's mayoral precept in council tax bills and the congestion charge – the daily fee for driving into central London. Once Londoners reach the age of 66, they continue to receive free travel in the form of a Freedom Pass, which is also provided to eligible disabled people regardless of age. This £350m bill is shouldered on to London's 33 boroughs – 28 of which increased council tax by the legal maximum of 5pc in April. The body that runs the scheme on behalf of the boroughs, has warned it will cost taxpayers £498m by 2029-30, a figure it described as 'unsustainable'. Sir Sadiq, 54, who is five years away from qualifying for free travel himself, banned the use of 60+ Oyster cards and the Freedom Pass before 9am during the pandemic. The move generated an extra £15m in fares. However, he rejected plans to increase the qualifying age for the 60+ Oyster card by six months a year for the next 12 years, allowing for it to be slowly phased out until it matched the qualifying age of the Freedom Pass. A spokesman for Transport for London said: 'Both the Mayor and TfL are committed to making public transport in London as accessible, convenient, and affordable as possible. 'We regularly review our range of concessions to ensure that they continue to benefit Londoners, while also remaining affordable for TfL to operate.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scrap Chagos Islands deal and agree new one, UN panel urges UK
A UN panel has urged the UK to renegotiate a deal returning the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, saying it "fails to guarantee" the rights of the Chagossian people. The deal, signed last month, returned sovereignty of the Indian Ocean archipelago to Mauritius, but the UK retained the right to run a military base on Diego Garcia, the largest of the Chagos Islands. By preventing the Chagossian people from returning to Diego Garcia, "the agreement appears to be at variance with the Chagossians' right to return," the UN experts wrote. A Foreign Office spokesperson said the UK-Mauritius deal had been "welcomed by international organisations including the UN secretary general". The panel of four experts were appointed by the UN Human Rights Council, but are not UN staff and are independent from the UN. They said by the UK keeping the military base of Diego Garcia, the Chagossian people were hindered from being able to "exercise their cultural rights in accessing their ancestral lands from which they were expelled". The panel called for the current deal to be suspended and for a new agreement to be negotiated. Under the agreement, the UK would pay an average of £101m a year for 99 years to continue operating the military base on Diego Garcia, in concert with the US. The Chagos Islands are located in the Indian Ocean about 5,799 miles (9,332km) south-east of the UK, and about 1,250 miles north-east of Mauritius. The UK purchased the islands for £3m in 1968, but Mauritius has argued it was illegally forced to give away the islands in order to gain independence from Britain. Diego Garcia was then cleared to make way for a military base, with large groups of Chagossians forcibly moved to Mauritius and the Seychelles, or taking up an invitation to settle in England, mainly in Crawley, West Sussex. Since then, Chagossians have not been allowed to return to Diego Garcia. Before the UK-Mauritius deal was signed last month, two Chagossian women living in the UK - who were born on Diego Garcia - launched a last-minute legal bid to stop it, saying the agreement did not guarantee the right of return to their island of birth. What is the Chagos Islands deal between UK and Mauritius? The deal includes a £40m trust fund to support Chagossians, a component that the UN panel also questioned would "comply with the right of the Chagossian people to effective remedy... and prompt reparation". "The agreement also lacks provisions to facilitate the Chagossian people's access to cultural sites on Diego Garcia and protect and conserve their unique cultural heritage," the panel added. The Foreign Office spokesperson said: "We recognise the importance of the islands to Chagossians and have worked to ensure the agreement reflects this." Shadow Foreign Secretary Dame Priti Patel said the Conservatives "have been warning from the start that this deal is bad for British taxpayers and bad for the Chagossian people". "It is why I have introduced a bill in Parliament that would block the [agreement] and force the government to speak to the people at the heart of their surrender plans," she said. Both the House of Commons and House of Lords have until 3 July to pass a resolution to oppose the deal being ratified. What I found on the secretive tropical island they don't want you to see
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sadiq Khan is the last person that should get a knighthood
With Mayor of London Sadiq Khan belatedly dubbed a knight today, the integrity of the honours system will be questioned by many. Part of me recognises the significance of an unapologetically pro-Islam monarch knighting a Muslim mayor of London. And there is no doubt that Khan has shattered his fair share of glass ceilings. Indeed, he embodies the story of social mobility in many of Britain's traditional ethnic-minority communities. Born in south London to a Pakistani family, his father worked as a bus driver and his mother a seamstress. He completed a law degree and went on to establish himself as a successful solicitor. Following his election as the MP for Tooting in the 2005 general election, The Spectator named Khan as 'Newcomer of the Year' at its Parliamentarian of the Year awards. Khan was reportedly singled out by the judges 'for the tough-mindedness and clarity with which he has spoken about the very difficult issues of Islamic terror'. The Mayor of London could have implemented an agenda in keeping with his own background – a wholesome working-class traditionalism focused on family values, the dignity of work, social mobility, and public security. Instead, he converted himself into an opportunistic purveyor of identity politics. He appears to be more interested in public relations and international showboating, having regularly scrapped with American president Donald Trump, as well as wading into issues such as the US Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v Wade. One could be forgiven for wondering how Khan even has the time to waste on antagonising diplomatic allies and debating abortion rights across the pond. London continues to be plagued by youth knife crime – especially in areas where the fatherlessness epidemic is being exploited by predatory violent gangs. Political conflicts and sectarian tensions from various parts of the world have been imported, yet we continue to hear empty platitudes from Khan on London's 'rich diversity' and 'vibrant cosmopolitanism'. Keeping our streets safe should be at the very heart of political and public service. Khan has failed spectacularly at this basic task. The honours system all too often rewards mediocrity in public office. Khan is just one of many eyebrow-raising choices we have seen in recent decades. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
