Sadiq Khan plots tower blocks on London's green belt
The Mayor of London will on Friday announce plans to release more of the capital's green spaces for housing as he launches a consultation on the city's development strategy for the next two decades.
Sir Sadiq is expected to argue that parts of the green belt 'can often be low-quality land, poorly maintained and rarely enjoyed by Londoners' and would be better used as housing.
The mayor will say in a speech in Greenwich: 'Development on carefully chosen parts of the green belt – done in the right way – would allow us to unlock hundreds of thousands of good-quality new homes for Londoners.
'This would not only go a long way to ending the housing crisis but provide a huge boost to our economy.'
It represent a U-turn in his stance, having staunchly opposed green belt development in previous years in favour of construction on brownfield sites.
However, the change of heart comes as Sir Sadiq scrambles to hit has target to build 88,000 homes per year. His existing plan is only delivering around 40,000.
Recent findings by research company Molior show housebuilding in the capital has slumped to its lowest level since 2009, with works starting on just 1,120 private homes in the first quarter this year, and no works starting in 23 of London's 33 boroughs.
The move to open up London's green belt sparked an immediate backlash from campaigners and the Conservatives.
Alice Roberts, at CPRE London, the countryside charity, said: 'Our green belt is incredibly valuable. It's a home for nature, it's the countryside next door, it's important for agriculture close to the city, it's incredibly important for climate because of the need to plant trees, to absorb rainwater, to manage rainwater and surface flooding. There's no more important time to keep our green spaces green.'
David Mooney, chief executive of the London Wildlife Trust, said: 'We will fight hard to protect our nature-rich green belt and hold the mayor to account to make absolutely sure only the right sites are selected, and that nature is not shoved out the way.'
Susan Hall, leader of the City Hall Conservatives, said: 'Once again, Sadiq Khan has shown his true colours by dancing to the tune the Labour Government sets.
'This is a mayor who will sacrifice London's precious green spaces to appease his Labour paymasters.
'Londoners elected him on a promise to protect our environment, but it's now clear those promises weren't worth the recycled paper they were printed on.'
Andrew Boff, who represents the City Hall Conservatives on planning matters, said: 'The mayor has repeatedly stood in the London Assembly chamber and given categorical assurances that he would protect London's green belt.
'This announcement is a complete betrayal of those promises and shows utter contempt for Londoners who treasure these vital green spaces.'
A review is already under way in City Hall examining the scope to build on so-called grey belt land, but the mayor's plans are expected to go further than this.
A spokesman for the GLA said the focus will be on low-quality, poorly-maintained land rarely accessed by Londoners, with scope to build high-density housing and good transport links.
Earlier this year, Sir Sadiq was accused of presiding over a 'crusade' to build on parks in the capital, after a row broke out over suggestions from Transport for London to release historic land in Enfield for more than 10,000 homes.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
5 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Who really suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome?
Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Two decades on, Krauthammer's coinage has been appropriated, rebranded, and defined down — way down. 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is now flung at anyone who objects to President Trump's conduct or opposes his policies. The term is no longer reserved for over-the-top expressions of revulsion — like actor Robert De Niro using a televised appearance at the Tony Awards to Advertisement No — today 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is used as an all-purpose put-down to deride any Trump critics, including those who stick to serious, fact-based analysis. I've lost count of all the times I've been Advertisement A woman seen at the Iowa State Fairgrounds on July 3, when President Trump was speaking there. Scott Olson/Getty The word 'syndrome' notwithstanding, this is merely political trash talk, popularized by Trump and his allies as a way to wave off criticism without having to engage it. Instead of refuting arguments or defending policy, the magic letters 'TDS' turn disagreement into proof of mental defect. Yet if 'derangement' means the loss of proportion and judgment Krauthammer was getting at, then the most severe cases aren't among Trump's critics. They're in the ranks of his most ardent loyalists. The real Trump Derangement Syndrome shows up in three telltale symptoms. First is the cult-like worship that treats Trump as infallible — his acolytes profess adoration not only for what he does, but for whatever could flow from him. Emblematic of that mindset are the Advertisement Second is the abandonment of principles that once seemed non-negotiable. Conservatives and Republicans who used to champion free trade A man with a MAGA tattoo on his stomach attended a rally at Macomb Community College in Warren, Mich., to mark President Trump's 100th day in office on April 29. EMILY ELCONIN/NYT Third is the unsettling delight so many supporters take in Trump's most outrageous behavior — a kind of giddy worship that equates offensiveness with authenticity. Such brazenness has been a hallmark of his political career — from mocking John McCain's Vietnam War heroism to charging undocumented immigrants with ' Advertisement Meanwhile, they reflexively use 'TDS!' as a go-to put-down for anything from mild disagreement to serious moral critique, framing opposition not as argument but as pathology — an easy, cheap discredit. Yes, plenty of Trump-haters go overboard — but in MAGA circles, the 'TDS' tag is sprayed far wider, hitting thoughtful critics just as readily as the genuinely unhinged. What is truly alarming is how some have sought to legalize that insult by casting dissent as disease. In Minnesota this spring, five Republican senators proposed a bill that would Krauthammer's original point in 2003 was that derangement is the breakdown of proportion and prudence. That breakdown isn't found among critics who quote Trump accurately and challenge his claims. The most alarming political derangement today affects those who cannot conceive that there are legitimate reasons to be appalled by the president, and so explain anti-Trump dissent as a sign of mental weakness. If reason is the measure, then those who shout 'TDS!' the loudest are the ones most in need of treatment. Jeff Jacoby can be reached at
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
From hotels, to wine and candy: Canada spent $170K to bring back women who joined Islamic State
The federal government spent more than $170,000 to bring Canadian women and their children back to the country after they went overseas to join the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, documents show. As first reported by Global News, the documents, which were released under access to information legislation, contain details of the costs incurred when eight women, along with their children, were brought home from Syria. They include costs for business class air travel and hotel bills in Montreal that include wine, candy and chocolates. A number of the women have since been charged with terrorism offences. On Friday, the Conservatives called for an investigation into the expenditures in a letter addressed to Jean-Yves Duclos, the chair of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, Global News reported. 'With Canadians lining up in food banks in record numbers and struggling with housing costs, the Liberal government must answer for why they spent $170,000 on lavish costs to repatriate reported ISIS criminals,' the letter reportedly says. The Conservative party did not respond by press time to National Post's request for comment. The first round of repatriations, completed in October 2022, cost $10,863, according to the documents from Global Affairs Canada. Canadians Kimberly Polman and Oumaima Chouay were returned to the country in that operation. Polman is facing terrorism charges and Chouay pleaded guilty last month to one charge of participating in the activities of a terrorist group. The second operation, which occurred in April 2023, cost $132,746 in expenses for government staff and those returned to Canada. Not all the expenses are detailed in the documents, but the total cost includes $20,331 for 23 hotel rooms at the Marriott hotel at the Montreal Airport, including room-service bills and a catering tab of nearly $3,000. At the time, four Canadian women — three of whom were arrested upon arrival — and their 10 children were returned to Canada, The Canadian Press reported. Among that group was Edmontonian Aimee Lucia Vasconez, who was married to two different ISIS fighters, according to an affidavit filed in court by an RCMP officer. Another, Ammara Amjad, was also arrested and faces a terrorism charge. Individual bills show that one room cost nearly $1,100, driven up from the original room cost of $638 by purchases of $95 worth of wine, a $105 room-service meal and $87 worth of items from the hotel gift store, including chocolate, chips and drugs such as Benadryl and Reactine. That same room tipped $7 on an $8 coffee. Another room ordered $15 worth of children's ice cream, and a third ordered white, red and sparkling wine at $25 apiece. One room's food bill included two $24 smoked meat dishes. The third repatriation operation, done in early July 2023, cost more than $27,500 and saw a government of Canada employee purchase snacks, including goldfish and granola bars, from Costco, and Timbits from Tim Hortons, for the operation. Hotel rooms in Montreal cost a bit more than $2,300. Two Edmonton women, Dina Kalouti and Helena Carson, were among that group. Both have been sentenced to six-month peace bonds and they are required to continue counselling with the Edmonton-based Organization for the Prevention of Violence (OPV), which provides programming for people seeking to leave extremist groups. The documents redact a number of details, and 50 pages were not released, as they are under consultation. The documents do not appear to account for the costs of actually flying to Syria to get the women from detention camps; they include only the costs of transferring them within Canada. Global Affairs Canada did not respond to National Post's requests for comment by press time. A number of Canadian women travelled to the Middle East when the Islamic State seized territory in Iraq and Syria more than a decade ago. However, the terrorist group lost much of its territory, and Canadians who had been living and fighting with the Islamic State were held in detention camps. This led to a major push, particularly from the United States, to have nations repatriate their citizens who were held in Syria. In 2023 alone, the U.S. state department reported under then U.S. president Joe Biden, 14 countries — Canada among them — repatriated 3,500 citizens from where they were detained. Overall, the administration reported that nearly 7,000 family members of foreign fighters had been repatriated by 30 countries. The U.S. bureau of counterterrorism warned in December 2023 that more than half of those held in camps were under the age of 12 and if they remained, they would become vulnerable to ISIS recruitment, perhaps fuelling a resurgence of the terrorist group. — With addition reporting by the Edmonton Journal and The Canadian Press Quebec woman pleads guilty to joining ISIL, sentenced to one day in custody Ruling ordering Ottawa to bring Canadian ISIL suspects home sparks security debate Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.
Washington Post
2 days ago
- Washington Post
RFK Jr. rules out 2028 presidential bid, vows ‘loyalty' to Trump
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Friday addressed rumors he would seek higher office, pledging his singular focus is serving as U.S. health secretary in a public statement aimed at tamping down attacks from some conservatives who have questioned his devotion to the president.
