Sadiq Khan plots tower blocks on London's green belt
The countryside on London's outskirts could soon be concreted over to make way for tower blocks as Sir Sadiq Khan throws his support behind building on the green belt.
The Mayor of London will on Friday announce plans to release more of the capital's green spaces for housing as he launches a consultation on the city's development strategy for the next two decades.
Sir Sadiq is expected to argue that parts of the green belt 'can often be low-quality land, poorly maintained and rarely enjoyed by Londoners' and would be better used as housing.
The mayor will say in a speech in Greenwich: 'Development on carefully chosen parts of the green belt – done in the right way – would allow us to unlock hundreds of thousands of good-quality new homes for Londoners.
'This would not only go a long way to ending the housing crisis but provide a huge boost to our economy.'
It represent a U-turn in his stance, having staunchly opposed green belt development in previous years in favour of construction on brownfield sites.
However, the change of heart comes as Sir Sadiq scrambles to hit has target to build 88,000 homes per year. His existing plan is only delivering around 40,000.
Recent findings by research company Molior show housebuilding in the capital has slumped to its lowest level since 2009, with works starting on just 1,120 private homes in the first quarter this year, and no works starting in 23 of London's 33 boroughs.
The move to open up London's green belt sparked an immediate backlash from campaigners and the Conservatives.
Alice Roberts, at CPRE London, the countryside charity, said: 'Our green belt is incredibly valuable. It's a home for nature, it's the countryside next door, it's important for agriculture close to the city, it's incredibly important for climate because of the need to plant trees, to absorb rainwater, to manage rainwater and surface flooding. There's no more important time to keep our green spaces green.'
David Mooney, chief executive of the London Wildlife Trust, said: 'We will fight hard to protect our nature-rich green belt and hold the mayor to account to make absolutely sure only the right sites are selected, and that nature is not shoved out the way.'
Susan Hall, leader of the City Hall Conservatives, said: 'Once again, Sadiq Khan has shown his true colours by dancing to the tune the Labour Government sets.
'This is a mayor who will sacrifice London's precious green spaces to appease his Labour paymasters.
'Londoners elected him on a promise to protect our environment, but it's now clear those promises weren't worth the recycled paper they were printed on.'
Andrew Boff, who represents the City Hall Conservatives on planning matters, said: 'The mayor has repeatedly stood in the London Assembly chamber and given categorical assurances that he would protect London's green belt.
'This announcement is a complete betrayal of those promises and shows utter contempt for Londoners who treasure these vital green spaces.'
A review is already under way in City Hall examining the scope to build on so-called grey belt land, but the mayor's plans are expected to go further than this.
A spokesman for the GLA said the focus will be on low-quality, poorly-maintained land rarely accessed by Londoners, with scope to build high-density housing and good transport links.
Earlier this year, Sir Sadiq was accused of presiding over a 'crusade' to build on parks in the capital, after a row broke out over suggestions from Transport for London to release historic land in Enfield for more than 10,000 homes.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
£140bn of transport investment missed over last government says new report
The North of England would have received an extra £140 billion in transport investment under the previous government if funding levels had been the same as in London, research has claimed. Independent analysis by think tank the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) looked at Treasury figures between 2009/10 and 2022/23, during which time the Conservatives were in power. It reached the figure, which it said was enough to build seven Elizabeth Lines, by considering the amount of spending per person across the different English regions over that period. While England as a whole saw £592 spent per person each year, London received double that amount with £1,183 spent per person, the IPPR said. The entire North region saw £486 spent per person, with the North East and North West seeing £430 and £540 spent per person respectively. READ MORE: Upgrades to Energy Coast train line 'crucial' for Cumbria | News and Star Cumbrian MPs have called for a 'major upgrade' of the Cumbrian coast train line to help boost economic growth. Former prime minister Rishi Sunak promised to 'upgrade' the energy coast train line linking Carlisle, Workington and Barrow after cancelling the leg of HS2 from Birmingham to Manchester.
Boston Globe
10 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump budget's caps on grad school loans could worsen doctor shortage
Four years of medical education costs $286,454 at a public school, on average, and $390,848 at a private one, according to the Association of American Medical Colleges. Medical school graduates leave with an average debt of $212,341, the association found. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The price of a four-year program in osteopathic medicine is $297,881 at a public school, on average, and $371,403 at a private school, according to the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. The average indebtedness of their graduates is $259,196. Advertisement The proposed loan caps 'will either push students and families into the private loan market, where they take on more risk and have less consumer protection, or simply push people out of higher education altogether,' said Aissa Canchola Bañez, policy director at the Student Borrower Protection Center, a nonprofit advocacy group. Private student loans are also not eligible for Public Service Loan Forgiveness programs, which many students rely on to manage their debt. Students from low-income families may have difficulty qualifying for private loans. Advertisement In a letter to congressional leaders, the American Medical Association asked lawmakers to carve out exceptions in the law for medical education, saying that the current bill would deter good candidates from applying to medical school, discourage physicians from working in underserved areas, and make medical school unaffordable for all but the very wealthy. Critics said it could also drive more doctors away from lower-paying primary care fields, an area of acute need, and into more lucrative specialties. Conservatives have argued for decades that the availability of federal student loans allowed tuition costs to balloon — a proposition rejected by the Association of American Medical Colleges, which instead blames the rising cost of living. Studies examining the relationship between loans and tuition have varied in their conclusions. Sara Robertson, press secretary for Republicans on the House Education and Workforce Committee, said the proposed loan limits 'will drive down the cost of medical school and thus reduce the need for students to borrow in the first place.' She said private lenders would offer students lower interest rates than the government's Grad PLUS program would. The private market, though, has shrunk markedly since the Great Recession, according to Lesley Turner, an associate professor of public policy at the University of Chicago and an author of an unpublished paper that linked loans to rising tuition. In an email, Turner said it wasn't clear that 'the same level of nonfederal funding would be available today.' Because of inflation, she noted, the $150,000 limit for medical students is 'substantially reducing the amount these students can borrow, even compared to the status quo before the Grad PLUS program.' The program was started in 2006. Advertisement Robertson said schools could also help close the gap. 'Nothing in the bill prevents colleges from providing additional financial aid to low-income students pursuing medical school,' she said. That is not an option for schools of osteopathic medicine, most of which are private and not attached to universities with foundations, and which currently enroll almost one-third of the nation's future doctors, said David Bergman, senior vice president of government relations and health affairs for the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine. And many academic medical centers, which have lost millions of dollars in research grants abruptly pulled by the Trump administration, are facing severe financial strain. A vast majority of medical students rely on loans, not just those from low-income backgrounds, Bergman noted. Ending federal involvement in administering and subsidizing student loans was one of the goals laid out in Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation's conservative blueprint for overhauling the government. It argued that leaving student loans to private lenders and ending federal loan forgiveness programs would 'allow for market prices and signals to influence educational borrowing.' Trump's policy bill would allow medical residents to defer not only their loan payments but also the interest on those payments, a provision that many medical professionals have supported. But the legislation would prohibit residents from counting those low-paid years of training as public service, limiting their eligibility for a popular loan forgiveness program that encourages young doctors to work in underserved areas. As a result, 'access to much-needed medical care for patients in rural and underserved communities will be diminished,' the American Medical Association's CEO, Dr. James Madara, wrote in the letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson, Republican of Louisiana, and House Democratic leader Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York. Advertisement The changes will disproportionately affect low-income students with backgrounds that are underrepresented in medicine, who may face more difficulty obtaining private loans, said Dr. Virginia Caine, president of the National Medical Association, which represents Black physicians and which advocates for health equity. In turn, she said, it will limit those students' ability to return to serve in their communities. By 2037, the United States is expected to face a shortage of 187,130 physicians, including 87,150 primary care physicians such as internists and pediatricians who play a pivotal role in the early detection and management of chronic disease, according to the federal Health Resources and Services Administration. (There are currently 933,788 professionally active physicians.) About 75 million Americans live in areas where it is difficult to get access to primary care. The ratio of primary care providers is projected to decline to 76.8 per 100,000 people by 2037, from 81.6 per 100,000 in 2022. This article originally appeared in
Hamilton Spectator
10 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Canada plans huge boost in defence spending to hit NATO target by year's end, Carney says
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney tore up Canada's timelines for boosted military spending on Monday and replaced them with an aggressive pledge of $9.3 billion to finally hit Canada's long-standing commitment to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization within a year — half a decade faster than previously promised. The new funding is on top of $53.4 billion in already-expected defence spending in the current 2025-26 fiscal year, and will — among other things — boost military salaries, replace and repair aging equipment, and increase the ranks of the short-staffed Canadian Armed Forces, Carney said. It will also lift Canadian defence spending past the equivalent of two per cent of gross domestic product (GDP), the prime minister said, a threshold the country has failed to achieve since all NATO members agreed to meet it in 2014. Carney said his government would continue increasing defence spending even further as NATO prepares for a summit later this month, where leaders like U.S. President Donald Trump and the alliance's secretary general have forecast talks towards a new defence spending target of five per cent of GDP. In a speech at the University of Toronto on Monday, and later at a news conference at Fort York, Carney declared the new track to hit the NATO target is needed in a world made more dangerous by Russia's aggression in Ukraine, rising competition between great powers and a less reliable United States. Billions of new spending earmarked for the military over the past decade is 'still not close enough to face these mounting risks,' Carney said. 'The brave women and men who are protecting our sovereignty do not have the resources they need for a risker world,' he added, describing how only 'one of our four submarines is seaworthy' and 'less than half our maritime fleet and land vehicles are operational.' The Department of National Defence (DND) reported last year that 51 per cent of its maritime fleet, 56 per cent of its 'key land fleets' and 54 per cent of its air fleets met their definition for operational readiness in 2022-23. In the House of Commons, Conservative MP James Bezan accused the Liberals of 'breaking our military' through underinvestment, and charged that 'nobody believes them' when they talk of boosting defence spending. Jill McKnight, the Liberal veterans affairs minister, responded that defence spending fell below one per cent of GDP in 2014, when the Conservatives were in power. In recent years, Canada has come under intensifying political pressure to hit the NATO target. Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 prompted calls across the West to rapidly rearm with the return of Cold War-era tensions. Canadian military officials and the federal government have also pointed to China as a potential threat, especially in the Arctic, where the advance of climate change is widely expected to open trading routes and access to resources. Last summer, at the NATO summit in Washington, Canada came under fire from Republican politicians over its relatively low ratio of defence spending. As the Star reported at the time, the government arrived at the meetings without a clear plan to demonstrate how it would hit the NATO spending target. On the final day, then-prime minister Justin Trudeau promised Canada would achieve it by 2032, but did not provide details of how. He also criticized the idea of the spending target, dismissing it as a ' crass mathematical calculation ' that doesn't reflect Canada's true contribution to the military alliance. Trump has railed against NATO members he sees as taking advantage of the huge American military to spend less on their protection — criticism he has levied at Canada and European allies alike. On Monday, Carney repeated his pledges to deepen partnerships with like-minded democracies, including by seeking to participate in the European Union's defence industrial plan, ReArm Europe. He also said DND will 'immediately design a new defence policy' barely one year after it released the last one, which earmarked $8.1 billion in fresh spending over five years — less than the $9.3 billion in a single year that Carney unveiled Monday. The new spending includes $2.63 billion to help recruit and retain soldiers, as the CAF grapples with a persistent personnel shortfall of 13,000 it aims to overcome by 2030. It also includes $2.1 billion for a new 'defence industrial strategy' to build more munitions in Canada, and explore ways to development critical minerals, energy, and communications infrastructure the military needs, according to officials who briefed journalists. On top of that, the government pledged $2 billion to 'diversify' defence partnerships beyond the U.S., with money to be spent on new defence policy advisers who will be sent abroad as part of a diplomatic push, officials said. The $62.7 billion now expected for defence spending in the current fiscal year is mostly budgeted for DND, officials said, but also includes spending from 13 other government departments — like Veterans Affairs and Global Affairs Canada — that is counted toward the NATO target. The government also announced Monday that the Canadian Coast Guard will be used for some defence purposes. Officials said Monday that the government doesn't plan to arm Coast Guar boats, but will use the agency to boost the military's maritime surveillance, especially in the Arctic. Alluding to the ongoing trade war over Trump's tariffs, which Canada deems illegal and unjustified, Carney argued the rapid increase in defence spending is necessary in a world changing so dramatically. The once-reliable U.S., he said, is 'monetizing its hegemony' amidst other threats that require Canada to bolster its military. But Carney also said Monday that there is still room for Canada to deepen its military ties with the U.S., pointing to ballistic missile defence as a possible example. In recent weeks, Carney confirmed Canada is in talks with the U.S. to join Trump's $243-billion 'Golden Dome' missile defence system, although the government has not said how much money it might spend to do so. 'There are many, many reasons for very close, if not enhanced, co-operation between Canada and the United States,' Carney said. The prime minister also defended the new spending, which comes as the new Liberal minority government delays its first budget — normally presented each spring — until the fall sitting of Parliament. Carney said part of the reason to wait is for clarity on Canada's defence commitments. That will come up at this months' NATO summit in The Hague, where leaders are expected to agree to a new spending target. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte predicted the alliance will endorse a threshold of five per cent of GDP, with more than three per cent on 'hard' defence spending and the rest for 'defence-related' investments. Carney said Monday that he's confident Canada can get there, stating that defence industrial spending on areas like artificial intelligence, critical minerals and quantum computing are already 'in the zone' of 1.5 per cent of GDP. 'Defence, it literally is to keep our citizens secure, and we'll do what's needed,' he said.
