University lecturer loses RM172k in crypto & romance scams
According to New Straits Times, district police chief Assistant Commissioner Azli Mohd Noor revealed that the educator lost RM162,170 through a fraudulent cryptocurrency scheme and an additional RM10,000 in a romance-parcel scam.
The crypto fraud began when the victim connected with a Hong Kong-based woman through social media on July 15. She persuaded him to invest in digital currency through the 'cryptoproe' platform after several days of conversation.
Between July 19 and 25, the academic transferred funds from his Luno wallet to the fake investment platform across five separate transactions. His suspicions arose only when withdrawal attempts failed, with scammers demanding additional investments instead.
The second scam involved another woman named Elizabeth, whom he met on the same social platform on July 27. After developing an online romantic connection, she requested his home address to send a gift package.
Fraudsters posing as courier representatives then contacted the victim, demanding RM4,000 for delivery charges and claiming customs officials discovered cash in the parcel. Additional fees of RM8,500 were requested to resolve the customs issue.
The victim managed to pay RM6,000 before his bank's anti-fraud system flagged the recipient account during his attempt to transfer the remaining RM2,500 at an ATM.
Both incidents involved the academic's personal savings, with police reports filed yesterday evening and afternoon respectively. Investigations proceed under Section 420 of the Penal Code for fraud offenses.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
5 minutes ago
- The Star
Wahaha CEO's bank account frozen in HK
The Hong Kong High Court has frozen a bank account containing US$1.8bil amid a legal battle over the inheritance of the Zong Qinghou, late founder of China's leading beverage giant Hangzhou Wahaha Group. The defendant in the case is Zong's daughter and current Wahaha CEO Kelly Zong Fuli, who has been sued by Zong's three other children. The 42-page written judgment, delivered by Deputy High Court Judge Gary Lam Chin-ching on Friday, rules that Kelly Zong is prohibited from "withdrawing or encumbering" any asset from a Hong Kong Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) account owned by Jian Hao Ventures Limited, a company incorporated under British Virgin Islands law, pending the conclusion of a parallel lawsuit in a Hangzhou court or until further court orders. She is also required to disclose the latest balance of the HSBC account, the movements of assets inside, and a full account of receipts and disbursements of the HSBC account. The case has drawn significant public attention, with dozens of spectators, including journalists, law students and members of the public gathering outside the courtroom ahead of the scheduled public hearing. However, the proceeding lasted only a few minutes and was not open to the public, with just one party's representatives present to collect the court's decision. The plaintiffs — Jacky Zong, Jessie Zong Jieli and Jerry Zong Jisheng — allege that Kelly Zong breached a family agreement by failing to establish offshore trusts worth $2.1 billion for them after their father's death in February last year. They also claimed that at least $6 million for unknown purposes was transferred out of the HSBC account. Zong Qinghou was the sole director of Jian Hao Ventures Limited during his lifetime, with Kelly Zong succeeding him after his death. As of May 31, 2024, the company's HSBC Hong Kong account held $1.799 billion, consisting primarily of bonds and other fixed-income assets, along with some cash and term deposits. The trio therefore filed a lawsuit in the Hong Kong High Court last year seeking a court order banning Kelly Zong from disposing of or transferring assets held in the account. Wahaha stated on July 14 that the lawsuits do not affect its operations. The company reported a 40 percent surge in revenue last year under Kelly Zong's leadership, reaching 70 billion yuan ($9.7 billion). Born in 1945, Zong Qinghou founded Wahaha in 1987, a Hangzhou-based beverage company later grown into a commercial empire. Once the wealthiest individual on the Chinese mainland, Zong was long seen as a symbol of traditional family values. Kelly Zong, previously believed to be his only child, took over Wahaha after his death but briefly resigned five months later due to disagreements with shareholders. She later resumed her role as CEO following negotiations. - China Daily/ANN
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Cops seize drugs worth almost RM18mil in raid on KL house
KUALA LUMPUR: Police have seized RM17.78mil worth of drugs in a raid on a terrace house in Taman Sri Hartamas here. The syndicate involved is believed to have used the house to store the drugs before marketing them locally and overseas. A 30-year-old local man, suspected of being the syndicate's coordinator and transporter, was also detained in the July 29 raid, police said. Bukit Aman Narcotics Crime Investigation Department (NCID) director Comm Datuk Hussein Omar Khan said they seized 234kg of syabu and 205.7kg of ketamine, disguised in packages labelled as containing tea. "The drugs worth RM17.78mil could have been supplied to 1.8 million drug abusers," he told reporters at city police headquarters on Monday (Aug 4). The suspect was reportedly paid RM7,000 per trip to transport the drugs, he said. "We believe he made 10 trips before being caught. "The house was also rented by the syndicate for RM6,000 a month for a year," he added. Comm Hussein said initial investigations found that the syndicate has been active since June. "We believe the drugs seized had just arrived from a neighbouring country... by land," he said. He said the NCID planned and executed the operation within a month of receiving credible intelligence. "Given the amount of the drugs, the syndicate is huge with a good network overseas," he added. Comm Hussein said the NCID is tracking down remnants of the syndicate, including its head. "We also seized RM93,350 worth of the syndicate's assets, including two cars, three luxury watches and a mobile phone," he added. In another case, 42.3kg of ganja buds worth RM1.48mil have been seized, also on July 29, from an apartment in Kuchai Entrepreneurs Park. "We detained a local man along with a man and two women from Vietnam. "The local man was the syndicate's transporter and coordinator, while the foreign suspects arrived in Malaysia on July 8. "The Vietnamese women also worked as guest relations officers (GRO)," Comm Hussein said. The drugs seized were meant to be distributed in the Klang Valley and the syndicate is believed to have been active since last month, he added. Comm Hussein said the NCID would continue to combat the drug menace, but needs the cooperation of the public. "We urge anyone with information to contact the NCID hotline at 012-2087222," he said.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
What is judicial mercy, and how does it apply to Ong Beng Seng's case?
Both the defence and the prosecution noted that a fine in lieu of jail would be appropriate as Ong Beng Seng has advanced multiple myeloma, which is an incurable cancer. - ST/ANN SINGAPORE: Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng pleaded guilty to one count of abetting the obstruction of justice on Aug 4. Both the defence and the prosecution noted that a fine in lieu of jail would be appropriate as he has advanced multiple myeloma, which is an incurable cancer. His lawyers urged the court to exercise judicial mercy and impose a fine with no prison time. The prosecution did not object to this, noting that even if the court did not exercise judicial mercy, there was basis for it to consider Ong's ill-health as a mitigating factor for a significant reduction of sentence. ALSO READ: Singapore-based Malaysian billionaire Ong Beng Seng pleads guilty to abetting obstruction of justice in case linked to ex-minister Iswaran What is judicial mercy? Judicial mercy is the discretionary power of Singapore's courts to give a more lenient sentence because of exceptional mitigating circumstances. It has a high threshold, and so far has been exercised in only two types of situations. The first is where the offender is suffering from terminal illness. The second is where the offender is so ill that jail time would carry a high risk of endangering his or her life. The High Court previously said that when judicial mercy is exercised, the central consideration by the court is not the culpability of the offender. Instead, the sentence will be based on humanitarian considerations. These must outweigh public interests in punishing the offender for his crime. This is distinctly different from when ill-health is considered as a mitigating factor. The High Court said judicial mercy is to be invoked only sparingly. Previous cases where it was invoked saw no imprisonment, or a nominal period of imprisonment, or the statutory minimum. Difference between judicial mercy and ill-health as mitigating factor Judicial mercy has a higher threshold than ill-health as a mitigating factor. When judicial mercy is invoked, the main consideration for sentencing becomes one of humanity. When the courts pass sentences with ill-health considered as a mitigating factor, the central consideration is still the public interest in punishing one for the offence committed. The punishment would remain proportional to the offender's culpability, but may be reduced at the discretion of the court. The courts have exercised judicial mercy in cases where the offender has not long left to live or when prison time would pose a significant risk to the offender's life. Cancer-stricken woman In 2020, the court fined a woman S$5,000 (US$3,885) instead of jailing her for a week for contempt of court. The mother of two had breached court orders relating to divorce proceedings with her former husband. She had turned her children on him and harmed his reputation. The court granted judicial mercy, noting that the woman had stage 4 breast cancer, was using a wheelchair and weighed only 30kg. Six months to live In 2018, a man who managed a coffee shop had a three-week prison sentence cut to a S$250 fine after he was diagnosed with cancer and given six months to live. Lam Kim Heng, then 68, had tried to bribe a building inspection officer with a pack of cigarettes. But three weeks after sentencing, he found out he had acute myeloid leukaemia. The High Court granted judicial mercy when it heard his appeal about three months after the diagnosis. Former Tangs chairman's kidney scandal In 2008, then Tangs chairman Tang Wee Sung was jailed for a day and fined S$17,000 for attempting to buy a kidney. He suffered from multiple medical conditions, including end-stage renal disease. Tang had to undergo dialysis six days a week, and had extremely detailed checks, injections and medication daily. The court granted him judicial mercy. Tang underwent a kidney transplant in 2009 and died in 2022. Molester with nose cancer In 2006, a convicted molester was granted judicial mercy on appeal and had his original sentence of four months' jail and three strokes of the cane replaced with a S$5,000 fine. Chng Yew Chin, then 43, had molested his maid. But he appealed and a doctor told the court he could not be cured and had little time left. The court granted him judicial mercy, saying his cancer was a far harsher sentence that would kill him in the near future. - The Straits Times/ANN
