
When Older Renters Become First-Time Buyers
It was the fire in her Harlem rental building that galvanized Sandra Foley.
With her longtime apartment suddenly uninhabitable, Ms. Foley, a nanny, stayed with her employer for a few months, then with an aunt. And she began to rethink the future.
'Getting older, you know, I wanted to make sure I had something for myself later in life or when I retired,' said Ms. Foley, 60, who moved to New York from Trinidad more than 30 years ago. 'And I have a daughter, and I wanted to make sure that there was something left behind for her, too.'
Last year, she made her first home purchase — a one-bedroom co-op in Riverdale, the Bronx, in an all-cash deal for $170,000. While the monthly maintenance is more than she was paying in rent, 'It's worth it,' said Ms. Foley, who's in the process of renovating the kitchen. 'It's totally worth it because this is something I own.'
In 2024, the median age of first-time buyers in the United States was 38, according to data from the National Association of Realtors. Only 11 percent of buyers in the 55-to-64 demographic, and 6 percent of buyers in the 65-to-74 category, were first-timers.
Hesitant older buyers have all sorts of reasons to explain their hesitation, said Kathy Braddock, co-owner of Braddock and Purcell, a residential real estate consulting firm. They may be paying an unbeatable rent, or they may be comfortable where they are and don't want the hassle of relocating. They may not have the wherewithal for a down payment because they're saving for their children's college tuition. Or they may live in a big city where renting is the norm.
But there are just as many reasons longtime renters choose to take the plunge. Some have come into a bonus at work, vested stock or a family inheritance, and decide to invest the proceeds in real estate. Others are sick of writing rent checks with nothing in the way of equity to show for it. Then there are those who are bumping up against that most unattractive truth: They aren't getting any younger. 'Fifty, or 50-ish, is like the last exit,' Ms. Braddock said.' People think to themselves, 'if not now, when?'
And for many, she added, 'homeownership is still the American dream.'
It was never Kathleen Tolan's dream. An actor, playwright and professor, Ms. Tolan, now 74, came to New York City as a college student and began a long tenure as a renter, first in the East Village, later in Chelsea, and most recently in Carroll Gardens, Brooklyn, where the full floor of a brownstone (admittedly a narrow floor) was hers for $2,000 a month.
The apartment was lovely, with exposed brick and good light. The landlord was lovely too: He never raised the rent. 'It felt cozy and I thought, 'I'll never leave,'' recalled Ms. Tolan, who's divorced and has two adult daughters. 'I didn't feel any need to own.'
But that was before the landlord came to her and explained that he wanted the space back for his daughter and her growing family. Accordingly, Ms. Tolan began looking for a new place near Prospect Park, an area she knew and liked, but was stunned by the high rents.
'My mother died some years ago, and I realized I had enough money for a down payment on something,' Ms. Tolan said. 'I talked to a financial adviser, which was very grown-up of me, and he said it made sense for me to buy.'
At the suggestion of friends, she looked at two adjacent neighborhoods just south of the park: Kensington, then Ditmas Park — which is where she ended up, in a prewar one-bedroom co-op.
She was firm on a single issue: 'There had to be an elevator.'
It's one of the things that's often on the 'must have' list for older buyers. It may not be needed right away, but it will be crucial down the line. Stairs outside a building are also a consideration, 'as are the topography and logistics of managing a neighborhood,' said Peter Cohen, a licensed salesman at Brown Harris Stevens.
Elevator and all, Ms. Tolan hopes the one-bedroom apartment, which she bought for $540,000, will belong to her daughters someday. 'But I have a 30-year mortgage,' she said. 'It will be astounding if I pay it off.'
By law, a borrower's age must be irrelevant to a lender. 'Whether 25 or 55, applicants must meet set qualifications in the same core areas when it comes to home financing,' said Sam Lanfear, a senior vice president at Tomo, a mortgage lender.
Still, buyers over 50 may have an advantage over younger ones. 'They've had more time to establish both a long credit history and to accumulate savings,' Mr. Lanfear said. 'That could make it easier for them to qualify in general, and also to get financing with better terms.'
Ronell Mitchell, a 56-year-old father of two and a lifelong renter in Harlem, the Bronx and Queens, always wanted to own a place. He attended numerous seminars and classes on the ins and outs of home buying before he took the leap of faith.
'It just felt like a lot of talk about regulations and loopholes,' said Mr. Mitchell, who owns a retail clothing business. 'I think that's what kept me on the sidelines for so long. But the desire was always there. I understood that it was a way to create generational wealth. If something happened to me, I'd have something to leave to my kids.'
A helpful mortgage lender helped ease Mr. Mitchell off the sidelines. Because he had fond memories of apple-picking trips to Connecticut with a favorite elementary schoolteacher, he focused on properties in Bridgeport, Waterbury and Hartford.
Late last year, Mr. Mitchell closed on a three-bedroom townhouse in Hartford for $185,000. 'It's like I was in a football league for 20 years and never won a championship, and then all of a sudden I'm the MVP and also have a Super Bowl ring,' he said. 'That's what buying feels like.'
His monthly mortgage payment is $1,600 — $300 less than he'd most recently been paying in rent. Should he have bought 20 years ago? Ten years ago? Think of all the money he could have saved. But that's just not how he likes to look at things.
'I always tell people we can't argue about when blessings arise,' he said. 'I would rather it happened now than to have it never happen at all.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Form 8.5 (EPT/RI)-Craneware plc
FORM 8.5 (EPT/RI) PUBLIC DEALING DISCLOSURE BY AN EXEMPT PRINCIPAL TRADER WITH RECOGNISED INTERMEDIARY STATUS DEALING IN A CLIENT-SERVING CAPACITY Rule 8.5 of the Takeover Code (the 'Code') 1. KEY INFORMATION (a) Name of exempt principal trader: Investec Bank plc (b) Name of offeror/offeree in relation to whose relevant securities this form relates: Use a separate form for each offeror/offeree Craneware plc (c) Name of the party to the offer with which exempt principal trader is connected: Investec is Joint Broker to Craneware plc (d) Date dealing undertaken: 10th June 2025 (e) In addition to the company in 1(b) above, is the exempt principal trader making disclosures in respect of any other party to this offer? If it is a cash offer or possible cash offer, state 'N/A' N/A 2. DEALINGS BY THE EXEMPT PRINCIPAL TRADER Where there have been dealings in more than one class of relevant securities of the offeror or offeree named in 1(b), copy table 2(a), (b), (c) or (d) (as appropriate) for each additional class of relevant security dealt in. The currency of all prices and other monetary amounts should be stated. (a) Purchases and sales Class of relevant security Purchases/ sales Total number of securities Highest price per unit paid/received Lowest price per unit paid/received Ordinary shares Purchases 3,408 2090 1975 Ordinary shares Sales 1000 2090 2090 (b) Cash-settled derivative transactions Class of relevant security Product description e.g. CFD Nature of dealing e.g. opening/closing a long/short position, increasing/reducing a long/short position Number of reference securities Price per unit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (c) Stock-settled derivative transactions (including options) (i) Writing, selling, purchasing or varying Class of relevant security Product description e.g. call option Writing, purchasing, selling, varying etc. Number of securities to which option relates Exercise price per unit Type e.g. American, European etc. Expiry date Option money paid/ received per unit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (ii) Exercise Class of relevant security Product description e.g. call option Exercising/ exercised against Number of securities Exercise price per unit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (d) Other dealings (including subscribing for new securities) Class of relevant security Nature of dealing e.g. subscription, conversion Details Price per unit (if applicable) N/A N/A N/A N/A 3. OTHER INFORMATION (a) Indemnity and other dealing arrangements Details of any indemnity or option arrangement, or any agreement or understanding, formal or informal, relating to relevant securities which may be an inducement to deal or refrain from dealing entered into by the exempt principal trader making the disclosure and any party to the offer or any person acting in concert with a party to the offer: Irrevocable commitments and letters of intent should not be included. If there are no such agreements, arrangements or understandings, state 'none' None (b) Agreements, arrangements or understandings relating to options or derivatives Details of any agreement, arrangement or understanding, formal or informal, between the exempt principal trader making the disclosure and any other person relating to: (i) the voting rights of any relevant securities under any option; or (ii) the voting rights or future acquisition or disposal of any relevant securities to which any derivative is referenced: If there are no such agreements, arrangements or understandings, state 'none' None Date of disclosure: 11th June 2025 Contact name: Priyali Bhattacharjee Telephone number: +91 9768034903 Public disclosures under Rule 8 of the Code must be made to a Regulatory Information Service. The Panel's Market Surveillance Unit is available for consultation in relation to the Code's dealing disclosure requirements on +44 (0)20 7638 0129. The Code can be viewed on the Panel's website at in to access your portfolio

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Form 8.5 (EPT/RI)- De La Rue plc
FORM 8.5 (EPT/RI) PUBLIC DEALING DISCLOSURE BY AN EXEMPT PRINCIPAL TRADER WITH RECOGNISED INTERMEDIARY STATUS DEALING IN A CLIENT-SERVING CAPACITY Rule 8.5 of the Takeover Code (the 'Code') 1. KEY INFORMATION (a) Name of exempt principal trader: Investec Bank plc (b) Name of offeror/offeree in relation to whose relevant securities this form relates: Use a separate form for each offeror/offeree De La Rue plc (c) Name of the party to the offer with which exempt principal trader is connected: Investec is Joint Broker to De La Rue plc (d) Date dealing undertaken: 10th June 2025 (e) In addition to the company in 1(b) above, is the exempt principal trader making disclosures in respect of any other party to this offer? If it is a cash offer or possible cash offer, state 'N/A' N/A 2. DEALINGS BY THE EXEMPT PRINCIPAL TRADER Where there have been dealings in more than one class of relevant securities of the offeror or offeree named in 1(b), copy table 2(a), (b), (c) or (d) (as appropriate) for each additional class of relevant security dealt in. The currency of all prices and other monetary amounts should be stated. (a) Purchases and sales Class of relevant security Purchases/ sales Total number of securities Highest price per unit paid/received Lowest price per unit paid/received Ordinary shares Purchases 43,810 129.1 129.1 (b) Cash-settled derivative transactions Class of relevant security Product description e.g. CFD Nature of dealing e.g. opening/closing a long/short position, increasing/reducing a long/short position Number of reference securities Price per unit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (c) Stock-settled derivative transactions (including options) (i) Writing, selling, purchasing or varying Class of relevant security Product description e.g. call option Writing, purchasing, selling, varying etc. Number of securities to which option relates Exercise price per unit Type e.g. American, European etc. Expiry date Option money paid/ received per unit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (ii) Exercise Class of relevant security Product description e.g. call option Exercising/ exercised against Number of securities Exercise price per unit N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A (d) Other dealings (including subscribing for new securities) Class of relevant security Nature of dealing e.g. subscription, conversion Details Price per unit (if applicable) N/A N/A N/A N/A 3. OTHER INFORMATION (a) Indemnity and other dealing arrangements Details of any indemnity or option arrangement, or any agreement or understanding, formal or informal, relating to relevant securities which may be an inducement to deal or refrain from dealing entered into by the exempt principal trader making the disclosure and any party to the offer or any person acting in concert with a party to the offer: Irrevocable commitments and letters of intent should not be included. If there are no such agreements, arrangements or understandings, state 'none' None (b) Agreements, arrangements or understandings relating to options or derivatives Details of any agreement, arrangement or understanding, formal or informal, between the exempt principal trader making the disclosure and any other person relating to: (i) the voting rights of any relevant securities under any option; or (ii) the voting rights or future acquisition or disposal of any relevant securities to which any derivative is referenced: If there are no such agreements, arrangements or understandings, state 'none' None Date of disclosure: 11th June 2025 Contact name: Priyali Bhattacharjee Telephone number: +91 9768034903 Public disclosures under Rule 8 of the Code must be made to a Regulatory Information Service. The Panel's Market Surveillance Unit is available for consultation in relation to the Code's dealing disclosure requirements on +44 (0)20 7638 0129. The Code can be viewed on the Panel's website at in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump-Musk fight reveals fragility of relationship between Silicon Valley and White House
The falling out between President Trump and Elon Musk is just the latest reminder that the relationship between the new White House and the titans of technology has turned out to be complicated. The CEO of Tesla (TSLA) was among several big names from Silicon Valley awarded prime seats for the president's Jan. 20 Capitol inauguration, alongside Meta (META) CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook, Amazon (AMZN) chair Jeff Bezos, and Google (GOOG) CEO Sundar Pichai. In the five months since, the president has either confronted all of their companies in court or applied pressure on those firms with his own words. Musk and Trump made their break official last week in a series of social media posts that featured insults and threats hurled by both men. The other executives and their companies had already been grappling with a tougher-than-expected stance on their industry. Zuckerberg, for example, was not able to convince Trump to stop an antitrust trial against Meta from going forward this spring. The president has since threatened Cook's Apple with 25% duties on overseas-made iPhones and criticized the iPhone maker's ramped-up production in India. Meanwhile, the company is defending against an antitrust lawsuit led by the Justice Department, filed during President Joe Biden's administration. Trump's Justice Department has also pushed ahead with a Biden-era recommendation for a judge to break up Pichai's Google empire. Trump even called Bezos to complain about Amazon after it was reported that the online retail giant was considering displaying the cost of tariffs next to prices on its site. Trump said Bezos "solved the problem very quickly.' Yet Amazon still faces a lawsuit from Trump's Federal Trade Commission that is due to start in February 2027. The FTC, which brought the case during Biden's term in office, told a judge in the spring that it needed to push the original October 2026 trial date due to Amazon's litigation delays. One of the biggest questions facing the tech world as Trump took office was how aggressive Trump's antitrust enforcers would be following four years of a Biden administration marked by legal fights with many of Silicon Valley's biggest names. By sustaining many of these cases and probes against Big Tech, Trump has parted ways with traditional Republican-style enforcement, legal experts say. "This isn't the Bush administration," Trump's FTC chair Andrew Ferguson told a group of American CEOs this spring in Washington, D.C., referring to one of the weakest US antitrust enforcement periods in modern history. Case Western Reserve University School of Law professor Anat Alon-Beck expects the Trump administration will continue to rein in Big Tech, especially given bipartisan support for the idea that Big Tech currently has too much power. There have been some positive developments for the tech firms too. Big Tech has gained the benefit of a relaxed regulatory environment, especially in the industry of artificial intelligence, making fundraising and complying with securities laws easier. In an executive order titled 'Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence,' the president rescinded Biden's executive order on AI safety and directed federal agencies to remove regulatory obstacles to US global AI dominance. "So they have to take what they can get from the current administration," Alon-Beck said. One tech giant that does have an early win from Trump is Microsoft. President Trump's antitrust cops ended what had become an uphill government effort to unwind Microsoft's (MSFT) $69 billion acquisition of video game maker Activision Blizzard that also began during the Biden administration. The decision came when the FTC voluntarily dropped a lawsuit that Biden's FTC boss, Lina Khan, first filed against the tie-up in December 2022. But Microsoft may not emerge unscathed, either. Bloomberg has reported that Trump officials at the FTC are also broadening a probe into Microsoft and its relationship with AI upstart OpenAI ( The probe was first launched by Khan, a key architect of a new movement seeking to expand the legal theories that can give rise to antitrust claims. In June of last year, multiple news organizations reported that the probe also involved a DOJ investigation into chipmaker Nvidia's (NVDA) competitive conduct. The probe was to address concerns over the company's dominance in the market for microprocessors that power AI. The Trump administration has not indicated it has dropped the investigation. And in April, Nvidia said in a regulatory filing that the president had kept in place Biden's export restrictions on the company's H20 AI chips to China. As for Musk, Trump this past weekend said he had no desire to repair the relationship, which he said was over. He warned there would be 'serious consequences' if Mr. Musk financed candidates to run against Republicans who voted in favor of the president's domestic policy bill. But on Monday, Trump made some conciliatory comments about Musk and Tesla. "I'd have no problem with it," Trump said at a White House event on Monday when asked if he would be willing to speak with Musk. "I'd imagine he wants to speak with me." He added, "I wish him well, very well actually." Wedbush technology analyst Dan Ives wrote in a note on Monday that he doesn't expect Trump and Musk to fully patch their soured relationship but would not be surprised if it improved in the months ahead. At the end of the day, Ives wrote, "Trump needs Musk to stay close to the Republican party and Musk needs Trump for many reasons," including a federal framework for autonomous vehicles. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data