logo
NC House begins advancing GOP budget, with votes set for next week. Here's what's in it.

NC House begins advancing GOP budget, with votes set for next week. Here's what's in it.

Yahoo15-05-2025

North Carolina Legislative Building (Photo: Galen Bacharier/NC Newsline)
Republicans in the North Carolina House began unveiling their plan for the state budget Thursday, laying out a spending proposal separate from the Senate's in a series of committee meetings.
Senate Republicans approved their own version of the budget weeks ago, sending it to the House. But as is standard practice, the House will pass a budget of its own, requiring budget writers from both chambers to sit down and hammer out a compromise.
Rep. Donny Lambeth (R-Forsyth), a lead House budget writer, remarked that the proposal developed by him and his GOP colleagues was 'better than the Senate's.' But he said concerns about the national landscape, as well as a busy few weeks that also included the 'crossover' deadline, complicated matters.
'Are there cuts in here that I don't like?' Lambeth said. 'Absolutely. But we're up against a really challenging time economically … we've just had to balance out a lot of priorities.'
The rapid process Thursday drew frustration from Democrats, who did not have access to the budget's hundreds of pages until just prior to committee hearings. And their ability to amend the budget was limited by a series of watertight legislative rules that prevented almost all substantive changes.
'With respect, we should really have more time — at least a day,' said Rep. Phil Rubin (D-Wake).
Early next week, larger committees will approve the budget before it heads to the full floor for debate.
The House budget is widely expected to include raises to teachers, principals and school staff, much like the Senate's. But the specifics of those raises aren't yet known; details will come next week.
Lawmakers have debated different variations on cell phone restrictions for K-12 classrooms this session. A version is included in the House education budget that would require all districts to eliminate or severely restrict phone access.
School boards would also be required to adopt guidance for policing how students can access the internet. They would be limited to 'age-appropriate subject matter,' and wouldn't be able to access social media through school-provided internet.
And $10 million would be earmarked yearly to train teachers on the 'science of reading,' a method for teaching literacy in schools championed by the last two state Republican superintendents.
The UNC System would be hit with funding reductions — $61 million in the first year of the budget, and $69 million in the second. The Board of Governors would be asked to prioritize cuts to the system office and systemwide initiatives before making cuts to individual campuses.
Tuition rates would also likely go up. Lawmakers are asking the system to generate at least $30 million from tuition in new revenue in fiscal year 2026-27. The system has not raised tuition in nine years.
On the chopping block under the House's budget for the Department of Health and Human Services is the Office of Health Equity.
The office, which describes itself as working to 'eliminate health disparities,' is eliminated under the plan. Legislative staff said the cut would mean the removal of three full-time positions, and save around $3.2 million.
Lawmakers are also aiming to cut long-empty positions, tasking HHS with cutting $10 million worth of vacant roles. That would roughly equate to 200 cut positions.
The state's expanded Medicaid program would also see major changes under the budget.
Like the Senate version, House lawmakers are moving to attach work requirements to Medicaid coverage. House Republicans in Washington are working to include similar requirements in the federal budget.
The budget would also end coverage of weight management drugs like Ozempic and Wegovy for Medicaid enrollees.
And the House plan takes a slightly different tack than the Senate on child care, but still aims to increase the subsidy reimbursement rate.
The House declined to follow the Senate's lead in eliminating the Innocence Inquiry Commission, which investigates post-trial claims of actual innocence. Instead, it proposes to rename the program to the 'Postconviction Review Commission.'
Budget writers in the House are also proposing to make the State Bureau of Investigation an independent agency, removing it from the purview of the Department of Public Safety. Lawmakers made a similar move with the highway patrol last year — a measure currently being challenged in court.
Republicans are also making a number of changes to judgeships — removing them from some counties and adding them to others. Those changes drew Democratic opposition, with Rep. Marcia Morey (D-Durham) filing an unsuccessful amendment to reverse the removal of a judge from her district.
The House budget also amps up funding for the Center for Safer Schools, providing $50 million in school safety grants. The Senate plan allotted $35 million.
Like teacher pay, details on raises for state workers — which are expected to be higher than in the Senate's budget — were not included in the draft budget Thursday.
North Carolina's State Board of Elections would see major changes under the House plan. It creates seven new 'exempt' (politically protected) staff positions for the board, a $1.5 million litigation fund for the hiring of private attorneys and $2 million to move the board into the same building that houses the state auditor's office.
The board recently came under new, Republican-appointed leadership after the legislature passed a law shifting governance of the board to Dave Boliek, the Republican state auditor. Amendments offered by Rubin, a Democrat, to remove or delay the provisions were shot down by Republicans.
The House is also proposing a new self-insurance system for state agencies, designed to replace a current system to protect state property. It would cost $200 million.
House budget writers also included a laundry list of bills introduced this session to adopt new state symbols, including a state star, cookie and television show. And they set aside money to keep the legislative building's snack bar open later than usual when lawmakers remain in session.
As has been the pattern for several years under Republican legislative leadership, the House proposal targets the Department of Environmental Quality for cuts to funding and programming
Among other things, the proposal would eliminate the Office of Environmental Education, three positions assigned to the Environmental Justice initiative, and four positions in the Facilities and Health Services and Public Information Office sections. The proposal also axes funding used to support a pathologist position at North Carolina State University's Center for Marine Sciences and Technology.
In contrast, the Department of Natural and Cultural Resources would realize some modest funding increases. This includes exhibit updates at state historic sites, as well as positions and operating costs for the expanded visitor center and grounds at Fort Fisher State Historic Site and North Carolina Transportation Museum.
The budget allows funding to add a conservator, a museum park director, and a curator of Judaic art at the North Carolina Museum of Art, as well as additional funds for the North Carolina Symphony.
The proposal also proposes more funding for costs associated with renovating and expanding the Fort Fisher Aquarium, and the new Asia complex at the North Carolina Zoo.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amid backlash, Tesla remained resilient in Texas
Amid backlash, Tesla remained resilient in Texas

Axios

time21 minutes ago

  • Axios

Amid backlash, Tesla remained resilient in Texas

Even as Tesla deliveries plunged nationally this year amid Elon Musk's very visible (if short-lived) alliance with President Trump, there was at least one state where Tesla registrations were up: Texas. Why it matters: The registration data, obtained by Axios through public information requests, indicates loyalty to the brand in its home base, including Texas' large urban and suburban counties. The depth of conservatives' enthusiasm for Musk's automobiles now faces a major test amid the absolute meltdown last week between the Tesla CEO and the president. By the numbers: Texans registered 12,918 new Teslas in the first three months of 2025, a period when Musk, who contributed more than $250 million to a pro-Trump super PAC during the 2024 election campaign, was enmeshed in the Trump administration as the overseer of DOGE, the president's cost-cutting initiative. Over the same period in 2024, Texans registered 10,679 Teslas. That's a 21% increase year over year. The intrigue: The spike in Texas registrations came as Tesla was flailing elsewhere. Tesla's vehicle deliveries plunged 13% globally in the first quarter of 2025 (336,681 electric vehicles) compared with Q1 2024 (386,810). Tesla vehicles were torched at showrooms and the brand's reputation cratered. Zoom in: Tesla saw year-over-year improvements in its sales in some of the most populous Texas counties. In Travis County, new Tesla registrations grew from 1,369 in the first quarter of 2024 to 1,424 during the first quarter of 2025. In Harris County, they grew from 1,526 to 1,837 during the same period. Tesla registration grew from 1,316 to 1,546 in Collin County and from 990 to 1,146 in Dallas County. In Bexar County, registrations grew from 631 to 664. What they're saying:"It's homegrown pride," is how Matt Holm, president and founder of the Tesla Owners Club of Austin, explains the car company's resilience to Axios. "And regardless of all the drama going on these days, people can differentiate between the product and everything else going on, and it's just a great product." "Elon has absolutely and irreversibly blown up bridges to some potential customers," says Alexander Edwards, president of California-based research firm Strategic Vision, which has long surveyed the motivations of car buyers. "People who bought Teslas for environmental friendliness, that's pretty much gone," Edwards tells Axios. Yes, but: The company had been enjoying an increasingly positive reputation among more conservative consumers. Musk was viewed favorably by 80% of Texas Republicans polled by the Texas Politics Project in April — and unfavorably by 83% of Democrats. In what now feels like a political lifetime ago, Trump himself even promoted Teslas by promising to buy one in support of Musk earlier this year. "In some pockets, like Austin, you have that tech group that loves what Tesla has to offer, can do some mental gymnastics about Musk, and looks at Rivian and says that's not what I want or might be priced out," Edwards says. Between the lines:"Being in the state of Texas, you're naturally conditioned to think you're better than everyone else in the U.S. And when you buy a Tesla" — a status symbol — "that's what you're saying. It doesn't surprise me that there's an increase in sales" in Texas, Edwards says. Plus: Tesla's resilience in Texas could have practical reasons as well, Edwards says. Texas homes — as opposed to, say, apartments in cities on the East Coast — are more likely to have a garage to charge a car in, he adds. What's next: Musk said late last month that Tesla was experiencing a "major rebound in demand" — without providing specifics. But that was before things went absolutely haywire with Trump and Tesla stock took a bath last week.

Colombian presidential candidate in a critical condition following assassination attempt
Colombian presidential candidate in a critical condition following assassination attempt

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Colombian presidential candidate in a critical condition following assassination attempt

BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) — Miguel Uribe, a conservative Colombian presidential hopeful, was in critical condition on Monday after being shot in the head from close range during a rally at the weekend. In a statement, doctors said the 39-year-old senator had 'barely' responded to medical interventions, that included brain surgery, following the assassination attempt that has had a chilling effect on the South American nation. Uribe was shot on Saturday as he addressed a small crowd of people who had gathered in a park in Bogota's Modelia neighborhood. On Sunday hundreds of people gathered outside the hospital where Uribe is being treated to pray for his recovery. Some carried rosaries in their hands, while others chanted slogans against President Gustavo Petro. 'This is terrible' said Walter Jimenez a lawyer who showed up outside the hospital, with a sign calling for Petro's removal. 'It feels like we are going back to the 1990's,' he said, referring to a decade during which drug cartels and rebel groups murdered judges, presidential candidates and journalists with impunity. Petro has condemned the attack and urged his opponents to not use it for political ends. But some Colombians have also asked the president to tone down his rhetoric against opposition leaders. The assassination attempt has stunned the nation, with many politicians describing it as the latest sign of how security has deteriorated in Colombia, where the government is struggling to control violence in rural and urban areas, despite a 2016 peace deal with the nation's largest rebel group. The attack on Uribe comes amid growing animosity between Petro and the Senate over blocked reforms to the nation's labor laws. Petro has organized protests in favor of the reforms, where he has delivered fiery speeches referring to opposition leaders as 'oligarchs' and 'enemies of the people." 'There is no way to argue that the president… who describes his opponents as enemies of the people, paramilitaries and assassins has no responsibility in this' Andres Mejia, a prominent political analyst, wrote on X. The Attorney General's office said a 15-year-old boy was arrested at the scene of the attack against Uribe. Videos captured on social media show a suspect shooting at Uribe from close range. The suspect was injured in the leg and was recovering at another clinic, authorities said. Defense Minister Pedro Sánchez added that over 100 officers are investigating the attack. On Monday, Colombia's Attorney General Luz Adriana Camargo said that minors in Colombia face sentences of up to eight years in detention for committing murders. Camargo acknowledged that lenient sentences have encouraged armed groups to recruit minors to commit crimes. However, she said that Colombian law also considers that minors who are recruited by armed groups are victims, and is trying to protect them. 'As a society we need to reflect on why a minor is getting caught up in a network of assassins, and what we can do to stop this from happening in the future' she said.

This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market
This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market

Dario Amodei, CEO of the artificial intelligence company Anthropic, published a guest essay in The New York Times Thursday arguing against a proposed 10-year moratorium on state AI regulation. Amodei argues that a patchwork of regulations would be better than no regulation whatsoever. Skepticism is warranted whenever the head of an incumbent firm calls for more regulation, and this case is no different. If Amodei gets his way, Anthropic would face less competition—to the detriment of AI innovation, AI security, and the consumer. Amodei's op-ed came in a response to a provision of the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which would prevent any states, cities, and counties from enforcing any regulation that specifically targets AI models, AI systems, or automated decision systems for 10 years. Senate Republicans have amended the clause from a simple requirement to a condition for receiving federal broadband funds, in order to comply with the Byrd Rule, which in Politico's words "blocks anything but budgetary issues from inclusion in reconciliation." Amodei begins by describing how, in a recent stress test conducted at his company, a chatbot threatened an experimenter to forward evidence of his adultery to his wife unless he withdrew plans to shut the AI down. The CEO also raises more tangible concerns, such as reports that a version of Google's Gemini model is "approaching a point where it could help people carry out cyberattacks." Matthew Mittelsteadt, a technology fellow at the Cato Institute, tells Reason that the stress test was "very contrived" and that "there are no AI systems where you must prompt it to turn it off." You can just turn it off. He also acknowledges that, while there is "a real cybersecurity danger [of] AI being used to spot and exploit cyber-vulnerabilities, it can also be used to spot and patch" them. Outside of cyberspace and in, well, actual space, Amodei sounds the alarm that AI could acquire the ability "to produce biological and other weapons." But there's nothing new about that: Knowledge and reasoning, organic or artificial—ultimately wielded by people in either case—can be used to cause problems as well as to solve them. An AI that can model three-dimensional protein structures to create cures for previously untreatable diseases can also create virulent, lethal pathogens. Amodei recognizes the double-edged nature of AI and says voluntary model evaluation and publication are insufficient to ensure that benefits outweigh costs. Instead of a 10-year moratorium, Amodei calls on the White House and Congress to work together on a transparency standard for AI companies. In lieu of federal testing standards, Amodei says state laws should pick up the slack without being "overly prescriptive or burdensome." But that caveat is exactly the kind of wishful thinking Amodei indicts proponents of the moratorium for: Not only would 50 state transparency laws be burdensome, says Mittelsteadt, but they could "actually make models less legible." Neil Chilson of the Abundance Institute also inveighed against Amodei's call for state-level regulation, which is much more onerous than Amodei suggests. "The leading state proposals…include audit requirements, algorithmic assessments, consumer disclosures, and some even have criminal penalties," Chilson tweeted, so "the real debate isn't 'transparency vs. nothing,' but 'transparency-only federal floor vs. intrusive state regimes with audits, liability, and even criminal sanctions.'" Mittelsteadt thinks national transparency regulation is "absolutely the way to go." But how the U.S. chooses to regulate AI might not have much bearing on Skynet-doomsday scenarios, because, while America leads the way in AI, it's not the only player in the game. "If bad actors abroad create Amodei's theoretical 'kill everyone bot,' no [American] law will matter," says Mittelsteadt. But such a law can "stand in the way of good actors using these tools for defense." Amodei is not the only CEO of a leading AI company to call for regulation. In 2023, Sam Altman, co-founder and then-CEO of Open AI, called on lawmakers to consider "intergovernmental oversight mechanisms and standard-setting" of AI. In both cases and in any others that come along, the public should beware of calls for AI regulation that will foreclose market entry, protect incumbent firms' profits from being bid away by competitors, and reduce the incentives to maintain market share the benign way: through innovation and product differentiation. The post This AI Company Wants Washington To Keep Its Competitors Off the Market appeared first on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store