logo
Israel rejects UN allegations that its forces have sexually abused detained Palestinians

Israel rejects UN allegations that its forces have sexually abused detained Palestinians

Independent20 hours ago
The U.N. chief warned Israel that the United Nations has 'credible information' of sexual violence and other violations by Israeli forces against detained Palestinians, which Israel's U.N. ambassador dismissed as 'baseless accusations.'
Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in a letter to Ambassador Danny Danon that he is 'gravely concerned' about reported violations against Palestinians by Israeli military and security forces in several prisons, a detention center and a military base.
Guterres said he was putting Israeli forces on notice that they could be listed as abusers in his next report on sexual violence in conflict 'due to significant concerns of patterns of certain forms of sexual violence that have been consistently documented by the United Nations.'
Danon, who circulated the letter and his response Tuesday, said the allegations 'are steeped in biased publications.'
'The U.N. must focus on the shocking war crimes and sexual violence of Hamas and the release of all hostages,' he said.
Danon was referring to the militant group's surprise attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, where some 1,200 people were killed and about 250 taken hostage. Israeli authorities said women were raped and sexually abused.
The Hamas attack triggered the ongoing war in Gaza, which has killed more than 61,400 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not say how many were fighters or civilians but that about half were women and children.
Danon stressed that 'Israel will not shy away from protecting its citizens and will continue to act in accordance with international law.'
Because Israel has denied access to U.N. monitors, it has been 'challenging to make a definitive determination' about patterns, trends and the systematic use of sexual violence by its forces, Guterres said in the letter.
He urged Israel's government 'to take the necessary measures to ensure immediate cessation of all acts of sexual violence, and make and implement specific time-bound commitments.'
The secretary-general said these should include investigations of credible allegations, clear orders and codes of conduct for military and security forces that prohibit sexual violence, and unimpeded access for U.N. monitors.
In March, U.N.-backed human rights experts accused Israel of 'the systematic use of sexual, reproductive and other gender-based violence.'
The Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory said it documented a range of violations perpetrated against Palestinian women, men, girls and boys and accused Israeli security forces of rape and sexual violence against Palestinian detainees.
At the time, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lashed out at the U.N. Human Rights Council, which commissioned the team of independent experts, as an 'anti-Israel circus' that 'has long been exposed as an antisemitic, rotten, terrorist-supporting, and irrelevant body.' His statement did not address the findings themselves.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

TIFF pulls documentary on 2023 Hamas attack from festival lineup, citing footage rights issue
TIFF pulls documentary on 2023 Hamas attack from festival lineup, citing footage rights issue

The Independent

time26 minutes ago

  • The Independent

TIFF pulls documentary on 2023 Hamas attack from festival lineup, citing footage rights issue

The Toronto International Film Festival has pulled from its lineup a documentary on Hamas ' 2023 attack into Israel over what the festival says was a footage rights issue. Organizers for the festival acknowledged Tuesday that they withdrew Canadian filmmaker Barry Avrich's 'The Road Between Us: The Ultimate Rescue' after initially offering the film a spot in the upcoming edition of TIFF. The film chronicles the story of retired Israeli Gen. Noam Tibon, whose efforts to save his family and others during the Oct. 7, 2023 attack was profiled in a '60 Minutes' segment. Representatives for the festival said in a statement that the film's invitation 'was withdrawn by TIFF because general requirements for inclusion in the festival, and conditions that were requested when the film was initially invited, were not met, including legal clearance of all footage.' 'The purpose of the requested conditions was to protect TIFF from legal implications and to allow TIFF to manage and mitigate anticipated and known risks around the screening of a film about highly sensitive subject matter, including potential threat of significant disruption,' the festival said. The filmmakers, though, say the festival is engaging in 'censorship' by denying the film a place in the festival. 'We are shocked and saddened that a venerable film festival has defied its mission and censored its own programming by refusing this film," the filmmaking team said in a statement. 'Ultimately, film is an art form that stimulates debate from every perspective that can both entertain us and make us uncomfortable.' Deadline, which first reported the news, reported that a sticking point related to the identification and legal clearance of Hamas militants' own livestreaming of the attack. Festival organizers didn't respond to requests for further comment Wednesday. The filmmakers pledged to release the film regardless: 'We invite audiences, broadcasters and streamers to make up their own mind, once they have seen it.' The Toronto International Film Festival has sometimes prompted headlines over its selections. Last year, it canceled screenings of 'Russians at War,' a documentary about Russian soldiers in the war with Ukraine. Protesters in Toronto called the film Russian propaganda. After the festival paused screenings due to 'significant threats,' 'Russians at War' was quietly screened toward the end of the festival. The 50th Toronto International Film Festival runs Sept. 4–14.

A simple formula to stop small boats
A simple formula to stop small boats

The Guardian

time27 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

A simple formula to stop small boats

It appears that successive governments are able only to formulate key policies in the form of three-word phrases, usually absent of an executive subject. While I welcome the shift in focus represented by the switch from boats to gangs, it is surely evident that this is still only addressing the symptom, not the cause. Most of those arriving in small boats have come from countries either torn by ongoing conflict or ravaged by past conflict. To use the idiom of government, we need to stop the cause, stop the MulhollandGoldsithney, Cornwall Surely the fact that 'More than 50,000 people have crossed Channel in small boats since Labour took power' (12 August) must show that the country is worth living in?Helen KeatingGatehouse of Fleet, Dumfries and Galloway With all the terrible news connected with Gaza, I was gulping to stop tears while reading the final message of the Al Jazeera reporter Anas al-Sharif ('If these words reach you … Israel has succeeded in killing me': the last words of a journalist killed in Gaza. 11 August).His article touched me as no other. I am not religious, but his love shines through all the pain and terror he has MazumdarGalmpton, Devon When journalists are bombed for reporting what they observe, the only conclusion we can draw is that truth has become the enemy (Global outrage mounts as funeral held for five journalists killed by Israel, 11 August).Pete LavenderWoodthorpe, Nottinghamshire Good Friday is always a non-gardening day in Maria Thun's biodynamic gardening calendar (Letters, 11 August).Stephen BowdenSt Cyr les Colons, France Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

IHRA definition of antisemitism has long been a target in anti-Zionist campaigns
IHRA definition of antisemitism has long been a target in anti-Zionist campaigns

The Guardian

time31 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

IHRA definition of antisemitism has long been a target in anti-Zionist campaigns

In his open letter to the acting president of Columbia University (I spent decades at Columbia. I'm withdrawing my fall course due to its deal with Trump, 1 August), Rashid Khalidi announces that he will not teach his scheduled course in the fall term, 'specifically […] in light of Columbia's adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism'. The IHRA definition, Khalidi explains, 'deliberately, mendaciously and disingenuously conflates Jewishness with Israel, so that any criticism of Israel, or indeed description of Israeli policies, becomes a criticism of Jews'. The IHRA is an intergovernmental body with a mandate to address contemporary challenges related to the Holocaust and genocide of the Roma. It has 35 member countries, including every member of the EU except Malta. So this is a serious allegation. But what does the IHRA definition actually say? Prof Khalidi does not quote a sentence of it, and perhaps we can see why. It says that 'criticism of Israel similar to that levelled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic'. But the following 'could, taking into account the overall context' qualify as antisemitic: 'denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination', 'requiring of [Israel] a behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation', 'using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterise Israel or Israelis', 'drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis', or 'holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel'. It must be obvious to Prof Khalidi that these things are sometimes antisemitic. No doubt, antisemitism and anti-Zionism are sometimes tendentiously conflated. Equally, antisemitism is sometimes cloaked in political discourse or mixed with political criticism, and that is what the IHRA calls out. Denying that this happens is absurd. Here, for example, is the Hamas charter: 'In their Nazi treatment, the Jews made no exception for women or children. Their policy of striking fear in the heart is meant for all. […] The Zionist Nazi activities against our people will not last for long. […] The Zionist plan is limitless. After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates. When they will have digested the region they overtook, they will aspire to further expansion, and so on. Their plan is embodied in the 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion'.' The IHRA definition has been a target in anti-Zionist campaigns for years, in the same way as Black Lives Matter became a target for the right during Donald Trump's first term. A question about how to recognise antisemitism has been weaponised by anti-Zionists, just as antisemitism is weaponised by some on the Israeli HymanGrote chair in philosophy of mind and logic, University College LondonAnthony JuliusChair of law and the arts, University College London

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store