Citroen lights up the EV market with six comfy & clever cars under £35k – and a big battery beast coming soon
IMAGINE if Maccy D's did a Statue of Liberty takeover.
Or if Wetherspoon's had a Thursday curry club menu hanging off the side of Big Ben.
Advertisement
9
The French stuck 250,000 bulbs on the Eiffel Tower in 1925 to spell out CITROEN in 100ft letters - now they have electrified the brand again with six new EVs
Credit: Supplied
9
The titchy two-seater Ami costs £7,695 - and it will zip around for 46 miles, recharges in four hours and has a 28mph top speed
Credit: simon thompson
9
The first proper car is the e-C3. Two battery sizes. One that'll do 124 miles for £20k and one that'll nudge 200 miles for £22k
Credit: simon thompson
It's a bit like the French sticking 250,000 bulbs on the Eiffel Tower to spell out CITROEN in 100ft letters.
Actually, that last one did happen in 1925 and lit up Paris for nine years.
The ad was so bright it could be seen for 60 miles.
Legend has it that Charles Lindbergh, the first man to fly across the Atlantic, used it to guide him towards Le Bourget airport as he came in to land in 1927.
Advertisement
READ MORE MOTORS NEWS
The car company's founder, Andre Citroen, was a genius marketeer.
He illuminated other landmarks including the Arc de Triomphe and the Avenue des Champs-Elysees in his time.
There's a bit more red tape to deal with today.
One hundred years on, Citroen's 'Electric Show' amounted to a measly six Ami quadricycles parked alongside the River Seine, lighting the way for a random street dance act.
Advertisement
Most read in Motors
And that was about it.
That's progress for you.
Beloved European car brand releases new 'flagship' EV version of popular model...and you'll never have range anxiety again
Thought they'd at least send up some drones.
The actual reason I'm in Paris is because Citroen has refreshed its entire model line-up in the last 12 months — all with a plug. Everyone is doing electric cars. But Citroen is doing six at prices more of us can afford.
Advertisement
All under £35k. We're getting there, aren't we?
It starts with Ami.
The titchy two-seater costs £7,695. Not my cup of tea, if I'm honest. But I do like the open-air Ami Buggy that's coming soon.
9
Next up is the £23k e-C3 Aircross - a C3 that has been s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d by 30cm to make the cabin even roomier
Credit: Adrien Cortesi
Advertisement
9
The e-C4 is a £28k family hatchback. Not a faux SUV. I already like it
Credit: Matt Howell
9
The £29k e-C4 X, a saloon with a big boot
Credit: Adrien Cortesi
Amazing what taking the doors off can do.
Ami will zip around for 46 miles, recharges in four hours and has a 28mph top speed.
Advertisement
Everything we discuss from here on out has the option of a petrol engine. Which makes them cheaper and more convenient. But today we're talking electric Citroens.
The first proper car is the e-C3. Two battery sizes. One that'll do 124 miles for £20k. One that'll nudge 200 miles for £22k.
Not as cool as a Renault 5 but loads more space in the back. There's a C3 van coming soon.
Next up is the £23k e-C3 Aircross, a C3 that has been s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d by 30cm to make the cabin even roomier.
Advertisement
The petrol has a seven-seat option. But not the EV. The e-C4 is a £28k family hatchback. Not a faux SUV. I already like it. The French VW
Golf
if you like.
The 51kWh version gives you 156hp under your right foot and a range of about 256 miles.
Copy and paste the £29k e-C4 X, a saloon with a big boot.
Finally, the £35k e-C5 Aircross is Citroen's new flagship arriving in September.
Advertisement
Same menu of motors and batteries as a
One thing I will say is that all these cars are super comfy with sofa-like seats and pillow-soft suspension. That's the Citroen way.
They're also priced to sell.
Citroen UK boss Greg Taylor said: 'We're never going to be the cheapest but equally, as other brands have pushed further upmarket, a white space has been created and that's where we sit.
Advertisement
'The cars look good, they're comfortable, they have the right level of technology, and people can afford them.
'We have five cars under 30 grand you can buy today. So they're not coming in six months. They're not coming in 18 months. They're here today.
'No one else can say that.'
This summer Citroen will be launching a service-activated eight-year warranty.
Advertisement
Another bright idea.
9
Finally, the £35k e-C5 Aircross is Citroen's new flagship arriving in September
Credit: simon thompson
9
The biggest 97kWh battery in the e-C5 nudges 422 miles
Credit: simon thompson
9
The cars are super comfy with sofa-like seats and pillow-soft suspension. That's the Citroen way.
Credit: simon thompson
Advertisement
Unlock even more award-winning articles as The Sun launches brand new membership programme – Sun Club.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
an hour ago
- Irish Independent
Adrian Weckler: Honest debate about drones must go a lot further than whinging about noise
Ireland is unusually out in front, in European terms, in the drone delivery space. This is solely because of Bobby Healy's drone delivery firm, Manna, which has just signed its third major fast-food giant deal, this time with Deliveroo. Last week, Healy said he expects to see up to 10,000 daily drone delivery flights by the end of the year across 10 different locations in Ireland, including Blanchardstown, but maybe also Cork, Tallaght and Glasnevin. Regulators, generally, seem content. Businesses do too. But will there be pushback on the issue of irritation, particularly when it comes to noise? A scathing feature article in the Irish Times last week quoted a number of residents and councillors in the Blanchardstown area who said they took issue with the drones, mostly because of their noise. These complaints were dismissed as 'hysterical' by Manna, who said that the company has received just 77 complaints from over 170,000 delivery flights. So just how noisy are delivery drones? In my experience, they're clearly audible, though far less noisy than almost any delivery motorbike. Seated indoors with windows closed, you'd only hear one when it's delivering something close to your house at its lowest hover point. With windows open, it's more like hearing a buzzy bluebottle. Manna put forward a study it said was conducted by Trinity College Dublin (though commissioned by Manna) which measured the company's self-built drones at two key points of its flight: when passing over a home at 65 metres' height and when at its lowest point (14 metres in height) when delivering the package. Over the home, the TCD measurement report said the drone had the same audible reach as 'a normal conversation [within] one metre', and that it was 'audible but brief [lasting]10 seconds'. When flying at its lowest, at the point of package delivery, the drone sounded like a 'washing machine' or 'distant vacuum cleaner'. This, the TCD study said, was 'the loudest part of the mission'. It's not hard to see how this would divide opinion. Anyone who doesn't like the idea of delivery drones in the first place will say that the additional noise is unacceptable. Those in favour of the development will say it's a pretty modest hum. If Healy's projections come to pass, and we start seeing thousands, rather than hundreds, of drone delivery flights per day, this debate is likely to escalate. If it does, my hope is that it broadens sufficiently to encapsulate the core issue: acceptable noise limits in residential settings. There is a real, fully-defensible interest we all have in 21st century cities, towns and villages enjoying peaceful, non-piercing, non-disruptive levels of noise around our homes. It's a civilisation issue; we simply don't need to accept screaming machines the way we used to. Even apartments beside motorways, which are already discounted compared to those 100 metres farther away, now feel a right to thicker windows and quieter vehicle engines. I have always wondered, for example, why we put up with the existence of shrill mopeds and loud motorbikes. I know it's because they were a cost-efficient answer at the time. But these days? It's harder to justify, especially around residential areas. Everyone accepts some noise – even jolting, intrusive noise – if it serves a purpose we believe serves our neighbourhood. No-one says an ambulance's siren should be quieter. No-one seriously objects to agricultural machinery operating at the edge of town homes. And there's generally no by-law against petrol lawnmowers, as cacophonous as they are. We even still accept noisier diesel cars, even though we now know that their initial justification – that they were better for the environment than petrol engines – was false. So where do drones fit into this discussion? Is whatever noise they produce justifiable, relative to what they do for society? This is where views start to differ wildly. Listen to any call-in radio debate or online discussion on the issue and it soon becomes clear that many complaining of their noise simply don't like the idea of delivery drones at all, independent of whether they can be heard. The main objections, it seems, are a combination of utility, safety and privacy. 'Do we really need coffee delivered by a drone?' is the most common retort I hear or see. 'Medicine, maybe, but doughnuts? What sort of a society have we become?' This argument seems a little weak. It's a preachy tone laced with undertones of snobbery – what kind of slobs are you that you'd do this? And so on. This complaint also completely ignores the much worse noise from delivery motorbikes – shouldn't there be a ban on such vehicles, if noise really is the priority? Safety also crops up as a potential worry to drone delivery. What if they crash? A much more worthy objection, in my view, would be legitimate concerns over privacy and surveillance. Last week, this column revealed that a loophole in European law may allow gardaí to use face-tracking AI in real time, contrary to the EU AI Act (which applies to almost every other country) and contrary to what the Government currently says its intentions are. It may not be so hard to believe that a shift in attitudes could see delivery drones double as policing or security devices. After all, aren't Ring doorbells now effectively used as an extension of local policing? Safety also crops up as a potential worry to drone delivery. What if they crash? With thousands of flights, wouldn't the chance of that go up? The noise debate seems to be the one that looks set to occupy most heat in any pushback against drone deliveries. But if it's an honest debate, it should surely be wider than just for flying coffee couriers.
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Fashion blogger Rosie Connolly's clothing brand 4th Arq on course to post record profits
Dublin-based Connolly said the brand – founded by Connolly and her husband Paul Quinn in June 2020– was set for a refresh this year, shaking up its hugely popular fleece line in the autumn. While plans to grow internationally in the UK and Australia – where it already has a significant market – remain, Connolly said 4th Arq will be turning more of its attention back to the Irish market. In its most recent accounts, Haremi Limited, the owner of 4th Arq, recorded a profit of over €4.16m in the year to the end of June 2024. Connolly said the business – backed by John Kelly, son of E-Shop World founder Tommy, expects to post a slight increase in its next accounts. Investments in staff and infrastructure had bit into the overall margin. 'We are on track and working away,' she said. 'We are still loving the momentum of everything. I don't know if we can class ourselves as a startup, but it still feels like one. We still have that hunger and that growth in us.' Continuing growth is a key focus for Connolly. She said Ireland still had huge potential for 4th Arq. 'Something we did do was a bit of research on where we are at in Ireland, and how many people are familiar with us,' she said. 'We kind of felt like everyone knows about us in Ireland, when actually there was still a huge amount that are not familiar with our brand here. 'So we have also turned a bit of our attention back to Ireland to make sure we are getting the best out of the market here.' The UK and Australia remain important markets for the brand. It is also considering some moves in Europe. 'We are just testing new markets but also nurturing the ones that are there organically,' she said. 'Generally, that is Ireland, the UK and Australia. I think wherever the Irish are, to be honest.' Looking into 2026, Connolly said selling wholesale into retail outlets would become a feature for 4th Arq. 'There is so much more potential there. Like in Ireland, wholesale is something we are really looking at in the UK and across Europe. We are in talks with a couple of different people at the moment, but that is something that won't come to fruition until 2026.' Connolly said 4th Arq had recently recorded its one-millionth online order and had shipped its clothes to over 20 countries globally.
Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
US judge dismisses Ireland-based multinational's GDPR fears in ruling on handover of Irish-based staff files
American power giant Eaton had asked court to reconsider order to surrender performance data to US taxman, citing data privacy fears Today at 21:30 A Dublin-headquartered multinational has been told to ignore GDPR rules in a long-running US legal case over access to Irish employee related data. The American judge argued any resulting fine from the Irish Data Protection Commissioners here would likely only be 'marginal', a view that is likely to be highly controversial with European regulators and privacy campaigners.
