The VA Has the People—Now It Needs the Infrastructure
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) stands alone in purpose and scale—tasked with caring for millions who've served. For all its significance, the VA is hobbled by a truth no one in Washington wants to say: it was built for the last century, not this one.
The cracks are deeply human. A Marine needs to see a cardiologist. The nearest hospital has openings, but he's routed to a facility hours away. Across the country, a doctor has openings but no way to reach patients. In the private sector, gaps like these would raise alarms. At the VA, it's all too common.
Committed professionals fill the ranks, but even the best can't outrun the system around them. The VA's regional structure is a patchwork of networks, each with its own priorities and patchy methods to move care where it's needed most. A
VA schedulers navigate legacy platforms, often unable to see the full network of available providers. And clinicians, trained for everything from combat trauma to mental health, are caught in a system where access depends more on geography than on need.
Washington's answer? Spend more or cut deeper.
Related Stories
5/18/2025
5/16/2025
The latest budget sets a goal to reduce the VA workforce by
The data's there. What's missing is the ability to read it, act on it, and move the supply of care dynamically. Today, some facilities are crowded, others underused, and too often, they're miles apart. The capacity exists yet goes untapped without the infrastructure to shift care across regions, professionals, or venues.
Private health systems faced a similar reckoning. They now use data to anticipate patient demand and surface availability across markets. Scheduling a quick check-up is a tap away online. Kaiser Permanente built a national virtual care network, offering round-the-clock care by phone, video, or email —no in-person visit required.
What's stopping the VA from creating a single virtual network where a doctor in Arizona can meet the needs of a veteran in Florida? For years, the solution to access gaps was to expand referrals outside the system. The MISSION Act opened more doors through Community Care. By 2022,
But even with more options, delays persist. In 2023, veterans referred to outside providers waited, on average,
The fix starts with strengthening the VA's digital foundation.
Healthcare now generates nearly
The same approach can restore the VA by reactivating capacity and rebuilding trust with veterans. But that demands more than austerity measures, as real innovation builds smarter and connects what's already there to create a network that's digital and borderless.
The Dole Act—recently signed into law—gives the VA Secretary the runway to build a plan that books appointments during the first call, aims for same-day access, and puts veteran preferences at the center of every decision. The law gives the new administration a concrete target to move on and upgrade how veterans get care.
VA Secretary Doug Collins
.
No more wasted capacity. No more isolated regions. No more digital vacuums swallowing up care. The VA has the scale and people. Now, it needs the infrastructure—and the will—to deliver.
From
Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
27 minutes ago
- CNN
Department of Veterans Affairs looks to end certain abortion services for veterans
The US Department of Veterans Affairs is proposing to end certain abortion services to veterans, rolling back a Biden-era move to expand abortion rights. In a proposed rule filed Friday, the department said that it is seeking to revoke access to abortions and abortion counseling for veterans and the beneficiaries of the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 'We take this action to ensure that VA provides only needed medical services to our nation's heroes and their families,' the department said in the filing. Under the Biden administration's rule, the department currently provides access to abortions when a pregnant veteran's life or health is at risk if their pregnancy were carried to term, or if the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest — regardless of state laws. The proposed rule would allow abortions in cases where 'a physician certifies that the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term,' which, according to the filing, had been permitted even before the 2022 expansion. The Biden-era rule was part of the administration's efforts to expand abortion access after Republican-led states pushed ahead with restrictions in the wake of the 2022 Supreme Court ruling that eliminated the federal right to an abortion. The VA argued at the time that it was necessary to give veterans access to abortions, saying, 'As abortion bans come into force across the country, veterans in many States are no longer assured access to abortion services in their communities, even when those services are needed.' But on Friday, President Donald Trump's VA slammed the Biden administration's rule, calling it federal overreach. 'The stated reason for (the expansion) was a reaction to a Supreme Court decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization … that itself was intended to prevent federal overreach and return to States control over the provision of abortion services,' the filing states. 'Yet, the last administration used Dobbs to do the exact opposite of preventing overreach, creating a purported Federal entitlement to abortion for veterans where none had existed before and without regard to State law.' Twenty states have banned or limited access to abortion. States where abortion is limited report higher rates of maternal and infant mortality, as well as greater economic insecurity. The proposed rule will now be open for public comment for 30 days starting Monday. In his first term, Trump made good on campaign promises and appointed Supreme Court justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade. Since that ruling, Trump has been keen to leave regulations over the issue to state governments. The Trump administration has overall been quiet on the issue of abortion in his second term. However, in June, the US Department of Health and Human Services and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services moved to rescind a 2022 federal guidance to health care providers specifying that people should be able to access an abortion in the event of a medical emergency, even if state laws restrict such procedures. CNN's Veronica Stracqualursi and Jen Christensen contributed to this report.
Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Admin Restores Long‑Standing Ban on Taxpayer‑Funded Abortions at VA Hospitals
The Trump administration has announced a proposal to rescind a Biden-era rule and bar medical centers operated by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from performing taxpayer-funded abortions except when the mother's life is in danger. The regulatory change will be formally proposed by VA in the Aug. 4 edition of the Federal Register, with a 30-day public comment period before it can enter into force.
San Francisco Chronicle
13 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Should you wear sunscreen when it's cloudy in S.F.? Here's what experts say
How much can the sun damage our skin if we can't even see it? That's a reasonable question in San Francisco, especially given that it's the city's coldest, foggiest summer in recent memory. But experts say there's no ambiguity: You still need to wear sunscreen. Weather — even our eternal fog — should not play a role in your decision. 'There's a significant or clinically meaningful amount (of skin-damaging radiation coming through), even if it is foggy,' said Dr. Sungat Grewal, co-director of laser surgery and cosmetic dermatology at UCSF. On foggier days, clouds scatter and absorb a portion of ultraviolet radiation from the sun, but a lot still gets to the ground — especially UVA rays (which primarily cause skin aging), and to a lesser extent UVB rays (which primarily cause sunburn). Both types can lead to cancer. Up to 80 to 90 percent of UV rays can penetrate fog and clouds, according to Dr. Estelle Kahn, a dermatologist at Kaiser Permanente. All UV radiation contributes to your risk of getting skin cancer, and the damage is cumulative — meaning the problem is not just one day, but rather total exposure throughout your lifetime. Grewal recommends wearing tinted, broad-spectrum sunscreen with an SPF of 30 or higher, every day. 'Broad spectrum' protects against both types of ultraviolet light, whereas SPF mainly refers to UVB protection. The tinted element is more for cosmetic purposes — fighting aging — but still important to consider, both Grewal and Kahn said. Tinted sunscreen blocks visible light, which leads to pigmentation and other skin appearance issues. 'The best sunscreen is the one that you like … and are going to want to use every day,' Grewal said. The UV index, found at the Environmental Protection Agency's SunWise UV Index app or your preferred weather app, shows considerable variation during the day in San Francisco. On Friday in San Francisco, for example, the index — which runs on a scale of 1 to 11 — showed 2 until around 9:30 a.m., but then soared to 10 around 1 p.m. While you can forgo sunscreen if the index is at 1 or 2, indices of 3 and upward warrant sun protection, according to the EPA — and a 1 or 2 can very quickly become a higher number, with 8 or more considered 'very high to extreme.' The National Weather Service calculates the UV index using both UVA and UVB rays. Winter months have a lower UV index. But Kahn said you still need to wear sunscreen then. She reiterated that UV radiation is invisible and doesn't correlate with temperature. Chronicle meteorologist Greg Porter's advice? 'Don't base your sunscreen choice on the cloud cover, certainly in this city.'
