Alaska summit: Bombarded by questions, flummoxed Putin 'shouts' back; Trump looks on
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Saturday [Friday in the US] faced an unexpected media encounter in Alaska, where reporters bombarded him with questions as he arrived for talks with US President Donald Trump on the Ukraine conflict.
During the welcome ceremony, foreign journalists called out questions on issues ranging from civilian casualties to prospects for a ceasefire in the three-year-old war.
One question -- 'When will you stop killing civilians?' -- drew a gesture from Putin suggesting he could not hear. Another asked why Trump should trust his words. There was no clear response to whether he would agree to a ceasefire.
Such open exchanges are rare at events attended by the Russian leader, where the travelling press pool is generally limited to state-approved reporters.
Later, the two leaders sat side by side at a US base, flanked by their delegations against a blue backdrop reading "Pursuing Peace".
While Putin appeared taken aback by a volley of simultaneous questions, Trump looked on.
The reporters at the summit again called out queries, but this time, Trump offered only a "Thank you very much" before the press was escorted out.
The Alaska meeting marks a rare in-person discussion between the US and Russian presidents amid ongoing hostilities in Ukraine, with both leaders under close scrutiny at home and abroad.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Vertical Coffee Roasters
Vertical Coffee Roasters
Undo
Ahead of the summit, which could influence the war in Ukraine and relations between Washington and Moscow, Trump said that if the talks with Putin go badly, he "would walk."
"I think it's going to work out very well, and if it doesn't, I'm going to head back home real fast," Trump said while talking to American news broadcaster Fox News.
"If it doesn't, you walk?" Fox anchor Bret Baier asked. "I would walk, yeah," Trump replied.
The meeting gives Trump an opportunity to present himself as a negotiator who can help end the conflict in Ukraine, something he had assured he could do quickly after being elected to the White House.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump thinks owning piece of Intel would be good deal for US: Here's what to know
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads President Donald Trump wants the US government to own a piece of Intel , less than two weeks after demanding the Silicon Valley pioneer dump the CEO that was hired to turn around the slumping the goal is realised, the investment would deepen the Trump administration's involvement in the computer industry as the president ramps up the pressure for more US companies to manufacture products domestically instead of relying on overseas Trump administration is in talks to secure a 10 per cent stake in Intel in exchange for converting government grants that were pledged to Intel under President Joe Biden. If the deal is completed, the US government would become one of Intel's largest shareholders and blur the traditional lines separating the public sector and private sector in a country that remains the world's largest his second term, Trump has been leveraging his power to reprogramme the operations of major computer chip companies. The administration is requiring Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, two companies whose chips are helping to power the craze around artificial intelligence, to pay a 15 per cent commission on their sales of chips in China in exchange for export interest in Intel is also being driven by his desire to boost chip production in the US , which has been a focal point of the trade war that he has been waging throughout the lessening the country's dependence on chips manufactured overseas, the president believes the US will be better positioned to maintain its technological lead on China in the race to create artificial what the president said August 7 in an unequivocal post calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign less than five months after the Santa Clara, California, company hired demand was triggered by reports raising national security concerns about Tan's past investments in Chinese tech companies while he was a venture capitalist. But Trump backed off after Tan professed his allegiance to the US in a public letter to Intel employees and went to the White House to meet with the president, who applauded the Intel CEO for having an "amazing story."The company isn't commenting about the possibility of the US government becoming a major shareholder, but Intel may have little choice because it is currently dealing from a position of enjoying decades of growth while its processors powered the personal computer boom, the company fell into a slump after missing the shift to the mobile computing era unleashed by the iPhone's 2007 has fallen even farther behind in recent years during an artificial intelligence craze that has been a boon for Nvidia and AMD. The company lost nearly USD 19 billion last year and another $3.7 billion in the first six months of this year, prompting Tan to undertake a cost-cutting the end of this year, Tan expects Intel to have about 75,000 workers, a 25% reduction from the end of last rare, it's not unprecedented for the US government to become a significant shareholder in a prominent company. One of the most notable instances occurred during the Great Recession in 2008 when the government injected nearly $50 billion into General Motors in return for a roughly 60% stake in the automaker at a time it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The government ended up with a roughly $10 billion loss after it sold its stock in Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC during a Tuesday interview that the government has no intention of meddling in Intel's business, and will have its hands tied by holding non-voting shares in the some analysts wonder if the Trump administration's financial ties to Intel might prod more companies looking to curry favour with the president to increase their orders for the company's was among the biggest beneficiaries of the Biden administration's CHIPS and Science Act, but it hasn't been able to revive its fortunes while falling behind on construction projects spawned by the company has received about $2.2 billion of the $7.8 billion pledged under the incentives programme - money that Lutnick derided as a "giveaway" that would better serve US taxpayers if it's turned into Intel stock. "We think America should get the benefit of the bargain," Lutnick told CNBC. "It's obvious that it's the right move to make."
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
In Moscow, Jaishankar raises challenge posed by tariff to India-Russia trade, calls for early conclusion of India-Eurasian Economic Union FTA
In the backdrop of U.S. President Donald Trump's imposition of penalty tariff on India, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on Wednesday (August 20, 2025) in Moscow raised the challenge posed by 'tariff and non-tariff trade barriers' before Russia-India trade and called for 'early conclusion' of a Free Trade Agreement among India and the countries of the Eurasian region. Mr. Jaishankar made the remarks during the 26th Session of the India-Russia Inter-Government Commission for Trade, Economic, Scientific, Technological and Cultural Cooperation (IRIGC-TEC) where the Russian side was being led by First Deputy Prime Minister of Russia Denis Manturov. Delivering his opening remarks Mr. Jaishankar said, 'tariff and non-tariff trade barriers, removing bottlenecks in logistics, promoting connectivity through the International North-South Transport Corridor, the Northern Sea Route and the Chennai-Vladivostok Corridor, effecting payment mechanisms smoothly' are the main issues before the IRIGC-TEC. He further said that Wednesday's meeting in Moscow also finalized the terms of reference of the India-Eurasian Economic Union Free Trade Agreement of which Russia has been a leading proponent as it aims at removing obstacles for overland trade among Russia, China, India and the Central Asian countries. '..we are all acutely aware that we are meeting in the backdrop of a complex geopolitical situation. Our leaders remain closely and regularly engaged,' said Mr Jaishankar indirectly referring to the trade-related anxieties in India-U.S. relation. He also raised the issue of trade imbalance in India-Russia trade that has expanded in the past few years as India's trade with Russia grew from $13 billion in 2021 to $68 billion in 2024-'25. India-Russia trade has risen sharply after Russia was hit with Western sanctions following the crisis in Ukraine. Bulk of this trade is in hydrocarbon that Russia supplies to India. As a result the earlier trade imbalance of $ 6.6 billion has risen to $58.9 billion. 'So, we need to address that urgently,' said Mr Jaishankar in his remarks.
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
RTI Act amendment through data protection law balances it with privacy rights: Ashwini Vaishnaw
The amendment made in the RTI Act through the data protection law balances it with Right to Privacy , Parliament was informed on Wednesday. In response to a question on the impact of Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023 on Right to Information, Union minister Ashwini Vaishnaw in a written reply to the Lok Sabha said there is a provision available in the RTI that may allow access to information if the public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interest. "The amendment to Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act through the DPDP Act balances the fundamental right to privacy, as affirmed by the Supreme Court in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, with the right to information," Vaishnaw said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top 15 Most Beautiful Women in the World Undo The minister said the amendment aligns with established judicial reasoning on reasonable restrictions, codifies existing jurisprudence, and helps avoid potential conflicts between the laws. "Further, under Section 8(2) of the RTI Act, a public authority may allow access to information if the public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests," Vaishnaw said. Live Events As per Section 8(2) of the RTI Act if an information is not restricted under the official secret Act or is not exempted under the provision of RTI Act then a public authority may allow access to information, if public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests. "The said amendment does not restrict the disclosure of personal information; rather, it balances individuals' privacy rights with right to information. This ensures that the transparency framework under the RTI Act and privacy framework under the DPDP Act continue to exist harmoniously, preserving the balance between transparency and privacy," Vaishnaw said.
