logo
Drivers may never want to give up combustion engine, says Bentley

Drivers may never want to give up combustion engine, says Bentley

Telegraph19-03-2025
Bentley is pressing ahead with plans to go all-electric despite its chief executive admitting that some drivers will never want to give up petrol or diesel cars.
Frank-Steffen Walliser conceded that the luxury carmaker's green transition could scare off some customers, especially those who believe:'If it's not a combustion engine, I will not drive it.'
He issued the warning after Bentley recently started work on its first electric vehicle production line in Crewe.
The company's 85-year-old Pyms Lane plant is set to begin building its first electric model, a battery-powered SUV, next year, with the first deliveries expected in 2027.
Mr Walliser, who was appointed last July, reiterated a pledge to roll out a new electric or hybrid model each year for a decade as a prelude to moving to an EV-only line-up by 2035.
The chief executive said the company's clientele is split between people happy to have the latest technology and others who are wedded to traditional engines.
Bentley is intent on pursuing the former, he said, claiming its aim is to develop an EV that can win over doubters.
He said: 'We have a wide variety of customers. They are not driven by the cost per mile. Different things excite different drivers.
'There are, for sure, customers who say, fine, if it's the latest and greatest technology I will take it, whatever it is.'
However, he said others will take the view that 'if it's not a combustion engine, I will not drive it'.
Mr Walliser said anticipating future sales trends was more important than focusing on holdouts against EVs, stressing that the electric SUV would help to boost sales.
He said: 'If we have a great product, a true Bentley, maybe the best Bentley ever, then we will have enough pulling power no matter what the drivetrain.'
Bentley scrapped plans to move to an electric-only line-up by 2030 last November, pushing the date for ending hybrid combustion engine sales back five years.
Mr Walliser said the British brand, owned by German automotive giant Volkswagen (VW), was 'maybe a little bit too bullish in the beginning'.
He said Bentley is monitoring public attitudes to EVs and anticipates that sluggish demand will begin to pick up.
He said: 'Our judgment is that, at the moment, we are at the very deep point on the acceptance of electric cars. We assume it will come back.'
Bentley ended production of petrol-only cars last year as it retired its W12 engine, with all models now equipped with hybrid engines as part of the transition towards EVs.
The chief executive's comments come after VW-owned Audi said it was reconsidering plans to halt new petrol model launches from next year, a day after revealing that it was cutting 7,500 jobs.
Another sister company, Porsche, last month announced that it would expand its petrol-car range after concluding that combustion engines would be around for significantly longer than previously thought.
Bentley's operating profit fell almost 40pc to €373m (£314m) last year, though the company said it achieved record revenue per car as it focuses on 'value over volume'.
Almost three quarters of buyers opted for the bespoke options from the company's Mulliner personalisation division, which typically costs three times more than the baseline price.
Earnings were held back by a volatile economic environment, Bentley said, with the Chinese market posting a drop in sales.
Mr Walliser also said it is not yet clear whether Bentley, which imports parts from Europe, would be affected by Donald Trump's trade war.
The US market, the company's biggest, has seen no reaction so far to the threat of tariffs, he added, with potential buyers conscious that the situation may change and 'staying cool'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rachel Reeves's self-defeating attack on British racing
Rachel Reeves's self-defeating attack on British racing

Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Spectator

Rachel Reeves's self-defeating attack on British racing

Few British traditions can claim as long a history as racing. The first races thought to have taken place in these islands were organised by Roman soldiers encamped in Yorkshire, pitting English horses against Arabian. By the 900s, King Athelstan was placing an export ban on English horses due to their superiority over their continental equivalents. The first recorded race meeting took place under Henry II in Smithfield as part of the annual Bartholomew Fair. Nearly 1,000 years later, racing remains the nation's second most popular spectator sport. Five million people attend more than 1,400 meets throughout the year. The industry is estimated to be worth more than £4 billion, contributing around £300 million to the Exchequer, and supports some 80,000 jobs. No activity better unites Benjamin Disraeli's 'two nations'. Royal Ascot, the Derby and the Grand National are cornerstones of the sporting calendar. Britain still produces many of the world's finest horses, jockeys and races. More than 600 million people across 140 countries tune in to the National each year; in this country alone, around 13 million people, a quarter of adults, bet on it. Britain's racing success is something to be proud of, which naturally means that Rachel Reeves has decided to go after it. The Treasury is proposing to increase the 15 per cent tax on bookmaker profits to 21 per cent – the same levy faced by online slot games and casinos. The British Horseracing Authority predicts the rate hike would cause a £330 million loss of revenue in its first five years, and put more than 2,500 jobs at risk in the first year alone. In response to the proposal, the BHA has called a strike for 10 September – the first in the industry's history. Rather than racing, jockeys, owners and trainers will decamp to Westminster to lobby MPs. The industrial action is expected to cost around £700,000. Many senior figures in the world of racing fear that increased costs for operators would mean less money available for promoting the sport. Worse odds would be offered to customers, making bookmakers less competitive compared with black market sites, which are now more easily accessible than ever thanks to the large increase in Virtual Private Network downloads by people trying to circumvent the Online Safety Act. Reduced turnover means reduced profits for bookmakers, 10 per cent of which are paid to a levy designed to support the sport through prize money, veterinary research and equine welfare. Even before the Treasury's planned hike, the recent introduction of more stringent affordability checks on online gambling means that turnover is down and fewer thoroughbreds are being bred. British racing is falling behind as owners, riders and horses decamp abroad to wealthier competitions. This leaves the long-term sustainability of British racing under threat. The Chancellor's latest attempt to find a few pennies down the back of the Treasury sofa would repeat the error of last year's inheritance tax raid on farmers and the imposition of VAT on private schools. It is a mean-spirited and self-defeating assault on a part of the country's history and way of life that the Labour party does not seek to understand. If racing unites the upper and lower classes, it is uniquely vulnerable to stigmatisation by the middle-class prudes found so dis-proportionately among our governing lanyard class. Of course, many Labour MPs are enthusiastic supporters of racing – 23 represent racecourse constituencies. But any attempt to squeeze the industry until the pips squeak is representative of a Treasury mentality that knows the cost of everything but the value of nothing. Taxing bookmaking at the same rate as online gambling draws a false equivalence between the two that ignores their fundamental differences. A punter at a race might enjoy six or seven bets in a day at most; an enthusiastic online gambler could place that number in a minute. Betting on racing requires research and skill (incidentally, The Spectator's own racing tipster, Penworthy, has had an excellent year). In contrast, online casinos are the gambling equivalent of Pac-Man, colourful distractions designed to be played on a loop. That is why online gambling and gaming make up the overwhelming majority of gambling addiction cases. In its zeal for protecting the vulnerable, the Gambling Commission, supported by the Treasury, could strangle the life out of the industry it regulates. In her quest to make her sums add up, Reeves may embark on another experiment which costs more than it raises. Reeves and the Treasury should recognise that next month's strike is an extraordinary protest from an industry facing an existential threat. Rather than breaking with the tradition of treating bookmaking differently to online gambling, the government should extend the industry support, through direct grants or a reformed betting levy. Yet with each day bringing rumours of the Treasury eyeing potential targets, the odds of the Chancellor putting the turf's future before her spreadsheets seem slim. Who would be willing to bet on it?

German tax revenues grow at slower pace in July
German tax revenues grow at slower pace in July

Reuters

time3 hours ago

  • Reuters

German tax revenues grow at slower pace in July

BERLIN, Aug 21 (Reuters) - German federal and state tax revenues rose 3% year-on-year in July, a slower rate of increase than the previous month, due in part to a decline in earnings from sales tax, the finance ministry said on Thursday. The total tax take in Europe's biggest economy came to 65.74 billion euros ($76.60 billion) in July, with increases in taxes on income, wages and inheritance, said the ministry in its monthly report. In June, tax revenues had risen more than 7%. In the first seven months of the year, Germany collected some 513.3 billion euros in tax, up 7.4% from the same period in the previous year. Germany's economy contracted in 2024 for the second consecutive year and shrank slightly in the second quarter. Economists expect the export-driven economy to suffer further from U.S. tariffs and mostly predict stagnation for this year. The ministry played down any likely impulses that would boost tax revenues. "Leading indicators do not point to a short-term acceleration of economic activity," said the ministry. ($1 = 0.8582 euros)

‘Boom or bust' – how extreme weather impacts farmers
‘Boom or bust' – how extreme weather impacts farmers

Channel 4

time6 hours ago

  • Channel 4

‘Boom or bust' – how extreme weather impacts farmers

Farmers have always been reliant on the weather . Colin Chappell, an arable farmer in Lincolnshire, even says 'mother nature is my business partner'. In that context, it's unsurprising that the driest start to the year in the UK since 1976 has played havoc with harvests. Chappell's challenge on his farm is usually flooding but, after last year was wet, this year has brought the opposite extreme. Fields he owns were underwater in January, then by May were so dry they had cracks in the soil. Production of his pea crop is a third of what it usually would be. And his harvest is earlier than ever. 'We've finished a week now already. That's four weeks ahead of schedule.' – Colin Chappell 'We've finished a week now already. That's four weeks ahead of schedule. This is just unique in my lifetime. My wife's birthday is early September. I've only ever finished once in my lifetime for her birthday.' Extreme weather is creating extreme outcomes for farmers . While some have had their worst harvests, others have had their best. Although even in the most positive circumstances, cash flow is tough. Alan Sutcliffe runs an organic dairy farm in West Yorkshire. There's been a drought there as well, and it is the driest year he can remember. He may have to reduce his cattle numbers due to feed shortages. He says the changing weather conditions will impact consumers as well, particularly when it comes to vegetables, fruit and British dairy products. 'Everybody expects everything to be on the supermarket shelf just when they want it. And I think some things may become either very expensive or they're going to not be available all year round.' A lack of rainfall in 1976 drove food prices up by 12 percent. The Drought Act was passed to ration water and conserve supplies. But half a century later, many farmers feel not enough has changed to improve resilience against the extremes of climate change. That's despite the government committing £5 billion to the sector. Rachel Hallos is Vice President of the National Farmers' Union. 'Even if you're making good returns, for instance, like the livestock industry is doing right now, any margin that you're making is being swallowed up with immediate effect by the fact you're having to go and buy additional feed to feed your animals. My real concern is that farmers start making decisions and actually cease to produce.' 'My real concern is that farmers start making decisions and actually cease to produce.' – Rachel Hallos If some farmers do abandon their farms due to the difficulties of working in an ever-changing climate, it could lead to increased reliance on imported food and undermine national food security. Farmer who took his own life was plagued by inheritance tax fears Tariffs 'better in long run', says Trump-voting farmer Farmers rally against government reforms to inheritance tax

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store