U.S. News & World Report ranked the best states in America. Here's where Vermont landed
Vermont is one of the ten best state in the U.S., according to a new ranking from U.S. News and World Report.
The Best States rankings look at eight categories: health care, education, natural environment, opportunity, economy, crime and corrections, infrastructure, and fiscal stability.
With top rankings in the crime and corrections and natural environment categories, U.S. News gave Vermont the seventh spot. That makes it the second best New England state, coming in behind New Hampshire which was ranked No. 2.
Vermont ranked very high in several key metrics.
It was rated as the best state for opportunity, which looks at economic opportunity, affordability and equality It's one of the safest states, coming in at No. 4 for crime and safety. And it doesn't slack when it comes to the natural environment, coming in at No. 9. It also ranked No. 9 for infrastructure.
The main ranking pulling it down was fiscal stability, coming in at No. 41. It's second lowest score was education, coming in at No. 23.
New Hampshire's first place ranking in the crime and corrections category and fourth place ranking for natural environment helped propel the state to its second-place finish.
'The state's natural beauty stands out more for its valleys, rivers, lakes and mountains than its mere 13 miles of Atlantic Ocean coastline,' said the report. 'Its highest peak, Mount Washington, stands at 6,288 feet in the White Mountains, and Lake Winnipesaukee is its best-known inland resort.'
New Hampshire was also ranked 6th in opportunity, which included a first-place ranking in economic opportunity and third-place in equality.
It's worst category was fiscal stability, with a ranking of 37th.
Gov. Kelly Ayotte said the ranking comes as 'no surprise.'
'Today's ranking is a testament to our dedicated law enforcement officers, hardworking business leaders, and energetic, independent people,' she said in a post on X, also emphasizing the state's high public safety ranking. 'Thank you to all those who protect and serve our communities each day. Together, we will ensure our state remains the safest in the nation.'
According to U.S. News and World Report, Utah is the best state in the country for the third year in a row.
It earned top 10 marks in five categories: fiscal stability, economy, infrastructure, education and crime and corrections.
The report said that Utah's economy has become one of the most diverse in the U.S., giving it great strength in the fiscal-related categories.
"In the last two and a half decades, Utah's economy has outperformed the nation, had greater strength, and when we've had downturns, we have been able to rebound much more quickly in our state,' said Natalie Gochnour, director of the Kem C. Gardner Policy Institute at the University of Utah.
Utah
New Hampshire
Idaho
Minnesota
Nebraska
Florida
Vermont
South Dakota
Massachusetts
Washington
This article originally appeared on Burlington Free Press: Vermont is the second best state in New England, ranking says. See why
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Trump says governors should be able to handle disasters without FEMA
President Donald Trump said Tuesday that his administration plans to 'wean' states off of Federal Emergency Management Agency assistance after this year's hurricane season, offering in the most explicit terms yet his plans for states to respond to natural disasters and other emergencies on their own. 'We're moving it back to the states, so the governors can handle. That's why they're governors,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'If they can't handle it, they shouldn't be governor.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Ayotte signs universal EFA bill, parental bill of rights
Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed House Bill 10 and Senate Bill 295 into law at the State House Tuesday. The bills broaden parental rights and expand the voucher-like education freedom account program, respectively. (Photo by William Skipworth/New Hampshire Bulletin) Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed two pieces of legislation Tuesday, one to extend the education freedom account program to all income levels and another to give families more control over their schools, delivering significant victories to 'school choice' conservatives. Flanked by children in a crowded council chamber room adjacent to her corner office in the State House Tuesday morning, Ayotte signed Senate Bill 295, which would allow families of all income levels to access state funds for private and home schooling expenses, and House Bill 10, which would enumerate a number of requirements for public schools to respond to parental demands. 'No one loves a child more than a parent, and making sure that parents have rights and can understand and know what's happening in their classrooms when their children are in school is so, so important,' Ayotte said. Republicans have hailed the two bills as instrumental to allowing parents the freedom to make choices for their children and avoid mandates from public school districts. But LGBTQ+ advocates have denounced HB 10, which they say could require school employees to disclose information about a students' gender identity or sexual orientation to their parents, even when the student asks the school employee not to. And Democrats and public school supporters say expanding education freedom account will take away state money that should be spent on public schools. HB 10 lays out a number of requirements for public schools, as well as a list of rights that parents have to be informed about regarding what public schools are teaching and what their children are doing during the school day. For instance, the bill lists the rights to opt a student out of sex education courses; choose not to participate in any non-academic survey; receive all educational records for their children within 10 days of asking; review instructional materials, and others. Many of those are already allowed under existing state law. The bill also requires school districts to adopt policies to encourage parental cooperation with teachers over homework, attendance, and discipline. HB 10 also includes the right for parents to 'inquire of the school or school personnel and promptly receive accurate, truthful, and complete disclosure regarding any and all matters related to their minor child, unless an immediate answer cannot be provided when the initial request is made.' That requirement does not apply to information brought to any counselor, school psychologist, school nurse, or other certified health care provider that is 'reasonably expected to be privileged.' The bill allows school staff to withhold information if they have 'clear and convincing' evidence that disclosing it could lead to the child being abused by their parent. And it also allows parents to sue the school if they allege any part of the bill is being violated. SB 295, meanwhile, would remove income caps from the education freedom account program, which allows parents to access at least $4,182 per year in state funding to use toward nonpublic school education expenses. Currently, that program is limited to families making 350% of the federal poverty level or less — or $112,525 for a family of four. SB 295 would impose a 10,000-student cap on the program in the first year of the expansion — the 2025-2026 school year — and would increase that cap by 25% per year if demand for the program hits at least 90% of the previous year's cap. The EFA program had 5,321 students at the start of the 2024-2025 school year under the 350% federal poverty level cap, according to the Department of Education. However, a group of 'priority guideline' students would not be subject to that cap, according to the new law. That would include students already enrolled in an EFA program, siblings of students enrolled in the program, children with disabilities, and students in families making up to 350% of the federal poverty levels. Both bill signings represent the culmination of years of work by conservatives. Efforts in previous years to lift income caps on education freedom accounts were voted down in the Senate, while House Republicans have spent four years attempting and failing to pass a parental bill of rights.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Red herring should be New Hampshire's state fish
Nancy Brennan of Weare (center) and others protest outside of Gov. Kelly Ayotte's bill signing on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. (Photo by William Skipworth/New Hampshire Bulletin) I used to like reading 'If You Give a Mouse a Cookie' to my daughters when they were little. In fact, my wife and I read it aloud so often back then that we still refer to the title when we set out to do one thing and get distracted by a bunch of side tasks that pop up along the way. We've all been there: You go to throw an empty can into the recycling bin, which is full, and then on your way to empty it your sock catches on that exposed nail you keep meaning to fix, so you head over to grab the hammer but then realize the tool drawer is stuck, and on and on it goes. So, it's a story about getting sidetracked. Gov. Kelly Ayotte and the rest of her party should give it a read. On Tuesday, Ayotte ceremoniously signed two bills that not only don't address any of the state's most pressing problems but actually exacerbate a couple that the party itself created. House Bill 10, establishing a 'parental bill of rights,' is legislation born out of right-wing, QAnon-esque paranoia about public educators collaborating to undermine the well-being of the students they serve and prevent parents from parenting. To understand the depths of this paranoia, consider this statement from Atkinson Republican Rep. Debra DeSimone, chair of the House Children and Family Law Committee, regarding the Senate's version of the parental rights bill: 'If I know that most parents are way more trustworthy than teachers like Pamela Smart, then I will vote to pass this bill as amended.' The absurdity of that statement represents a big part of the Republican problem. Between my first day of school at Londonderry's North Elementary in 1978 and graduation day at Merrimack Valley High School in 1990, I had some great teachers and some not-so-great teachers. I've also had good and bad auto mechanics, doctors, plumbers, barbers, etc. I bet that's true for all of you, and yet none of us (I hope) apply any singular unpleasant experiences definitively across an entire field or industry. But the Republican anti-public-school agenda seems dependent on making people believe, often in opposition to their own broad experiences, that the most notorious of school employees (and, for what it's worth, Smart was a media coordinator, not a teacher) is somehow representative of the profession — and the system — as a whole. The Republican Party is the party of dark fantasies. It is the party of distraction (purposeful and otherwise) and of red herrings. And it is also the party of nostalgia, which makes it all the more baffling that its membership is so intent on ripping apart the seams of the communities they claim to cherish. The second bill signed into law Tuesday, establishing universal eligibility for school vouchers, is a prime example of just how far Republicans have wandered from real public service. New Hampshire has a school funding problem, and we've known this for decades. We know it because of our punishing property taxes and because of the tense nature of our debates over school district budgets. And, we know it because over the past few decades the courts have said so more than once. Democratic governors in recent state history failed again and again to address the problem, but Republicans have truly excelled at making things much, much worse. Every state eventually learns that vouchers don't do what Republicans have long said they would — that is, save money and improve educational outcomes. What vouchers do accomplish, however, is hastening the demise of publicly supported places of learning that have educated generations of Americans and helped forge the communities that give us our collective strength. The attempted destruction of public schools is tragic enough, but the budget constraints aggravated by universal vouchers will ultimately lay waste to a much broader swath of public services. If you want to see that dynamic in action, look no further than the cutting crew now going to work on New Hampshire's budget. As much as I love the goofy, frantic, full-circle plot of 'If You Give a Mouse a Cookie,' I have to admit that the comparison to Republican policy pursuits in New Hampshire is largely flawed. You see, more than anything the mouse is an innocent victim of its own industriousness. It means well but is led astray by an overwhelming desire to create order amid endless strands of unavoidable chaos. Republicans' inability to avoid getting sidetracked — whether by perverse imaginings about pet-devouring immigrants, or vaccine conspiracies, or presidential robot clones, or sinister teachers — lacks that innocence because it is fully by design. In a country that boasts more than 900 billionaires yet is cutting health care for poor people, Republicans' foundational, centerpiece principle of trickle-down economics is a really, really tough sell right now. So, if the very existence of your party is predicated on passing laws that help wealthy people become wealthier, you're going to have to bundle that colossal dud with some visceral distractions. That's really what's behind all of the trumped-up, misanthropic, right-wing 'issues' that push voters to turn against teachers, scientists, researchers, antiracists, climate activists, and others — anyone whose driving ambition is for greater equality and a reduction, by degrees, in overall human suffering. If you've ever wondered why the GOP seems to jump from one hot-button issue to another, at breakneck speed and in the absence of credible data to support their breathless claims, I hope this helps.
