Tauranga flood map update a ‘win' for landowners, developers after court case
The council also released new flood hazard maps for the city based on a one-in-100-year storm scenario and accounting for climate change forecasts.
The maps deemed 30,400 properties at risk of flooding - thousands more than under the previous modelling.
An independent hearing panel heard submissions on the plan change and the decision to approve it was notified in April 2022.
Twenty parties took three appeals to the Environment Court. The cases were settled in mediation, avoiding a hearing.
Tauranga 's Urban Task Force (UTF), which represents property owners, developers and businesses, was one appellant.
The UTF cited significant errors and inaccuracies, claiming the maps did not show the most up-to-date flooding information.
The task force also believed the plan change would hurt property values across the city.
Through the court process, the council agreed to keep the flood maps updated so they could be relied upon by developers and landowners.
UTF chairman Scott Adams, managing director of development company Carrus, said all parties generally accepted there were technical errors and issues with the mapping.
'[The] council has accepted through the appeal that a site-specific technical assessment on flooding will now prevail over the indicative maps that are currently shown on the council's online GIS [mapping tool] layer.'
'This is a significant win for the UTF on behalf of property developers and landowners,' Adams said in a statement.
'They can now get a simple stormwater engineering assessment to override the mapping. This will be particularly useful where there are errors with the flood modelling and map outputs.'
The council also agreed that whenever its stormwater model was updated using more up-to-date or site-specific information, this would prevail over the indicative flood hazard areas depicted in its GIS layer.
Other concerns raised by UTF about how roadworks might affect flooding were also addressed in the new consent provisions issued by the Environment Court.
Advertise with NZME.
Adams said roads were designed to help carry stormwater during major floods.
UTF's concern was if the council improved roads – like raising the height or adding engineering features – it could cause floodwater to spill onto nearby properties or reduce the ability of stormwater to flow along the roads, he said.
Because of this, Plan Change 27 was altered and neighbours must now be notified if roadworks could cause flooding on their properties.
Policies have also been updated to focus on reducing flood risks, rather than just managing activities. The goal was to ensure that activity still maintained suitable overland flows that water takes during floods, instead of restricting the activities themselves.
The Environment Court consent order was signed off by Judge Kelvin Reid in March.
The council approved the plan change at a meeting last week. It would become operative on May 13.
City planning team leader Janine Speedy said the process started after Tauranga had significant flooding events in 2005, 2010, 2011 and 2013.
The council then looked at how it could better manage risk from flooding, Speedy told the meeting.
An integrated stormwater project was started, and Plan Change 27 was the regulatory response for this, Speedy said.
Prior to 2020, the council didn't have any flooding rules in the City Plan and Plan Change 27 introduced those rules, she said.
The council had an ongoing flood modelling programme to ensure its information was up to date, Speedy said.
Councillor Glen Crowther said it was helpful to have the issues dealt with through the legal process.
It was important to get it right and there was a lot of effort put into it to ensure that happened, he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
4 days ago
- NZ Herald
Māori trust loses bid for lapse of Carrington Estate consents in Far North
Carrington Resort on Karikari Peninsula was originally developed in the early 2000s by American businessman Paul Kelly. A Māori trust has failed to persuade a court that resource consents granted 20 years ago for a luxury resort in the Far North should be declared lapsed. If the Environment Court had granted Haititaimarangai Marae Kaitiaki Trust's (HMKT) application for the declaration, Carrington Estate would need new consents to
Scoop
28-05-2025
- Scoop
Gisborne Council Awarded $51k From Forestry Company In Environment Court Decision
Article – Zita Campbell – Local Democracy Reporter Environmentalists call for stronger regulations to prevent similar issues. Gisborne District Council has recovered half of just over $100,000 spent on what its legal representative described as 'avoidable' legal costs in an Environment Court decision against a Chinese-owned forestry company. The case followed several recent enforcement actions taken by the council across several forests, including Kanuka, West Ho, Te Marunga, and Wakaroa, which the council says have resulted in forestry operators reducing risks and improving compliance. Environmentalists said they were pleased with the legal outcome but believe these issues should be addressed through stronger regulations. The council spent $101,175 on legal and expert witness costs associated with a four-day hearing in July last year. The hearing concerned enforcement orders related to woody debris and sediment migrating from commercial forestry activity in the Kanuka Forest in the Upper Waimata River catchment. According to the court decision, the council argued that the conduct of the forestry groups, China Forestry Group (CFG), and management company Wood Marketing Services (WMS), 'unnecessarily lengthened' the hearings process through conduct before and during the hearings, which included the NZ-based director of China Forestry Group NZ, Mr Yuxia Sun, resigning 10 days before the hearing. The council submitted that the respondents provided 'arguments without substance and technical or unmeritorious points which failed', which caused the council to incur more 'avoidable legal costs' drafting submissions in response. Speaking with Local Democracy Reporting, council's resource management compliance manager, Gary McKenzie, said the council had a responsibility to uphold environmental standards and protect public welfare as a regulatory authority. 'While some costs can be recovered through the courts, full cost recovery is not always possible. Like other regulatory agencies, we rely on public funding to fulfil these statutory obligations,' McKenzie said. He confirmed the costs awarded by the court had been paid to the council by the respondents. 'The council will continue to monitor forestry activity across the region and, where necessary, pursue legal action where environmental risks are not adequately managed.' During a council meeting last year, council chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann said about forestry prosecutions that for every $1 million spent on legal and investigation fees, 'you may get $250,000 back'. The environmental group, Mana Taiao Tairāwhiti (MTT), served as a third respondent to the case, with Alanya Limmer, a King's Counsel from Uawa, working pro bono. Spokesman Manu Caddie said it was a poor way to manage environmental issues and not fair to ratepayers, as it took council resources, including staff time away from other priorities. 'A small community group like ours could never afford to go up against these multinational companies like China Forestry Group if it wasn't for Alanya's generosity,' Caddie said. He said it was the fifth enforcement order application against forestry companies, four of which have been successful and one of which was awaiting an outcome. 'This is an incredibly costly and ineffective way of trying to reduce risk in catchments across Tairāwhiti and should instead be dealt with through stronger regulations.' The lawyers of China Forestry Group and Wood Marketing Services said the organisations did not wish to comment. The court decision, made on April 28, enforced China Forestry Group NZ, its NZ director at the time, Mr Yuxia Sun (who has since resigned), and management company Wood Marketing Services to pay the council $51,000 and MTT $8500. The council sought various enforcement order applications on September 8, 2023, which were granted nearly a year later on August 9, 2024 However, 'the issue of costs was reserved', with the court granting leave for the council and MTT to apply for costs. The council sought half of its expenses incurred in its application, which the court rounded up to $51,000. The $51,000 will be split, $38,250 for China Forestry Group NZ and Sun, and $12,750 for Wood Marketing Services. MTT's $8500 will be split, $6000 for China Forestry Group and Sun and $2500 for Wood Marketing Services. The court found that the respondents contributed to the length of the case management process and the hearing, with 'WMS's contribution to the length of the process less than CFG in terms of the way it conducted itself at the hearing. Further, it complied with Court directions'.
1News
27-05-2025
- 1News
Council awarded $51k from forestry company in court decision
Gisborne District Council has recovered half of just over $100,000 spent on what its legal representative described as "avoidable" legal costs in an Environment Court decision against a Chinese-owned forestry company. The case followed several recent enforcement actions taken by the council across several forests, including Kanuka, West Ho, Te Marunga, and Wakaroa, which the council says have resulted in forestry operators reducing risks and improving compliance. Environmentalists said they were pleased with the legal outcome but believe these issues should be addressed through stronger regulations. The council spent $101,175 on legal and expert witness costs associated with a four-day hearing in July last year. The hearing concerned enforcement orders related to woody debris and sediment migrating from commercial forestry activity in the Kanuka Forest in the Upper Waimata River catchment. ADVERTISEMENT According to the court decision, the council argued that the forestry groups, China Forestry Group (CFG), and management company Wood Marketing Services (WMS), "unnecessarily lengthened" the hearings process through conduct before and during the hearings. This included the NZ-based director of China Forestry Group NZ, Yuxia Sun, resigning 10 days before the hearing. The council submitted that the respondents provided "arguments without substance and technical or unmeritorious points which failed", which caused the council to incur more "avoidable legal costs" drafting submissions in response. Speaking with Local Democracy Reporting, council's resource management compliance manager, Gary McKenzie, said the council had a responsibility to uphold environmental standards and protect public welfare as a regulatory authority. "While some costs can be recovered through the courts, full cost recovery is not always possible. Like other regulatory agencies, we rely on public funding to fulfil these statutory obligations," McKenzie said. He confirmed the costs awarded by the court had been paid to the council by the respondents. "The council will continue to monitor forestry activity across the region and, where necessary, pursue legal action where environmental risks are not adequately managed." ADVERTISEMENT Call for stronger regulations During a council meeting last year, council chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann said about forestry prosecutions that for every $1 million spent on legal and investigation fees, "you may get $250,000 back". The environmental group, Mana Taiao Tairāwhiti (MTT), served as a third respondent to the case, with Alanya Limmer, a King's Counsel from Uawa, working pro bono. Spokesman Manu Caddie said it was a poor way to manage environmental issues and not fair to ratepayers, as it took council resources, including staff time away from other priorities. "A small community group like ours could never afford to go up against these multinational companies like China Forestry Group if it wasn't for Alanya's generosity," Caddie said. He said it was the fifth enforcement order application against forestry companies, four of which have been successful and one of which was awaiting an outcome. "This is an incredibly costly and ineffective way of trying to reduce risk in catchments across Tairāwhiti and should instead be dealt with through stronger regulations." ADVERTISEMENT The lawyers of China Forestry Group and Wood Marketing Services said the organisations did not wish to comment. The court decision, made on April 28, enforced China Forestry Group NZ, its NZ director at the time, Yuxia Sun (who has since resigned), and management company Wood Marketing Services to pay the council $51,000 and MTT $8500. The council sought various enforcement order applications on September 8, 2023, which were granted nearly a year later on August 9, 2024. However, "the issue of costs was reserved," with the court granting leave for the council and MTT to apply for costs. The council sought half of its expenses incurred in its application, which the court rounded up to $51,000. The $51,000 will be split, $38,250 for China Forestry Group NZ and Sun, and $12,750 for Wood Marketing Services. MTT's $8500 will be split, $6000 for China Forestry Group and Sun and $2500 for Wood Marketing Services. The court found that the respondents contributed to the length of the case management process and the hearing, with "WMS's contribution to the length of the process less than CFG in terms of the way it conducted itself at the hearing. Further, it complied with Court directions". ADVERTISEMENT LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
