Trump pulls US from World Health pandemic reforms
Mr Trump on returning to office on Jan 20 immediately began his nation's withdrawal from the UN body.
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump's administration said on July 18 that the United States was rejecting changes agreed last year for the World Health Organisation on its pandemic response, saying they violated the country's sovereignty.
Mr Trump on returning to office on Jan 20 immediately began his nation's withdrawal from the UN body, but the State Department said the language from last year would still have been binding on the United States.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F Kennedy Junior, who is a longtime critic of vaccines, said the changes 'risk unwarranted interference with our national sovereign right to make health policy.'
'We will put Americans first in all our actions and we will not tolerate international policies that infringe on Americans' speech, privacy or personal liberties,' they said in a joint statement.
Mr Rubio and Mr Kennedy disassociated the United States from a series of amendments to the International Health Regulations, which provide a legal framework for combatting diseases, agreed last year at the World Health Assembly in Geneva.
'We regret the US decision to reject the amendments,' WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a statement posted on X.
He stressed the amendments 'are clear about member states sovereignty,' adding that the WHO cannot mandate lockdowns or similar measures.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore A deadly cocktail: Easy access, lax attitudes driving Kpod scourge in S'pore
Singapore 'I thought it was an April Fool's joke': Teen addicted to Kpods on news that friend died
World Trump administration moves to release Epstein case transcripts amid public scrutiny
Singapore 'May you find rainbows in your skies': Outpouring of support for Jetstar Asia staff as closure looms
Singapore New auto pet wash service in Buona Vista draws flak, but firm stands by its safety
Singapore 314 suicides reported in Singapore in 2024, remains leading cause of youth deaths
Asia 'Guardian angels': Taiwan's dementia-friendly village promotes ageing in place
Life US tech firm launches probe into Coldplay 'kiss cam' couple after clip goes viral
The changes included a stated 'commitment to solidarity and equity' in which a new group would study the needs of developing countries in future emergencies.
Countries have until July 19 to lodge reservations about the amendments. Conservative activists and vaccine skeptics in Britain and Australia, which both have left-leaning governments, have waged public campaigns against the changes.
The amendments came about when the Assembly failed at a more ambitious goal of sealing a new global agreement on pandemics.
Most of the world finally secured a treaty this May, but the United States did not participate as it was in the process of withdrawing from the WHO.
The United States, then under president Joe Biden, took part in the May-June 2024 negotiations, but said it could not support consensus as it demanded protections for US intellectual property rights on vaccine development.
Mr Rubio's predecessor Antony Blinken had welcomed the amendments as progress.
In their rejection of the amendments, Mr Rubio and Mr Kennedy said the changes 'fail to adequately address the WHO's susceptibility to the political influence and censorship – most notably from China – during outbreaks.'
WHO's Mr Ghebreyesus said the body is 'impartial and works with all countries to improve people's health.' AFP
More on this topic US rejects WHO pandemic reforms, citing national sovereignty
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
20 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Ukraine's military loses first French Mirage fighter jet in crash
Find out what's new on ST website and app. A Mirage 2000 fighter jet supplied to Ukraine from France crashed on Tuesday after experiencing equipment failure during an assignment, with the pilot ejecting safely, Ukraine's military said. It was the first loss of a Mirage jet since Ukraine's military started receiving them earlier this year. "Equipment failure occurred, which the pilot reported to the flight controller," a military statement said on Telegram. "The pilot then acted competently, as is expected in crisis situations, and successfully ejected. A rescue crew found the pilot in a stable condition. There were no casualties on the ground." Ukrainian news reports said the incident occurred in the northwestern Volyn region. Ukraine's military announced the arrival of the first batch of Mirage aircraft in February. U.S.-made F-16 fighter jets began arriving last year from different countries as Ukraine's Western allies sought to help Kyiv upgrade its largely Soviet-era air force fleet. REUTERS Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Two found dead after fire in Toa Payoh flat Singapore Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 can claim $600 SG60 vouchers from July 22 Singapore Singaporeans continue to hold world's most powerful passport in latest ranking Singapore Singapore, Vietnam agree to step up defence ties, dialogue between leaders Asia Malaysia govt's reform pledge tested as DAP chief bows over unresolved 2009 death of political aide Tech Singapore to increase pool of early adopters in AI to complement data scientists, engineers Singapore Prosecution says judge who acquitted duo of bribing ex-LTA official had copied defence arguments Singapore Ports and planes: The 2 Singapore firms helping to keep the world moving
CNA
20 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: Will Indonesia regret its trade deal with Trump?
JAKARTA: Be careful what you wish for, lest it come true. That ancient proverb comes to mind when considering the eagerness of America's trade partners around the world to negotiate deals with United States President Donald Trump's administration. Four countries already have, with Indonesia the latest to do so – and possibly the first to regret it. The United States has announced a complex, tiered tariff regime, including a 25 per cent tariff on labour-intensive goods such as textiles and footwear, a 40 per cent tariff on goods suspected of being 'trans-shipped' or having content of Chinese origin, and a 50 per cent tariff on so-called 'strategic sectors', including aluminum, copper, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. An additional 10 per cent levy applies to exports from BRICS countries (including Indonesia). Countries might also face anti-dumping duties, which are often steep, politically driven and inconsistently applied. While these measures hurt US importers and consumers the most, they also significantly heighten uncertainty for exporters. By guaranteeing that Indonesia will not face tariffs exceeding 19 per cent on its exports to the US through 2029, its new agreement with the US seems to mitigate this uncertainty, providing a level of protection against Trump's tariff escalations. Indonesia can now rest assured that it will not face the kinds of extreme tariffs to which China has been subjected. A DEAL THAT REDUCES LOSSES WITHOUT DELIVERING GAINS Indonesia's government argues that such a deal was essential, because even though the US accounts for only 9.9 per cent of Indonesia's total exports, the trade relationship is disproportionately important. Indonesian exports to the US – including apparel, footwear, furniture, rubber products and integrated circuits – are labour-intensive, they note, and thus support a substantial number of jobs. But these sectors may remain vulnerable to higher tariffs. As it stands, it is not clear whether the 19 per cent cap applies to all Indonesian exports, or if some products – particularly those containing Chinese inputs – could still be subject to steeper duties. In any case, 19 per cent tariffs are very burdensome, and Indonesia has also agreed to impose no tariffs on US goods. At best, the deal reduces losses; it does not deliver gains. Moreover, to secure this dubious victory, Indonesia reportedly agreed to purchase 50 Boeing aircraft and commit to importing US$15 billion worth of US energy products (nearly 40 per cent of Indonesia's total energy imports) and US$4.5 billion worth of American agricultural products. But many important questions remain unanswered. How will these purchases be financed, and on what terms? What are the specifications, unit costs and delivery timelines? Who will oversee procurement, and how will transparency be ensured? Most important, if these exchanges are merely political gestures, they could turn out to be economically damaging. The use of jets from Boeing, which has faced a string of quality and safety scandals in recent years, could create considerable risks for Indonesia's airlines. And imports of US agricultural goods risk undercutting local farmers and breaching commitments to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as well as other trade agreements. IMPACT ON INDONESIA'S TRADE RELATIONS The deal might affect Indonesia's trade relationships in other ways. Indonesia has concluded comprehensive trade agreements with several major partners, including Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand and South Korea. It is close to finalising one with the European Union, and it recently launched negotiations with the United Arab Emirates. If US firms are granted preferential treatment and zero-tariff market access, these partners might question Indonesia's commitment to fair competition – or demand comparable terms. Beyond trade, the agreement risks eroding Indonesia's carefully maintained strategic neutrality. Indonesia has long sought to balance its relationships with the US and China, but this deal could be seen as a lurch toward the US, exposing the country to escalating pressure to choose a side. As Indonesia becomes increasingly politically entangled with one giant – with far-reaching economic and strategic consequences – it is at risk of becoming economically dependent on the other. Over the past decade, Indonesia's trade with China has more than doubled, reflecting deepening economic ties. While Indonesia exports mostly commodities and processed metals to China – especially nickel, iron and steel, mineral fuels and vegetable oils – it imports high-value machinery, electrical equipment, vehicles and plastics from the country. In the face of challenging trade relations with the world's two mightiest powers, Indonesia's government deserves credit for seeking trade assurances. But the deal that it secured with the US lacks clarity, transparency, mutuality, and strategic vision. As a result, it may turn out to be largely symbolic, bringing only a slight reduction in short-term costs. In the long term, it might prove economically and even geopolitically damaging. AVOIDING DEPENDENCE ON A SINGLE PARTNER Three urgent steps can help prevent this outcome. First, Indonesia's government must demand full clarity from the US on the 19 per cent tariff cap: Are all its exports shielded from Trump's sector-specific classifications, or is the real cost of the deal hidden in the fine print? Second, the authorities should publish the full details of their procurement commitments, particularly the purchase of Boeing aircraft and US agricultural and energy products, so that these commitments' financial implications and strategic value can be assessed. Finally, Indonesia must reaffirm a long-term trade strategy anchored in diversification, rules-based agreements, and regional leadership. Above all, it needs a strategy that avoids excessive dependence on any single partner and preserves its autonomy in an increasingly polarised global economy. Only then can Indonesia ensure that a handshake in Washington does not become a handcuff at home.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Two Russian soldiers needing medical care returned by Ukraine, Moscow says
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Two Russian soldiers in need of medical care were handed over by Ukrainian authorities on Tuesday to be returned home, the Russian Defence Ministry said. A ministry statement on Telegram said the two servicemen were handed over and taken to Belarus, one of Moscow's closest allies, on Russia's western border. They were receiving treatment in Belarus and would soon return to Russia, it said. The statement said the action was undertaken on the basis of agreements reached at the second of two direct meetings aimed at ending the conflict last month between Russian and Ukrainian representatives. The two meetings in Istanbul resulted in agreements to return prisoners of war and remains of fallen soldiers, but made little progress towards an end to the more than three-year-old conflict. Large exchanges have taken place since the two meetings. A third meeting was due to be held on Wednesday in the Turkish city. REUTERS
