
Homeowners ‘face average bill of nearly £4,000 to fix issues after moving'
Two in five (40%) homeowners fail to factor in the full cost of their move, spending nearly £4,000 on unexpected expenses on average, a survey indicates.
Those who have overlooked costs are spending an extra £3,876 beyond their budget to fix issues such as boiler breakdowns or a leaking roof soon after getting the keys to their new home, according to the research commissioned by online estate agent Purplebricks.
Millennials, aged 28 to 43, and Generation X, aged 44 to 59, stumped up the most to cover emergency issues, averaging £4,302 and £4,331 respectively.
Gen-Z adults, aged 18 to 27, reported average unexpected costs of £3,412, according to the survey.
Baby boomers, aged 60 to 78, paid the least in unexpected expenses, at £2,767 on average, perhaps due to people in this age group having more experience of home moves.
Planning ahead, understanding potential risks, and building a financial cushion for emergencies can help alleviate the pressure and make the experience of moving into a new home a more positive one
Tom Evans, Purplebricks
As well as boiler or roof problems, other issues uncovered by homeowners included unexpected removal fees, mould problems, faulty door locks or keys not working, broken white goods, and blocked drains.
Researchers asked 2,000 homeowners across the UK about their most recent move, including asking them to estimate the cost of unforeseen expenses after completion. The survey was carried out by Walr and completed in December 2024.
Some homeowners surveyed had turned to borrowing to fund the unexpected expense, such as by a credit card or loan or asking friends and family for help.
Tom Evans, sales director at Purplebricks estate agency, said: 'After buying, taking ownership of your new home is meant to be a joy.
'However, there is nothing more likely to take the shine off your new dream home than discovering a series of costly problems to tackle once you're all moved in.'
He added: 'It's essential for all buyers to factor in a little extra into their removal budget to account for these unforeseen expenses.
'Planning ahead, understanding potential risks, and building a financial cushion for emergencies can help alleviate the pressure and make the experience of moving into a new home a more positive one.'
The research was released as property firm Savills estimated the total value of UK housing stock has reached more than £9 trillion.
It calculated the value of all homes across the UK stands at £9.10 trillion, having increased by £346 billion in 2024.
Lucian Cook, head of residential research at Savills, said: 'With the Bank of England expected to cut interest rates further over the coming months, we anticipate an increase in transactional activity, particularly among second-steppers (former first-time buyers taking their next step on the property ladder) who have held off moving until rates fall.'
The North West of England, Scotland, and Yorkshire and the Humber have each added more than £37 billion to the value of their housing stock since 2022, exceeding the £31 billion growth seen in London, Savills said.
Dan Hill, Savills
Dan Hill, research analyst at Savills, said: 'A shift in the distribution of growth over the past two years is largely reflective of where we are in the UK housing market cycle. Regional markets that are less reliant on debt have more capacity for growth and have therefore remained the most robust.
'Despite this, vast housing wealth remains concentrated in pockets in London and the South East. These two locations alone still account for more than 40% of the total UK housing value, even though they are home to just 26% of housing stock.'
Rightmove said on Monday that the average price tag on a home in Britain increased by 0.5% or £1,805 month on month in February, to reach £367,994.
The property website said new sellers are showing some pricing restraint this month, after a fast start to the year.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
17 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Boomer homebuyers had to battle the highest interest rates in Australian history - but there's one reason they 'did it tougher' is a big lie
Baby boomers had it much easier than the younger generations buying a house - despite having to pay exorbitantly high interest rates. The generation born after the war were hit with massive 18 per cent interest rates back in the late 1980s. Those repayments were crippling, when they were coming of age in the seventies and eighties, but houses were significantly cheaper compared with typical incomes. That was also back when Australia's population was almost half of what it is today, long before annual immigration levels soared. Baby boomer economist Saul Eslake bought his first house in Melbourne 's St Kilda East for $105,000 in 1984 on a $35,000 salary when he was 26, after benefiting from free university education. With an $80,000 mortgage, he was borrowing little more than double his pay before tax and hits out at any suggestion his boomer generation did it tougher - despite the high interest rates he paid. 'I paid eighteen-and-a-half per cent for some of that but my first house cost $105,000 and it took me less than three years to save up the deposit,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'Even though interest rates are less than half what I was paying, it was nowhere near as tough as now and I didn't have HECS debt to pay off because I was part of that lucky generation when it was free. 'My generation had it pretty easy - we got free education, we got housing very cheaply and we have made a motza out of the increase in house prices that we have voted for.' In 1980, Sydney's mid-point priced house cost $65,000, or just 4.5 times the average, full-time male wage in an era when a woman would struggle to get a mortgage without a signature from her husband. Real estate data group PropTrack estimated Sydney's median house would cost $338,000 today, or just 4.3 times the average salary now for all Australian workers, if house prices had increased at the same pace as wages during the past 45 years. In 2025, Sydney's middle-priced house costs $1.47million or 14.3 times the average, full-time salary of $103,000. But that price-to-income ratio surges to 18.7 if it's based on the average salary of $78,567 for all workers. AMP deputy chief economist Diana Mousina, a Millennial, said the younger generations were having a tougher time now saving up for 20 per cent mortgage deposit just to buy a home. 'The problem now is just getting into the market - that's what takes the larger chunk of trying to save; it takes 11 years to save,' she said. Boomers battled with sky high interest rates in the 80s - they haven't been that high since - but they had it easier because house prices were much more affordable Melbourne's mid-point house price cost just $40,000 in 1980 or 2.8 times the average male salary. If affordability had remained constant, a typical Melbourne would now cost just $205,400. But the Victorian capital's median house price of $850,000 is now 10.8 times the average salary for all workers. Brisbane's median house price cost $32,750 in 1980 or just 2.2 times what an average man earned. That would be $174,600 today if buying power hadn't changed. Queensland capital houses now cost $910,000 or 11.6 times the average salary. The major banks are unlikely to lend someone more than five times their pay before tax, which means many couples would now struggle to get a loan for a capital city house unless they moved to a far, outer suburb and had a big deposit. Housing affordability deteriorated following the introduction of the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount in 1999, just before annual immigration levels tripled during the 2000s. 'Since about 2000, you've seen home prices relative to incomes rise at a substantial amount - it's been the fact that we have been running high levels of population growth - so immigration, so more demand for housing,' Ms Mousina said. 'We have been running high migration targets, at the same time we haven't been building enough homes across the nation. 'We do have pretty favourable investment concessions for housing, including negative gearing, capital gains tax concession.' Mr Eslake said politicians from both sides of politics wanted house prices to rise, because more voters were home owners than renters trying to get into the market. 'For all the crocodile tears the politicians shed about the difficulties facing would-be first home buyers, they know that in any given year, there's only 110,000 of them,' he said. 'Even if you assume that for everyone who succeeds, in becoming a first home buyer, there are five or six who would like to but can't - that's at most around 750,000 votes for policies that would restrain the rate at which house prices go up. 'Whereas the politicians know that at any point in time, there are at least 11million Australians who own their own home; there are 2.5million Australians who own at least one investment property. 'Even the dumbest of our politicians - as the Americans say, "Do that math" which is why at every election, politicians on both sides of the divide - while bewailing the difficulties faced by first-home buyers - promise and implement policies that make it worse because they know that a vast majority of the Australian population do not want the problem to be solved.' Sydney was the first market to become seriously unaffordable as Australia's most expensive metropolitan housing market. PropTrack estimated Sydney's median house would cost $338,000 today, or just 4.3 times the average salary now for all Australian workers, if house prices had increased at the same pace as wages during the past 45 years (pictured is an auction at Homebush in the city's west) In 1990, the typical Sydney house cost $187,500 or $447,300 now if affordability had remained constant. A decade later 2000, shortly after the introduction of the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount, a typical Sydney house cost $284,950. That would translate into $544,000 today if affordability had remained constant. This would also be the point where a single, average-income earner could still get a loan at a stretch with a 20 per cent mortgage deposit. By 2010, Sydney's median house cost $600,000 or nine times the average, full-time salary, putting a home with a backyard beyond the reach of an average-income earner buying on their own. In addition, the housing affordability crisis has worsened as Australia's population has climbed from 14.5million in 1980 to 27.3million now. During the 2000s, annual net overseas migration doubled from 111,441 at the start of the decade to 315,700 by 2008 when the mining boom was driving population growth. After Australia was closed during Covid, immigration soared to a new record high of 548,800 in 2023, leading to house prices climbing even as the Reserve Bank was putting up interest rates. When it came to the stereotype of young people wasting their money on smashed avocado breakfasts instead of saving for a house deposit, Mr Eslake had a simple answer to that. 'At the very least, a highly visible rolling of the eyeballs,' he said.


Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Brits should try this budget hack to save more money this summer
It can be difficult to balance having a social life alongside trying to maintain saving goals, especially during the summer months - but financial experts insist it is possible if you follow these tips As summer rapidly approaches, balancing a social life while trying to maintain savings goals can be quite challenging. New data from MoneyPlus has revealed that Generation X (ages 45-60) are particularly feeling the financial pinch, with over half even cancelling holidays due to their financial situation, or resorting to buy now, pay later schemes to stay afloat. However, this struggle between saving and spending isn't exclusive to just this age group, as it can affect everyone. Yet, finance expert at Moneyfacts, Rachel Springall, assures that "it is possible to both save and have a sociable summer." Springall explains: "It is down to consumers to budget and be conscious of any essential bills whilst also juggling their aspiring saving goals." Don't neglect your saving pot MoneyPlus discovered that 60% of people surveyed felt pressured to spend a lot on big events and milestones – which may be amplified during summer. Springall warns: "The cost of the summer can escalate quickly if someone does not make efforts to budget. It's unwise to neglect building a saving pot at this time and it is true that consumers could be a bit apathetic this time of year to save. However, putting a little bit of cash aside each month could really make a difference in the months ahead." With the warmer months approaching, Springall and Santander financial advisor Mark Weston are offering practical tips on managing savings while still making the most of the summer holidays. Automate your saving habits Springall advises: "During this time, the arrival of app-based savings providers can be useful for those who want to automate their savings habits. There are apps available, such as Plum, which can connect to a customer's bank account and work out their weekly savings amount. This is incredibly handy for those with busy lives and may forget to make a manual payment each month into their savings pot." Help us improve our content by completing the survey below. We'd love to hear from you! Know your finances According to Weston, staying on top of your spending and planning ahead increases your chances of having more financial freedom and flexibility. "Having a clear idea of your expenses and budget is a great start," Weston says. "Using budgeting tools is a good way of getting a handle of what you're actually spending and what you can afford to spend." He advises: "Making sure you understand where your spending has come from and also having a budget plan for the whole year, with summer in particular, can help for planning ahead." Springall adds: "Using a budget app like Emma, could be useful on the go. It monitors spending and can help build a pot towards different goals, like holidays, an MOT or even Christmas." Use a regular savings accounts Springall suggests that these types of savings accounts are perfect for gradually accumulating funds as they encourage positive saving habits. "However, consumers will need to work out if they are the right choice for them as some can be restrictive and might not be suitable for larger deposits," she advises. "Regular savings accounts can also revert to a flexible account after the term ends, which might not pay a good rate, so savers must make a diary note to reinvest if they are still building funds toward their future goal." Be prepared for unexpected expenses Weston particularly urges parents to have savings set aside for unforeseen costs. "If you know that your normal monthly disposable income is a bit tighter due to children being home more rather than being in school, it is good to have savings put away so it is still possible to socialise and do things with them in the summer." Combat financial inertia Springall encourages consumers to overcome any indifference and reassess how to make their money work harder. "Consumers need to shake any apathy they may have and take a step back to decide how their money could work harder for them during this time period also. "Consumers ready to get started would be wise to explore the latest top rate tables and read up on some tips and guides to help them on their savings journeys."


Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
UK's 'worst seaside resort' insists abandoned £18.5m investment isn't a 'blow'
A popular seaside resort that has grappled with its image in recent years is facing yet another blow, as it seemingly struggles to sell a huge £18.5 million shopping complex A popular seaside city savagely ranked as one of the UK's worst has clapped back at claims it has suffered a major blow over a £18.5 million complex. For many, Bangor - nestled on the coast of Wales and just a stone's throw from Snowdonia National Park - is a coastal gem wrapped up in nostalgia and natural beauty. Classed as the oldest city in the country, and commonly mistaken as a town, Bangor is filled with a rich history, unique architecture, and an impressive Victorian pier that stretches almost half a kilometre out to sea. Residents insist their hometown has 'lots to offer', but Bangor was sensationally snubbed earlier this year when it was ranked as the worst seaside resort in the whole of the UK. Earning a measly 42 per cent overall destination score, almost 5,000 Which? members gave the destination just one star for its seafront/ pier, food and drink offerings, shopping experience, and tourist attractions. Bangor redeemed itself slightly with its scenery and parking availability. "It's disappointing to see Bangor City named as one of the UK's worst seaside towns," said Bangor City Council at the time. "Such rankings often fail to capture the full picture and the unique charms that make Bangor City so special." However, Bangor's sliding reputation has recently been cast under the spotlight once more due to the sale of its premier shopping complex, the Menai Centre, which reports describe as another 'blow' to the city. Developed back in 2007 by Cathco Property Group - reportedly costing £18.5 million to build - the 130,000 square ft building struggled during the pandemic, which caused almost 80 per cent of its shops to close down. According to North Wales Live, it was bought by Bearmont Capital back in 2023, who added a bunch of retailers including he Original Factory Shop (TOFS), Greggs, and Hays Travel to the complex. Plans to open a major health centre in the complex in place of the former Debenhams store, using Welsh Government funds, have also been unveiled. The centre has now been placed up for auction with a guide price of just £4.2 million - a mere fraction of the price it cost to build. However, the sale does not include the Debenhams unit or a linked site, which was sold off a number of years ago. "If no stand out bids are received or bids received are of a similar value then a reserve price will be set on the property and it will be sold via a live online auction (date to be determined subject to Stage 1 of the process)," Savills, who is selling the property, said. Speaking to the Mirror, a spokesperson for the council stressed that Bangor doesn't have a beach and has never promoted itself as a 'seaside resort' - despite being located near the sea. "Similarly, Bangor does not promote itself as a tourist destination," they added. "We do, of course, have interesting attractions, such as St Deiniol's Cathedral, Garth Pier (which won the National Pier of the Year award in 2022), and the University building, to name a few, and Bangor is an ideal base to visit North Wales's attractions. However, to consider Bangor as a seaside resort would be flawed and inaccurate. In contrast to the Which survey, another survey found that the people of Bangor as the happiest people in the County." The spokesperson added that the council does not consider the sale of the Menai centre as a 'blow to the city' as most of the retail units within the complex are 'occupied on long leases' that won't be impacted by the change of ownership. "The sale, several months ago, of the other Bangor shopping centre, namely the Deiniol Centre, has not impacted negatively on the units within it nor on the City and there is no reason to think that this one will," they stated. "This year, Bangor is celebrating 1500 since St Deiniol established his religious settlement here and to mark this important milestone, the City has come together and is hosting an ambitious programme of events. It has something for everyone, from a military parade to music concerts, from Bangor's Across the World Exhibition to a History Festival, from the Summer Festival to the Christmas Festival and much more. The one exception being that Bangor does not have a beach."